May 12, 2009 4:31 PM

Social Security, Medicare Finances Worsen

(AP)  The financial health of Social Security and Medicare, the government's two biggest benefit programs, have worsened because of the severe recession, and Medicare is now paying out more than it receives.

Trustees of the programs said Tuesday that Social Security will start paying out more in benefits than it collects in taxes in 2016, one year sooner than projected last year, and the giant trust fund will be depleted by 2037, four years sooner.

Medicare is in even worse shape. The trustees said the program for hospital expenses will pay out more in benefits than it collects this year and will be insolvent by 2017, two years earlier than the date projected in last year's report.

The trust funds — which exist in paper form in a filing cabinet in Parkersburg, W.Va. — are bonds that are backed by the government's "full faith and credit" but not by any actual assets. That money has been spent over the years to fund other parts of government. To redeem the trust fund bonds, the government would have to borrow in public debt markets or raise taxes.

Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, the head of the trustees group, said the new reports were a reminder that "the longer we wait to address the long-term solvency of Medicare and Social Security, the sooner those challenges will be upon us and the harder the options will be."

Geithner said that President Barack Obama was committed to working with Congress to find ways to control runaway growth in both public and private health care expenditures, noting the promise Monday by major health care providers to trim costs by $2 trillion over the next decade.

However, Republicans pointed to the newly dire assessments as evidence the Obama administration has failed to come forward with actual entitlement reform to close the funding gaps.

"Instead of getting existing public programs in order right now, some are saying we should create a new government-run health insurance plan," Sen. Chuck Grassley, the top Republican on the Finance Committee, said in a reference to the administration's health care proposals. "When we can't afford the public health plan we have already, does it make sense to add more?"

House Republican leader John Boehner said the trustees report "confirms what we already knew: Our nation cannot afford to continue this reckless borrowing and spending spree."

The findings in the trustees report, the annual checkup given the two benefit programs, did not come as a surprise. Private economists had been predicting that the dates the programs would begin to pay out more than they take in and the dates the trust funds would be insolvent would occur sooner given the economic recession.

The deep recession, the worst the country has endured in decades, has resulted in a loss of 5.7 million jobs since it began in December 2007. The unemployment rate hit a 25-year high of 8.9 percent in April.

Fewer people working means less being paid into the trust funds for Social Security and Medicare.

The Congressional Budget Office recently projected that Social Security will collect just $3 billion more in 2010 than it will pay out in benefits. A year ago, the CBO had projected that Social Security would have a much higher $86 billion cash surplus for the 2010 budget year, which begins Oct. 1.

The trustees report projected that Social Security's annual surpluses would "fall sharply this year," then remain at a reduced level in 2010 and be lower in the following years than last year's projections. The report said that the Social Security annual surplus would be eliminated entirely in 2016, reflecting increased demands from the wave of 78 million baby boomers retiring.

That means Social Security will have to turn to its trust fund to make up the difference between Social Security taxes and the benefits being paid out beginning in 2016. The trustees projected the trust fund would be depleted in 2037, four years earlier than the 2041 date in last year's report.

At that point, the annual Social Security taxes collected would be enough to pay for three-fourths of current benefits through 2083. To tap the trust fund, the government would have to increase borrowing or raise taxes because Social Security bonds exist only as bookkeeping entries.

While the government is obligated to redeem those bonds, it has already spent the excess Social Security collections over the years to fund general government operations, providing the trust funds with IOUs.

While the smaller surpluses that will begin this year will not have any impact on Social Security benefit payments, the government will need to borrow more at a time when the federal deficit is already exploding because of the recession and the billions of dollars being spent to prop up a shaky banking system.

Medicare's condition is more precarious, reflecting the pressures from soaring health care costs as well as the drop in tax collections.

Obama on Monday praised the pledge by the health care industry to achieve $2 trillion in savings on health care costs over the next decade, but it was unclear how much help those pledges would be in achieving Obama's goal of extending coverage to some 50 million uninsured Americans. The administration is pushing Congress to pass legislation in this area this year, preferring to tackle health care before Social Security.

The trustees report is likely to set off renewed debate over Social Security and Medicare. Critics have charged that the Obama administration has failed to tackle the most serious problems in the budget — soaring entitlement spending.

The administration on Monday revised its federal deficit forecasts upward to project an imbalance this year of $1.84 trillion, four times last year's record, and said the deficits will remain above $500 billion every year over the next decade.

© 2009 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment See all 193 Comments
by rhs648 May 13, 2009 11:11 PM EDT
You Ditto Heads don't get it! The American People will NOT change or give up Social Security. I'm not going to go into how many MILLIONS of American's it has helped but go ahead.. TRY IT! Just TRY to trash it and see when the NEXT time is you will win an election... for ANYTHING. YOU and the rest of the Radical Right has been tossed on the scrap heap BECAUSE you refused to listen to the people and deal with the problems we face. Now all you can do is post STUPID statements like this.
Posted by skyk-2009

It is not a matter of giving up social security. It is a matter of insolvency resulting from government raiding the social security trust fund for decades and borrowing money from social security at zero interest and not investing the funds over the years. If social security and medicare become insilvent, there are only three choices. Drop them, raise taxes significantly, or make us work longer. None of the soliutions are great. This is not a Republican thing or a Democratic thing anymore. It is the survival of retirement money for millions of retired Americans and their health care.
Reply to this comment
by paddyhayes May 13, 2009 10:52 PM EDT
"The Republican has a job and pays taxes and the Democrat is holding their hand out for more freebies."

Interesting.

I wonder why I bothered to get up this morning to go to the job I don't have.

I wonder why I had to fill out all that tax paperwork for taxes I didn't pay.

I wonder what I've done with all of those handouts I've been given.
Reply to this comment
by sleepyric May 13, 2009 8:24 AM EDT
there would be a lot more people paying into the system if voters weren't so stupid as to vote Bush for 2 terms....he basically wasn't governing while he let the markets, banks, etc..go "cowboy" for 8 years resulting in this mess....you get what you vote for....
Reply to this comment
by Ichabod09 May 13, 2009 7:10 AM EDT
Looks like I have found a troll with the multiple IDs of:

Python
TruthisLife1
Informed1
Stuart2560
Reply to this comment
by nextgenman09 May 13, 2009 4:50 AM EDT
Oh, wow! What a surprise! Obama screwed something else up. We already knew it was bad, that was aresult of Clinton scuttling the Soc Sec Trust Funds. But now Obama is making it WORSE! He's supposed to be improving it!!!

It's really hard to think of anything that isn't worse since this guy seized power! I guess that what happens when you have "HOPE" instead of say "WISDOM" or a "PLAN"!
Posted by allylic at 11:44 PM : May 12, 2009
------

Yawn. Another ridiculous rant. Lets see, another nut expects sane people to believe that in a little over 100 days Obama made Social Security go from solvent to broke.

You guys are really not right in the head anymore.
Reply to this comment
by patocc123 May 12, 2009 10:19 PM EDT
GET CORPORATE AMERICA TO "CREATE JOBS" OR TAX THE LIVING H-E-L-L OUT OF THEM,
--------------------------------------
Wow, I wonder where the right get thier fire power from. Idiots like this sounds like he has the smarts to be a wall street exec. We should tax GM for all those layoffs. Maybe that will help the company out.
Reply to this comment
by SamTCat May 12, 2009 10:10 PM EDT
-----House Republican leader John Boehner said the trustees report "confirms what we already knew: Our nation cannot afford to continue this reckless borrowing and spending spree."-----

Once American Idol came back on, I stepped away from the boards to take a break from all the financial troubles this country is facing. So it's pretty hilarious to come back and see this guy still up to his annoying little tricks - blech!

I'm going back to immersing myself in AI. If anybody's got a moment, please vote for Adam Lambert if you can! Thx!

1-866-43657-03
1-866-43657-06
1-866-43657-09
Reply to this comment
by erasmus111 May 12, 2009 9:55 PM EDT
Well, obviously Stuart has some "issues" that need some professional attention.
Posted by mrcrosbyll at 5:43 PM : May 12, 20


And just who the hell do you think you are?
Posted by Stuart2560 at 6:32 PM : May 12, 2009

His real name is mrRacist. : )
Reply to this comment
by tincup356 May 12, 2009 9:24 PM EDT
Question : How many drug dealers - Now in prison
Were receiving Social Security Benefits when Arrested ?

Prison Official : All of Them
Posted by lastdance148 at 6:17 PM : May 12, 2009 .......................................regardless,,,of whatever ...If people paid in to social security from deductions on pay...they are entitled to every cent they paid in,,,,it shouldn't matter if they have committed crimes and are in prison .... the bottom line is ,,,they paid in that money and it is supposed to be theirs......If I had my way about it ..I would not be paying in as the money does not go where it is supposed to go,,,congress sees to that,,,they steal it for purposes of waging war and killing for profit, not for what it was intended...... and THAT is a crime called misappropriation of funds,,,and when done to the American citizen ,,,that becomes HIGH TREASON.
Reply to this comment
by bozworth4 May 12, 2009 9:19 PM EDT
The trust funds ? which exist in paper form in a filing cabinet in Parkersburg, W.Va. ? are bonds that are backed by the government's "full faith and credit" but not by any actual assets. That money has been spent over the years to fund other parts of government.

Just like anything the government runs, plunder and pillage, steal and rob, then raise taxes etc: for more money to do the same. Wake up comrade! We common workers will wear our peasant shirts and provide the luxuries for the ruling class, we will have to, or face certain torture or death. Get ready, this life is upon us. Won't need health care, no production, no food. Pretty simple to figure out. More than one form of slavery, only this time threw lack of resistance we will welcome any crumb the helpful government will give us, while all the real goods go to the rulers. See you all in the fields.
Reply to this comment
See all 193 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook