June 26, 2009 5:13 PM

Obama, Cheney Plan Dueling Speeches

By
Brian Montopoli
(The Politico)  This story was written by Jim VandeHei And Mike Allen.

President Barack Obama will attempt to regain control of a boiling debate over anti-terrorism policy with a major speech on Thursday--an address that comes on the same day that former Vice President Cheney will be weighing in with his own speech on the same theme.

The dueling speeches amount to the most direct engagement so far between Obama and his conservative critics in the volatile argument over what tactics are justified in detaining and interrogating suspected enemy combatants.

The national security debate-egged on by frequent charges from Cheney that Obama is leaving the country more vulnerable to attack-is the only subject on which many Republicans believe they have been able to gain traction against a popular president and the Democratic majority that now dominate Washington.

But, as described by administration sources, Obama's speech is also intended to quiet the ire aimed at him from the political left. Some activists are furious over his recent decisions on continuing military commissions rather than civilian trials for suspected terrorists, and his about-face in deciding to fight a court order releasing photos of detainees undergoing abuse.

Obama advisers are comparing Thursday's speech to his big-picture Georgetown University speech on the economy last month-not intended necessarily to produce "hard news" but a sustained effort to describe and defend his policies and the political and intellecutal assumptions behind them.

A centerpiece of the president's speech will be his plans for dispersing the detainees at the U.S. military prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Senate Democrats, running from the White House as never before this year, moved Tuesday to withhold $80 million he had requested to close the prison by early next year. In response, White House press secretary Robert Gibbs promised "a more detailed plan."

Cheney will be speaking at 10:45 a.m. on "Keeping America Safe: An Address by Dick Cheney" during a 45-minute appearance at the conservative American Enterprise Institute. Cheney will take questions during his open-press appearance, which was scheduled several weeks ago.

The White House and Democrats have been thrown off balance for three weeks running on a debate Republicans believe has made their opponents look weak and disingenuous on national security policy. The broader terrorism debate has produced the most embarrassing chapter of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's reign, and the more specific one on Gitmo has produced a rare Democratic slap at an Obama policy.

The Pew Research Center's Project for Excellence in Journalism reports that terrorism coverage accounted for 22 percent of the news hole it measured from May 11-17.

Few of those stories were the kind Obama wants to read. Democrats think the issue works both ways because it pulls unpopular Republicans like Cheney out of the dark. But it also pulls the spotlight from Democrats' preferred subjects of health care and energy policies.

Republican have tried for months to keep up a drumbeat on Gitmo, and some Democrats have been frustrated that there has been a vacuum on their side.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) has needled the president about the issue in 16 floor speeches, a Washington Post op-ed, several Sunday shows, weekly stakeouts, and a speech at the Conservative Political Action Conference on Feb. 27 that kicked off the effort. A timeline by his office shows 22 writings and remarks, plus three videos.

The GOP got an unexpected big gift in the fallout from the statement last week by Pelosi that she was accusing the CIA of "misleading the Congress of the United States" with its briefings on waterboarding. The next evening, she put out a statement of "respect for those in the intelligence community who work to kee our country safe."

Early Wednesday, Former Speaker Newt Gingrich published a column in the conservative Human Events headlined, "Why Speaker Pelosi Should Step Down" over her comments on the CIA waterboarding briefings.

"The person who is No. 2 in line to be commander in chief can't have contempt for the men and women who protect our nation," Gingrich wrote. "[T]his isn't about politics. It's about national security."

Democrats replied that they find it pathetic that the GOP is relying for the charges on a former speaker - reprimanded in a 1997 ethics case on which Pelosi was one judge as part of House panel, giving the exchange the look of massive payback. A top official said: "No House Democrat thinks she should go. None."

Politico's David Rogers contributed to this report.
By Jim VandeHei And Mike Allen

The Politico
  • Brian Montopoli

    Brian Montopoli is the senior political reporter at CBSNews.com.

Add a Comment See all 288 Comments
by pr_boxer May 21, 2009 10:11 AM EDT
Dick "The Modern Day Himmler" Cheney is the most despicable human being I can think of!
Reply to this comment
by pr_boxer May 21, 2009 10:07 AM EDT
I've heard all of Dick Cheney I want to. I thought he was wrong and the results proved it. Sorry, Mr Cheney we don't want to be Nazi's.
Reply to this comment
by chitown639 May 21, 2009 8:39 AM EDT
Actually, Jeb Bush is one name being considered as a contender in 2012.
Posted by stuart2561

I hope Jeb does run....but only if he uses his last name and has George W campaign for him.......
Reply to this comment
by r9119111 May 21, 2009 7:51 AM EDT
Torture -- making a deal with Lucifer to trade soul for security. Of course Christians have rationalized just about everything from piling stones and ducking witches to exact confessions, to hacking off limbs, and burning people at the stake all in the name of Christ and for the glory of God all the while becoming the very evil they abhor.
Posted by xmissile at 3:44 PM : May 20, 2009


I think you are right. The past administration did more to damage Christianity in the name of God than anyone in the past fifty years --- even the Evangelicals, who, in my opinion, misrepresent God just about the most of anyone else in America. No offense meant, just recognizing the truth.
Reply to this comment
by texasbeta May 20, 2009 8:30 PM EDT
Would someone just blow up the Death Star, seriously? Vadar is getting on my nerves
Reply to this comment
by mrzerato May 20, 2009 6:44 PM EDT
Ron Paul.....wants to end education funding. Says it's unconstitutional.
Posted by stuart2561

At one point in my travels, ron paul was my representative. He has a district that gets more federal aid than any other Texas district. So his rhetoric runs away from his reality
Reply to this comment
by xmissile May 20, 2009 6:44 PM EDT
Torture -- making a deal with Lucifer to trade soul for security. Of course Christians have rationalized just about everything from piling stones and ducking witches to exact confessions, to hacking off limbs, and burning people at the stake all in the name of Christ and for the glory of God all the while becoming the very evil they abhor.
Reply to this comment
by mrzerato May 20, 2009 6:33 PM EDT
I like analysts that are independent of either parties talking points. they make more sense.
Posted by mrzerato at 3:20 PM ...

What is the best site for that? Do you have a favorite?
Posted by stuart2561

I like the david gergen, I like the former black representative from tennesse, and Joe scarborough. Others that I can not remember
Reply to this comment
by ayatoldya May 20, 2009 6:27 PM EDT
Cheney still sounds like Darth Vader. Does he have any real friends?
Reply to this comment
by mrzerato May 20, 2009 6:20 PM EDT
Ron takes up for his republicans colleagues, who do not want him in their party. Funny a black gay would keep defending the republicans.
Posted by mrzerato at 3:14 PM : May 20, 2009 He is soooooooo biased and untruthful and quite pompous. That's what turns me off. I don't mind that he's a republican. Just the rest.
Posted by stuart2561

I don't mind him being a republican either, I used to be one back during the Watergate days. I agree he is quite pompous and not much of an analyst. He just toes the republican line, no matter how silly it seems. I like analysts that are independent of either parties talking points. they make more sense.
Reply to this comment
See all 288 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook