Senators Dive Into Health Overhaul Details
"I Never Suggested This Was Going To Be Warp Speed," Warns Sen. Chris Dodd On Day 2
-
Play CBS Video Video Expensive Health Care Bill When President Obama announced plans to overhaul our health care system, no one expected it to be cheap. The health care bill could cost much more than the president wants. Wyatt Andrews reports.
-
Sen. Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., right, accompanied by Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee ranking Republican Sen. Mike Enzi, R-Wyo., presents a stack of documents comprising of the health care reform bill during the committee's markup hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, June 17, 2009. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak, File)
-
Interactive 111th Congress With Democrats in control in both chambers AND the White House, latest session convenes.
-
Interactive HealthWatch Explore health issues including AIDS, cancer and antibiotics.
Senators pushed ahead anyhow Thursday on what were supposed to be the easy parts of sweeping health care legislation. But they quickly found out that almost nothing about revamping the system is uncontroversial.
First up for the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, which Dodd is heading in Sen. Edward M. Kennedy's absence, were amendments to improve quality and efficiency. But the debate quickly shifted to more contentious issues including the overall cost of enacting President Barack Obama's top domestic priority of reshaping the nation's health care system to bring down costs and extend insurance to 50 million Americans who lack it.
"You could end up with a bill that's easily headed to a $2 trillion price tag," complained Sen. Judd Gregg, R-N.H., as he offered an amendment that would require proof that various quality measures such as training and identifying best practices would actually save money.
The committee rejected his amendment, as Sen. Barbara Mikulski, D-Md., contended it would be "throwing sand in the gears."
An amendment by Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, would have limited the use of research comparing the effectiveness of various medical procedures - a hot-button issue for Republicans because they say it could lead to health care rationing. It, too, was rejected on a 13-10 party-line vote.
The committee was on its second day of work on a 600-plus-page bill, but the first day of real work after Wednesday's session was entirely given over to speechmaking. Dodd, a Connecticut Democrat, is leading the committee while Kennedy receives treatment for cancer.
Elsewhere in the Capitol senators on the key Finance Committee delayed their own voting session as they struggled to slash costs to under $1 trillion over 10 years.
Members of the Finance Committee, considered Congress' best hope of producing a bipartisan bill, were meeting behind closed doors Thursday for further negotiations.
In the House joint draft legislation was expected as early as Friday from the three committees with health care jurisdiction - Ways and Means, Energy and Commerce, and Education and Labor - with hearings to begin next week. The committees are writing legislation that would require all Americans to have health care coverage, and establish a new public insurance plan to compete with the private market.
"I have every confidence we will have a public option coming out of the House of Representatives. It will be a level playing field. For us to have substantial health care reform, this has to be part of it," House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., said Thursday.
The public plan option, supported by Obama, could have a much tougher ride in the Senate where minority Republicans hold more sway and believe it could drive private companies out of business.
The Finance Committee, struggling with the public plan among other issues, was supposed to release draft legislation Wednesday and begin voting on it next week. But the committee announced that votes would wait, possibly until after July 4, as senators sought to retool their proposals to cut the cost by more than one-third, from an initial $1.6 trillion to less than $1 trillion.
Senators on the health committee were considering a lengthy bill plus 388 amendments, but with the most contentious issues - the public plan question and whether to require employers to cover their workers - still unwritten.
The legislation would create a new insurance marketplace where people could shop for coverage plans with help from government subsidies.
As written, it would cost some $1 trillion but still leave 37 million people uninsured, and Republicans are deeply skeptical. The health committee is scheduled to meet daily and was supposed to finalize the bill by the end of next week, but after Wednesday's session Dodd backed away from that deadline, saying he wasn't tied to it.
© MMIX, The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
The secrets of tennis legend 



- 1
- 2
- next
See all 28 CommentsThe insurance companies charge too much in premiums, copays and deductibles, not to mention the 20% or more they don't pay. You get a major illness they will look back at all your medical records and find something so they can drop your coverage! They are Rip off scam artists and America has had enough!!! We need HR676 passed yesterday!!!
Any other excuse is just for Wall Street/City of London to keep the bailout loot and the Insurance companies profiteering off our pain and suffering.
Dodd should do someting decent for a change and promote 'single payer' and dump the Obama Death-care plan where it's designed to DENY care to cut costs.
Druggie Limbaugh and junkyard dogs Sean Hannity should be proud of Obama's plan because it keeps the the parasitical insurance companies and HMO's in place to suck off the blood of dead patients in order to save costs.
Everyone knows that insurance companies and the AMA are going to be calling the shots on this and all the cowardly Whimpo-crats will do is rubber stamp everything and claim victory.
The ones who are really going to lose out will be the average person who can't get health insurance because the insurance companies consider them to big a "risk" (against their corporate bottom line!) and those who can't get insurance because it costs too much (Corporate GREEED!!).
Us average people will still have to resort to home remedies and witch doctors qwhen we get sick while GRREEDDYY corporate crooks like Be3rnie Madoff can afford the Mayo Clinic!!
HAIL OBAMA????????
Are you suggesting that all republicans are Confederates ? how utterly stupid can you get....Lincoln (Union)a Republican, I am from the northeast and Conservative Republican as are millions others.
This desperate attempt by you and the left to suggest that all Republicans or Conservatives are "confederates" or "american taliban" as you said previously, is an insult to every american and especially republican americans.
Sorry you hate the south and southern states, but you should deal with that yourself, don't apply your hate to a political party.
Are you saying the MAJORITY of the party isn't in the South? And were did I say ALL the party was? You can't handle it, go join the massive amount of Republican's now calling themselves Independents. If you were more moderate I'd suggest you switch, like so many Moderate Republican's already have, to the Democrat Party. It's not MY fault they are now a regional Party and only represent 25% or less of the Whole.
Of course congress won't do that. They feel their privilege allows them to decide that the peons below them should do with less, probably much less. They will finally decide to make the medical establishment and insurance companies (and their million-dollar CEOs) richer while the rest of us are uninsured or under insured. Same ol', Same ol.
One out of every THREE healthcare dollars spent in America is spent on administrative costs, as insurance agents figure out how to deny you coverage. In Canada, with single payer healthcare, administrative costs are 1% of the total. Thats why they get superior care to the U.S. and it costs them HALF what we pay.
It seems especially surprising that Baucus, from Montana, a rural state, one that would benefit most from a single payer plan, is opposed to any discussion. However if one looks at campaign contributions from the health insurance industry to Baucus, we see why he supports the status quo.
Of course that won't happen. Congress wants to keep its privilege and let the peons below them settle for much less (or no insurance at all as it is now for almost fifty million).
The DEMS in Congress are actually smiling and laughing at all of this. GAWD! PEOPLE! THEY ARE EFFING STEALING MONEY and we have no recourse.
The DEMS in Congress are actually smiling and laughing at all of this. GAWD! PEOPLE! THEY ARE EFFING STEALING MONEY and we have no recourse.
So why is private insurance better?
Time to learn Spanish so I could masquerade as an illegal alien.
- 1
- 2
- next
See all 28 Comments