TEHRAN, June 17, 2009

Mousavi Defies Ban, Calls For Rally

Iranian Opposition Leader's Web Site Urges Mass Rally In Direct Challenge To Country's Religious, Political Leadership

  • Play CBS Video Video Unrest In Iran

    After a series of violent protests, Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei announced an investigation into the recent controversial presidential election. Elizabeth Palmer reports from Tehran.

  • Mir Hossein Mousavi has called on his Web site for a mass rally Thursday to protest the country's disputed election results and violence against his followers.

    Mir Hossein Mousavi has called on his Web site for a mass rally Thursday to protest the country's disputed election results and violence against his followers.  (CBS)

  • Photo Essay Iran Election Sparks Riots

    Reform candidate supporters charge fraud in the landslide victory of President Ahmadinejad.

  • Photo Essay Iran Elections

    Iranians begin voting on whether to keep Ahmadinejad in power for four more years.

(CBS/AP)  Last Updated 12:01 p.m. Eastern.

Iranian opposition leader Mir Hossein Mousavi issued a direct challenge Wednesday to the country's supreme leader and cleric-led system, calling for a mass rally to protest disputed election results and violence against his followers.

A crackdown on dissent continued, with more arrests of opposition figures reported, and the country's most powerful military force - the Revolutionary Guard - saying that Iranian Web sites and bloggers must remove any materials that "create tension" or face legal action.

CBS News correspondent Elizabeth Palmer reports that Iranian authorities appear to have successfully blocked all access to Facebook, MySpace and Twitter Wednesday morning. Access had been intermittent since the election.

In one high-profile display of apparent opposition support, several Iranian soccer players wore green wrist bands - the color of Mousavi's campaign - during a World Cup qualifying match in South Korea that was televised in Iran.

Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has told Mousavi to pursue his demands through the electoral system and called for Iranians to unite behind their Islamic government, an extraordinary appeal in response to tensions over the presidential vote. But Mousavi appears unwilling to back down, issuing on his Web site a call for a mass demonstration Thursday.

"We want a peaceful rally to protest the unhealthy trend of the election and realize our goal of annulling the results," Mousavi said.

He called for his followers to wear or carry black in mourning for the alleged election fraud and the deaths of protesters, and said there should be "a new presidential election that will not repeat the shameful fraud from the previous election."

Web sites associated with Mousavi and the reformists called for at least one rally later Wednesday but the opposition leader made no reference to the gathering in his official statement.

Mousavi and his supporters accuse the government of rigging the June 12 election to declare hard-line President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad the overwhelming winner. Their street protests, paired with dissent from powerful clerical and political figures, have presented one of the gravest threats to Iran's complex blend of democracy and religious authority since the system emerged from the 1979 Islamic Revolution.


Click here for the latest updates on Iran.
Key to that threat, says Time magazine reporter Joe Klein, who just returned from Iran, may be Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani.

Klein told Early Show co-anchor Harry Smith that Rafsanjani, a former Iranian president and now head of the powerful Expediency Council, is one of the few individuals who might be capable of fomenting enough internal descent to force change in the country's clerical leadership.

Rafanjani is a politician, but he is also a long-time member of Iran's Islamic clerical establishment. He studied alongside the country's first supreme leader, Ayatollah Khomenei, and is generally viewed as a conservative pragmatist.

Klein explains that, while the government, currently led by President Ahmadinejad with the backing of present supreme leader Khamenei, feels right now that it is still in control of the situation, there is, "great worry that it will get out of control."

"The problem is that this has unleashed a real debate within the Iranian establishment. Powerful forces are going up against each other in a way that we have never seen before," Klein told Smith.

It would take a powerful figure like Rafsanjani, who has backed Mousavi in the election dispute and has long been a critic of Khamenei and Ahmadinejad, to force any real change in Iran.

Iranian TV showed pictures of Faezeh Hashemi, Rafsanjani's daughter, speaking to hundreds of Mousavi supporters, carrying pictures of Khomeini and others.

And while it is theoretically possible for Rafsanjani to force the ouster of Khamenei, Klein points out that Iran has only had two supreme leaders since the revolution, and it is a position which comes with "great job security." (To read more of Joe Klein's original reporting for Time Magazine, click here.)

Election tensions appeared to be spreading further into the Iranian political and religious classes - and into the sports world.

Mousavi's Web site said seven Iranian players wore the green bands on their wrists in the first half of the World Cup qualifier, although most were forced to take them off in the second half. Mehdi Mehdavi-Kia kept his green band on throughout the game, which Iran and South Korea drew 1-1.

Fans from Iran unfurled a banner in the stands that read "Go To Hell Dictator," and waved Iran's national flags emblazoned with the plea "Free Iran."

Blogs and Web sites such as Facebook and Twitter have been vital conduits for Iranians to inform the world about protests and violence.

The Web became more essential after the government barred foreign media Tuesday from leaving their offices to report on demonstrations on the streets of Tehran.

Mousavi condemned the government for blocking Web sites, saying the government did not tolerate the voice of the opposition.

The violence has left at least seven people dead, according to Iran's state media, although videos and photos posted by people inside Iran show scenes of violence that have not been reported through official channels. The newly imposed media restrictions make it virtually impossible to independently verify much of the information, which includes dramatic images of street clashes and wounded demonstrators.

Much of the imagery has been posted anonymously. In other cases, those who have posted have declined to be identified due to fear of government retaliation, or cannot be reached due to government restrictions on the Internet and mobile phones.

The Revolutionary Guard, an elite military force answering to Khamenei, said through the state news service that its investigators have taken action against "deviant news sites" that encouraged public disturbances. The Guard is a separate military with enormous domestic influence and control of Iran's most important defense programs. It is one of the key sources of power for the ruling establishment.

The statement alleged that dissident Web sites were backed by Canadian, U.S. and British interests, a frequent charge levied by hard-liners against the opposition.

"Legal action will be very strong and call on them to remove such materials," it said.

The semiofficial ISNA news agency and the private ILNA news agency reported that scuffles broke out between two legislators - one a reformist and the other a hard-liner - in an open session of parliament after they argued about the election.

The agencies said hard-liner Ruhollah Jani Abbaspour attacked reformer Amir Taherkhani after a parliamentary committee probing the protests met Mousavi and the speaker of parliament gave a report on the inquiry.

Mousavi has also sought support from Iran's grand ayatollahs - widely respected clerics at the top of the religious hierarchy, although most don't have direct political roles. He sent a letter to one liberal grand ayatollah, Yousef Sanei, who was encouraging, issuing a statement calling for "achieving rights and respect for the people's votes."

Iran's most senior dissident cleric, Grand Ayatollah Hossein Ali Montazeri, said widespread vote fraud had undermined the legitimacy of the ruling Islamic system and that "no sound mind" would accept the results.

"A government that is based on intervening in (people's) vote has no political or religious legitimacy," said Montazeri, who had once been set to succeed Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini as supreme leader until he was ousted because of criticisms of the revolution.

State media said Khamenei would deliver the sermon at Friday prayers, the most important religious address of the week. The supreme leader generally leads Friday prayers only two or three times a year.

Meanwhile, the U.S.-based International Campaign for Human Rights in Iran said that several dozen noted figures associated with the reform movement have been arrested, among them politicians, intellectuals, activists and journalists.

Tehran-based analyst Saeed Leilaz, who is often quoted by Western media, was arrested Wednesday by plainclothes security officers who came to his home, said his wife, Sepehrnaz Panahi.

At least 10 Iranian journalists have been arrested since the election, Reporters Without Borders said, and a Web site run by former Vice President Mohammad Ali Abtahi said the reformist had been arrested.

Prominent reformer Saeed Hajjarian has also been detained, Hajjarian's wife, Vajiheh Masousi, told The Associated Press. Hajjarian is a close aide to former President Mohammad Khatami.

To try to placate the opposition, the main electoral authority has said it was prepared to conduct a limited recount of ballots at sites where candidates claim irregularities. The recount would be overseen by the Guardian Council, an unelected body of 12 clerics and Islamic law experts close to Khamenei.

Mousavi charges the Guardian Council is not neutral and has already indicated it supports Ahmadinejad. He and the two other candidates who ran against Ahmadinejad are calling for an independent investigation.

His representative, reformist cleric Ali Akbar Mohtashamipour, said after a meeting with the council Tuesday the number of votes in counted in 70 districts was higher than the population in those districts. He also said many polling stations were closed sooner than scheduled on election night while people were still lining up.

On Tuesday, the government organized a large rally in Tehran to show it too can bring supporters into the streets. Speakers urged Iranians to accept the election results.

The appeal for unity failed to calm passions, and a large column of Mousavi supporters marched peacefully in north Tehran, according to amateur video.

A witness told the AP that the pro-Mousavi rally stretched more than a mile Security forces did not interfere, the witness said, speaking on condition of anonymity for fear of government reprisal.

Ahmadinejad, who has dismissed the unrest as little more than "passions after a soccer match," attended a summit Tuesday in Russia that was delayed a day by the unrest. He returned to Iran and held a cabinet meeting, saying on state television Wednesday that people had voted for his "policies of justice."

In Washington, President Barack Obama expressed "deep concerns" about the legitimacy of the election and post-voting crackdowns.

© MMIX, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 51 Comments
by WayAround June 17, 2009 11:08 PM EDT
From Fox News today: "A written exam administered by the Pentagon labels 'protests' as a form of 'low-level terrorism'."
Reply to this comment
by gravyboat3000 June 17, 2009 9:47 PM EDT
by tiredofthebs June 17, 2009 6:25 PM PDT
Where was ALL OF THIS SENTIMENT when Bush stole the election from Gore?! America should be the LAST NATION to offer an opinion about an election abroad after that fiasco. Hypocrites I swear ........ Go back to discussin' SURVIVOR or American Idol or somethin'.

Bass turd...

(and adam lambert was hosed!)...

{literally and figuratively}

[and you missed an opportunity, you could have thrown in a trailer trash comment, just sayin]
Reply to this comment
by tiredofthebs June 17, 2009 9:25 PM EDT
Where was ALL OF THIS SENTIMENT when Bush stole the election from Gore?! America should be the LAST NATION to offer an opinion about an election abroad after that fiasco. Hypocrites I swear ........ Go back to discussin' SURVIVOR or American Idol or somethin'.
Reply to this comment
by esthetics June 17, 2009 7:49 PM EDT
I believe Iran will use 'America's meddling' as an excuse to
launch a nuclear attack on american soil. The ongoing political
chaos in Iran will pave the way for nuclear war.
Reply to this comment
by gravyboat3000 June 17, 2009 5:53 PM EDT
by pw08-2009 June 17, 2009 2:12 PM PDT
It's refreshing to see protests in Iran that are not aimed at America and American interests, but at the same time, it's funny how we're somehow getting all of this blam from Ahmadigawhatever for "meddling"
________

What else is Ahmadinajad gonna do?

I bet he's thinking of attacking Twitter...

Oh wait, he already shut them down in Iran...
Reply to this comment
by pw08-2009 June 17, 2009 5:12 PM EDT
It's refreshing to see protests in Iran that are not aimed at America and American interests, but at the same time, it's funny how we're somehow getting all of this blam from Ahmadigawhatever for "meddling"
Reply to this comment
by TheMasses0003 June 17, 2009 4:20 PM EDT
ConstantineXI June 17, 2009 7:16 AM PDT
The only way to prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons is to bomb their reactors.
---------------------------------
But not their detractors though right?
Instead of bombing their reactors, let's send in those missile drones on suicide missions.
Reply to this comment
by brianp55 June 17, 2009 4:19 PM EDT
I think the mullahs have reshuffled the deck one too many times. The demographics alone make this current form of government uusustainable.
Reply to this comment
by kenbomc June 17, 2009 4:14 PM EDT
Video from today's march in Iran;

http://www.youtube.com/user/SenatorJohnMcSame
Reply to this comment
by daffy64 June 17, 2009 3:36 PM EDT
You would think that "Conservatives" in the USA would heartily endorse the current government in Iran:

religion based dictatorship and suppression of "liberal" young people.

Sounds like heaven.
Reply to this comment
by NY-Joe-10 June 17, 2009 3:56 PM EDT
sounds daffy to me.....religion based dictatorship ??? don't make us laugh....YOUR party has the dictatorship, if you didn't notice, and the republicans haven't mentioned religion since the 2000 election....wake up lib
by SusanStoHelit June 17, 2009 5:27 PM EDT
They do - they're saying we should butt out, let the religious nutjob take it, ignore the votes.
by Questionews June 17, 2009 3:12 PM EDT
I wonder if Kim Jong Il is going to threaten the Iranians for knocking him off the front page?
Reply to this comment
by SusanStoHelit June 17, 2009 3:07 PM EDT
Amazing how far behind the mainstream news is on this. Iran is a powderkeg - huge, enourmous, hundreds of thousands of people marching PEACEFULLY in the street every day demanding their votes be counted, lots of evidence the gov't just made up the vote tally (including an insider saying they did just that), lots of irrational violence and threats to the protesters, invading the university to smash it's computers in the typical dictator's fear of the intelligent and communication, people killed in the street by soldiers, police and soldiers starting to seem to turn to the side of the people, the leading religious council that can depose their religious leader (the true power in the country) meeting, etc.

This is about the Iranian people having their votes counted in their democracy - a vital thing. The new guy isn't any kind of moderate - but he's the people's choice, so he should be seated. Their alternative right now is to shut up and become a known dictatorship, where they know voting has no meaning.
Reply to this comment
by TheMasses0003 June 17, 2009 3:00 PM EDT
This latest revolt of the suppressed Iranians is the biggest since the Islamic Revolution in 1979. I wonder if it will go nowhere as all have done since then.
Reply to this comment
by NY-Joe-10 June 17, 2009 4:04 PM EDT
Masses, several administrations have been hoping for a revolution or uprising, due to the bad economic results of the president Ahmedoneabadjob whatever his name is....lol
by woeisme1 June 17, 2009 7:52 PM EDT
Don't hurt yourself wondering. We all know how delicate that publican pea brain is.
by woeisme1 June 17, 2009 9:20 PM EDT
Don't hurt your pretty little delicate self wondering too hard now.
by despido June 17, 2009 2:48 PM EDT
It will never cease to amaze me how gullible the American people really are. Obama has Americans cheering for a terrorist who has ties to Hezbolla and supported the taking of American hostages in 1979.
Reply to this comment
by SusanStoHelit June 17, 2009 3:08 PM EDT
Nope. We're cheering for the citizens who voted in an election to have their votes counted. Whoever they choose - whether we like them or not, should be seated.
by credibility2 June 17, 2009 2:48 PM EDT
Even if Mousavi is declared the winner, do these protesters really think things will change that much in their country, which is run and controlled by the religious leaders? Iranians flooded the streets to protest the Shah and nothing really happened in that country as a result except the ouster of the Shah, his family and his inner circle of supporters. It also caused a mass exodus of pro-Shah citizens. It's all well and good to ride the tail of the protesters, thinking it's appropriate for the cause of democracy, but again, its rather naive to think that anything substantively will change in that country. Iran will never be a democratic nation, until the religious cease controlling and running the country.
Reply to this comment
by zonkzilla June 17, 2009 2:28 PM EDT
The old clerics, like all dictators, are out of touch with the people.
By saying the US is "meddling" in Iranian affairs it just gives encouragement and support to the students who want peace with the United States.
The student protestors are very brave nut not stupid and not being manipulated by any foreign country they have a mind of their own.
The end is near for the old clerics who are dictators of Iran. Their time has come and gone.
We do owe some credit to GW Bush and his success in a democracy in Iraq. The people of Iran see Iraq has more freedom and they want the same.
As for President Obama, he is handling this exactly as he should by not giving the clerics and hard liners ammunition to stir up the chants of "death to America" and divert attention from the real issue of the election.
Reply to this comment
by connunism June 17, 2009 1:47 PM EDT
Were not McCains Nazis calling for the death of Barack Obama during last years campaign? Are these not the same people that are now asking President Obama to take a stronger stance against Iran, thus giving the Iranian dictatorship a rallying point for all Iranians to come together and rally instead against the USA? When will Republicons wake up to the fact that the USA now considered a pariah nation, despised by the entire world, including the Republicons only ally, Israel?
Reply to this comment
by hclinton2012 June 17, 2009 1:45 PM EDT
Iran's leadership tells President Barack Obama to 'shut-up" and stay out of their "election" business? Did that "hurt" your feelings like FOX News doesn't like you either you LOSER of a President Obama?
Reply to this comment
by USASTILLONTOP June 17, 2009 1:16 PM EDT
Yes, Let's see hwat the dems and libs do if We have to go into Iran.. I know, They will blame Bush... What a joke.
Reply to this comment
by hclinton2012 June 17, 2009 1:08 PM EDT
Libs and Democrats were against bring Democracy to Iraq and Afaghan, why would othey want that to occur in Iran? Bunch of BS on the part of their party, President Obama doesn't want any 'freedom" for the Iranian People, they want the dictator President Mamoud Ahmadinejad and the Mullads! Democrats, the Party of Slavery 1860, Racists Bigots to this day, plain and simple!
Reply to this comment
See all 51 Comments
Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: