Sotomayor Quits All-Women's Club

(AP)  Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor resigned Friday from an elite all-women's club after Republicans questioned her participation in it.

Sotomayor said she resigned from the Belizean Grove to prevent the issue from becoming a distraction in her confirmation hearings.

In a letter to Democratic Sen. Patrick Leahy of Vermont and Republican Sen. Jeff Sessions of Alabama, the federal appeals court judge said she is convinced that the club does not practice "invidious discrimination" and that her membership in it did not violate judicial ethics.

But she said she didn't want questions about it to "distract anyone from my qualifications and record."

Federal judges are bound by a code that says they shouldn't join any organization that discriminates by race, sex, religion or nationality.

The Belizean Grove bills itself as women's answer to the 130-year-old all-male Bohemian Club in California. The club owns a 2,500-acre camping area in northern California called the Grove. Chief Justice Earl Warren belonged to the Bohemian Club beginning in the 1940s, before he joined the court and long before the federal judiciary adopted a code of conduct.

"The Belizean Grove is a constellation of influential women who are key decision makers in the profit, non-profit and social sectors; who build long term mutually beneficial relationships in order to both take charge of their own destinies and help others to do the same," the group says on its Web site. There are about 115 members, the club says.

Earlier in the week, Sotomayor defended her participation in the group, telling senators that it involves men in some of its events and that she was unaware of any man who had tried to become a member.

Sotomayor's backers noted that the court's only current woman, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, belongs to the membership-only International Women's Forum. So did former Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, who defended her involvement in all-women groups during her Senate confirmation hearings in 1981.

Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy faced similar questions over his longtime membership in the all-male Olympic Club in San Francisco. Kennedy resigned his membership in October 1987, as he was under consideration for the high court.

[gravyboat3000]

by SilentCowboy June 20, 2009 1:11 PM PDT
Sotomayor is a communist pig in waiting to rob you of even more of your constitutional rights she will obey her masters as the rest of them that serve the Zionist agenda in the ***** house on the ill that Americans call the Capital but soon you all will learn the it is not a capital it is a temple of hell serving the occult and controlling the dumb downed masses
______

No more cough medicine for you...

[hakori]

mrman007, America woke up last November!

[hakori]

sloughfoot, I agree loosers have rights, too. I just wonder if you thought the same thing from 2000-2008. But sometimes you have to ignore the loosers until they come up with some new ideas rather than pushing the same ole faild policies. Also, it would be nice to see republicans put country ahead of party for a change.

[hakori]

I wonder how many of these "outraged" republicans had any problem with Katon Dawson when he was being conisdered for the RNC chairmanship? I bet most of them had absolutely no problem he was a member of an all white country club for twelve years. Is it that they can't see the hypocricy they wallow in, or is it they could care less?

[Snowhare]

I am a bit disappointed and I join the list of people who think nobody should listen too much to the loosers of the election who have not yet learned that theirs is not the opinion of the majority of the people.
The Republicans cannot - and will not filibuster the process over this.
If they could they would filibuster Sotomayor anyway. But bipartisanship in honour, there is a time when the government and its party should just move on!
If Democrats and people like Sotomayor listen to the extreme minds of the republicans all the time, they will not gain points! If they make it clear how ridiculous Republicans' ideas are, they will win again.
Don't give in. Standing to your opinion is NOT unamerican!!!

[Sloughfoot]

Losers have rights too. But you knew that. However, she dumped her buds and her values for fame and fortune. Scares me, it does.

[gravyboat3000]

The point it, she should not have quit. She's only doing so to make it easier on her confermation, and other justices, as the story points out, have done the same thing.

But it's not like this women's group was some sort of subversive, anti-American organization. 115 successful women, who promote the successes of other women, how is that a bad thing?

And when will ALL the members of Congress, and the major parties quit their own gender/frat/religious/race/ based groups that I may find objectionable?

That's right, they're not scrutinized on the same level as a SC nominee.

You should have stuck to your guns, Sonia.

[Sloughfoot]

You got that right! But she bugged out to save her hide now that unsettles me.

[Sloughfoot]

That Sonia Sotomayor belonged to an elite organization is no big deal. Was it religious base, racist based or anti American based, no it wasn't. However, to renounce her friends and vowed beliefs to achieve personal fortune and acclaim speaks volumes. Wouldn't want her covering my back in a fire fight.

[lorinkundert]

Just because she quit after being called on it does not change the facts, no more than a bank robber turning in the cash he stole and then trying to claim he was not a bank robber.

[1notrub11]

Agreed, the fact that she did quit after being called on it shows no conviction of her choices and the worst reason you would want the job - profile. Can't we find people who want the job because they feel they are qualified AND could contribute to the judicial process?

[Sloughfoot]

One slight difference, one is a crime and one is a Freedom. Guess which one is which, you got a 50-50 chance.

[gravyboat3000]

The GOOD OLE BOYS, point out that Sotomayor is a memeber of an exclusive club, who's members are successful women, that does charitable works, and puts forth a possitive image for all women,(but it's ONLY for women!), so...it's a bad thing?

How many, "GOOD OLE BOYS", clubs are there?

I expected more from you, Sonia. The fact that you were a member of such a club brings out who you are, a person who cares about the world around you, and the people in it.

Being in a,"gender", based club isn't necessarily a bad thing, depending on what that group's goals are. A gathering of successful women, or men, can accomplish many positive things. Most of all, ensuring the success of others who might not have attained such lofty goals.

It's too bad, you had to quit, under the pressure of the GOP nay sayers, who unjustly call you names,(based on one speech, that they don't understand), and call you out on issues such as the Belizian Grove membership, when they themselves have a long history of exclusive clup memberships, in organizations with completely evil intentions.

Pot, this is kettle? I don't think so, Republicn Hypocrites. You should have revered your membership in the Belizean Grove, not resign from it, Judge Sotomayor.

[Sloughfoot]

Dems control both houses and I didn't see ol' Rush with a gun to her head.

[rmm26a]

What is so wrong with being involved in a sexually exclusive club? Sometimes it's nice just to get together with the guys. Or sometimes the girls just want to get together with the girls. That being said, she is definitely gay...