Dow
     -89.23
12801.23
-0.69%
|
     -9.31
1342.64
-0.69%
|
     -108.90
14000.51
-0.77%
|
     -23.35
2903.88
-0.80%
|
     -1.03
53.27
-1.90%
|
     +1.09
116.27
+0.95%
|
     +0.01
2.01
+0.42%
May 20, 2009 6:01 PM

SEC Head: Obama Watchdog Plan "Damaging"

By
CBSNews
(AP)  The head of the Securities and Exchange Commission is objecting to a plan being considered by the Obama administration to create a new financial watchdog to protect consumers.

SEC Chairman Mary Schapiro said such a new entity, which was discussed Tuesday night by Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and other officials, would reduce the SEC's authority and damage government protection of investors.

"I question pretty profoundly any model that would try to move investor protection functions out of the Securities and Exchange Commission," Schapiro said Wednesday.

That couldn't be done "without really damaging the fabric of the entire investor protection regime," she told reporters.

The proposal the administration was considering would centralize the enforcement of laws that protect consumers of financial products, such as credit cards, mortgages and mutual funds. That effort currently is spread across a number of federal and state agencies, including the SEC, with oversight of mutual funds and other investments, the Federal Reserve and Federal Trade Commission.

Any changes to the nation's financial rule book and oversight will require congressional action and it's unclear whether lawmakers will unite behind a single approach this year.

Schapiro's comments marked her first sharp public breach with the administration over the shape of the overhaul of rules designed to prevent another massive financial breakdown. Schapiro has in recent weeks affirmed in testimony to Congress, which is debating the changes, her position that the SEC must play a key role as an independent watchdog protecting investors in any new financial regulation system.

Schapiro also has said she favors the idea floated recently by Sheila Bair, the head of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., for a new "systemic risk council" to monitor large institutions against financial threats that would include the Treasury Department, Fed, FDIC and SEC. The White House, by contrast, leans toward recommending that the Fed alone become the new supercop for "too big to fail" financial companies capable of setting off another meltdown.

Officials said the administration has been exploring the new approach in meetings over the past few days with executives of the financial industry. It was discussed at a dinner Tuesday at the Treasury Department attended by Geithner and Lawrence Summers, director of President Barack Obama's National Economic Council.

Schapiro said Wednesday she has been engaged with administration officials in offering her views on the issue, and didn't view the proposal as in its final form.

"I certainly hope we'll be refining it," she said. "I don't think it's a concrete proposal by any means at this point."

An administration official who confirmed that the dinner had taken place said no final decisions had been reached.

Under one possible approach, some federal banking agencies might be combined and some powers over consumer products might be consolidated into a new body.

An industry official said the administration supported the concept that already has been introduced in legislation by several senators. This official said the administration may offer its own approach to the issue.

Geithner has said extensive changes were needed to make sure that the current financial crisis, the worst in seven decades, is never repeated. In prepared remarks to the Senate Banking Committee Wednesday, Geithner said new financial products have resulted in benefits, but lax regulation has exposed Americans to abuses. He said government rules should ensure that financial choices are clear, reasonable and appropriate.

The officials who spoke late Tuesday did so on condition that their names not be used because the administration was not ready to unveil a proposal.

Treasury issued a statement late Tuesday that called the dinner "one of a series of meetings with a wide range of relevant constituencies and experts" to seek views on regulatory reform. "No decisions have been made but the administration is actively seeking various viewpoints as it puts together its framework."

A leading proponent of the commission approach has been Harvard University professor Elizabeth Warren, who is the head of the Congressional Oversight Panel for the government's $700 billion financial rescue effort.

Warren argued in a 2007 article that the government needed to do a better job of protecting homeowners who take out mortgages and consumers of other increasingly complex financial products.

Sens. Richard Durbin, D-Ill., Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., and Edward Kennedy, D-Mass., introduced legislation earlier this year that would create a commission like the one proposed by Warren.

Some industry groups already have expressed opposition to the plan.

The Financial Services Roundtable, which represents some of the biggest institutions in the country, has argued that it would be a mistake to separate the regulation of financial products from the regulators who oversee the institutions selling those products.

It was unclear whether the administration will propose creating a new federal agency to house the commission or placing the commission under an existing agency.

The administration is expected to unveil its proposal in the next few weeks as it pushes ahead with a sweeping effort to overhaul the government's financial regulatory system.

The administration already has put forward some broad principles for financial regulatory overhaul, including creation of new powers to allow authorities to take over major financial institutions that represent a threat to the system.

AP
Add a Comment See all 45 Comments
by omnibus66 May 21, 2009 7:15 AM EDT
That couldn't be done "without really damaging the fabric of the entire investor protection regime," she told reporters.

Translation - The stock market is, and has been the biggest, most profitable casino in the world and we want to keep it that way.
Reply to this comment
by voxpopulus May 21, 2009 5:52 AM EDT
"Right around this time there's a heck a lot (millions, perhaps) of Obama voters who are feeling pretty stupid for supporting him" Yeah sure, because you Republican posters were SO honest during the primaries (pretending to be Democrat women) and since. Obama's popularity eclipses that of anyone in the party of no, and will for a long time to come.
Reply to this comment
by voxpopulus May 21, 2009 5:50 AM EDT
Well dear, the SEC hasn't exactly been doing a sterling job so far
Reply to this comment
by beach671 May 21, 2009 1:53 AM EDT
Who was it that decided to let illegal immigrants in 2005 start getting mortgages in the United States?

After the 5 million went into foreclosure......how do you go after those non-citizens with no Social Security numbers for the Trillions they got away with swapping homes for sale between themselves then ditching the country with the loot and letting the homes go into foreclosure?

Can't go after them can you. Such widespread fraud from the Fed's down to the illegals stealing money and now the real citizens of the United States are paying for it as our economy collapses.
Reply to this comment
by spaceatoms May 21, 2009 12:38 AM EDT
Its more control in an area that is suppose to be left alone, Wall Street messed up and right now AIG is out of business in the virtual world and the country is going into a summer meltdown, but no the foreign investors were sarcastically spared while we lose our jobs here due to the globalization policies so Joe the Kennedy plumber can ride a boat in Maine. I really want to feel like the person in Pakistan who is dead broke living like dirt, this country is psychotic and we might as well listen to Arnold and legalize marijuana instead of hiding it, everything is a secret in this country.
Reply to this comment
by earlysaid May 20, 2009 11:05 PM EDT
Dear Mary is not the one who has the job of President of this country. Hopefully she will lose her job in the SEC. President Obama needs to keep replacing Bush appointees with people who care about the middle class as well as the wealthy. We need oversight badly to stop the criminal actions of financial institutions.
Reply to this comment
by jumkey May 20, 2009 10:09 PM EDT
Posted by weedapoopl

Listening to your BS you'd almost think the Democrats have been running this country for the last 25 years.

Did you vote for Dumya and his Republican partners in crime?

Yeah, I thought so.
Reply to this comment
by weedapoopl May 20, 2009 9:06 PM EDT
And Jimmy Carter was a pretty bad president, too.

Moving right along...
Reply to this comment
by texasbeta May 20, 2009 8:34 PM EDT
...done with overwhelming bipartisan support, and signed eagerly by Bill Clinton, the king of sleaze.
Posted by weedapoopl

No kidding. How funny...all the Democrats, like me...LOVE Bill Clinton. The Repubs are still trying to blame him for everything from crucifying Jesus to eliminating life on Jupiter. BUT. the more you get into it...the Republicans should LOVE HIM. Nafta, WTO, deregulation...talk about playing both sides. They are up in arms about getting a bj in the oval office I guess. How ridiculous...I would get a bj in the oval office if I got there. I would have a crazy porno party that lasted for a year if I got there. I guess that is one of the many reason why I will never be there.
Reply to this comment
by weedapoopl May 20, 2009 8:06 PM EDT
Posted by texasbeta at 5:03 PM : May 20, 2009

Thanks, but I was talking more about the courts splitting up AT&T, and trying to split up IBM.

Believe it or not, this country actually did go through another episode of companies getting "too big" and wreaking havoc.

Why didn't they split up GM or Chrysler?

Yes, the repeal of Glas-Steagal allowed financial companies to get too big. And it was all done against he strenuous objections of experts, done with overwhelming bipartisan support, and signed eagerly by Bill Clinton, the king of sleaze.
Reply to this comment
See all 45 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook