Study: Dog Food Tastes Just Like P?t?
Sync also allows Bluetooth audio streaming, but the information displayed is minimal.
Back to review. / Josh Miller/CNET
If the recession gets worse, we may be eating dog food for dinner.
Don't laugh. It's apparently tastier than you'd expect.
In the last few years, organic dog food made with human-grade free range meat and fresh vegetables has spiked in popularity among health-conscious shoppers. Some companies even claim, for instance, that "humans actually taste our foods, as part of our QC process!"
What's surprising is that some of the new organic dog foods taste as good as (or as bad as) similar human foods, like liverwurst and duck liver mousse, according to a working paper circulated on Friday by the American Association of Wine Economists.
The paper is titled "Can People Distinguish Pâté from Dog Food?" and it concluded that, well, they can't.
These enterprising researchers separately put organic Canned Turkey & Chicken Formula for Puppies/Active Dogs, duck liver mousse, pork liver pâté, liverwurst, and spam in a food processor. The resulting confection was ladled into five different bowls and garnished with parsley.
The volunteers in this culinary experiment didn't exactly prefer the dog food, but they couldn't identify it either. "Only 3 of 18 subjects correctly identified sample C as the dog food," the paper says.
The authors conclude that: "Although human beings do not enjoy eating dog food, they are also not able to distinguish its flavor profile from other meat-based products that are intended for human consumption."
The lesson? Presentation matters. Expectations matter. And, perhaps, that organic dog food is better than you think.
Which is why blind taste tests are so useful; Trader Joe's $2-or-$3-a-bottle Chardonnay won a blind test in California against formidable competition. Another working paper published by the wine economists' group found that, as you might expect, people give higher ratings to wine if they're told it's more expensive.
By Declan McCullagh
Copyright 2009 CBS. All rights reserved. Don't laugh. It's apparently tastier than you'd expect.
In the last few years, organic dog food made with human-grade free range meat and fresh vegetables has spiked in popularity among health-conscious shoppers. Some companies even claim, for instance, that "humans actually taste our foods, as part of our QC process!"
What's surprising is that some of the new organic dog foods taste as good as (or as bad as) similar human foods, like liverwurst and duck liver mousse, according to a working paper circulated on Friday by the American Association of Wine Economists.
The paper is titled "Can People Distinguish Pâté from Dog Food?" and it concluded that, well, they can't.
These enterprising researchers separately put organic Canned Turkey & Chicken Formula for Puppies/Active Dogs, duck liver mousse, pork liver pâté, liverwurst, and spam in a food processor. The resulting confection was ladled into five different bowls and garnished with parsley.
The volunteers in this culinary experiment didn't exactly prefer the dog food, but they couldn't identify it either. "Only 3 of 18 subjects correctly identified sample C as the dog food," the paper says.
The authors conclude that: "Although human beings do not enjoy eating dog food, they are also not able to distinguish its flavor profile from other meat-based products that are intended for human consumption."
The lesson? Presentation matters. Expectations matter. And, perhaps, that organic dog food is better than you think.
Which is why blind taste tests are so useful; Trader Joe's $2-or-$3-a-bottle Chardonnay won a blind test in California against formidable competition. Another working paper published by the wine economists' group found that, as you might expect, people give higher ratings to wine if they're told it's more expensive.
By Declan McCullagh
Popular in SciTech
- Chinese supercomputer named world's fastest
- Airborne laser reveals hidden city in Cambodia
- Valentina Tereshkova: First woman in space 13 Photos
- NASA picks 8 new astronauts, 4 of them women
- Solar plane lands at Dulles Airport Play Video
- Russian tycoon seeks human immortality by 2045
- "Tweet" added to Oxford English Dictionary
- NASA unveils plans to capture asteroids
b2busa@usa-ham.com
Hint it tastes like cheap corn beef hash. :)
I feel the same way about baby food.
Do they dislike the story simply because they think it is "gross"? (Should watch Mel Gibson's "Road Warrior", in that case; a dark future where a can of dog food is a tasty treat!)
Do they dislike the story because they fear their own economic situation may force them to accept the idea?
Do they dislike the story because their atrophied consciences twinge at their having just come home from an anti-tax tea-bagging?
Do they dislike the story because they foresee the consequences of three decades of Republican malfeasance including dog food for the masses?
Posted by dottybgood at 11:28 PM : May 4, 2009
The can of dog would would be a more nutritious (that means, more likely to keep you alive) choice than any of the substitutes you proposed.
intelligent animals and mammals such as dolphins and orcas , and eagles, etc. are trying to survive in this world we humans have not been good stewards of, that is You if you are not a caring person an
you know whoyou are ! U sit at yer PC and dont do squat to help ! Wake the hell up !
How can you be a better person in regards to helping save this world from starvation? Think ! and Do anything to help !