May 10, 2009

Don't Let The Court House Door Hit You

Schieffer Finds The Justice's Longstanding Disapproval Of Washington D.C. Unfathomable, And Unwelcome

  • Justice David Souter has made no secret of his displeasure with Washington, D.C. life, which has fueled his recent decision to retire from the Supreme Court.

    Justice David Souter has made no secret of his displeasure with Washington, D.C. life, which has fueled his recent decision to retire from the Supreme Court.  (AP Photo/Jim Cole)

  • Play CBS Video Video A Quiet Kind Of Justice

    Bob Schieffer commented on the retiring of Supreme Court Justice, David Souter. Schieffer describes Souter as the quietest man to serve on the Supreme Court.


(CBS)  Weekly commentary by CBS Evening News chief Washington correspondent and Face the Nation host Bob Schieffer.
David Souter may be the quietest and most low-key man ever to serve on the Supreme Court. He has made it official: He is retiring to return to the New Hampshire woods from whence he came.

By all accounts, he was a good Justice, thoughtful, reasonable.

For sure he was the surprise to the man who nominated him, the George Bush, who thought he was picking a conservative only to discover he had chosen a liberal. But these things happen sometimes when people get jobs for life.

I had no problem with the Justice's legal work. But as one who has lived 40
years in Washington, I'll be honest: I didn't care for his attitude.

He made it no secret that he hated the city, once describing his work as the best job in the world in the worst city in the world.

Another time he called life here "akin to an intellectual lobotomy."

Really? Our nation's capital? One of the most beautiful cities in the world?

Call me corny, but I have to confess, I've run into some pretty smart people here over the years, but then again I tried to get to know the city and its inhabitants. Who wouldn't if you were going to live in a place? Justice Souter, obviously.

I've never known anyone who ever saw him outside the court. But now he's leaving. I take it he won't miss Washington - but my guess is Washington will hardly miss him.

© MMIX, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 24 Comments
by skeezix06 June 27, 2009 12:05 PM EDT
This particular article was more or less a personal attack that was based not on Justice Souter's rulings but on Schieffer's personal dislike of an aspect of his character. That's unprofessional and wrong.
Reply to this comment
by garyl615 May 31, 2009 8:10 AM EDT
I don't miss Harry Schieffer . Ever since his wuss of a job when he interviewed Cheney.
Reply to this comment
by skeezix06 May 21, 2009 7:06 AM EDT
If this is a matter of a broken system it should be fixed. If it is a matter of getting mad and not wanting to see people's objections to your comments about Souter, some of which were politely stated, then you shouldn't have the comment feature on the page at all. Left as it is, you are losing respect.
Reply to this comment
by beekanzi May 20, 2009 11:09 AM EDT
Asf ar as I am concerned Mr Schieffer is right on the money. He has been there and knows all the rules of conduct. His elegance and experienec precedes him and gives him license. Admire him; dont disparage the grand master.
Reply to this comment
by skeezix06 May 17, 2009 1:39 PM EDT
p.s. Could you have someone other than Harry K. Smith next time? He's hardcore right and is one of the reasons I gave up trying to watch The Early Show.
Reply to this comment
by skeezix06 May 17, 2009 1:36 PM EDT
Have a nice vacation anyway.
Reply to this comment
by TrumbullStickney May 12, 2009 3:12 PM EDT
Schieffer's commentary is emblematic of how inane modern journalism has become. It is more about access than reporting and Schieffer is obviously miffed that he never got to interview Justice Souter. Let's take just one example from that poor piece of commentary: Schieffer quotes Souter as saying something derogatory about Washington, but surprise surprise, Justice Souter never said it! Of course, Schieffer didn't care about that little fact, he wanted to vent. Will CBS News ever return to the days when it stood for first-class journalism or is it just too late?
Reply to this comment
by doggril May 11, 2009 9:37 PM EDT
A justice on the Supreme Court during one of the most contentious periods of American history is retiring; and the best Schieffer can come up with is a whine that Souter didn't sufficiently love living in Washington? Are you guys kidding? Is this what you consider commentary of national relevance? I've read more thoughtful commentary in a high school yearbook.
Reply to this comment
by skeezix06 May 11, 2009 7:18 PM EDT
lol. Is this thing gonna get fixed?
Reply to this comment
by mswolfestock May 11, 2009 1:35 PM EDT
Will somebody cite the law or regulation wherein the Supreme Court Justices are required to have a bubbly, outgoing personality? . . . . . . . . . Good thing I'm not holding my breath. And who knows, maybe all of the Supreme Court Justices feel the same way he does about Washington DC. Maybe you'd better ask all of them, Bob.

Souter's only mistake was forgetting about this old saying:

"If you don't have anything good to say [about DC or anything else] then don't say it."

Supreme Court Justices have the same rights to free speech as the rest of us do. The problem comes from people like Schieffer who are ready to take offense at anything they don't agree with.

Hey Bob, I love ya, guy, but I think you spent too much time with that hideous creature Cheney. Lighten up, will ya?
Reply to this comment
See all 24 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Author Thomas Friedman on Obama's Afghanistan plan and the war on terror. Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: