Why Elizabeth Edwards Stands By John
She Reveals All In New Memoir
-
Play CBS Video Video Mrs. Edwards' Tell All Book Elizabeth Edwards wrote about her life with husband John in "Resilience." Psychologist Robi Ludwig explains to Maggie Rodriguez why some wives choose to stay with their cheating husbands.
-
Elizabeth Edwards appeared on The Early Show in 2008. (CBS)
Now Elizabeth Edwards, in her new memoir, "Resilience," reveals why she stood by her husband, former 2008 presidential hopeful, John Edwards, after she learned he cheated on her with a former campaign worker, Rielle Hunter.
Edwards, who has terminal breast cancer, appears on "The Oprah Winfrey Show" on Thursday to talk about her new book and how she learned Edwards was cheating.
In the taped interview, Edwards says John Edwards met then-42-year-old Hunter at a hotel. Her pickup line, according to Edwards, was "You are so hot."
Elizabeth says she cried, screamed and vomited when she learned of his infidelity. But even after John initially revealed the truth to Elizabeth -- just days after declaring his presidential run in 2006 -- she stayed with him.
"He should not have run," Edwards wrote in her book, adding that she wanted her husband to drop out to save her family from media scrutiny. The Edwards have three children: Cate, Jack and Emma Claire.
On The Early Show Wednesday, Dr. Robi Ludwig, psychologist and contributing editor of Cookie magazine, told co-anchor Maggie Rodriguez why many political wives stand by their cheating spouses.
"You know, (the wives) may understand that with these kinds of people -- these men are in the spotlight, they're very powerful, there are women throwing themselves at these kinds of men," she said. "I think, in some way, (these women) make a deal, whether it's conscious or unconscious, they understand that, if you enter into a political relationship, you might be dealing with a guy who might cheat, and to really keep the whole picture in mind. Do you want to maintain your life? Do you want to fight for a person you love? Maybe at the end of the day that's what's important."
Beth Frerking, senior editor of Politico.com, has a similar take on political wives.
"I think, when people ... go into politics or have ambitions to go into politics, they know that this is part of the package," she told CBS News correspondent Bianca Solorazno. "And I think really, it's the exception when that spouse leaves."
In the case of Elizabeth Edwards, Ludwig said there could be many reasons she stayed with John.
"...We have to give her credit, maybe she did make the right decision," Ludwig said. "You have to think about keeping the family intact, she has health issues, it's a business, too, they're a political couple. ... She probably loves him; when you love somebody, you understand the reasons they digress, and maybe it's not right, but...we don't know what their relationship looks like, really behind closed doors."
Rodriguez also asked about the possibility of a strong marriage after infidelity.
Ludwig assured that it's possible.
"An affair is like a conversation that you haven't had," Ludwig said. "You have to understand the symptoms, what contributed to the affair, and if you can understand that, get through that, then you can come out stronger at the end of the day."
And Elizabeth Edwards is still standing by her man now, Solorzano points out, even as the former candidate is reportedly under federal investigation for misuse of campaign funds -- more than $100,000 paid to his Hunter's production company.
John Edwards has denied any wrongdoing.
This is Elizabeth Edwards' second book. Her first memoir, "Saving Graces," focused on the death of her 16-year-old son, Wade, in a tragic car crash and her ongoing battle with cancer.
© MMIX, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie."





- 1
- 2
- next
See all 39 CommentsPosted by SoCalBruce at 10:07 PM : May 6, 2009
Yes, Republicans used to be more progressive than Democrats. But that hasn't been the case for a long, long time. The racist Southern Democrats of the 1960s became Republicans.
Posted by leeanna59 at 2:59 PM : May 6, 2009
The Democrats were the prevailing party in the South because Lincoln was a Republican.
And yet, how many southern black Republicans did you ever hear of?
Posted by leeanna59 at 2:59 PM : May 6, 2009
***********************
Sorry, leeanna59, Al Gore is from and lives in the great state of Tennessee!
I am appalled at the harsh comments directed at Elizabeth Edwards. Her political affiliation has no bearing on this story whatsoever. She is a woman with recurring terminal breast
cancer, who has been dealt a lot of heartache in her life. Just the fact that she lost a 16 yr old son and managed to cope with that loss means she is worthy of my respect. I fear none of us would fare very well if we had to live in glass houses.
I wish Elizabeth Edwards the very best that life can offer her at this point. If talking about her hardships in this life helps her deal with, who are we to judge her.
NONE of her problems have been through some fault of her own...loss of a child, recurring cancer, and an unfaithful spouse. She should have our admiration, not our scorn. Shame on some of you for your disgusting comments.
Posted by itsjustathought
When ever Libs want to trash the Republicans, they always trash the South. I'm not from the South, but I have lived there and I found it to be quite lovely.
Let's see, I expect that no one from the Dems is from the South? Oh wait, John and Elizabeth live in the Carolinas, Al Gore lives in Kentucky, and Bill Clinton was from Arkansas. So, why is that the South is trashed only when talking about Republicans? Apparently all the southern Democrats are above reproach?
Posted by itsjustathought at 1:15 PM : May 6, 2009
And what about that toe-tappin' Craig? Huh? What about that?
Democrats jump with glee at a character scandal involving the GOP.
But when it's one of their own, it's just "noboody'd perfect, why can't you just leave her alone, boo hoo."
Nice double standard, libs.
Democrats think Democrats can do no wrong.
But they bash Bush for every burned out lightbulb in the past 8 years.
That's why.
Is she even sane?
I thought she was terminally ill? What's up with that? Did she have a pimple on her boob and use it as an excuse to get the sympathy vote?
- 1
- 2
- next
See all 39 Comments