WASHINGTON, June 10, 2009

Dodd To Lead Health Care Overhaul

In Absence Of Ailing Kennedy, Dodd Takes Over Senate Leadership On Obama's Top Domestic Priority

  • Senate Banking Committee member Sen. Christopher Dodd, D-Conn. takes part in a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, June 9, 2009, to discuss pending health care legislation. (AP Photo/Harry Hamburg)

    Senate Banking Committee member Sen. Christopher Dodd, D-Conn. takes part in a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, June 9, 2009, to discuss pending health care legislation. (AP Photo/Harry Hamburg)  (AP Photo/Harry Hamburg)

  • Only On The Web Your Health In Focus

    CBS News Medical Correspondent Dr. Jon LaPook hosts a weekly show, CBS Doc Dot Com, all about health issues.

(AP)  Sen. Chris Dodd is emerging as the face of a Senate plan to overhaul the nation's health care system in the absence of Congress' acknowledged expert on the subject, ailing Sen. Edward M. Kennedy.

Republicans already are griping about being frozen out, saying that Kennedy wouldn't treat them that way.

"I've never worked a process on any bill with him that went like this, where there was absolutely no input taken from the other party," said Sen. Mike Enzi of Wyoming, the senior Republican on the Senate Health, Education Labor and Pensions Committee that Kennedy chairs.

"I do feel badly that Sen. Kennedy is not able be here," said Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, ticking off the major health care and other legislation the two have written together. "He is the only one who can say Orrin is right, and get the riffraff out of the room."

Democrats are doing a delicate dance around the prospect that Kennedy, who is being treated for brain cancer, won't be able to manage the legislation that represents his life's work, could affect every American and is President Barack Obama's most urgent domestic priority.

There is still a possibility that the Massachusetts Democrat could attend critical work sessions that begin next week, Democrats said. But for the first time, there is little doubt that Dodd, D-Conn., will now steer the legislation from the helm of the health committee, working with Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus, D-Mont., to find a way to pay for it.

"Sen. Kennedy has asked (Dodd), that's his best friend in the Senate, to take over the work on health care," Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., told reporters.

"I don't like to make it official. He's the chairman," Dodd said of Kennedy in a brief interview between appointments.

Dodd and Kennedy are in almost daily contact. Dodd also had dinner at the senator's famous family compound in Hyannis Port, Mass., on Sunday with Kennedy and his wife, Vicki.

"He looked pretty good to me," Dodd said. "He's up walking around, sitting at the dining room table, and out on the porch."

Still, Kennedy's absence has sparked a robust round of rumors among Washington dealmakers whose professional and personal fortunes often rise and fall with the shifting roles of senators.

Kennedy's decision puts Dodd in a lead role for the White House's two top domestic agenda items. Dodd also chairs the Senate Banking Committee, which oversees the housing and financial industries, whose troubles have plunged the nation into the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression.

Obama has argued that the nation's economic revival depends on a health care overhaul passing Congress this year.

Making Dodd the Senate's point man overhauling both health care and the government's regulation of financial companies could put him in a position to strengthen his hold on a Senate seat endangered by accusations that he's been too cozy with the very companies his committee is supposed to oversee.

Dodd has long been a favorite of the financial sector when it comes to campaign donations. The finance, insurance and real estate sectors gave him $13.2 million from 1989 through 2008, according to the Center for Responsive Politics, a nonpartisan watchdog group.

But those campaign gifts have also caused him some recent grief. He's the top recipient of campaign money from American International Group Inc., the insurance giant whose $182.5 billion government bailout and hundreds of millions of dollars in executive bonuses have made it the poster child of what's wrong on Wall Street.

After first denying it, Dodd acknowledged that he agreed to a request by Treasury Department officials to weaken a bonus restriction in the economic stimulus bill. His approval rating sank to a career-low 33 percent in a recent Quinnipiac University poll.

Dodd will remain in charge of the Banking Committee's business, according to his aides. However, at a news conference Tuesday, Dodd said Sen. Jack Reed, D-R.I., will take on a more visible role in overhauling financial regulations and chairing hearings on oversight of the Securities Exchange Commission.

© MMIX The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment
by payasyougo June 11, 2009 8:02 AM EDT
"Dodd has long been a favorite of the financial sector when it comes to campaign donations. The finance, insurance and real estate sectors gave him $13.2 million from 1989 through 2008, according to the Center for Responsive Politics, a nonpartisan watchdog group."
----

Was it not a bubble in real estate, over-leverage in finance and reckless assumption of risk in insurance that resulted in this recession? Why is this person not being held accountable?

While the media and politicians keep republicans and democrats throwing jabs at each other your government robs you, your children and grandchildren of their future.
Reply to this comment
by payasyougo June 11, 2009 7:57 AM EDT
It's comforting to know that one of the men responsible for overseeing the financial industry, leading up to it's global meltdown, is being rewarded with a new job where we expect him to be just as successful.

Did I read this week that the taxpayer lost $5B on two financial institutions that both reported profits in the 1q09? How is that possible?
Reply to this comment
by stn_sage June 11, 2009 7:11 AM EDT
So, they're going to put Chris Dodd as acting head while Mr. Kennedy recovers from his illness?

Why? Are there no other Democrats with the guts to 'rip off the public' but HIM?!

I use to believe he was relatively honest, but the last 8-10 months---I dunno---I think he's turned!

I think he's out to get whatever he can for himself, the public be d*a*m*n*e*d!

We've seen what a lousy job he's done on the bailout activity! How he tried to see that the AIG execs got their bonuses anyway! Uh-huh! I don't trust him anymore!

The public is going to be real unhappy if health care reform doesn't turn out correctly!

In all probability, the citizens of Connecticut are going to replace him the next election, anyway! That being the case, a lame-duck Senator should NOT be interim head of
health care reform! This is a big mistake!
Reply to this comment
by brundage3 June 10, 2009 7:33 PM EDT
I have had a 40 + year career in "the media"if what you mean here is broadcast journalism.

The post complaing of Republican's being protrayed as "griping" and Democrats as being "denied their fair share" is griping a lot too much. Talk about being over-sensitive....

As advice to my fellow consumers of news. (News IS a product offered for sale in newspapers, radio, internet and tv. It is sold to us in a waide number of venus and to a wide range of commericial sponsors too. Just as we use our own minds and analysis in buying a car we need to do so in buying news asa well.

AND we are no more expert at what is quality news than we are expert in what is the finest built computer, car, or newspaper printing equipment or any number of other items.

A suggestion,,, As a news consumer, do not jumpt to conclusions based on what you already "know." A Democrat "knows"Republicans are bad or even criminal. A Hindu "Knows"Christians are wrong about religion. Etc. As a news consumer, ALL such "knowledge" should be forgotten. Such "knowledge" is NOT knowledge. It is simply a conclusion reached by an individual.

When a conclusion is used as a yardstick of truth, then the news product is bound to be considered as wrong. Hence "the media"is at fault for not telling "the truth" about things.
Reply to this comment
by specialty8 June 10, 2009 5:27 PM EDT
Great, maybe Pelosi and Reid will help. Bring Biden in for laughs. This should be a meeting of some great minds to decide our future.
Reply to this comment

Exclusive Webshow

Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more. Watch Now

  • MOST POPULAR
Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: