May 8, 2009 2:34 PM

FDIC Head Wants End To "Too Big To Fail"

By
CBSNews
(AP)  The head of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. says new powers are needed to oversee companies that pose financial risks to the economy, an authority that could be shared by the FDIC and other regulators.

In testimony at a Senate hearing Wednesday, FDIC Chairman Sheila Bair called for a new system of supervision that prevents institutions from taking on excessive risk and becoming so large their failure would threaten the financial system.

She suggested the Treasury Department, FDIC, Federal Reserve and Securities and Exchange Commission could be members of a new "systemic risk council" set up to monitor large institutions and potential risks to the system.

Bair stressed again that the "too big to fail" policy used by the government in the financial crisis must end.

"Our current system has clearly failed in many instances to manage risk properly and to provide stability," Bair said.

She maintains that a mechanism is needed to resolve troubled financial institutions similar to what the FDIC does with federally insured banks and thrifts.

"We're talking about a resolution and not a bailout," Bair told the Senate Banking Committee. If needed, big banks and other financial institutions should be broken up in those instances, she said.

Policymakers are trying to craft a new system of financial rules to replace the "too big to fail" stamp put on federal policy in the financial tumult, as the government rushed in to rescue insurance giant American International Group Inc., and pumped tens of billions of dollars into Citigroup Inc. and Bank of America Corp.

The Obama administration has presented to Congress an extensive overhaul of financial regulation meant to prevent a repeat of the banking crisis. A pillar of the plan is creating a so-called systemic regulator to monitor against the risks that plunged markets worldwide into distress last year.

A "council" of regulators would be better equipped than a single agency to exercise that oversight, writing rules and collecting data on large institutions that pose potential risk to the system, Bair said.

For taking over and resolving financial institutions, Bair said the FDIC is well equipped to do so. She suggested Congress could give the agency the authority to resolve bank holding companies like Citigroup or Bank of America — now under the supervision of the Fed. The FDIC now can take over and resolve only the subsidiaries of bank holding companies that take federally insured deposits.

Rep. Barney Frank, chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, and other lawmakers have proposed that the Fed assume the role of systemic regulator.

AP
Add a Comment See all 41 Comments
by ianlou May 9, 2009 2:31 PM EDT
Part of the "Too Big to Fail" policy should be a required "Bust up and Sell" policy.

A failing company deemed too big to fail, should not be allowed to continue to exist.
Reply to this comment
by godfirstcountrysecond May 7, 2009 10:50 AM EDT
The intorlerance some have of those who believe in God is not so shocking. It is well known that we will be persecuted. If you know anything about prophecy then you know what is next. Either you do not believe which is your choice or you are scared and know what you did not believe is actuality. Because those of us who know God are not afraid. I understand tolerance and that My right wing approche scares some but I also know that I like you have a right to my opinion and believe that racism comes in many forms.
Reply to this comment
by jbar116 May 6, 2009 7:35 PM EDT
Bush, Obama it doesn't matter the crooks in politics and running these corporations are one in the same; they all worked together and will work together in the future so the little guy has to stick together. The recent "Tea Party" was one example of what "We the People" can do if we band together. Suggestion, since City Bank needs 39Billion more lets take all of our money out of their stock and stop using their services. Let them see what it feels like to be SCREWED by they people who they are screwing. BREAK THEM UP and sell them off.
Reply to this comment
by bobnjersey May 6, 2009 4:18 PM EDT
[As to the person that suggested that big companies be broke up, I disagree with that too, again, let the market take care of itself and the chips fall where they may. Government should stay out of this entirely! ]
[Posted by aldon61 at 10:42 AM : May 6, 2009 ]

'the market taking care of itself' produced the cdo and cds scandals ... which were the predominant cause of the issues with the housing market ... and ultimately fed the whole downturn in the economy. investment banks deliberately created financial instruments to hide risk from the investor ... which is just the opposite of what they should be doing ... their value add is to mitigate risk for the investor.

while you're waiting for 'the market to take care of it' ... there will be many casualties along the side of the road to 'corrected' ... and this is what regulation and control is for ... to lessen the severity of these cyclical swings.

free market capitalism is a myth ... to be used as the subject of novels and economic professor dissertations.
Reply to this comment
by patocc123 May 6, 2009 4:01 PM EDT
Bipartisanship is just another word for political cover.
Posted by omega39-2009
-----------------------------------
I do not want Bipartisanship I want both political parties to go away. They are wants wrong with the country atm and the droves of lemmings that follow them blindly.
Reply to this comment
by omega39-2009 May 6, 2009 3:31 PM EDT
The republicans were too busy with thier head up thier ***** on the Iraq war to care or focus on this. The democrats who are just as much in bed with the finacial sector as the republicans were too busy running scared and making sure they where re-elected cause at the time the national atomsphere was your either for the war or your anti-american. Both sides are to blame. Plus again the democrats are to blame for this war too. No fillabuster proof congress . Nice key word there nowadays fillabuster. But yet they voted for it to get re-elected. The question I always find myself asking is . . Which is worse someone who does something wrong that doesn't know any better who someone who knows its bad and does it anyways for personnal gain. But alas the democrat supports are so blind nowadays that they are no better than the repubicans now.
Posted by patocc123 a

Bipartisanship is just another word for political cover.
Reply to this comment
by patocc123 May 6, 2009 3:11 PM EDT
So Clinton was supposed to take care of a Republican made problem? He didn't do it so everyone was absolved until another Democrat showed up? Are you saying the Republican War got in the way of everything including common sense and now it is back on a Democrat to fix things again?
Posted by WITHINMEANS
-------------------------------
Umm as President your suppose to fix the problems of the US so YES. I'm blaming both sides your giving a free pass cause its your guy when it should be our guy. Thats what is wrong with people who blindly follow people cause they have a "D" or "R" next to thier name. Plus yes the on the Iraq war . . . Listen if the republicans knew there was a problem and ignored it cause the dems said there was no problem then both parties are to blame. The republicans were too busy with thier head up thier ***** on the Iraq war to care or focus on this. The democrats who are just as much in bed with the finacial sector as the republicans were too busy running scared and making sure they where re-elected cause at the time the national atomsphere was your either for the war or your anti-american. Both sides are to blame. Plus again the democrats are to blame for this war too. No fillabuster proof congress . Nice key word there nowadays fillabuster. But yet they voted for it to get re-elected. The question I always find myself asking is . . Which is worse someone who does something wrong that doesn't know any better who someone who knows its bad and does it anyways for personnal gain. But alas the democrat supports are so blind nowadays that they are no better than the repubicans now.
Reply to this comment
by inventagod May 6, 2009 2:31 PM EDT
The bigger they are, the harder they fail.

Let them.
Reply to this comment
by antoniof123 May 6, 2009 2:18 PM EDT
Here is a fix start holding these corporate mobsters accountable instead of letting them hide behind the corporate legal entities put them in jail.

Better yet fire them then put them in jail.
Reply to this comment
by aldon61 May 6, 2009 1:42 PM EDT
Simply put, I agree with her. The free market will take care of itself. Investors should only risk capitol that they can afford to lose. Buyer beware! Don't bail out these rich investors with taxpayer dollars. As to the person that suggested that big companies be broke up, I disagree with that too, again, let the market take care of itself and the chips fall where they may. Government should stay out of this entirely!
Reply to this comment
See all 41 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook