BATON ROUGE, La., May 7, 2009

Porn Star Seeks New Stage: U.S. Senate

Stormy Daniels May Challenge La. Republican David Vitter, Whose Reputation Was Marred In D.C. Madam Scandal

  • Stormy Daniels joked to photographers,

    Stormy Daniels joked to photographers, "If you get any closer you're going to have to start tipping me."  (AP Photo/Bill Haber)

  • Interactive 111th Congress

    With Democrats in control in both chambers AND the White House, latest session convenes.

(AP)  Stormy Daniels strode onstage at a downtown Baton Rouge restaurant in a tight black blouse with a plunging neckline and a knee-length skirt in the popular purple of Louisiana State University. She introduced herself with a warning.

"For those of you who don't know who I am," she told the lunch crowd at The Roux House, "I'd suggest that you don't Google that until you get home from work."

She's a Louisiana-born porn star who says she is considering a 2010 run for the U.S. Senate seat currently held by Republican David Vitter, whose family-values reputation was marred in 2007 when his name was linked to a Washington prostitution ring.

Daniels, 30, insists she's serious. She's spending her own money on a "listening tour" to hear what people have to say as she considers a possible run, and said she isn't just starting a publicity stunt to promote her work or embarrass Vitter. However, she said she hasn't lived in Louisiana for seven years - she currently resides in Florida - and would need to re-establish residency to run.

She sprinkled her presentation Tuesday with the occasional joke ("If you get any closer you're going to have to start tipping me," she told a crowd of reporters and photographers) but she kept the topics serious.

Daniels' platform contains a few issues she probably has professional knowledge of - backing efforts to remove child pornography from the Internet and keeping minors from viewing adult material - as well as the bread-and-butter issues of many other candidates: Support for a national sales tax to replace the income tax and pushing to get troops home sooner from Iraq.

She doesn't want to take questions about Vitter. "I think it's about time David Vitter started answering David Vitter questions," she said.

Vitter has steadfastly refused to discuss the "serious sin" he confessed to after his phone number was linked to Deborah Palfrey, the so-called "D.C. Madam" who committed suicide as she faced prison time for running a prostitution ring that catered to the powerful. His office declined to comment Wednesday on Daniels' possible candidacy.

Vitter, 48, kept a low profile in the months after his scandal broke but has emerged as a chief critic of government bailouts and President Barack Obama's spending plans - popular stands in a state that went solidly for Republican John McCain in last year's presidential election.

He also has been aggressively fundraising, amassing $2.5 million in campaign funds for what will be his first re-election attempt since the Palfrey scandal broke. He won the Senate seat for the first time in 2004, spending more than $7 million to defeat four major opponents for the open position.

Noting Vitter's solid conservative stances and his healthy campaign account, Ed Chervenak, a political science professor at the University of New Orleans, doesn't think a Daniels candidacy would do much damage.

"It's probably going to be fairly easy for him to ignore her," he said.

"What it really shows is the lack of any real credible Democratic challenger," he added.

(AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)
Pollster and political consultant Bernie Pinsonat agreed. But he said a possible Daniels' candidacy could be a distraction if Vitter, seen at left, is challenged in next year's Republican primary.

"Is she a threat to beat him? No. Is she really going to run? I seriously doubt it," Pinsonat said. "But if I had my druthers and I was running the campaign of David Vitter, I would rather she not be there."

Louisiana Secretary of State Jay Dardenne has expressed interest in the GOP primary. Others reportedly considering a run are retired state Supreme Court Justice Chet Traylor, a Republican; and state Sen. Eric LaFleur and Shaw Group CEO Jim Bernhard, both Democrats. Nobody has announced.

If nothing else, a Daniels candidacy could bring color to the Senate campaign the way adult film star Mary Carey did as a candidate for governor in California's 2003 recall race, which Arnold Schwarzenegger won. And Daniels could restore the spectacle missing from Louisiana politics since the unabashed gambler, reputed womanizer and now-felon Edwin Edwards left the governor's office in 1996.

Edwards was succeeded by the staid Mike Foster, the grandmotherly Kathleen Blanco and the young policy wonk, Bobby Jindal. All are a far cry from other colorful characters from Louisiana's political past: the windmill-armed Depression-era orator, Huey Long; country-singing Gov. Jimmie Davis, who once rode up the Capitol steps on horseback; or Gov. Earl Long, Huey's brother, who openly cavorted with Bourbon Street stripper Blaze Starr in the 1950s.

Daniels, meanwhile, has not committed to a candidacy - or a political party.

She decided to explore a possible run after a draft movement started by fans after the Palfrey scandal broke, she said. "I completely ignored the whole thing for a while, and then I just got so much encouragement and feedback that I thought at the very least I owe it to myself and to the people to come out and see what they have to say."

At Mike Serio's Po-Boys & Deli in downtown New Orleans on Wednesday, the crowd was friendly but some seemed more interested in Daniels' film career.

"You look familiar. Not your face, though," said Jody Mathern, 51, a New Orleans man who said he works in the oil industry, drawing laughs from Daniels and a table full of oil patch workers. "She's a whole lot prettier than Vitter. But I still don't know what color her eyes are."

© MMIX The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 63 Comments
by johndevinejr June 14, 2009 10:53 AM EDT
How would she differ from the rest of the w h o r e s in Washington?
Posted by johndevinejr at 7:49 AM : Jun 14, 2009
Reply to this comment
by johndevinejr June 14, 2009 10:49 AM EDT
How would she differ from the rest of the ****** in Washington?
Reply to this comment
by OregonJames June 2, 2009 7:31 AM EDT
It is sad to say this, but I'd have just as much faith in her being a good senator as any of the neo-con republican out there, if not more.
Reply to this comment
by bbpkr May 8, 2009 11:19 PM EDT
roadking041, your characterization of Ms. Daniels and the four ladies who happen to be prominent Democrats hints strongly of the cesspool-bottom depth of your Sleazy "character".
You make typical rightwingnut trailer-trash RepugliCON lapdogs seem a Little better than subhuman.
The only "road" you're traveling is the one leading to HELL.
Reply to this comment
by stillwaters6 May 8, 2009 10:37 AM EDT
Hello Everyone.

Its a new day in the global market.

He who can produce a quality product for the lowest price WINS AND GRINS.... never mind increasing living standards...drive countries and companies out of business...after all American people are no different than anyone else. They want a high quality product for a low price. China has learned this and this is one reason why CHINA DEFLATES its currency (i.e. reduces its own standard of living) so that it can drive American companies out of business and even attract jobs from America to China. Folks, it will not be long before you purchase a GMC vehicle MADE IN CHINA.

We're not in Kansas TOTO

Whispering Thought...

When faced with NEW questions do you reply with OLD answers???

GO BO!
Reply to this comment
by May 8, 2009 7:30 AM EDT
This is so funny!

We have every kind of fruit, nut and flake in federal government today. Why would a porn star be so unusual.
Reply to this comment
by kansas1946 May 8, 2009 12:03 AM EDT
Noting Vitter's solid conservative stances and his healthy campaign account, Ed Chervenak, a political science professor at the University of New Orleans, doesn't think a Daniels candidacy would do much damage.
***************************

Just exactly would those "solid conservative stances" be?? The Larry Craig wide stance? The "let me attack everyone's morals except mine" stance.

Yes, I suppose the Republicans will vote for this guy. After all, he represents the Republicans party perfectly. An arrogant, pompous, hypocrite. Perfect fit. Enjoy, Lousianna.



Yes, I guess the Republicans will
Reply to this comment
by trueblueusa May 7, 2009 10:22 PM EDT
If She can UN-Seat a RE-CON

GO GO GO !!!!!
Reply to this comment
by ju78iklo9 May 7, 2009 10:12 PM EDT
Stormy, I think you're terrific. I thought your Google pics were erotic but bedroom normal. Perhaps consider working with a sex therapist to create a simple how-to best seller for couples seeking to keep their failing marriage hot. Are you every loving husband's dream? Just use Google pics. Although having sex with multiple partners may not be a wise idea, why not just follow your heart and teach marriage thearpy as a successful part of your future political career? Is your heart as beautiful as your body/face! God bless your ministry to marriages everywhere! Call me!
Reply to this comment
by scorp79 May 7, 2009 2:17 PM EDT
endurorob, You do make some valid points and I respect them. Some of them are very clever and have added to my insight.

But I just don't view the majority of our politicians as unpatriotic people who hate the country they were born and raised in. I view them as people in a goverment who are doing what they can to preserve American dominance in the world.. fool-heartedly or not.

And I do believe America will win this economic war with China, if the right moves are made. The wrong moves would be raising interest rates to strengthen the dollar. So what if our credit rating with the chinese ends up garbage. We are at war with them economically. We want to screw them! As long as we honor our debt to everyone else.

China is sitting on the largest reserve of American currency in the world.. and as much as they'd like to convert it to the euro.. or precious metal, they can"t.... cuz the dollar is so weak they'd get nothing for all that currrency.

What they will do is continue to hold the reserves until the dollar gains strength and then convert it. But let them wait that long.. hopefully by the time the dollar is stong, you'll have an economic collapse in china that will make the great depression look like a happy song and dance.. and at that point, when our # 1 compeditor is no more, we can raise interest rates and the chinese will then enjoy the fruits of converting that currency and using it to start all over again!
Reply to this comment
by ElectricBlue44 May 7, 2009 2:12 PM EDT
Probably has a better chance of winning a seat in the house than in the senate. Either way I hope she can get a legg up for a victory.
Reply to this comment
by scorp79 May 7, 2009 2:07 PM EDT
endurorob, you're only looking at the bottom end.. the employee/illegal alien side.

You're not looking at the corporate argument or the broader argument with respect to globalization.

America losing her wealth at unpresidented levels. And China is gaining wealth exponancially. We are fighting a losing battle with China, economically. President Bush ratched down the Fed interest rate so the value of the dollar would plummet. China was warned by the Bush adminstration to stop holding down the value of its dollar which was hurting our exports and causing a massive trade deficit.. Because the value of the dollar is so retardedly low, China is now the proud owner of the largest reserve of us currency that is worth SH*T right now, AND whats worse is that they have to keep financing us to keep their own economy from getting any worse than it actually is.

If you think we got problems, check out the millions upon millions of displace chineese workers and the massive stimulus packages being dished out by the people's republic
Reply to this comment
by endurorob May 7, 2009 2:03 PM EDT
Oh yeah, immigrants who are here unlawfully are not allowed to vote. So their benefit to the democratic party is only symbolic of a GOP that likes to exclude every group except Souther white christian men.

Posted by scorp79 at 10:56 AM : May 7, 2009
The benefit to the dems is the votes of the legal latino community that are, fro racial reasons, supportive of the illegal community and will vote for the dems because they seem to support illagals and the illegals also have children here that are legal citizens and grow up to vote dem.
Reply to this comment
by endurorob May 7, 2009 2:00 PM EDT
And when wages go up.. so to, does the cost of the product. That in turn, makes our exports less appealing overseas and has a negative impact on our GDP. Or, the profit the company is making from its product isn't able to sustain the higher wages demanded by your typical american, and the company flops all together.

Immigrant labor is nearly critical to our economy especially right now man. We are in the great unspoken war with China over who will be the pre-eminant superpower.. And cheap labor from south of the boarder is just another weapon in America's arsenal.

Oh yeah, immigrants who are here unlawfully are not allowed to vote. So their benefit to the democratic party is only symbolic of a GOP that likes to exclude every group except Souther white christian men.

Oh, and obviously we would have a GDP.. I was being sarcastic when I asked the question.
Posted by scorp79 at 10:56 AM : May 7, 2009

So you area o.k. with illegals coming here and working for next to nothing and sending most of that back to their home country while legal workers are sitting at home on unemployement or public assistance? We do not need to lower ourselves to the labor standards of other countries they need to raise theirs to meet ours.
Reply to this comment
by scorp79 May 7, 2009 1:56 PM EDT
And when wages go up.. so to, does the cost of the product. That in turn, makes our exports less appealing overseas and has a negative impact on our GDP. Or, the profit the company is making from its product isn't able to sustain the higher wages demanded by your typical american, and the company flops all together.

Immigrant labor is nearly critical to our economy especially right now man. We are in the great unspoken war with China over who will be the pre-eminant superpower.. And cheap labor from south of the boarder is just another weapon in America's arsenal.

Oh yeah, immigrants who are here unlawfully are not allowed to vote. So their benefit to the democratic party is only symbolic of a GOP that likes to exclude every group except Souther white christian men.

Oh, and obviously we would have a GDP.. I was being sarcastic when I asked the question.
Reply to this comment
by melpol1 May 7, 2009 1:45 PM EDT
High priced call girls and high salaried female executives deserve equal status. They both work in an upbeat environment that offers the best of material comfort. But expensive call girls are more independent than the female executive that answers to a boss. Beautiful and talented hookers have their own cliental and do not need anyone exploiting them. The low end of prostitution is not as glamorous. Very few of its ladies are able to break away from their pimp and enjoy the luxury of becoming a high priced and independent hooker.
Reply to this comment
by endurorob May 7, 2009 1:35 PM EDT
endurorob, if you are going to say i'm confused, state why. Everything i've said is grounded in fact and I can even sight sources if you'd like.
Posted by scorp79 at 10:23 AM : May 7, 2009

1. Economic benefits you say we gain from using illegal labor are false. A large part if the money they make leaves the country. The overtax our social systems to the point that in many areas, southern california most heavily, they have been the cause of emergency rooms shutting down. They are a tax burden to the rest of us.

2. The politicians, both sides have everyhting to gain from ignoring the illegal immigrant problem. The repubs benefit because their buddies in business benefit from the cheap labor and pass on their support to the politicians. The dems benefit bacause they gain support from the latino community and increase their voter base.

3. Yes if you slashed everthing from the GDP created by illegal labir we would still have a GDP. That comment is just ridiculous. Facts show that when a company is raided and the illegal labor is removed then the company is forced to go the legal route and hire legal labor and then wages go up.
Reply to this comment
by badbears May 7, 2009 1:30 PM EDT
I would never vote for her because Im from Michigan-- Now, if she would run for office in Michigan- I would vote for her. Family values start with sex-- if you dont have sex- how you gonna have a family. YOU GO GIRL
Reply to this comment
by fedup12 May 7, 2009 1:27 PM EDT
Porm star vs porm user.

Gotta love it!
Reply to this comment
by scorp79 May 7, 2009 1:23 PM EDT
endurorob, if you are going to say i'm confused, state why. Everything i've said is grounded in fact and I can even sight sources if you'd like.
Reply to this comment
See all 63 Comments
Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: