Millions Of Tons Of Coal Ash To Go To Ala.
The nation's largest public utility plans to dispose of millions of tons of coal ash from a massive spill in Tennessee into a giant landfill in one of Alabama's poorest counties, state environmental officials said Friday.
Both the Alabama and federal officials say the ash from the Tennessee Valley Authority's plant in Kingston, Tenn., isn't dangerous despite containing toxic materials like arsenic and lead. Alabama officials say the material can be safely stored in the dump, which most often receives household garbage.
An environmental activist, however, said the potentially dangerous waste was another example of government and industry dumping on poor people who live in a vulnerable area.
The Alabama Department of Environmental Management said it received notice from TVA this week that 3 million cubic yards of coal ash from the Dec. 22 spill at Kingston are bound for a privately owned dump in Perry County. Operators say it's one of the nation's largest commercial landfills, located just outside Uniontown about 100 miles from Birmingham. The exact rail route the waste will take to the landfill, more than 300 miles southwest of Kingston, was unclear Friday.
If the Environmental Protection Agency agrees, TVA plans to begin shipping 85 railcars loaded with coal ash every two days beginning June 16. A letter to the state from TVA said shipments of the same size would begin coming daily in early July.
The landfill only has five full-time employees, but as many as 50 could be added to handle the shipments, according to the letter from TVA, which supplies electricity to about 8.7 million consumers in seven Southeastern states.
Documents show the waste contains at least 14 heavy metals and other hazardous compounds. Alabama officials said they will allow the shipments because tests showed the toxins were present in low concentrations considered non-hazardous.
"It's not necessarily what's in there but the amount that's in there," said Scott Hughes, a spokesman with the Alabama Department of Environmental Management.
An environmental leader said the exact contents of the ash, which spilled into the Emory River and a lakeside neighborhood, remain a "huge issue."
"It's unverified, depending on which sources you go to, what the level of toxicity is," said Michael Churchman, executive director of the Alabama Environmental Council.
"I don't see how they think it should be shipped to Perry County and treated like a banana peel or other items from my house."
TVA said it sent a test shipment of 1,500 tons of the sludge in 15 railcars last month to the Arrowhead Landfill in the mostly black county, where U.S. Census statistics show 31 percent of families live in poverty. A test shipment of the same size went to a landfill near Mauk, Ga.
Jeff Cown, a manager with the Georgia Environmental Protection Division, said that state hasn't received any information from TVA on additional shipments.
But the Alabama environmental agency said TVA notified the state on Tuesday that the Kingston spill waste was headed to Alabama. Based on the TVA test and figures from Cown, such a shipment would weigh about 3.9 million tons and require about 35,000 railroad cars to transport.
The TVA letter said the initial disposal contract was for a year and could be extended. The value of the deal wasn't disclosed.
TVA spokeswoman Barbara Martocci confirmed that about 2.7 million cubic yards of ash needs to be dredged from waters in eastern Tennessee and disposed of, but she declined comment on whether the utility had selected Alabama for shipments.
"We are working with EPA on that," she said.
An EPA official working on the project did not immediately return messages seeking comment. John Delvac, operations director at the landfill, referred questions about coal ash shipments to TVA.
TVA estimates a total of 5.4 million cubic yards of ash and sludge breached an earthen dike surrounding a water-covered mountain of ash at the Kingston plant. The grayish muck covered 300 acres. The final cost of the cleanup could reach almost $1 billion, and the toxic spill left residents in Kingston worried about water contamination and other problems.
Meanwhile, hazardous materials could escape into groundwater and leave residents with little recourse, said Churchman, the environmentalist.
"I would think that there's not many people in Perry County could afford to pick up tomorrow and move to somewhere else," he said.
"This is another example of how we bear the burden of people in other places benefiting from cheap power."
By JAY REEVES
AP Both the Alabama and federal officials say the ash from the Tennessee Valley Authority's plant in Kingston, Tenn., isn't dangerous despite containing toxic materials like arsenic and lead. Alabama officials say the material can be safely stored in the dump, which most often receives household garbage.
An environmental activist, however, said the potentially dangerous waste was another example of government and industry dumping on poor people who live in a vulnerable area.
The Alabama Department of Environmental Management said it received notice from TVA this week that 3 million cubic yards of coal ash from the Dec. 22 spill at Kingston are bound for a privately owned dump in Perry County. Operators say it's one of the nation's largest commercial landfills, located just outside Uniontown about 100 miles from Birmingham. The exact rail route the waste will take to the landfill, more than 300 miles southwest of Kingston, was unclear Friday.
If the Environmental Protection Agency agrees, TVA plans to begin shipping 85 railcars loaded with coal ash every two days beginning June 16. A letter to the state from TVA said shipments of the same size would begin coming daily in early July.
The landfill only has five full-time employees, but as many as 50 could be added to handle the shipments, according to the letter from TVA, which supplies electricity to about 8.7 million consumers in seven Southeastern states.
Documents show the waste contains at least 14 heavy metals and other hazardous compounds. Alabama officials said they will allow the shipments because tests showed the toxins were present in low concentrations considered non-hazardous.
"It's not necessarily what's in there but the amount that's in there," said Scott Hughes, a spokesman with the Alabama Department of Environmental Management.
An environmental leader said the exact contents of the ash, which spilled into the Emory River and a lakeside neighborhood, remain a "huge issue."
"It's unverified, depending on which sources you go to, what the level of toxicity is," said Michael Churchman, executive director of the Alabama Environmental Council.
"I don't see how they think it should be shipped to Perry County and treated like a banana peel or other items from my house."
TVA said it sent a test shipment of 1,500 tons of the sludge in 15 railcars last month to the Arrowhead Landfill in the mostly black county, where U.S. Census statistics show 31 percent of families live in poverty. A test shipment of the same size went to a landfill near Mauk, Ga.
Jeff Cown, a manager with the Georgia Environmental Protection Division, said that state hasn't received any information from TVA on additional shipments.
But the Alabama environmental agency said TVA notified the state on Tuesday that the Kingston spill waste was headed to Alabama. Based on the TVA test and figures from Cown, such a shipment would weigh about 3.9 million tons and require about 35,000 railroad cars to transport.
The TVA letter said the initial disposal contract was for a year and could be extended. The value of the deal wasn't disclosed.
TVA spokeswoman Barbara Martocci confirmed that about 2.7 million cubic yards of ash needs to be dredged from waters in eastern Tennessee and disposed of, but she declined comment on whether the utility had selected Alabama for shipments.
"We are working with EPA on that," she said.
An EPA official working on the project did not immediately return messages seeking comment. John Delvac, operations director at the landfill, referred questions about coal ash shipments to TVA.
TVA estimates a total of 5.4 million cubic yards of ash and sludge breached an earthen dike surrounding a water-covered mountain of ash at the Kingston plant. The grayish muck covered 300 acres. The final cost of the cleanup could reach almost $1 billion, and the toxic spill left residents in Kingston worried about water contamination and other problems.
Meanwhile, hazardous materials could escape into groundwater and leave residents with little recourse, said Churchman, the environmentalist.
"I would think that there's not many people in Perry County could afford to pick up tomorrow and move to somewhere else," he said.
"This is another example of how we bear the burden of people in other places benefiting from cheap power."
By JAY REEVES
Popular in SciTech
- Airborne laser reveals hidden city in Cambodia
- Baby named Like after Facebook button
- NASA unveils plans to capture asteroids
- Privacy officials request details on Google Glass
- Last telegram ever to be sent July 14
- Solar plane lands at Dulles Airport Play Video
- Apple TV gets HBO GO, WatchESPN
- Chinese supercomputer named world's fastest
How does this even come close to Nazi Germany you idiot!!!!!!!!!!!! The TVA is owned by the US Government and was set up by the God of the Dems. This is not about what side to blame, it's about energy. Coal and Nuclear are the only answer for the next 100 years. If anyone even thinks the U.S. population will accept a massive drop in their standard of living they are mistaken.
Those officials can drink a gallon of that stuff and prove it.
Why burry a good product? It's not like were giving aircraft manufacturers depleted uranium from the National stockpile just to get rid of it to use as balasts for aircraft.
Repave America with it. Start with the failing Democrat states. If they don't want it to create jobs, the Republican States will take it.
Amazing how stupid people really are. If your against one party, your a extreme member of the other. I'M AGAINST BOTH PARTIES. Bush AND Obama are crooks.
Posted by McHineguy
---------------------------
Let's get our figures correct, so that you're not spewing the same, old, tired LIES......
The 2009 budget deficit is 46% larger now than on Jan. 20th, 2009.
The national debt is 5.6% larger than it was on Jan. 20th, 2009.
Neither one is hardly 2 or 4 times as large as you wrongly stated!
Posted by cydygitt1
-----------------------
the size of the debt they are printing. Its two to four times larger since Jan 20. But thats ok. Obama has a plan, it just doesnt work. But he has a plan. Im sure he does. He must have one. Hope so anyway.
Posted by McHineguy
---------------------------
Thanks for proving my point hiney, and showing the republican't NO CLUE propaganda.
President Obama was handed a $1.3 Trillion budget deficit on Jan. 20th, 2009, along with a $10.7 Trillion national debt.
Today, the budget deficit for 2009 is $1.9 Trillion and the national debt is $11.3 Trillion.
The size of the debt is an added $600 Billion and not even close to your fantasized doubling or quadrupling of the "size of the debt they are printing." We might be able to say that it is almost 50% larger than what the shrub handed him, but your saying it was 200% or 400% larger is simply ludicrous!
Appears that republican'ts are certainly mathematics-challenged, and that goes right along with their economically-challenged, non-thinking minds as well.
Posted by McHineguy at 2:40 PM : Jun 6, 2009
So you oppose Obama's plan to spend the money on America and America's problems, and you prefer the Bush plan which sent TRILLIONS to Haliburton, Blackwater, Iraq's new regime, Israel, Pakistan, etc, etc, etc?