Dow
     -89.23
12801.23
-0.69%
|
     -9.31
1342.64
-0.69%
|
     -108.90
14000.51
-0.77%
|
     -23.35
2903.88
-0.80%
|
     -1.03
53.27
-1.90%
|
     +1.09
116.27
+0.95%
|
     +0.01
2.01
+0.42%
April 28, 2009 2:29 AM

GM To Shed 21,000 Jobs, Pontiac Brand

(CBS/AP)  The storied Pontiac brand is dead and more car factories and jobs are about to disappear - the latest casualties of a massive restructuring plan that GM is counting on to help it stave off bankruptcy protection.

The struggling automaker was to announce details of its plan at 9 a.m. EDT Monday as it makes an offer to its bondholders to swap debt for company stock. The plan was to include losing the Pontiac brand by 2010 and slashing 21,000 hourly jobs in the U.S., the company confirmed Monday, before the official announcement.

GM owes $28 billion to large and small bondholders, and under Securities and Exchange Commission rules, it must disclose its operational plans when it makes an exchange offer.

The Presidential Task Force on the Auto Industry released a statement Monday saying the Obama administration "has made no final decision regarding the treatment of its current loan to GM or with respect to any future investments in the company."

"Today's bond exchange filing represents an important step in GM's effort to restructure its company. The interim plan that GM laid out in this filing reflects the work GM has done since March 30 to chart a new path to financial viability. We will continue to work with GM's management as it refines and finalizes this plan and with all of GM's stakeholders to help GM restructure consistent with the President's commitment to a strong, vibrant American auto industry," read the statement from the White House.

Pontiac, brand of the Trans Am sports car, had been selling cars for 83 years. Within three years, half a million Pontiacs were sold, and the brand quickly grew in popularity, from early models like the Chief and the Master Six Coupe, to the Bonneville convertible, to the GTO - one of America's first muscle cars and so popular it inspired Ronny and the Daytonas to immortalize it in song.

But efforts in the last few years to market Pontiac as performance-oriented brand failed. The company had said it wanted to keep Pontiac as a niche brand with one or two models, but is buckling under tremendous government pressure to consolidate its eight brands, several of which lose money.

The company also has decided to close more factories than the five it announced in February, the two people said, asking not to be identified because the plan has not yet been made public. But the locations of the doomed factories will not be identified Monday.

One of the people said GM will list specific numbers of blue-collar job cuts, and announce another round of U.S. salaried job cuts beyond the 3,400 completed last week.

Chief Executive Fritz Henderson has said the company will go further and faster in making its cost cuts to reduce the number of cars and trucks it needs to sell to break even.

The sources said GM won't have much new information on Hummer, Saturn or other brands, including Europe's Opel. GM has indicated it wants to focus on four core brands, Chevrolet, Cadillac, GMC and Buick.

Also to be announced Monday will be a target number for dealer reduction, as well as details of GM's bond exchange offer. Exact numbers were not available Sunday night.

The news conference will include Chief Executive Fritz Henderson, Chief Financial Officer Ray Young, North American President Troy Clarke and Mark LaNeve, vice president of North American sales and marketing.

GM is living on $15.4 billion in government loans and faces a government-imposed June 1 deadline to restructure or go into bankruptcy protection.

The government's restructuring demands include swapping at least two thirds of GM's unsecured bond debt for equity in the company. Such a move would help GM straighten out its debt-laden balance sheet.

Chrysler LLC, which is living on $4 billion in government loans and is expected to get $500 million more, faces a Thursday deadline to restructure and ink an alliance deal with Italian automaker Fiat SpA. The government also wants Chrysler to exchange much of its $6.9 billion in debt for equity in the company, but with the deadline fast approaching, Chrysler and its secured debtholders remain far apart.

Both GM and Chrysler also must win concessions from the United Auto Workers union.

The UAW said late Sunday it reached agreement on concessions with Chrysler, Fiat and the U.S. government. Fiat CEO Sergio Marchionne was in the U.S. as talks continued for the automaker to take a 20 percent stake in Chrysler in exchange for its small-car technology.

© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Add a Comment See all 112 Comments
by growlll April 29, 2009 12:05 PM EDT
I am not betting on lesser quality standard with the GM vs a Toyo. Go look at any Toyo forums on line and look at the huge lists of issues, recalls and lemon buy backs.
Reply to this comment
by venkata4--2008 April 29, 2009 10:35 AM EDT
" Best wishes.
Posted by Sky017 at 9:30 PM : Apr 28, 2009 "

I agree to most of your postings. We need to add Toyota, Honda, Hyundai do not have unionized labor. When 3 Detroit autos investing more than 3+ billions to build big gas guzzling trucks, Toyota was investing billions to get it's Prius out. 10 years ago there are no GM models to compete with Accord or Camry. 3 autos opened their eyes only 5 - 7 years ago to change their mid sized sedan to compete with with that of Japanese.

Last government is most interested in getting profits to big oil , defense suppliers, banks & pharmaceuticals, Detroit 3 made a mistake in supporting that Govt. and hence $4+ ga at the pump that driven people out of big trucks.
Reply to this comment
by 850Rick April 29, 2009 1:51 AM EDT
[Congratulations to the government for wiping out American manufacturing jobs and promoting outsourcing of these jobs to India and China. Congratulations to American car buyers for their addiction to Japanese and German cars. Today, most Americans have little regard for buying goods that are 'Made in the USA'. Instead they gorge on cheap-quality junk that is 'Made in China'. Thanks to all of you for putting our economy in the dumps. ]
[Posted by fdx22 at 10:28 PM : Apr 27, 2009 ]

Did you know that Toyota Camrys are made in the USA on American assembly lines by American workers? Yet why is it that an American car made on the same assembly line is built of lesser quality standards? Hmmm. Figure that one out.
Reply to this comment
by Sky017 April 29, 2009 12:30 AM EDT
Posted by hollysbaby at 12:55 AM : Apr 28, 2009
------------------------------------------------------------------

[==> My (Sky017) comments are interspersed:]
* GM's brands (Cadillac, Chevrolet, Buick, Pontiac), representing 80 percent of our total volume, are ranked above industry average as measured by 2008 J.D. Power Initial Quality.

==> Initial quality is not as important or relevant as total ownership quality.


* GM and Ford tied for the leadership position in the 2008 J.D. Power Initial Quality Study ? 11 models ranked in the top three of their respective segments.

==> Ditto... *Initial* quality is not as important or relevant as total ownership quality.


* Since 2002 GM has earned 65 percent of all J.D. Power North/South America assembly plant quality awards (more than all other manufacturers combined.)

==> Not sure how relevant this 'assembly plant' award is. Seems like a KITCHEN award, but to what extent do customers award / like the FOOD?


* Since 2006, the total number of warranty repairs at GM dealerships have been reduced by 48 percent.

==> Paul is $10,000 in debt, and Larry has $300 in the bank. Since 2006 Paul has reduced his debt to $5,200 or by 48%. Larry now has $670 in the bank. Who is better off, Paul or Larry?


* GM dealers are among the best in the industry when it comes to a quality experience for customers. Since 2004, all GM brands have ranked above the industry average and better than many of the top Asian brands according to J.D. Power and Associates Customer Satisfaction Index and Sales Satisfaction Index.
==> OK ... [Sounds like GM navel-gazing to me.]

* General Motors is the best-selling automaker in the U.S. (2.98 million vehicles v. 2.2 million Toyota vehicles sold in 2008) and leads Toyota in 20 of the top 22 global markets (Toyota leads in Japanese and Australian markets).
==> Why cherry pick metrics? Sigh... Look at the breadth of vehicles GM has compared to Toyota. GM should be much further ahead. How many trucks does GM have? 12. Toyota? 2.


* Domestic automakers made up 47% of the U.S. vehicle market last year, as compared to a combined 34% for Toyota, Honda and Nissan.
==> Why just Toyota, Honda and Nissan? What about Volvo, Hyundai, VW, Kia, BMW etc?

* Twelve of the top 20 best-selling vehicles in the U.S. in March 2009 are built by domestic automakers, including the top two best-selling trucks: the Ford F-series pick-up and the Chevrolet Silverado pick-up. Domestic passenger cars, like the Chevy Impala, Chevy Malibu and Ford Fusion, all outsold the Toyota Prius. (See Wall Street Journal sales chart).

==> OK, again the scope has changed... from GM to "Domestic Automakers". Again, the breadth of vehicles the domestic automakers offer (which is part of their downfall) does not lead to fair comparison. Again, comparing apples and oranges... the Chevy Impala outsold the Prius... OK, but they are in different segments. Impala vs Avalon, Malibu vs Camry, Fusion (not even made by GM) GM does not have a car to compete with the Prius.


* The Chevy Malibu was awarded the 2008 Car of the Year among international automotive journalists, the second consecutive year a GM vehicle has won this prestigious award (Saturn Aura won in 2007).
==> And Slumdog Millionaire got the award (Oscar) for Best Picture. I think Batman (The Dark Knight) made WAY more money though.

* The Cadillac CTS was named Motor Trend's 2008 Car of the Year.
==> Isn't Cadillac one of the 4 brands we agreed to keep? Why are we looking at this? Bob (GM) is in the Emergency Room at the hospital, with multiple gun-shot wounds to the chest, has lost a lot of blood, pulse is weak, and he is fading in and out of consciousness. During one of his moments of consciousness Bob smiles at the Doctors and Nurses and says... "Nice biceps eh?"


* GM offers 20 vehicles that get 30 mpg or more on the highway, more than any other automaker.
==> Why 30 mpg (or more)? Hasn't GM been stuck around there for a LONG time?

* By mid-2009, GM will have nine hybrid models in the market, more than any other automaker.
==> Nine hybrid models... is this going to be like how there are now 12 trucks at GM while Honda has 1, the Ridgeline; or Toyota 2, Tundra and Tacoma?
How many iPhone models are there? How many do you need to be successful?

* Improved internal combustion powertrains, which can squeeze more miles from each gallon of gasoline or diesel;
==> GM is behind in electrics.
smithelecticvehicles.com

* Flex-fuel vehicles and investments in advanced biofuels;
==> Where is the focus?

* Electrically-driven vehicles like the Chevy Volt, which is scheduled to go into production in 2010

==> Two vehicles: Tesla Model S. BYD E6. (Google them)
treehugger.com/files/2008/04/byd-electric-car-e6-crossover-mpv.php


Best wishes.
Reply to this comment
by Sky017 April 28, 2009 10:44 PM EDT
Look at the 2009 Malibu, that is just a copy of the Camry (shape) and Accord.................
--------------------------
Posted by hollysbaby at 1:03 AM : Apr 28, 2009:

Looks fairly competitive.

2009 CHEVROLET
MALIBU
MSRP: $21,605
Competitively
Equipped: $22,325
Fuel Economy Highway (mpg) 30


2009 TOYOTA
CAMRY
LE 5-Spd AT
MSRP: $21,650
Competitively
Equipped: $23,020 + DPI
Fuel Economy Highway (mpg) 31

2009 HONDA
ACCORD SEDAN
LX 5-Spd AT
MSRP: $21,705
Competitively
Equipped: $22,375 + DPI
Fuel Economy Highway (mpg) 30

Competitive in terms of dollars and MPG, but there are 4 other factors which the public uses which are difficult to represent in dollars:

1. Overall Ownership experience - How much hassles you'll have and how many times you'll want to kick your car or your dealer? I have personally heard parents tell their children, "Get a Japanese car, or an American truck". Heard the same from colleagues at work.

2. The culture now is that copying styles (clothing) is for losers. If Malibu pioneered the shape and then Camry copied it, that is different. Even in pop music now... when someone says "biting someone's lyrics", it means copying... not being original... and it is derogatory.

3. The Malibu does not have as much resale value as an Accord or Camry.

4. Even in terms of a merialistic society, having a Malibu does not carry as much prestige as having an Accord or Camry. This is just public perception.

So overall, I don't think the competition is as close as your equipped prices or MPGs suggest. Also, which car's parts last longer? Subjective you say, but the public has been factoring all these things and buying accordingly. And I believe of the 3, the Camry has been the most successful.
Reply to this comment
by paofpa April 28, 2009 1:46 PM EDT
If the Treasury wants to play Wall Street; it needs to think like Wall Street. If the bond holders want more; tell the Treasury to put up. Optionalize all your stock holding into a true scattering and add it to the pot.
Reply to this comment
by craigh41 April 28, 2009 11:23 AM EDT
Posted by autogrrl at 9:06 PM : Apr 27, 2009

You have fully misunderstaood 2 issues - the $67,500 you earn gross costs the company much much more than that when the benefits are included - benefits that are much better than the average citizen and cost you MUCH MCUH less.

And secondly, the costs of the retirement benefits are real dollars being paid for through car sales today - just because those dollars aren't flowing directly into your pocket today doesn't mean the expense doesn't exist. It drives up the cost and therefore IT MUST BE COUNTED in the equation.
Reply to this comment
by bobnjersey April 28, 2009 10:44 AM EDT
[Congratulations to the government for wiping out American manufacturing jobs and promoting outsourcing of these jobs to India and China. Congratulations to American car buyers for their addiction to Japanese and German cars. Today, most Americans have little regard for buying goods that are 'Made in the USA'. Instead they gorge on cheap-quality junk that is 'Made in China'. Thanks to all of you for putting our economy in the dumps. ]
[Posted by fdx22 at 10:28 PM : Apr 27, 2009 ]

hey ... they were doing their part in fueling the economy. it being the wrong economy (asian) is just a minor technicality.

it's just like with trickle down economics ... we give all the money to the richest 2% so they can invest and create new jobs ... it's just that nobody told them that the intent was for the investment and jobs to be here ... and not in some new asian labor market where they'll work for $3/week.

it's the uaw ... no ... it' s gm management ... no ... their quality sucks ... their resale value is bad ... their styling is unattractive ... no no no ... it's obama and bush ... but it couldn't possibly be the selfish ignorant attitudes of the 'what about me' american population who gets upset when american idol or dwts is pre-empted with a prime time presidential news conference to discuss the unwinding of the united states as we know it. no ... they're the ones getting scr3wed.
Reply to this comment
by bobnjersey April 28, 2009 10:36 AM EDT
[The US carmakers need to STOP abusing Americans and their workers NOW. This is where the rubber meets the road. ]
[Posted by SteelersWinAgain at 5:40 PM : Apr 27, 2009 ]

abusing? what abuse is being levied by the american car companies?
Reply to this comment
by bobnjersey April 28, 2009 10:17 AM EDT
[America should not be having "Tea Parties"......we should be revolting. ]
[Posted by tincup356 at 5:03 PM : Apr 27, 2009 ]

yes we should ... and it should have started a long time ago.

why do you suppose this hasn't happened?
Reply to this comment
See all 112 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook