September 6, 2009 9:56 AM

Targeting Teens for Sexting

By
CBSNews
(CBS)  "Sexting" is the new term we apply when people electronically transmit racy, even nude photos of themselves to each other - not the best of ideas, and all the worse when those caught doing it are underage teens. Our Cover Story is reported by Rita Braver:

When celebrity teenager Vanessa Hudgens took some racy photos with her cell phone and sent them to a boyfriend, the star of the "High School Musical" films never expected them to show up on the Internet.

For her the result was embarrassment and fodder for gossip columnists and blogs.

But legally, sexually explicit pictures of minors can be classified as child pornography.

And "sexting" among everyday teens can mean big trouble …

"My life's been, it's just so different, I can even say upside down," said Orlando teenager Phillip Alpert. "It's just so far out there, something I never expected."

For Alpert it all started when he was a senior in high school. He had a girlfriend for a couple of years who sent him some pictures of herself.

"She was not wearing clothes in the pictures," he told Braver.

"And then you two started not getting along so well?" she asked.

"Yeah," Alpert said. "It was a few months after that, that basically things just kind of fell apart with the two of us."

"What'd you do?"

"I took the pictures she had sent me, and like at 3:30 in the night, I just hit the select button for contacts, and I just hit 'send,' and I went back to bed."

It was a few days after his 18th birthday, so legally Albert was an adult. Three days later, the police came to his home:

"They arrested me," he told Braver "They wanted to charge with, I think, like 76 counts of sending child pornography, which just means jail or prison for the rest of my life, or I could plead to five years probation, which can't be cut short - no contact with the victim or her parents, no Internet."

But what Phillip Alpert did NOT realize is that he would also be listed on Florida's Registry of Sexual Offenders, now and for 20 years AFTER his probation ends

"I mean, the guilt that I felt after I realized that I did it was punishment enough," he said. "But now I'm on this list, this sex offender list, so everyone in my neighborhood, or anyone near me can look me up on the Internet. And people have come to my house and checked up on me to make sure I wasn't a violent threat to their children."

Alpert was thrown out of the local community college when officials there realized he was on the list.

Now 19, he recently lost his job, and has not found another. He's living on savings and help from his family.

"When you meet someone new, do you sort of realize, 'Okay, I'm gonna have to tell them about this?'" Braver asked.

"It's very difficult, 'cause not a lot of people wanna be friends with a sex offender kid anyways," he said. "Do you tell them right away and then hope that they don't, you know, run away from you?"

"Has that happened?"

"Yes," he said.

Civil liberties attorney Larry Walters, who did not handle Phillip Alpert's case originally, said he was "floored" when he read about what happened the young man, and is now trying to help free of charge.

"We're dealing with kids exchanging photos of themselves in sexually explicit positions, and that is in my view a social problem, just like teen sexual activity," Walters told Braver. "The criminal justice system is not the proper vehicle to deal with something like that."

He says it's a long shot, but he plans to file a motion asking that Phillip's sentence be amended so his name can be taken off the sex offender list.

Legislation is now pending in states like Vermont and Ohio to lesson penalties for sexting, and Utah recently changed the offense from a felony to a misdemeanor.

Walters says ALL states should decriminalize picture-sharing among teenagers:

"The punishment doesn't fit the crime in this case," Walters said. "What's happening is you're punishing these kids, and there are a lot of them throughout the United States now."

In fact, a recent survey shows that it's very common teenage behavior.

Bill Albert of the National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy said, "We found, surprisingly, that one in five teens, and one in three young adults, freely admitted that they have sexted these nude or semi-nude images on the Internet or sent them via their cell phone."

Albert said about the same number of boys and girls have posted nude photos of themselves.

And this is not just a phenomenon among older teens: Eleven percent of teenage girls age 13 to 16 have sexted.

And while 67% of teenagers believe sexting is dangerous, Albert doubts that they really grasp the long-term implications:

"You know, I'm not sure many young people understand that this is sort of a cyber-tatoo," he said. "Once you press 'send.' it is out of your hands, and it can be used in ways that are a complete surprise of you."

Mindful of the case of Jessica Logan, an Ohio teenager whose family says she killed herself after her former boyfriend allegedly forwarded nude photos she'd sent him, local communities like Springfield, Va., are calling meetings to warn about the dangers of sexting.

"These are good kids, they don't know what they are doing," said police officer Marc McDonald.

Girls here say they don't personally engage in sexting, but agree with the survey's findings that 85% of teens believe girls do it to get a guy's attention, and 47% say pressure from a guy is a reason girls send sexy photos and messages.

One girl, Carol, said, "They compliment you, but like after that, and after it spreads and everyone hears abut it, then everyone starts talking bad about you, then it all, like, goes down from there."

And in some places, it can go from bad … to worse.

In the small town of Tunkhannock, in Wyoming County, Pennsylvania, girls who posed for revealing pictures now face child pornography charges.

When officials at the local high school found cell phones with sexy photos, they called in George Skumanick, the local District Attorney.

"We have a duty to protect our children," Skumanick told Braver. "And if they're gonna do things that are criminal, just 'cause they're kids, that shouldn't make it not criminal."

He told the kids who owned the cell phones, and those identified in the photos, they would either face felony charges, or accept probation while they took an education course that would cost them $100 each.

"So basically, it was five sessions, just to get across the dangers of doing this, short-term and long-term," he said.

But not every family opted for the deal.

Fifteen-year-old Marissa Miller said she had never posed for a sexy photo, and her mother, Mary Jo, demanded to see what the prosecutor was talking about.

The photo was taken at a slumber party when Marissa was 12.

"And what are they wearing?" Braver asked.

"Bras, training bras, plain training bras," Miller said.

"What did you say to the D.A. when you saw this photo that he said was child porn?"

"I actually, my first reaction was complete relief," she said. "I tossed it and said, 'Oh, Marissa!' My husband, my ex-husband said, 'What's wrong with this photo?' And he said she was posing provocatively."

Marissa refused to go to the class:

"Because it wasn't fair, I didn't do anything wrong," she said. "So why should I stand back and just let him tell us what to do?"

So the Millers and two other families contacted the American Civil Liberties Union, which sued in Federal court to stop the D.A. from bringing any charges. The case is now on appeal.

And if Skumanick wins, and the kids still won't take his course?

"We'll do what we need to do," said the District Attorney.

"You mean criminal charges?" Braver asked.

"We'll do what's appropriate, and what needs to done - I won't say more than that," Skumanick said. "Its an ongoing investigation at this point."

But Skumanick says he too believe the law should be changed for sexting by teenagers:

"The key thing is, if it's minor-to-minor, you know, then it should be a misdemeanor, yeah."

But there is one other point we should mention … Marissa is expecting a baby this summer.

"One of the things that is argued by a lot of people who are pushing these prosecutions is, well, when people see these sexy pictures, they are more apt to have sexual relations which will lead to teen pregnancy - what's your view of that?" Braver asked.

"I think most people who sent them probably already were doing things, their parents just aren't aware of what they're doing," Marissa said.

"I think that it's a little overkill to say that because of sexting you're gong to end up [with] teen pregnancy," said her mother.

Bill Albert, an expert on teen pregnancy, says anything that leads to what he calls a more "casual hook-up culture" IS a cause for concern.

"I don't think young people's moral compass has caught up with the race of technology," he said.

And he says, for MANY reasons, young people should think carefully before they press "send" … something 19-year-old Phillip Alpert understands all too well.

"This part of my life is ruined," he said. "The college times, the high school times, the best times of my life, that's not for me. I just hope that later down the road, when I'm, you know, 30, 35, whatever, I have a nice job, a nice family and that this is all behind me."


For more info:
  • The National Campaign
  • Weston, Garrou, Walters & Mooney Law Firm
  • American Civil Liberties Union
  • Copyright 2009 CBS. All rights reserved.
    Add a Comment See all 14 Comments
    by winskibug1962 March 24, 2010 7:45 AM EDT
    I think its wrong to charge the boy for posting the pics of the girl. She is just stupid for letting him have them. and for putting it out there for this to happen. These kids should try thinking about what they are doing, and the outcome of their actions before they do it. If you are that stupid to send pics of yourself like that and believe a guy won't show everyone, then you need to wake up and live in the real world.
    Reply to this comment
    by xpac316 July 14, 2009 10:07 PM EDT
    I am fully aware of the dangers associated with "sexting" as a teen, being 16 years of age myself. However, i don't believe we should be considered idiotic, or foolish for sending illict material to people we trust.

    Vanessa Hudgens sent nude photos of herself to her boyfriend, that was ok in my view. What was not ok was you reporters and paparazzi leaking those photos to every new desk and magazine cover in the country.

    A girl at my school, 13 at the time, was caught sending illicit material to hger then 16 year old boyfriend. This "boyfriend" sent these images and video clip to his friends and cousins, who then placed it on every video streaming site they could find. Police were called in from 13 hours away, to investigate and deliver talks to schools surrounding my area. They said "do NOT send illicit material, not even if you trust the recipient".

    I disagree wholeheartedly, seeing as how it was NOT the young lady's fault that her image was shared worldwide, but her boyfriend's stupidity and apparent lack of moral that enticed him to do what he did.

    The girl was punished severely, both by parents, community and police, but the boyfriend had no punishment, no backlash for what he did that was so cruelly foul. So i ask this of Australia, America and European countries alike...

    Are our legal systems truly in tact? Are we really directing the law in the right direction? Or are we simply looking for an easier way out because our Police force and our Politicians are too lazy to do what is right?
    Reply to this comment
    by nifer_d December 3, 2009 6:40 AM EST
    i agree with this that it is not the girls fault she trusted har boyfriend to keep her pictures and not foward them and in that case i think the boyfriend should be ponished for his actions to cause he is just as guily as the girl and i myself am 14
    by tgoodson65 June 1, 2009 11:58 AM EDT
    While I agree that the boy in the case was completely wrong, if you apply the DA's reasoning, then shouldn't the girl be charged as well for distributing pornography by sending her pictures to the boyfriend? So is he going to lock up everyone?
    Reply to this comment
    by Hank-B June 1, 2009 11:42 AM EDT
    It was disturbing that the sympathetic view of this story was of the young man that sent nude pictures of his ex-girlfriend to everyone on his contact list. The reporter did not contact the girl or her family on how this affected her life. There was one comment on a girl that committed suicide after her pictures were distributed in a similar fashion.
    He acted out of malice with intent to hurt her as bad as he could. The fact that his actions will affect him for the rest of his life do not solicate any sympathy from me. This story should have been more balanced in reporting how this affects both the perpetrater and the victim. It was woefully inadequate in revealing the devasting harm that can result from these so called pranks.
    Try and be a little more balanced in the future!
    Reply to this comment
    by casp101-2009 June 1, 2009 8:42 AM EDT
    I am not for teenagers going around nude and taking pictures of themselves and others but kids will be kids and to do something legally about it to cause a life time of problems is stupid. what ever happened to a swat on the rear end or staying in your room for two weeks. com'on now. we aren't going to make fugatives out of these kids because the had a moment of bad judgement. As for a irrate boyfriend doing something mean he should get two swats on the rearend and three weeks in his room. take care.
    Reply to this comment
    by larrychandle May 31, 2009 4:32 PM EDT
    The idea of using the child porn laws to go after teens who send nude pictures of themselves is repugnant. Anyone who does so should be prosecuted themselves on the grounds of endangering the welfare of a child.
    Reply to this comment
    by iamjonhorton May 31, 2009 1:45 PM EDT
    The subject of perceptions over the internet and texting can be a tricky one indeed. While I have sympathy for the kids who are being railroaded in the "justice" system, the fact is that your online presence is as important these days as a resume... except this resume, you have little control over.

    I had a similar problem at work with a comment I made about a picture taken of myself with a group of young ladies. One person, who saw the picture out of context, created a complaint big enough that I was forced to remove any work related pictures from my facebook page. The comment I had made was that I found the ladies "inspirational." And in case you are wondering, the athletes were in their practice uniforms, with nothing unusual about it.

    It's all about perceptions these days... not how you really are. Scary isn't, but very useful for blog topics when you write about social networking on the internet.
    Reply to this comment
    by jokr8790 May 31, 2009 12:56 PM EDT
    By the way, one of the young girls George is prosecuting was not nude, but in her training bra apparently. His claim was that the pose was "provocative." Really Mr. Prosecutor. You found a picture of a young teenage girl in her bra to be provocative? Were you aroused by it? Maybe we ought to be taking a look at this guy's computer. In any case, the law should be specific enough that under its definitions this prosecution could not occur, or it is so vaguely worded that it is unconstitutional, if not on its face, then certainly in its application in this specific instance.
    Reply to this comment
    by jokr8790 May 31, 2009 12:43 PM EDT
    This was not what the law was intended for. This law was promoted as being necessary to protect our children from child predators not to be able to prosecute teenagers for bad decisions. I think the young man who sent the photos of his ex-girlfriend to others is a scumbag, nonetheless the prosecution and resultant punishment was over the top. There should be built in defenses in the act, similar to the statutory rape laws in many states where in order to prosecute the offender has to be 4 years older than the victim and the victim is 16 or under. There should be no prosecution for the girls who are silly enough to send pictures of themselves. These prosecutions are but another example of prosecutors and the police bending the technicalities of the law to pursue a purpose neither contemplated nor intended by the lawmakers and certainly not how the law was promoted to the legislature. They can't or won't get the real predators so they give the community the illusion of doing something by going after these kids.
    Reply to this comment
    by annieomenous May 31, 2009 12:29 PM EDT
    Hi, I just wanted to know how to re-watch the full video of this story online. Is there some waiting period for watching the show online due to the time difference between the East and West coast? If so, what is the waiting period? Also, can any of this show be seen via internet services like Hulu?
    I didn't know where to post this question, but I hope it won't go unanswered.
    Sincerely,
    annieomenous
    Reply to this comment
    See all 14 Comments
    .
    Scroll Left
    Scroll Right More »
    CBS News on Facebook