June 18, 2009 6:28 PM

On Gitmo, Gates Stands By Obama

By
CBSNews
(CBS/ AP)  Defense Secretary Robert Gates says the Obama administration had no choice but to order the shutdown of the prison at Guantanamo because "the name itself is a condemnation" of U.S. anti-terrorism strategy.

In an interview broadcast Friday on NBC's "Today" show, Gates called the facility on the island of Cuba "probably one of the finest prisons in the world today." But at the same time, he said it had become "a taint" on the reputation of America.

Gates has served both President George W. Bush and now Barack Obama at the Pentagon. In an interview taped Thursday aboard the retired World War II-era battleship USS Intrepid, the defense secretary said that once the decision was made to close Guantanamo, "the question is, where do you put them?" He said Mr. Obama would do nothing to endanger the public and said there has never been an escape from a "super-max" prison in this country.

Of criticism the president's plan would jeopardize people's safety, Gates said: "I think that one of the points ... was that he had no interest whatsoever in releasing publicly detainees who might come back to harm Americans."

Gates said that "we have many terrorists in United States' prisons today," and he decried "fear-mongering about this."

The Gates interview was broadcast a day after Mr. Obama and former Vice President Dick Cheney, in speeches that occurred almost simultaneously, escalated the public argument over the new administration's anti-terrorism policy and claims by Republicans that it has put the nation at risk.

As CBS News White House correspondent Mark Knoller writes of Mr. Obama and Cheney: "They laid out the stark differences in their approaches to the interrogations of terrorists and the treatment and trial of detainees at Guantanamo Bay. They both renewed their commitments to keeping America safe, but made it clear they thought the other's strategy would have the opposite effect."

"The argument was settled at the polls last November 4. But don't think for a moment the debate has ended," Knoller writes.

Mr. Obama campaigned against keeping Guantanamo open when he ran for president, and he also said he was opposed to aggressive interrogation tactics that opponents call torture. When he took office, he signed orders providing for the closure of Guantanamo by January 2010 and he also prohibited extreme interrogation practices, such as "waterboarding," in the country's anti-terrorism strategy.

On Thursday, Mr. Obama went to the National Archives, repository of treasured national documents as the Declaration of Independence, Bill of Rights and Constitution, and forcefully defended his decision to close Guantanamo despite resistance from both Democrats and Republicans in Congress. He also said that some of the terror suspects held there would be brought to top-security prisons in the United States.

"There are no neat or easy answers here," Mr. Obama said in a speech in which he pledged anew to clean up what he said was "quite simply a mess" at Guantanamo that he had inherited from the Bush administration.

Moments after Mr. Obama concluded, Cheney vehemently defended the counterterrorism policies of the Bush administration. He expressed no regrets about actions the Bush White House ordered. And Cheney said that under the same circumstances he would make the same decisions "without hesitation."

CBS/ AP
Add a Comment See all 76 Comments
by hungry1968-15 May 22, 2009 5:10 PM EDT
When it comes to whether I would obey the law or do the ethical thing and protect thousands/millions of people, I would disobey the law.
Posted by mortar29





What about breaking the law, even if it wasn't going to save lives?

You know, like water boarding, even though water boarding produced no results?
Reply to this comment
by PVperson2 May 22, 2009 4:59 PM EDT
Dick Cheney is a prefect example of how the terrorists won on 9/11. He feels that America's laws are nothing but an obstacle, the Constitution is "just a piece of paper" to be ignored, ANY illegal action is justified by the means and that our country's following democracy is a show of weakness to our enemies. If al-queda was attempting to destroy America on 9/11, then they succeeded with Cheney.
Reply to this comment
by formrusmcsgt May 22, 2009 3:52 PM EDT
But at the same time, he said it had become "a taint" on the reputation of America.
---
More like a stain, Bob......indellible at that, as it will always be there.
Reply to this comment
by budmag06 May 22, 2009 3:35 PM EDT
"On Gitmo, AND OBAMA'S FAILING POLICIES, Gates Stands By Obama"
Reply to this comment
by valh1 May 22, 2009 3:30 PM EDT
Are they talking about William Gates? The creator of Microsoft?
Reply to this comment
by vinylogy May 22, 2009 2:33 PM EDT
In an interview broadcast Friday on NBC's "Today" show, Gates called the facility on the island of Cuba "probably one of the finest prisons in the world today." But at the same time, he said it had become "a taint" on the reputation of America.
____________________________________________________________________

Imagine that, one of the finest , yet some a "taint". The only "taint" on Gitmo resulted from PObama now thinking before opening his mouth! Obama cheap-shotted alot of what he now realizes is necessary during his populist campaign. Now he's stuck admitting he said a whole lot he shouldn't have just to get elected. By any yardstick, Obama is a hypocrite.
Reply to this comment
by credibility2 May 22, 2009 2:24 PM EDT
Of course Gates is going to side with his boss; otherwise, he'd lose his job, I mean, he'd resign suddenly for personal reasons. Gates doing this for Obama is nothing new in the games all of the kids play in D.C.
Reply to this comment
by auto1234abc May 22, 2009 2:19 PM EDT
Who said Bin Laden wanted to work with anyone. The statement is your ability to work with others is no better that Bin Laden's ---

____

Who said anything about that? ....
.
Posted by mortar29 at 11:14 AM : May 22, 2009





Terrorists target the innocent. I would be targeting the guilty.
Posted by mortar29 at 10:57 AM : May 22, 2009

That is a matter of opinion and I am not sure you have the capability to evaluate the situation from Bin Laden's shoes. However you do appear to share similar misconceptions about working with others and the motivation to work destructively instead of constructively to improve a situation.



---- Try again reading the exchange (above) of ideas you completely misinterpreted.
Reply to this comment
by auto1234abc May 22, 2009 2:15 PM EDT
Kinda like if you shoot some guy walking down your street for no reason, that is murder. But if you shoot the same guy as he breaks into your house, that is good!
Posted by mortar29 at 11:07 AM : May 22, 2009


Makes perfect sense to most normal people. Thats why you struggle with that concept.
Posted by stuart2561 at 11:10 AM : May 22, 2009

The problem is that once he has the (guy) burgler under control awaiting the police, he is no longer empowered to shoot the burgler.
Reply to this comment
by auto1234abc May 22, 2009 2:11 PM EDT
Terrorists target the innocent. I would be targeting the guilty.
Posted by mortar29 at 10:57 AM : May 22, 2009

That is a matter of opinion and I am not sure you have the capability to evaluate the situation from Bin Laden's shoes. However you do appear to share similar misconceptions about working with others and the motivation to work destructively instead of constructively to improve a situation.

__

No your error is thinking Bin Laden wants to work with you.

Second, I dont care what Bin Laden thinks to defend his position. If you fly planes full of kids, women and people into buildings, that is evil. You cannot defend that.

And we do not need to understand his motivations, or anyone like him. All we need to do is to capture and/or kill them.
Posted by mortar29 at 11:10 AM : May 22, 2009

Who said Bin Laden wanted to work with anyone. The statement is your ability to work with others is no better that Bin Laden's ---
Reply to this comment
See all 76 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook