By

CBSNews /

CBS/ June 23, 2009, 10:40 AM

Obama: Can't Let U.S. Be "Foil" For Tehran

President Obama says the United States has to guard against allowing itself to be used as a scapegoat by the regime in Iran.

In an exclusive interview with Early Show co-anchor Harry Smith, Mr. Obama responded to critics claiming he hasn't spoken out forcefully enough in favor of those who've taken to the streets to protest the result of the recent presidential election in Iran.

"The last thing that I want to do," the president said, "is to have the United States be a foil for -- those forces inside Iran who would love nothing better than to make this an argument about the United States. That's what they do. That's what we've already seen. We shouldn't be playing into that. There should be no distractions from the fact that the -- Iranian people are seeking to -- let their voices be heard.

"Now, what we can do is bear witness and say -- to the world that the, you know, incredible demonstrations that we've seen is a testimony to -- I think what Dr. King called the -- the arc of the moral universe. It's long but it bends towards justice."

Mr. Obama also delivered a message to the regime in Tehran, noting to Smith that, "The world is watching. And how they approach and deal with people who are, through peaceful means, trying to -- be heard -- will I think -- send a pretty clear signal to the international community about -- about -- what -- Iran is and -- and is not.

" ... This is not an issue of the United States or the West versus Iran. This is an issue of the Iranian people. The fact that they are on the -- the streets under pretty severe duress -- at great risk to themselves -- is a sign that -- there's something -- in that society that wants to open up."

In the wide-ranging interview, the president had some tough talk for North Korea, sharp words for former Vice President Cheney, and defended giving the Fed new, broad powers to oversee the financial industry.

While expressing his hope that Pyongyang would decide to start on a path toward "rejoining the international community," Mr. Obama also warned that his administration won't "reward belligerence and provocation in the way that's been done in the past," and stressed that leading world powers, including China and Russia, are on board with the U.S.'s stand on North Korea.

Smith observed that, "North Koreans have basically said that their intention is to fire a missile toward -- Hawaii on or about the 4th of July. Secretary Gates has said there has been a military adjustment and to -- to watch out for something like that happening. But beyond the sanctions and beyond the isolation that has already been tried, what has to happen to get North Korea to at least act like they're part of the community of nations?

"First of all," Mr. Obama replied, 'let's be clear. This administration -- and our military is fully prepared for any contingencies. And -- and --

"Is that a warning of a military response?" Smith quickly asked.

"No," the president responded. "It's just we are prepared for any contingencies. I don't wanna speculate on hypotheticals. But I want -- I do wanna give assurances to the American people that -- the t's are crossed and the i's are dotted in terms of -- what might happen. More broadly, I think the international community has spoken.

"When you've got Russia and China as well as South Korea and Japan, the United States, the entire Security Council -- saying unequivocally that North Korea has violated international law, that -- and -- and is willing to impose tougher sanctions --

"They're still defiant, though," Smith interjected.

"Well, the -- well, well what that sends a signal, though, is of a unity in the international community that we haven't seen in quite some time," Mr. Obama said. "And one of the things that we have been very clear about is that North Korea has a path towards rejoining the international community. And we hope they take that path. What we're not gonna do is to reward belligerence and provocation in the way that's been done in the past."

Turning to former President Bush and Dick Cheney, Smith said, "(CIA director) Leon Panetta ... intimated that the former Vice-president was playing politics with national security issues. The former President has intoned his own displeasure with some of your policy changes. I think they feel like some of the things that you've done, in fact, are treacherous."

Laughing, the president remarked, "Well, you know what? Be -- before you go there, I think if you read President Bush's -- remarks -- I think that that is -- that's not a fair characterization of what President Bush said.

"Well, I think -- I think when it comes to -- Vice-president Cheney, he and I have a deep disagreement about what's required to keep the American people safe. And I think that disagreement -- has been -- amply aired. And -- and certainly he has a right to -- to voice his opinions. I would argue that -- our policies are making the American people safer -- and that -- some of the policies that he's promoted in the past have not."

And when asked about concerns voiced by Senate Baking Committee Chairman Christopher Dodd that administration proposals would give the Federal Reserve Board too much power as a watchdog of financial firms, Mr. Obama said, "It wasn't the Fed -- where the -- the (financial) regulations broke down here. And part of what we wanna do is to have somebody who's accountable and clear when it comes to these large systemic firms that could potentially bring down the entire financial system.

"The Fed has the expertise and the credibility I think to do it. // we don't want a situation where taxpayers have to come in and bail out firms because if those firms go under, the whole system collapses. And unfortunately, that's been the situation -- up until now, that's what we intend to get fixed. We wanna make sure that this kind of crisis doesn't happen again."



Part One of the interview was aired on the CBS News broadcast Sunday Morning on June 21. To read the transcript, click here.
Copyright 2009 CBS. All rights reserved.
107 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
CLoverNYC1 says:
"President Obama says the United States has to guard against allowing itself to be used as a scapegoat by the regime in Iran."
----------------------------

We should be concerned about our 'image' in Iran because, *Beaver in Leave it to Beaver voice* the Iranians might get mad at us Wally!"
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
gennx30-2009 says:
My Gawd how easily you people are suckered

You fell for "Iraq has WMD'!" hook line and sinker-3 years later we find it was ALL BULLSH*T
Now its "IRAN stole the election!" -the very same thing-BULLSH*T or -"OMG! They have WMDs!" v.2; if you will

And in 2-3 years it will gradually leak out that the MOSSAD engineered this whole "opposition" Party
Israel begged and pleaded and threatened to hold their breath until they turned blue, if we didnt go over and turn THAT country to rubble; We declined; This thing seems far too orchestrated and planned- 2 weeks ago the media never even heard of or mentioned M-------- and his 'opposition' party. I keep up with all the news sources-all this is new to me

So it was up to Israel to launch 'plan B'- destablize the county,then draw in the shiites sunnis and Al Queda as Israel stands up dusts off their hands, smiles- and looks at the US and says-"Well, whuddya waitin' for? Dont stand there looking like a fool-get on with it!" And suddenly we are in a third war in the Middle East. Whos gonna pay for it? Where will the money come from?



"____________ has a.election fraud b. a brutal leader c. WMDs"; (fill in ONE country per blank attempts to add more than one country will be disqualified)

(put an 'x' in ONE blank only)
"We must use: sanctions___diplomacy___ payoffs ____invasion____wait untill Israel screams "Help! Theyre murdering us!-------------------------;; Not with white phosphorus I do hope, like was poured on the PEOPLE, locked inside the walled off Palestine compound recently;

"*Requesting country (mandatory) IRAN___ IRAQ____ INGUSHETIA___INDIA____ISRAEL__X___(proxy voting for the USA Inc- /USA_____). (please place an' X' the appropriate countries blank- PRESS HARD)

standardized omnibus Federal War request form 180924609 WY 009111-C; (revised Jan 21, 2000)
please press hard and use ink-this form is 10 pages, Canary copy to requestee-the other 9 to the pentagon drop box
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
**I cannot believe you people were so easily suckered by this 'dog and pony show'
Unbeleiveable !
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Volksstimme says:
When is the moron going to stop going on the campaign trail? It can only be that he loves himself so much that he has to see and hear himself every night. Why not tell the people who you really are Barry Soetorro? Guess once someone proofs that you are a liar born in Kenyia than you can start all over again. Your "Certificate of Life Birth" is not sufficient not even in Hawaii.........
reply
-Lawyers-Guns-n-Money- replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Hey, who left the lunatic assylum door unguarded?
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ajjaxtheleast says:
To all late logger-ons,,,

It seems that the Winged Dispatch-Bearer Of
The Gospel Truth had earlier decended from
above and held forth with:,,,

"AMERICA DID NOT HELP SET UP THE IRANIAN PROTESTS!",,,

Henceforth the question was ne'er revisited again.

The gospel truth is the gospel truth!

So as they've already settled that,,, and its
nearing time for dinner,,,,
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Snowhare says:
At some point not too far in the future, would you please publish the whole interview?
Not just the transcript but the video?
I'd like it to be as uncut as poss. - fly and all.
Thanks
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Snowhare says:
At some point not too far in the future, would you please publish the whole interview?
Not just the transcript but the video?
I'd like it to be as uncut as poss. - fly and all.
Thanks
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
hungry1968-15 says:
by NEWCO123 June 22, 2009 1:34 PM PDT
sure you do, you just don't remember. It's all because of "You might want to google "dissolution of the soviet union"", that led to Poland..... etc that fell out of soviet influence, that and Afghanistan led to Russia blinking first during the cold war.







When I told you to google "dissolution of the Soviet Union", that MEANT that I was talking about the Soviet Union, and Gorbachev's dismantling of the nation.

It WASN'T code for "I really mean Poland and the Solidarity Movement".

(You have real issues with "comprehension", "staying on topic", and "following the thread", don't you?)
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
hungry1968-15 says:
NEWCO123 June 22, 2009 1:26 PM PDT
You mean when Englands "Carter" Chamberlain came back with his feeble turn your back on those who need you most, talks with Hitler?






So you made an absurd statement, I called you on it, and you answer with more absurdity.

Typical neo con.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
hungry1968-15 says:
by NEWCO123 June 22, 2009 1:28 PM PDT
Physician heal thyself. Inaction is the same as no action.






I asked you at least FOUR TIMES: WHAT should Obama do or say, that is going to change the situation in the favor of the protesters, while making it look like America IS NOT meddling in Iran's internal affairs, victimizing the regime?

Do you REALLY think if he says, "We stand behind the Iranian people", that the Revolutionary Guard is just going to lay down it's weapons?



If you're so sure that you're right, then why do you refuse to answer these questions?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ajjaxtheleast says:
Obama is merely saying that we cant let Iran
blame us for the opposition protests, NOT that we
AREN'T to blame for whatever part
we might have played.

As if any of us knows enough to make a call on it.

But we damn well meddled in Palistine, Lebanon and
forced Pakistan into taking a military direction it
didn't, and for good reason, want to take so
"meddling" isn't beyond us.

"The CIA didn't meddle",,,,

If true,,,that sentense waited
a long long long time for it's 15 minutes in print.
reply
See all 107 Comments