May 29, 2009 4:13 AM

Plant To Destroy Nerve Gas Opens In Russia

By
CBSNews
(AP)  Russian and U.S. officials on Friday formally opened a massive plant in Siberia that is to destroy some 2 million chemical weapons shells, hailing the move as a milestone in global security and in cooperation between Moscow and Washington.

The village-sized plant in Shchuchye, about 1,000 miles east of Moscow, was largely funded by the United States under the Cooperative Threat Reduction initiative that started a year after the Soviet Union's collapse. The U.S. contribution exceeds $1 billion.

"The path to peace and prosperity for both Russia and the United States depends on how we resolve the threats posed by the arsenals built to fight World War III. Thankfully that confrontation never came. But today we must ensure that the weapons are never used, and never fall into the hands of those who would do harm to us or others," Sen. Richard Lugar, a Republican, said at the opening ceremonies. He is a co-author, with former Sen. Sam Nunn, of the legislation that led to the CTR.

"The United States and Russia have too much at stake and too many common interests to allow our relationship to drift toward conflict. Both of our nations have been the victim of terrorism that has deeply influenced our sense of security," he said.

The weapons at Shchuchye, loaded with nerve gases including VX and sarin, have a cataclysmic potential for terrorist attacks. If set off in a tightly packed area, each could kill tens of thousands of people. Many of them are small enough to fit in a briefcase.

Russia, as a signatory of the international Chemical Weapons Convention, is obliged to eliminate its vast stores of Class I weapons - chemicals that have no use other than in arms. Moscow already has destroyed about 30 percent of its stockpile, according to the Russian Munitions Agency.

"In this context, Shchuchye is the most important facility allowing us to fulfill this task," said Viktor Khristnko, the Russian minister of industry.

The Shchuchye facility significantly boosts destruction capacity. Russian officials claim it will allow the country to meet its treaty obligations of destroying all chemical weapons by 2012, although Lugar said that goal probably won't be met.

Nonetheless, the opening - which follows preliminary destruction work that began in March - is significant because of the dangers posed by the weapons. Lugar said some of the shells at Shchuchye could kill 80,000 people if deployed in a stadium.

The opening of the plant comes at a symbolically important time, as Russia and the United States take initial steps toward working out a successor to the START nuclear arms reduction treaty that expires at the end of this year.

The opening also comes as both countries tentatively try to repair relations that deteriorated under the presidencies of George W. Bush and Vladimir Putin.

But while the project can be seen as a model of long-term cooperation, it also underlines the frequent difficulties that the United States runs into with Russia.

Delays in opening the plant came as disagreements arose over the type of munitions to be destroyed and how to eliminate them. The U.S. General Accounting Office says the hunt for a Russian subcontractor to install equipment at a reasonable cost was alone responsible for pushing the project back a year.

"The road to this day has not been smooth. There have been delays caused by the apprehension of the U.S. Congress; bureaucratic obstruction; problems with Russian funding; and contractor disputes," Lugar said.

Nonetheless, he said, "Moscow and Washington have proven that former enemies can work together to achieve shared security benefits... Our policies toward one another have frequently been characterized by ambiguities and difficult choices. But this facility is testament to the fact that we can make progress on areas of collaboration that are essential to our common interests."

The weapons to be destroyed at Shchuchye contain in total about 6,000 tons of nerve agent, including sarin and VX; in all, that's about 14 percent of the chemical weapons that Russia is committed to destroy. The initial destruction capacity is roughly 935 tons a year, but the figure is expected to double when a second building at the complex comes into operation at the end of the year.

The welded shells are to be drilled, then drained of their deadly agents. The chemicals will be neutralized then turned into bitumen salt mass, a solid waste that is considered mildly dangerous. That waste is to be stored in drums in concrete-lined bunkers situated above the groundwater level.

The complex, which sprawls across some 250 acres is about 10 miles from the buildings where the shells are stored. The weapons will be transported there on a specially built railroad.

AP
Add a Comment See all 15 Comments
by YrSoWrong May 31, 2009 4:12 PM EDT
Does "destroying nerve gas" mean selling it to the Venezuelans?
Reply to this comment
by Dgunner May 31, 2009 8:22 AM EDT
It is a dark and lonely job but someone has to pay someone to do it. Ten minutes from now that 10 million won't matter and the twenty billion will be sent abroad all in the effort to protect this country from preemptive strike. Now if anyone thinks that all the enemies of the US want our money guess again . They want our massive resources that we are not using or haven't tapped. They really don't want the weapons . They have plenty of thier own.
Reply to this comment
by presjfk May 30, 2009 10:41 AM EDT
...so it isn't JUST the Soviet side that is "running up expenses", either! Is it?!
Posted by stn_sage

First, I suspect the American taxpayesr paid for this friggin factory. Second, the Russians are awash in cash. 3rd, we are a stupid country.
Reply to this comment
by stn_sage May 29, 2009 6:50 PM EDT
Leave it to politicians to create "systems of waste" like this!

Before---these munitions and shells---were often times left unguarded or stored in the snow in out of the way places---in a haphazard, 'devil may care' sort of way!

Now, they've spent a ton of money to set up a factory to de-construct these munitions to create a multiple of additional dangerous component parts! Thus, INCREASING the possibility of an accident and negative outcome!

...oh the genius of the American politician's mind!

The article cites a lot of wasted spending as a result of problems on the Russian side, but it should be noted that not only do currently active politicians 'have so much time on their hands' to be able to attend "opening ceremonies" at this new plant; but FORMER politicians are sent by this government as well---even though they NO LONGER represent it in any official capacity at all! How, lovely! How considerate of the American taxpayer!

...so it isn't JUST the Soviet side that is "running up expenses", either! Is it?!
Reply to this comment
by presjfk May 29, 2009 5:09 PM EDT
We could have bought off Saddam Hussein for $10 bill and saved many lives and lots of money. We could probably buy off many of the terrorists for a fraction of the cost of this war on terror. We could probably buy off North Korea for $20 bill and get them to stop counterfeiting and making nukes. Maybe we should just reduce our military and buy everybody off.
Reply to this comment
by presjfk May 29, 2009 4:56 PM EDT
Remember the Kursk? The Russian sub that sank and that the Russians allowed to sit at the bottom of the ocean while their sailors died - and only after overwhelming publicity did the Russians have the Norwegians raise the sub and then taken to Russia? Well guess who paid for the dismantling of the sub? Yes the US taxpayer. $10 mill USD God damn ***** ********.
Reply to this comment
by presjfk May 29, 2009 4:53 PM EDT
Notice how Russia will not destroy and weapons unless the US goes over there and pays for most of it? We are such suckers
Posted by tbbaot

You nailed it, we are the dumbest country on earth. We could pull a couple guys out of a car dealership that could negotiate better with the Russians than the monkeys in our State and Defense Departments.
Reply to this comment
by presjfk May 29, 2009 4:51 PM EDT
Moscow and Washington have proven that former enemies can work together to achieve shared security benefits.
Sen. Richard Lugar, R-Ind.

Former enemies can work together? They build weapons intended to destroy us and we pay to dismantle them? Last time I checked, we are broke and the Russians are awash in cash. This is BS!
Reply to this comment
by erasmus111 May 29, 2009 3:07 PM EDT
If they aren't all going to be destroyed, why bother?
Reply to this comment
by edward1975-2009 May 29, 2009 12:18 PM EDT
We are trusting a country, whose generals after the collapse of the Soviet Union, were selling plutonium to anyone who wanted it. This is a disaster waiting to happen.
Reply to this comment
See all 15 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook