Scroll Left Scroll Right
May 12, 2009 4:33 PM

Was The Perfect Spy A Double Agent?

By
CBSNews
(CBS)  Sometimes history is shaped by unknown people who operate in the shadowy world of espionage. And this story of war, deception and murder has a plot worthy of a John le Carre novel.

Thirty-five years ago, the armies of Egypt and Syria launched a surprise attack against the state of Israel on Yom Kippur, the holiest day of the Jewish year. Militarily, it ended in a stalemate, but in practical terms the war changed the map and the politics of the Middle East.

At the center of it all is a little known story about one man who played a major role in the outcome. Strangely enough, he's a hero in both Egypt and Israel, considered by each of these former enemies to be their greatest spy ever.

The question is: who was Ashraf Marwan really working for? And who finally murdered him in London?



The first stories in the London papers were sketchy at best: a mysterious Egyptian had been found dead outside his London apartment under questionable circumstances. The name Ashraf Marwan meant nothing to most people in Britain - just another rich Arab who owned hotels and a part of a soccer team.

But to bestselling author Howard Blum, who came across Marwan while writing a book on the Yom Kippur War a few years back, and to students of the Middle East, Marwan was much more: an arms dealer with connections to a half a dozen intelligence agencies and a secret player on the world stage.

"What went through your mind when you found out that Marwan was dead? Did you believe he'd been murdered?" 60 Minutes correspondent Steve Kroft asked Blum.

"Yes, I believed very much that he was murdered. My next question was by whom," he replied.

"And that's a complicated question?" Kroft asked.

"That's a complicated question because Marwan was a complicated man," Blum said.

It's a tale rooted in nearly 40 years of history and a distant war. And as you will see, there are two different versions.

Both of them begin in 1969, not long after the Israelis routed invading Arab armies in the Six Day War, capturing the West Bank from Jordan, the Golan Heights from Syria, and the Sinai Peninsula from the Egyptians.

Another war, to recapture the lost territory, was already brewing when a tall, elegant 26-year-old Egyptian contacted Israeli intelligence in London and offered to provide them his country's most important military secrets.

"It was, for us, something unbelievable," remembered Major General Aharon Farkash, who until recently was Israel's director of military intelligence.

"In our work of intelligence we are very, very suspicious about everything. So we try to ask difficult questions about everything that he brought. And after years we understood this is a piece of gold," Farkash told Kroft.

"In the annals of spies for Israel, where does Marwan rank?" Kroft asked Aharon Levran, who at the time was one of Israel's highest ranking intelligence officers.

"He was the best. He was the best," Levran replied.

Levran was one of only a select few with access to the information that Marwan provided.

"It was a bonanza. It was a masterpiece of information," Levran said.

"Like having somebody?" Kroft asked.

"In the bed of the ruler," Levran replied.

Actually, Marwan was in the bed of the ruler's daughter. He was the son-in-law of Egyptian president Gamal Abdel Nasser, and Nasser's liaison to the Egyptian intelligence services.

"Why do you think he became an Israeli spy?" Kroft asked Levran.

"It was money, it was adventure. He was a special character," he replied.

The meetings took place at a London safe house near the Dorchester Hotel, under the direct supervision of the head of Mossad, the Israeli intelligence service.

According to the Israelis, part of Marwan's motivation was a deep hatred of the Soviet Union, Egypt's major ally, military patron and chief arms supplier. But the Israelis say Marwan also demanded more than $100,000 per meeting to finance what they claim was a lavish London lifestyle that included wine, gambling and women.

"He was for sale," Kroft remarked.

"In a way," Levran acknowledged.

"And Israel paid him very well," Kroft said.

"He was worth every penny," Levran replied.



Copyright 2009 CBS. All rights reserved.
Add a Comment See all 14 Comments
by eyemdope May 17, 2009 4:57 AM EDT
GDW666,

"He did? I thought it was Navy snipers. How much credit goes to he who says "go ahead". How much thought does that take?"

A lot of credit. By trivializing the decision, you appear rather ignorant of history with regard to leaders in crisis and how they respond being what defines them as great or poor leaders. There decision involved risks and you don't even acknowledge that had anything happened to the captain Obama would be the first to be blamed by types like you that are now hypocritically claiming his decision was a 'no brainer' and him not worthy of credit. Hindsight is always 20/20, and there were multiple options on the table for a successful rescue. He could have done what Sarkozy did, and negotiate a ransom, and after the hostages are returned to safety the pirates pursued and gunned down, and the ransom money retrieved. Carter was roundly blamed for the 444 days American embassy workers spent as hostages even though he eventually negotiated their release. He was blamed for the failed special forces mission even though its failure had nothing to do with him. Your claim that Obama deserves no credit for taking a tough stance against the pirates when such a choice is not obvious, especially if there was a more liberal president in charge, only reveals how disingenuous you're being.



"You mean release of a journalist that was subject of a show trial."

Yes, exactly that. Show trials result in successful conviction and subsequent punishment. She was released on appeal.

"Where was he when she was falsely arrested and then convicted?"

Are you really that ignorant of the details of what happened? It was only after her conviction when SoS Clinton expressed her displeasure and the Obama diplomats protested vigorously through back channels did Ahmadinejad intervene by writing a letter to the juror and requesting a fair and open appeals process be granted. Your questions reveal an ignorance that comes in spades. What do you mean where was he when the trial was happening? If you had read up on what had happened, the Iranian judiciary had good reason to believe that she was a spy, which is why the previous poster labeled her as such. But of course you remain ignorant of such details. As has already been reported widely, the lawyer that represented her in Iranian court revealed she was found in possession of a classified document detailing the plans for the invasion of Iraq by the US, prepared by a research agency for then president Khatami. She was also in possession of papers from the Iranian conservative political party and had made multiple trips to Israel. So Iranian officials had concrete reasons to believe she was involved in espionage. She also admitted under questioning that she had been approached by the CIA to work
for them but did not take it seriously. So whether she was a spy or not was debatable, but your claim that she absolutely was not is based on your own lack of knowledge on the incident. And questioning where Obama was in the first place when she was arrested, I'll help you out there as well. She was arrested in January before Obama was inaugurated. The dull limits of your knowledge is quite telling.

"Why? Did he work without his teleprompter?"

Once again, the constituents that represent the toothless party out of power on all levels of government rears its ugly jealous head because they've never had such a charismatic leader with such natural talent for oratory. FYI, every president such the teleprompter was made has used it. So why is it that GOP presidents have such difficulty using such a simple device? Of course you're threatened because Obama is proving to be a far better communicator than the supposed 'great communicator' himself, Reagan in case you didn't know. Plus, the oratorical skills of Obama and Clinton put that of the bush duo to utter shame. Why can't republicans learn how to use a teleprompter?
Reply to this comment
by mjlewis6 May 12, 2009 2:31 PM EDT
This is a contract disposal by a third party to eliminate any further damage.

Whatever was possible to be written, has been stymied. Marwan played
both sides to insure his viability and his lifestyle. THAT alone is motive
sufficient for a Third Party to eliminate him as a possible player in a larger
negotiated/posturing situation in the MIddle East....Syrians, Saudis, or
even another of the General's Group in Israel may have taken him out.

The biggest clues are in the walls and nearby apartments to Marwan's
to have seen his writing or know what he was doing....A fall is pretty
convenient, regardless of which group is involved, but sensitive enough
to have acted with the goal of making it an accident.
Reply to this comment
by ibsteve2u May 11, 2009 3:40 PM EDT
That is one of the perks of being a double-agent: Unless you are caught by and returned to the nation you are betraying so that the appropriate pounds of flesh can be extracted in public revenge, "national pride" - that thing that so many claim is sufficient reason alone for war - will ensure that your betrayal is kept secret.
Reply to this comment
by antoniof123 May 11, 2009 9:48 AM EDT
Looks to me like he made a lot of money off the two of them.

Morons they keep fighting only to bring death to their children.

They had better hope their children never wake up.
Reply to this comment
by edward1975-2009 May 11, 2009 9:00 AM EDT
Seems to me he had two idiot nations as clients.
Reply to this comment
by gdw666 May 11, 2009 8:18 AM EDT
"It's now common knowledge that the US has often used Murder Squads even Dick Cheney had a Assassniation Squad during the 8 years of the US crime wave to silent those who would tell the truth."

Then we can assume that you have a reference to this "common knowledge".
Reply to this comment
by gdw666 May 11, 2009 8:16 AM EDT
"Had the US not painted over the US flags on their jets & stopped the tank advance"

Nonsense. Never happened.

"there would be no Israel today"

Despite the Israeli butt-kicking of the Arab armies every time they attacked.

" Islam would not be warred on by the Bushies. "

There is no such war. Unless you want to hide behind a blasphemous interpretation of Islam so that you can kill.
Reply to this comment
by gdw666 May 11, 2009 8:13 AM EDT
"Kills pirates that kidnapped captian."

He did? I thought it was Navy snipers. How much credit goes to he who says "go ahead". How much thought does that take?

"Now secures the relaese of a convicted spy. "

You mean release of a journalist that was subject of a show trial. Where was he when she was falsely arrested and then convicted?

"Looks like he works well under pressure. "

Why? Did he work without his teleprompter?
Reply to this comment
by nextgenman09 May 11, 2009 4:44 AM EDT
The jewraelis are our worst enemies. They leech off US Taxpayer welfare (60 year welfare babies) and they spy on us. All the stereotypes are apparently correct.....
Reply to this comment
by mejordelahistoria May 11, 2009 4:41 AM EDT
and I thought that the greatest spy was 007 , chuck norris and vin diesel............ I guess there is a difference between fiction and reality.
Reply to this comment
See all 14 Comments
.
The Best of Andy Rooney on DVD. Order now! Order Now »
60 Minutes on Facebook