May 1, 2009

Obama Hopes To Replace Souter By October

President Says He Will Consult Both Parties, Wants New Justice To Share His "Constitutional Values"

  • Play CBS Video Video Finding Souter's Replacement

    President Obama still needs to choose a replacement for Justice David Souter and the debate on many issues will determine who will be picked. Kimberly Dozier reports.

    • President Barack Obama, in a unexpected visit to the White House pressroom Friday, May 1, 2009, tells reporters that he just got off the phone with Supreme Court Justice David Souter and they talked about Souter's retirement.

      President Barack Obama, in a unexpected visit to the White House pressroom Friday, May 1, 2009, tells reporters that he just got off the phone with Supreme Court Justice David Souter and they talked about Souter's retirement.  (AP Photo/Ron Edmonds)

    • U.S. Supreme Court Justice David Souter was the nation's 105th justice.

      U.S. Supreme Court Justice David Souter was the nation's 105th justice.  (AP Photo/Jim Cole)

    Previous slide Next slide
  • Interactive The Supreme Court

    History, traditions and key cases, plus what it takes to get on the bench.

(CBS/ AP)  President Barack Obama said Friday he will replace retiring Supreme Court Justice David Souter with someone who shares the president's respect for "constitutional values" and hopes to have "him or her" seated on the highest U.S. court by the start of its next term in October.

The departure of Souter, part of the court's liberal wing, is unlikely to change the ideological balance of a court that became more conservative during George W. Bush's presidency. Mr. Obama's first pick is likely to be a liberal-leaning nominee.

In a dramatic flourish, Mr. Obama interrupted spokesman Robert Gibbs' daily press briefing to announce that he had just talked to Souter. The news of Souter's planned retirement had broken by then, but the White House had said nothing until the president came in.

Mr. Obama thanked Souter for his dedicated service, and quickly looked ahead to the nomination of a replacement.

"As I make this decision," Mr. Obama said, "I intend to consult with members of both parties, across the political spectrum. And it is my hope that we can swear in our new Supreme Court justice in time for him or her to be seated by the first Monday in October."

Souter informed Mr. Obama of his plans in a brief letter Friday. Mr. Obama praised Souter, who is leaving after nearly two decades in Washington. His retirement gives Obama his first pick for the Supreme Court three months into office.

"It's not a terrible shock that Souter would be leaving. He has perennially be one of the names listed when folks think about potential retirements," said CBS News legal affairs analyst Andrew Cohen.

The vacancy could lead to another woman on the bench to join Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, currently the court's only female justice.

At 69, Souter is much younger than either Ginsburg, 76, or Justice John Paul Stevens, 89, the other two liberal justices whose names have been mentioned as possible retirees. Yet those justices have given no indication they intend to retire soon and Ginsburg said she plans to serve into her 80s, despite her recent surgery for pancreatic cancer.

In Philadelphia, Sen. Arlen Specter said he would like to see more ethnic and gender diversity on the high court. "I think that, given the proportion of women in our society, that one out of nine is underrepresented," said Specter, a recent convert to the Democratic Party. "The court could use some diversity along a number of lines," he added, mentioning African-Americans and Hispanics.

Immediately, speculation has swirled over his possible replacements. Interest groups immediately began gearing up.

"Obama's own record and rhetoric make clear that he will seek left-wing judicial activists who will indulge their passions, not justices who will make their rulings with dispassion," said Ed Whelan, president of the conservative Ethics and Public Policy Center.

Nan Aron, president of the liberal Alliance for Justice, said, "We're looking for President Obama to choose an eminently qualified candidate who is committed to the core constitutional values, who is committed to justice for all and not just a few,"

Some of the names that have been circulating include recently confirmed Solicitor General Elena Kagan; U.S. Appeals Court Judges Sonya Sotomayor, Kim McLane Wardlaw, Sandra Lea Lynch and Diane Pamela Wood; and Leah Ward Sears, chief justice of the Georgia Supreme Court. Men who have been mentioned as potential nominees include Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick, Harvard Law professor Cass Sunstein and U.S. District Judge Ruben Castillo of Chicago.

Sotomayor, a federal appeals court judge in New York, would also be the first Hispanic on the Court as would as would Wardlaw, a California-based appeals judge, reports CBS News senior political correspondent Jeff Greenfield.

Obama has hinted he'd like to see folks with real life experience - political experience - on the bench, a different kind of diversity. This used to be commonplace: William Howard Taft was an ex-president; Earl Warren was a governor; Hugo Black was a senator; and Arthur Goldberg was a Cabinet member, reports Greenfield

If that's where Obama is going, maybe he will select Deval Patrick or Jennifer Granholm, governor of Michigan, and a former attorney general of her state, Greenfield said.

"Six weeks ago, when asked about a potential Supreme Court nomination, a senior Administration official told reporters that the White House is looking for people with experience in law and in life, people with character and commitments to a community, people who can make hard decisions but still have empathy for the litigants before them," Cohen said.

The Obama White House began from almost its first days in office preparing for the possibility of a retirement by thinking about and vetting potential high court nominees. Those efforts only accelerated with Ginsburg's cancer surgery.

The timing may have been unexpected, but Souter has long yearned for a life outside Washington.

He has never made any secret of his dislike for the capital, once telling acquaintances he had "the world's best job in the world's worst city." When the court finishes its work for the summer, he quickly departs for his beloved state of New Hampshire.

When the first President Bush appointed him, Souter was sold as a law-and-order kind of conservative. It wasn't to be, reports CBS News correspondent Wyatt Andrews.

"Justice Souter ended up being a big disappointment to the conservatives," said Wendy Long of the Judicial Confirmation Network. "He became very enamored with sort of elitist liberal outcomes."

Souter in fact outraged conservatives - and made legal history - with his decisive vote to solidify abortion rights and uphold Roe vs Wade in 1992, Andrews reports. Souter then grew consistently liberal - allowing affirmative action in college admissions, allowing the Guantanamo detainees access to federal courts and voting against the right of D.C. residents to own handguns.

"We constantly reexamine what the Constitution requires," Souter once said.

Souter is the court's 105th justice, only its sixth bachelor. He works seven days a week through most of the court's October-to-July terms, a pace that he says leaves time for little else. He told an audience this year that he undergoes "an annual intellectual lobotomy" each time the court resumes its sessions.

National Public Radio first reported Souter's plans Thursday night.



© MMIX, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 201 Comments
by USA_Constitution May 4, 2009 11:51 AM EDT
Good riddens!
Reply to this comment
by weedapeapl May 3, 2009 9:21 PM EDT
7/11 is hiring. FREE SLURPEES!
Posted by gravypants at 4:06 PM : May 3, 2009

Does that mean you'll be changing your screen name to slurpeepants soon?
Reply to this comment
by noloyalisti May 3, 2009 1:11 PM EDT
The conservative movement has been working for a religious theocracy in this country for a long time. The Christian fascists already have far too much power. The conservatives have been working against the Constitution during the last Bush Crime Family administration of lying and hiding government from the people while big corporations started invasions for oil and wrote our energy policy.

Time for progressive and liberal change on the Court
Reply to this comment
by SanityPlease May 3, 2009 2:11 AM EDT
And the neoCommies are swooning even though the economy has tanked under Obama's watch
Posted by libRidiots at 11:41 AM : May 2, 2009

Typical Rush Limpaw follower, make a catastrophic mess of this great country, then blame it all on the other guy. SICK. SICK. SICK.

Its no wonder majority of the electorate has had it with you. You are history, my friend, quit grasping at straws to float yourself, you are trash and the whole world know it.
Reply to this comment
by slownewsday05 May 3, 2009 1:15 AM EDT
Actually this is Mccain08nc and me a slow have conversed many times! I have had conversations with you I actually agree with you more then Slow on most ocasions.
Posted by stimporksuks

I can imagine. Regardless, I really like having people who can find a few common points, and turn that into a chance to hear other views in a somewhat sane environment. Not too many CAPITAL LETTERS TONIGHT, you know? Kinda nice for a change.
Reply to this comment
by slownewsday05 May 3, 2009 1:11 AM EDT
It appears SND was talking to one of his nics .........
Posted by TheMasses01

It's a nervous habit, Masses. I can't help it.

Actually, stimporksuks had been mc08nc (shortened, for a really lame attempt at anonymity) pre-format-change.

It's late there!
Reply to this comment
by TheMasses01 May 3, 2009 12:58 AM EDT
HA!


:)
Reply to this comment
by TheMasses01 May 3, 2009 12:57 AM EDT
It appears SND was talking to one of his nics .........
Reply to this comment
by slownewsday05 May 3, 2009 12:41 AM EDT
I will! Enjoy the rest of the weekend and I'll a have a cold one for you tomorrow.

Good Night!
Posted by stimporksuks

Will do, and thanks... See you tomorrow if you're around!
Reply to this comment
by slownewsday05 May 3, 2009 12:39 AM EDT
So what happens if we get a majority conservative Supreme court and they interpret that practice as murder should we go back and prosecute the justices that ruled different and maybe all the doctors who perform abortion.

Posted by stimporksuks

My brain is just about done for the day, but if you'll be around tomorrow, I've copied both questions so I can answer a bit better when I'm more awake...

I think reverse prosecutions are often out - kind of a grandfathering thing. But I do get the point. You gonna be around tomorrow, too?
Reply to this comment
See all 201 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Tempers Flare In Climate Change Flap

    (673 recent comments)

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
  • Kennedy Center Honors Kennedy Center Honors

    Stars and Politicians Step Out to Honor Bruce Springsteen, Robert DeNiro, Mel Brooks and More

  • Return to Toyland Return to Toyland

    Behind The Scenes: Singer Emily Osment, The "Big" Piano and More From Inside FAO Schwarz

  • 2009 L.A. Car Show 2009 L.A. Car Show

    Concepts, Hybrids and Alt-Fuel Vehicles

  • Verdict In Italy Verdict In Italy

    American Amanda Knox and Italian ex-boyfriend Found Guilty in Murder of British Student

  • Celebrity Circuit Celebrity Circuit

    "Everybody's Fine" in New York; Plus, Matt Damon, Madonna and the Jonas Brothers

  • Day in Pictures Day in Pictures

    A Glimpse at the Day's News as Seen Through a Camera Lens

Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: