June 1, 2010 3:00 PM

Court: Suspects Don't Need Lawyer Present

(CBS/AP)  The Supreme Court overturned a long-standing ruling that stops police from initiating questions unless a defendant's lawyer is present, a move that will make it easier for prosecutors to interrogate suspects.

The ruling comes the same day President Barack Obama officially nominated federal appeals judge Sonia Sotomayor to the replace retiring Justice David Souter.

In a 5-4 ruling, the high court overturned the 1986 Michigan v. Jackson ruling, which said police may not initiate questioning of a defendant who has a lawyer or has asked for one unless the attorney is present.

The Michigan ruling applied even to defendants who agree to talk to the authorities without their lawyers.

The court's conservatives overturned that opinion Tuesday, with Justice Antonin Scalia saying "it was poorly reasoned, has created no significant reliance interests and (as we have described) is ultimately unworkable."

Scalia, who read the opinion from the bench, said their decision will have a "minimal" effects on criminal defendants. "Because of the protections created by this court in Miranda and related cases, there is little if any chance that a defendant will be badgered into waiving his right to have counsel present during interrogation," Scalia said.

The Michigan v. Jackson opinion was written by Justice John Paul Stevens, the only current justice who was on the court at the time. He dissented from the ruling, and in an unusual move read his dissent aloud from the bench. It was the first time this term a justice had read a dissent aloud.

"The police interrogation in this case clearly violated petitioner's Sixth Amendment right to counsel," Stevens said. Overruling the Jackson case, he said, "can only diminish the public's confidence in the reliability and fairness of our system of justice."

The decision comes in the case of Jesse Jay Montejo, was found guilty in 2005 of the shooting death of Louis Ferrari in the victim's home on Sept. 5, 2002.

He was appointed a public defender at his Sept. 10, 2002 hearing, but was never indicated that he accepted the lawyer's help. Montejo then went with police detectives to help them look for the murder weapon. While in the car, Montejo wrote a letter to Ferrari's widow incriminating himself.

When they returned to the prison, a public defender was waiting for Montejo, irate that his client had been questioned without him being present.

Montejo was convicted and sentenced to death. He appealed, but the Louisiana Supreme Court upheld the conviction and sentence.

© 2010 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Add a Comment See all 42 Comments
by NancyLou9 May 27, 2009 4:13 PM EDT
"mrcrosbyll" writes "None of the current justices were placed by a republican." The statement is ridiculously FALSE. Antonin Scalia - Reagan nominated him to replace William Rehnquist - on bench since September 26, 1986; Clarence Thomas - Nominated by President George H. W. Bush - on bench since October 19, 1991; Samuel Anthony Alito, Jr. - Nominated by President George W. Bush - on bench since January 31, 2006; John Glover Roberts, Jr. Nominated by President George W. Bush - on bench since September 29, 2005. READERS BEWARE: mrcrosbyll represents the virulent Right-Wing extremist breed that has dominated the Republican Party for several decades. These Right-wing Republican extremists, like Bush, do not care what the "TRUTH" is. Their mission is to cover-up the Truth when it exposes their dishonesty. Their mission is to manipulate public perceptions by confusing and disrupting discussions with patently false claims. 90% of the virulent emails circulating patently false statements, are written by Right-wing Republican ideologues. One email claimed to be written by Bill Gates, another claimed to be written by Andy Rooney. All of the emails spouted support for the fanatic Right-wing Republican ideology. These Right-wing Republican zealots despise the Truth and cherish the opportunity to dupe the public.
Posted by truth_police at 8:05 PM : May 26, 2009
**************************************************************************
Wow, you're not a conspiracy theorist at all, are you? Go take your meds, please.
Reply to this comment
by truth_police May 27, 2009 4:09 PM EDT
Over the past 20 years the political Right-wing Supreme Court has amended the U.S. Constitution so extensively that it has obliterate 70 % of the 'Rights' it once protected. Under this "Right-wing Hunta" this court has determined that, under Eminent Domain, a person's property can be seized BY PRIVATE COMPANIES, for development. Prior to this coup, only the government could seize property and only for the general public welfare (Example: Utility poles on private property). But NOW, if a person is blessed with the good fortune of possessing coveted property which a private developer desperately wants, that developer can "take that property from them" by Eminent Domain. And without question -- taking property by Eminent Domain is the preferred method of confiscation for crooks because it guarantees the "true" property owner will NOT get anything close to "Fair Market Value" for their property. Make no mistake about it. THIS IS NOT THE COUNTRY IT WAS 50 YEARS AGO. The country we have today has a Constitution one tenth the size it was when it was written and approved. And this Right-Wing Regime of Supreme Court thugs accomplished this feat and obliterated the Constitution without adhering to the strict requirements for revision, namely, approval by three-fourths of the states by public vote. Like another Maddoff ripoff. You people have lost your Constitution and you are totally and completely oblivious and apathetic about that horrid fact. WAKE UP PEOPLE!
Reply to this comment
by jackp32 May 27, 2009 2:16 PM EDT
I just love that Scalia comment about the poor reasoning used in the 1986 case that was authored by that liberal weenie John Paul Stevens. Time to put down the murderer who initiated this updated ruling.
Reply to this comment
by tommynutz May 27, 2009 2:14 PM EDT
Another vast tragedy cortesy of socialism under Obama.

Thank you everyone who voted for this animal for eroding my rights!
Reply to this comment
by Dgunner May 27, 2009 10:27 AM EDT
I turned the page only to discover more rethoric. The next chapter surely will burn my eyes.
Reply to this comment
by searingtruth May 27, 2009 3:31 AM EDT
"...oh wait. If they bring out the waterboard, spill your guts and admit you really did shoot JFK. ..."
Posted by nofoolling at 12:20 AM : May 27, 2009


Ahhhh .... actionable intelligence ...
ST


"I writhed in anguish for years. Always knowing pain was coming, but never knowing what I should attempt to say next, or how I should appear so that my American torturers would believe me.

The problem was that I was innocent."
SearingTruth

A Future of the Brave
Reply to this comment
by nofoolling May 27, 2009 3:26 AM EDT
I mean surely you can trust the police to never badger you or do anything wrong.

"Can't we just all get along."
Rodney King.
Reply to this comment
by nofoolling May 27, 2009 3:20 AM EDT
It's really very simple.

Don't answer any questions, let them interrogate all they want,

oh wait. If they bring out the waterboard, spill your guts and admit you really did shoot JFK.

Same old rules still apply. Don't ever say a dam thing to anyone but your attorney who may or may not give you the presumption of innocence unlike the traitors at the KKK, er Supreme Clan.
Reply to this comment
by searingtruth May 27, 2009 2:38 AM EDT
"Justice is simple. Beware of those who declare it is not."
SearingTruth

A Future of the Brave
Reply to this comment
by PVperson2 May 27, 2009 2:14 AM EDT
Well of course Scalia read the conservative judgment, who else but a reactive, biased hypocrite like him would have the gall to proclaim that Americans should have no rights.
Reply to this comment
See all 42 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook