WASHINGTON, June 9, 2009

Hero Pilot: Bird Warnings Not Much Help

Capt. Sullenberger Says Experience Key To Safe Landing; Transcript Of US Airways Flight's Cockpit Recording Released

  • Play CBS Video Video A Look At Airline Safety

    Transcripts reveal what Capt. Chesley Sullenberger said during the emergency landing in the Hudson River in January. Unfortunately not all pilots are as skilled. Nancy Cordes reports.

    • Bob Benzon, NTSB investigator in charge, not pictured, plays an animation of the flight path of US Airways flight 1549 which suffered multiple bird strikes and was forced to land in the Hudson River, Tuesday, June 9, 2009, at a National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) hearing in Washington.

      Bob Benzon, NTSB investigator in charge, not pictured, plays an animation of the flight path of US Airways flight 1549 which suffered multiple bird strikes and was forced to land in the Hudson River, Tuesday, June 9, 2009, at a National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) hearing in Washington.  (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)

    • Capt. Chesley Sullenberger testifies at an NTSB hearing in Washington, D.C., June 9, 2009.

      Capt. Chesley Sullenberger testifies at an NTSB hearing in Washington, D.C., June 9, 2009.  (CBS)

    • Passengers wait to be rescued from the sinking US Airways jet shortly after it made a successful water landing on the Hudson River, Jan. 15, 2009.

      Passengers wait to be rescued from the sinking US Airways jet shortly after it made a successful water landing on the Hudson River, Jan. 15, 2009.  (AP Photo/Steven Day)

    Previous slide Next slide
  • Interactive Miracle On The Hudson

    All survive as commercial airliner makes emergency landing in Hudson River in New York.

(CBS/AP)  On takeoff, the pilot of Flight 1549 remarked on two things almost immediately: a breathtaking view of the Hudson River and the sickening thump of birds hitting his engines. Warnings about the birds probably would not have helped, Capt. Chesley Sullenberger told federal safety officials Tuesday as they looked for ways to prevent a recurrence that could prove deadly.

"In my experience, the warnings we get are general in nature and not specific and therefore have limited usefulness," Sullenberger said during a hearing by the National Transportation Safety Board.

The board began three days of hearings into safety issues arising from the Jan. 15 accident, including efforts to prevent bird strikes and the ability of aircraft engines to withstand collisions with large birds. Other issues include whether the Federal Aviation Administration's aircraft certification standards are adequate to protect passengers in event of a forced water landing.

In the case of US Airways Flight 1549, the Airbus A320 suffered a rupture near the tailcone that sent water gushing into the cabin after its forced landing on the Hudson River. All 155 aboard managed to escape the sinking craft.

A cockpit voice recorder transcript released by the board showed Sullenberger and co-pilot Jeffrey Skiles were admiring their surroundings less than a minute before their plane struck a flock of Canada geese and lost thrust in both engines.

"This is the captain, brace for impact": Transcript Of Cockpit Voice Recording From USAir Flight 1549 (pdf)
"What a view of the Hudson today," Sullenberger remarked.

"Yeah," Skiles responded.

Thirty-three seconds later Sullenberger said, "Birds," Skiles said, "Whoa," and there is the sound of thumping.

Sullenberger credited his 40 years of experience for his calm demeanor in the cockpit, reports CBS News correspondent Nancy Cordes.

"I think that it allowed me to focus clearly on the highest priorities at every stage of the flight without having to constantly refer to written guidance," he said.

The pilots in the deadly Colgan Air crash in Buffalo in February had significantly less experience and the captain had failed five flight tests, reports Cordes. That led the FAA today to order its inspectors to immediately focus on training programs at regional airlines like Colgan.

Meanwhile, US Airways Flight 1549 passenger Billy Campbell, a Woodland Hills, Calif., businessman who was in a window seat in the second-to-last row, said the engine he could see out his window after the bird strike was a "bonfire."

Sullenberger told the board that he didn't attempt to return to New York's LaGuardia Airport because he thought, "I cannot afford to be wrong."

"I had to make sure I could make it before I chose that option," he said. Instead of risking a crash in a densely populated area, he glided the plane into the river.

The Airbus A320 had climbed to about 900 meters when the plane hit a flock of Canada geese and lost thrust in both engines.
15:30:15 Flight Warning Computer: [sound of continuous repetitive chime begins and continues to end of recording]
15:30:15 Enhanced Ground Proximity Warning System (EGPWS): caution terrain.
15:30:16 Skiles: hundred and fifty knots.
15:30:17 Skiles: got flaps two, you want more?
15:30:19 Sullenberger: no let's stay at two.
15:30:21 Sullenberger: got any ideas?
15:30:22 LaGuardia departure control: Cactus fifteen twenty nine if you can uh....you got uh runway uh two nine available at Newark it'll be two o'clock and seven miles.
15:30:23 EGPWS: caution terrain.
15:30:23 Skiles: actually not.
15:30:24 EGPWS: terrain terrain. pull up. pull up. ["pull up" repeats until the end of the recording]
15:30:38 Sullenberger: we're gonna brace.
Campbell testified that water came flooding in his window when the plane hit the river. Someone also cracked open a rear door.

"My concern was that the plane was going to sink and we were going to be stuck in the back," he said.

In recent decades, many bird populations - including Canada geese - have rebounded thanks partly to environmental regulations. Air travel has also soared since deregulation in the late 1970s encouraged greater competition and lower fares.

Board member Robert Sumwalt, a former US Airways pilot who flew A320s, said he "never really worried about birds bringing my airplane down."

"Now this has caused a whole new focus on this," Sumwalt said in an interview.

With more planes and more birds in the sky, "we have a situation here - almost a numbers game - where eventually something is going to happen," Michael Begier, national coordinator of the Agriculture Department's airport wildlife hazards program, said in an interview. "We're very fortunate that Flight 1549 was not a catastrophe. It is a warning shot."

The FAA is testing bird-detecting radar that might help airports manage nearby bird populations. Some experts have also suggested aircraft engines should be designed to withstand bigger birds. Newer engines on commercial airliners have to withstand an 8-pound bird, but Canada geese can weigh twice that.

Disrupting bird habitats close to airports would probably not have helped Flight 1549. An analysis of remains of Canada geese in the plane's engines showed that they were migratory - perhaps from Labrador, Canada - not part of the Canada geese population that lives year-round in the New York area, according to the National Zoo's Migratory Bird Center. Moreover, the plane-geese collision occurred several miles from the airport.

Sumwalt told the hearing that he regrets saying that he expected Campbell to testify that the rear door of Flight 1549 was opened by flight attendant Doreen Welsh, who was seated near it. In fact, Campbell did not testify that Welsh had opened the door and instead called her "courageous."

Welsh has said in interviews and congressional testimony that a passenger pushed past her and opened the door, but no passenger has been identified.

For more info:
  • Docket of NTSB Investigation Into Crash of Flight 1549


    © MMIX, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
    Add a Comment See all 32 Comments
    by enemkay June 10, 2009 4:31 PM EDT
    why is this author so obsessed with the idea that the pilot commented on the view. i don't understand its relevance to anything.
    Reply to this comment
    by number1GI June 10, 2009 3:56 PM EDT
    To All these people who don't think what Sully did was a big deal ~~ Your Ignorance is showing. You don't have a clue what it's like on final trying to put those planes down even with full power avialable and a runway to put it on.
    What he pulled off was the result of excellent training, communication and cooperation belween himself and his crew .... You got that ???
    Reply to this comment
    by geminispyder-2009 June 10, 2009 10:15 AM EDT
    The man is a hero because he saved lives by doing his job the way it was supposed to be done.
    Posted by MrBag at 2:19 AM : Jun 10, 2009

    And zero-credit to the do*chebag in the back of the plane that opened up the rear compartment door that let the water in; after he shoved the flight attendant out of the way after warning him not to do so.

    (This fact was in the earlier reports within a week after the crash.)
    Reply to this comment
    by rrozsa June 10, 2009 9:46 AM EDT
    I don't mind hearing more about it. It beats hearing more about how Obama mentions Jesus more than Bush did, or how Jon and Kate's marriage is doing.
    Posted by willcad at 8:59 AM : Jun 9, 2009

    ===============================

    My sentiments exactly.
    Reply to this comment
    by MrBag June 10, 2009 5:19 AM EDT
    The man is a hero because he saved lives by doing his job the way it was supposed to be done.
    Reply to this comment
    by britney171 June 10, 2009 4:59 AM EDT
    The passengers of flight 1549 have no idea how lucky they were to have Sullenberger as their pilot that day. This is a man who at age 12 was deemed to have an IQ high enough to join Mensa, had a pilot's license by age 14, and was an experienced glider pilot and instructor. There was simply no better person to have been at the controls that day, and the passengers of flight 1549 today have their lives to show for it. If this isn't enough to inspire kids of today to get the best education they can, I don't know what is.
    Reply to this comment
    by Scimajor June 10, 2009 12:51 AM EDT
    "One thing I cannot understand, and that I have never read in any news story, is how they managed to avoid hitting the George Washington Bridge. How exactly did they do that? That's the most remarkable thing from my perspective."

    I've flown this scenarios several times in simulation and, while I'm nowhere near as experienced a pilot as Captain Sullenberger, it's a near thing at best. Maintaining a nice energy curve in readiness for landing and avoiding the bridge are conflicting objectives.
    Reply to this comment
    by Bregman June 9, 2009 11:41 PM EDT
    One thing I cannot understand, and that I have never read in any news story, is how they managed to avoid hitting the George Washington Bridge. How exactly did they do that? That's the most remarkable thing from my perspective.
    Reply to this comment
    by Scimajor June 9, 2009 11:12 PM EDT
    I don't think people really comprehend how remarkable this whole situation was. There is no worse time to lose engine power than shortly after takeoff.

    Additionally, the landing the captain made was remarkable by any standards. He saved the lives of his crew and passengers by keeping a clear head under the worst of possible situations by pulling off a ludicrously difficult landing. He also saved many hundreds of lives on the ground by not attempting to return to the airport (or some other airport) as most pilots would have done.

    If saving hundreds of lives by performing a seemingly impossible feat under the worst of circumstances isn't heroic then clearly I don't know the meaning of the word.

    Clearly, he performed his job heroically. Why not celebrate a real life hero?
    Reply to this comment
    by erb0087 June 9, 2009 11:09 PM EDT
    "...the sickening thump of birds hitting his engines. "

    ==============================

    Any news on the condition of the birds ?
    Reply to this comment
    by Vet_Turner June 9, 2009 8:52 PM EDT
    Things worked out because he did his job well not just because he was sitting in the left seat. Too often people don't do well enough, as in the Buffalo incident a couple of months ago. So yes, when a pilot does the right thing at the right time and follows his training and experience, he should get a pat on the back.
    Reply to this comment
    by vietnamwar June 9, 2009 7:57 PM EDT
    Mission Control:
    Warning warning there is bunch of birdyyyyyyy
    Reply to this comment
    by erb0087 June 9, 2009 6:38 PM EDT
    "Pilots Admired Hudson Before Bird Strike"

    They should keep their minds on their job at all times.

    Besides, Kate Hudson is all right, but there are better actresses out there.
    Reply to this comment
    by erasmus111 June 9, 2009 6:36 PM EDT
    See, Scooter, this is what I'm talking about. : )


    ' .. 210 million soldier jungle swamp monkey prostitutes and toddlers of all ages sowed and reaped and weaved and recycled cuffs and cages and guns and grenades (microscopic, macroscopic, or other) for non-consensual non-pornographic war at all the street corner and trail crossing sick bed partys and gatherings and rallys in the world (because some good angels asked them to?) .. 210 million civilian jungle swamp monkey prostitutes and toddlers of all ages sowed and reaped and weaved and recycled non-consensual non-pornographic lunches jargons bouquets and gardens buses blooms and toys baskets jingles (microscopi, macroscopic, or other) at all the same street corner and trail crossing sick bed partys and gatherings and rallys in the world (because the same good angels asked them to?) .. for a little while: the good angels highlighted some sports and puzzles and games and gallerys with some spotlights on some soldier jungle swamp monkeys, and for a little while: the good angels highlighted some sports and puzzles and games and gallerys with some spotlights on some civilian jungle swamp monkeys .. sometimes visitors to that little small scale local mall of malls prefered the non-consensual non-pornographic cuffs and cages and guns and grenades (microscopic, macroscopic, or other) .. and sometimes they prefered the non-consensual non-pornograpic lunches jargons bouquets and gardens buses blooms and toys baskets jingles (microscopic, macroscopic, or other) .. overall: whether the guest had a student or teacher type of charisma, or a prisoner or guard type of charisma: most were typically at ease and well absorbed the educations they wanted and easily left behind the ones they didn't regardless of the buffet or banquet or the section of the mall it was in .. '


    ' .. i like the stuff they sell for my windshield what keeps the water beading, i'm blind without it, i like often replacing my windshield wipers, i really really dislike diminished visibility .. i wish some kid would invent such a solution of water beading that i can see from here to my auto's destination and even reach across .. so's i can just quit traveling altogether .. i'm a cave dweller, it's a cardboard cave almost, but a cave just the same .. it's temperature controlled, so i don't strain my garden for a little air conditioning, it's moisture controlled, so i don't strain my garden for a little air conditioning, it's immobile, so i don't have to travel forever any more swiftly than the earth itself, and i've the time to bask and savor each and every cottage sized bouquet of math or science or culture or art i near .. '


    ' .. ten years ago, i thought i wanted a smallish house, in a smallish neighborhood, of art and craft hobbyists and furniture and knick knack enthusiasts, and near to a medium size factory or warehouse or mall to work in, and a tiny community center where folk go to help each other shop and gift bargains and other educations and surgerys small or large and such .. now it's a lot different .. i want a small or medium homeless garden full of milkcrate or lego rooms and houses constructed and deconstructed and woven and rewoven, disposable and interchangable and recycleable and portable, and everyone shops and gifts bargains and educations and surgerys and such for a living .. '
    Posted by vgbledblabl at 7:45 AM : Jun 9, 2009
    Reply to this comment
    by erasmus111 June 9, 2009 5:16 PM EDT
    Posted by Scooter68 at 12:00 PM : Jun 9, 2009

    I took the time to read your comment, and I agree with everything you said!

    You aren't a nutjob.
    Reply to this comment
    by erasmus111 June 9, 2009 5:07 PM EDT
    What's the matter davcampb - Too tough for you to read? Nobody's forcing you to read the posts.
    Posted by Scooter68 at 1:36 PM : Jun 9, 2009

    I hate to tell you this scooter, but most people skip over posts that are too long. It could be very informative, but for some reason I find myself moving over them. I think it's because most of the ones that are really long, they are usually written by the nutjobs. : ) I 'm not saying that you are a nutjob, I'm just saying that anyones that I have read, that is usually the case, so I stopped reading them. Nothing worse than starting to read this long drawn out comment, only to find out the person is CRAZY. Maybe divide it up into smaller ones. : ) I better stop now or I will look like one of them.
    Reply to this comment
    by davcampb June 9, 2009 4:48 PM EDT
    Those are better posts. Nice and concise.
    Reply to this comment
    by davcampb June 9, 2009 3:52 PM EDT
    Hey Scooter68....set your ego aside and learn how to make a brief post. People don't want to read your dissertation.
    Reply to this comment
    by akm081 June 9, 2009 2:18 PM EDT
    What is the big deal about this? The man ran into some birds and had to land the plane to avoid killing or injuring everyone on board. I don't understand why people are still talking about this and much less blaming the Capt. of the airplane for any wrong doing. He just did his job!
    Reply to this comment
    by erasmus111 June 9, 2009 1:08 PM EDT
    They violated the sterile cockpit rule. It's a bad rule but it's still a rule.
    Posted by summarex at 9:57 AM : Jun 9, 2009

    What do you mean?
    Reply to this comment
    See all 32 Comments
  • Exclusive Webshow

    Michelle Obama tells how her role as the First Lady has changed her perspective. Watch Now

    Latest News
    News in Pictures
    Scroll Left Scroll Right
    • The Fall Of The Berlin Wall The Fall Of The Berlin Wall

      Looking Back at the Wall that Once Divided Germany On the 20th Anniversary of Its Collapse

    • Patricia Clarkson Patricia Clarkson

      Television and Film Actress, Yale School of Drama Graduate and Academy Award Nominee

    • Day in Pictures Day in Pictures

      A Glimpse at the Day's News as Seen Through a Camera Lens

    • Andre Agassi Andre Agassi

      Former Top-Seeded Tennis Star, Gossip Column Favorite and Philanthropist

    • Yankees Victory Parade Yankees Victory Parade

      The Yankees Celebrate Their 27th World Series Championship with a Ticker-Tape Parade Up Broadway

    • Orlando Office Shooting Orlando Office Shooting

      A Gunman Opens Fire at the Offices of an Engineering Firm Where He Once Worked

    Connect with CBS News

    Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: