April 25, 2009 9:03 AM

Taliban Threat Near Islamabad Cools

(CBS/AP)  Taliban militants who had seized a district just 60 miles from Pakistan's capital began pulling out Friday after the government warned that it would use force to evict them.

The withdrawal from Buner, if completed, eliminates the most immediate threat to a peace agreement in the neighboring militant-held Swat Valley that the U.S. government worries has created a haven for allies of al Qaeda.

But is unlikely to quell fears that Islamabad is failing to deal forcefully with Islamist militants slowly expanding into the heart of the nuclear-armed country from lawless areas close to the Afghan order.

TV images showed dozens of militants emerging on Friday from a high-walled villa that served as their headquarters in Buner, a rural area in the foothills of the Karakoram mountains. The men, most of them masked with black scarves and carrying automatic weapons and rocket-propelled grenades, clambered into several pickup trucks and minibuses before driving away.

Syed Mohammed Javed, the top government administrator in the region, said a hard-line cleric who helped mediate the disputed peace deal persuaded the Taliban to return to Swat in a meeting on Friday.

"We told them that we have a deal, we have a peace agreement. We told them not to become a tool in the hands of someone aiming at sabotaging the peace in the region," Javed told The Associated Press by telephone from Buner.

Javed said he and the aging cleric, Sufi Muhammad, were leading the Taliban convoy back to Mingora, Swat's main town, but it was not clear when they would cross the mountains passes leading out of Buner.

The government agreed in February to impose Islamic law in Swat and surrounding areas of the northwest in return for a cease-fire that halted nearly two years of bloody fighting between militants and Pakistani security forces.

But hard-liners have seized on the concession to demand Islamic law across the country, and the Swat Taliban used it to justify their push into Buner, putting them within striking distance of the capital and key roads leading to the main northwestern city of Peshawar.

Taliban commanders insisted their fighters had been preaching peacefully for Islamic law, or Sharia, in Buner and their spokesman said they were leaving "of their own accord, not under any pressure."

The Taliban have enjoyed popular support in Buner, where the enforcement of strict religious law is welcomed by most in an area that has largely been ungoverned by federal authorities.

"Everyone here is happy with the Taliban," one local man in Buner told CBS News. "The only people who are unhappy are the thieves, murderers and criminals. There is no Muslim in the world who would be unhappy with the Islamic way of life."

President Barack Obama's administration, which views the elimination of militant sanctuaries in Pakistan critical to success in the Afghan war and to preventing another Sept. 11-style terrorist strike on the United States, has expressed dismay.

Adm. Mike Mullen, the chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, said in an interview broadcast Friday that the Buner episode had brought Pakistan "closer to the tipping point" where it could be overtaken by Islamic extremists.

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said Wednesday that Pakistan's leaders were "abdicating to the Taliban" in Swat, and on Thursday told U.S. lawmakers the Obama administration was trying to convince Islamabad to shift its traditional security focus from archrival India to Islamic extremists.

With the pressure mounting, the army, whose ability and commitment to combating Islamist extremists is under intense international scrutiny, issued an unusually tough statement Friday.

Apparently referring to the Swat deal, army chief Gen. Ashfaq Parvez Kayani said the current pause in military operations was "meant to give the reconciliatory forces a chance (but) must not be taken for a concession to the militants."

Kayani said the army was "determined to root out the menace of terrorism" and would "not allow the militants to dictate terms to the government or impose their way of life."

The Taliban pulled back from Buner before that resolve was put to the test.

With police hunkered down in their barracks, provincial authorities on Wednesday sent a few hundred lightly armed paramilitary troops to protect government buildings.

But they were halted shortly after crossing the district border by gunfire that killed a police officer, prompting a string of statements from politicians warning that they could scupper the peace agreement.

Ikram Sehgal, a Pakistani military analyst, said that while the attempt to insert the paramilitaries was a "fiasco," the Taliban likely feared that a full-blown army operation might follow.

"Buner is basically a one-road valley that would have been easy to seal. It was a tactical retreat," Sehgal said.

He said recent statements by Sufi Muhammad denouncing democracy had opened the eyes of ordinary Pakistanis as well as its generals to the real nature of the militants, who have beheaded opponents, torched girls schools and recently offered protection to al Qaeda chief Osama bin Laden.

The peace accord covers Swat, Buner and other districts in the Malakand Division, an area of about 10,000 square miles near the Afghan border and the tribal areas where al Qaeda and the Taliban have strongholds.

Supporters have said the deal takes away the militants' main rallying call for Islamic law and will let the government gradually reassert control. But critics say it hands immunity to criminals and note that the militants have rejected calls for them to give up their arms.

© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Add a Comment See all 31 Comments
by jsf14 April 26, 2009 12:02 PM EDT
"The only way to stop the talibans advancement is the absolute destruction of them and all of their supporters. " Just how many millions of people are you willing to kill? Aside from the moral issue, killing them all is one more idea that won't work.
Reply to this comment
by Skatlite April 24, 2009 11:05 PM EDT
Want a bet?
In the next 2 years we will be talking about getting those Nukes out Pakistan.
When it became evident that the South African Apartheid regime was about to fall, we got them to somehow neutralize their Nukes for fear of the ANC getting them.
The battle in Pakistan and Afganistan for that matter, is lost. Nothing will stop the Tilibans. We trained them to fight this kind of war and they are using the training they got from us to fight the Soviet, right in here in Pakistan, to perfection and to get a piece of the pie.
The government there is corrupt and a corrupt government can only fall.

What are we gonna do? Bombed them to stone age? They are there already. We are loosing...
Find something else that will work... Maybe ask the Pope to keep them in our prayers to change their hearts?
Pakistan is the next real thing... Just watch it crumble.
We create monsters wherever we go... this one might be the one too many...
God Bless America and No One Else.
Reply to this comment
by j40405 April 24, 2009 10:45 PM EDT
The only way to stop the talibans advancement is the absolute destruction of them and all of their supporters. This will mean women and children, As sad as that may sound it really is the only way. There is no possible way to reason or compromise with someone who believes the way they do. they are bent on the absolute destruction of all peace and freedom in the world so therefore they must be destroyed. Keep the media out and send in US special forces with that specific order, when they are finished there will be peace in that region.
Reply to this comment
by TPS2 April 24, 2009 8:34 PM EDT
Posted by clear141
I don't believe the international community, particularly the U.N. would do anything. If something were to be done, it would fall upon the United States to act.
Reply to this comment
by ToolMangler1 April 24, 2009 8:01 PM EDT
The moral of this story is that while you may draw lines in the sand, EVENTUALLY you will run out of beach!
Posted by walt1944 at 3:20 PM : Apr 24, 2009



I watched that become the 2nd world war. I have been warning these people that the Taliban are doing what we call "Establishing a Beach Head' (ask a Marine if you don't know what that means) (not you walt, I think you already know).
Reply to this comment
by burtwoody April 24, 2009 6:33 PM EDT
Islamabad is a government of wimps. Kind of like our Republicans! They have no backbone to deal with the Taliban. They might as well put their tail between their legs and run scared from the country and turn it over to these morons.
Reply to this comment
by mav547166 April 24, 2009 6:33 PM EDT
I wonder who will get nuked first India or Afghanistan when the moderate Taliban take over Pakistan.
Reply to this comment
by walt1944 April 24, 2009 6:20 PM EDT
The Taliban are doing the same thing the Nazis did in the 1930's.

Hitler looked at the map in 1936 and pointed at Alsace-Lorraine and said "THIS IS MINE!"! And he took it!

Hitler pointed at the map in 1937 and pointed at Austria and said "THIS IS MINE!"! And he took that too!

Hitler pointed at the map in 1938 and pointed at the Sudatenland in Checkoslavakia and said "THIS IS MINE!"! Not only did he get that too, but he kept right on marching until he took ALL of Checkoslavakia!!!

It wasn't until 1939 when Hitler looked at the map again and pointed at Poland and said "THIS IS MINE TOO, BUT I'LL TAKE HALF RIGHT NOW!", that suddenly the world woke up!

The moral of this story is that while you may draw lines in the sand, EVENTUALLY you will run out of beach!

HAIL OBAMA!!!!
Reply to this comment
by valh1 April 24, 2009 5:26 PM EDT
So the Taliban threat has cooled in Pakistan. Well, they went somewhere. We know that is for sure so where will they pop up next? As long as they have a following, they will continue to be a boil festering on the butt in the Middle East. It is going to take local people standing up against these thugs to finally be rid of them.
Reply to this comment
by formrusmcsgt April 24, 2009 4:58 PM EDT
More proof of the military truth that says standing armies are not effective against guerillas because of the "balloon" effect. You squeeze here, they go there.......
Reply to this comment
See all 31 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook