July 22, 2009 2:14 PM

Budget Deal Safeguards Obama Health Plan

By
CBSNews
(AP)  President Barack Obama's Democratic allies in Congress have agreed to allow his signature $400 tax cut for most workers expire after next year but are moving to give him a better chance at passing his health care bill.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said Friday that most House and Senate negotiators have resolved most of their differences over a congressional budget blueprint designed to advance Obama's agenda through Congress. The measure will set the rules on how Congress considers Mr. Obama's agenda for the rest of the year.

Lawmakers are rushing to agree on the budget framework in time to give Mr. Obama a victory within his first 100 days in office. Late-night talks Thursday produced the framework of a deal that would protect his ambitious plan to overhaul the U.S. health care system from a Republican filibuster.

A senior Democratic congressional aide revealed the fundamentals of the accord on condition of anonymity because the talks were private.

The negotiations have centered on the annual congressional budget resolution, which sets the parameters for the legislation that follows. Congressional votes next week would provide a symbolic victory for Mr. Obama's sweeping agenda to enact a universal health care system, invest in education and clean energy and cut the exploding budget deficit to manageable levels.

Mr. Obama marks his 100th day in office on Wednesday.

Most importantly, the tentative agreement would give congressional Democrats the ability to push Mr. Obama's health care initiative through the Senate under rules that prevent filibusters. Under typical Senate rules, 60 votes are needed to advance a bill, but passage of the budget plan would enable majority Democrats to enact the health care plan with just a simple majority and only 20 hours of debate.

Democrats hold 56 seats in the Senate plus two independents who typically vote with the party. Republicans have 41 seats, and there is one vacancy.

The fast-track process would limit the Republicans' ability to get concessions and give Democrats far more control over the specifics of the health care legislation. Mr. Obama's plan to cut private banks and other lending institutions out of the market for student loans would also move on a filibuster-free path.

But Mr. Obama's signature "Making Work Pay" tax cut of $400 for most workers and $800 for couples would expire at the end of 2010 as currently scheduled. The temporary tax cut was part of the economic stimulus plan enacted in February, and Mr. Obama is proposing to make it permanent.

Senate Budget Committee Chairman Kent Conrad of North Dakota told reporters that the budget plan would extend for three years a temporary fix that prevents the alternative minimum tax, or AMT, from hitting more than 20 million taxpayers. The AMT was enacted 40 years ago to make sure wealthy people can't dodge the tax system, but it was never adjusted for inflation and now increasingly threatens middle-class taxpayers with increases averaging $2,000 a year.

The budget plan also anticipates the expiration of former President George W. Bush's tax cuts on income and investments at the end of next year. But it ignores Mr. Obama's calls for raising taxes to help pay for his health care initiative by reducing the benefits wealthier people take on itemized deductions like charitable gifts and mortgage interest.

The measure also avoids taking a stand on Mr. Obama's unpopular cap-and-trade plan, proposed by the White House to raise more than $600 billion to pay for tax cuts and clean energy programs. Under cap-and-trade, the government would auction permits to emit heat-trapping gases, with the costs being passed on to consumers through higher gasoline and electric bills.

The Democratic plan promises to cut the deficit from levels as high as $1.8 trillion this year to about $500 billion by 2014, about 3 percent of the size of the economy. That's the level economists say is sustainable without producing a crippling debt burden.

Republicans are sure to protest the measure as spending, taxing and borrowing too much. The plan would only slightly curb Mr. Obama's proposed 10 percent, almost $50 billion increase in the operating budgets of nondefense agencies. They would instead receive an 8 percent increase, though congressional appropriators say the increases are smaller than they seem due to some complicating factors, like extra spending for the decennial Census increases in the cost of Federal Housing Administration mortgage loan guarantees. And they have been complaining furiously at the prospect of health care reform passing under fast-track rules.

Democrats, including Mr. Obama, have said repeatedly that they want the health care debate to be bipartisan and that the filibuster-proof terms would be used only if the GOP obstructs. But Republicans say the move has already poisoned the debate.

"Reconciliation is basically a nuclear weapon to use against the negotiators so what happens is nobody negotiates seriously because they can always go to reconciliation ... tilting the playing field unfairly," said Sen. Judd Gregg of New Hampshire, top Republican on the Budget Committee.

"If it's going to be used, it'll be used when bipartisan bills are not possible," Reid said.

AP
Add a Comment See all 41 Comments
by quapawsix April 26, 2009 5:49 PM EDT
There is one other way to deal with this Regulate the Damn Insurance Companies let WE THE PEOPLE have the same health care the people in Washington. THESE SCUM BAGS ARE SUPPOSED TO BE WORKING FOR US NOT CORPORATE AMERICA AND THE LOBBYISTS who ALL OUTWARD APPEARANCES SEEM TO BE WRITING THE LAWS IN THEIR FAVOR and getting them passed buy the government they have bought and paid for.
Reply to this comment
by quapawsix April 26, 2009 5:39 PM EDT
I also like they way there is enough to bail out the rich but none for the people working for these rich SOB's
Reply to this comment
by quapawsix April 26, 2009 5:38 PM EDT
Notice there was no mention of the tax breaks for the rich so it's not hard to see how he's going to pay for it the working class will pay through higher taxes. Change all right, right back on the backs of the people who can afford it the lest..
Reply to this comment
by jxknowles April 25, 2009 7:36 PM EDT
Let's see. The agenda is to enact a universal health care system, invest in education and clean energy and cut the exploding budget deficit to manageable levels. No wonder the Republican'ts are against it.
Reply to this comment
by starleo146 April 24, 2009 6:31 PM EDT
The people fighting this are the pharmaceuticals and doctors and insurance companies, does that tell you anything the middle man will be gone, in health cares case, triple middle man.
Reply to this comment
by oftencensord April 24, 2009 6:10 PM EDT
Is it possible to crash the US Government by spending more money than exists in the world?
How much has Obama spent so far this year? I heard $3 trillion and change...

If I earned 1 dollar every second, it would take me 100,000 years to pay for Obama's first 3 months... do the math.
Reply to this comment
by jimmyc1955 April 24, 2009 4:49 PM EDT
tj217-2009 - What is alarmingly clear is you are still more focused on Bush than on the current administration. So you will blindly trust the current one for one simple reason - it isnt the old one.

So to stretch that metaphor a little - you hated your last car so much you bought the very first car you saw because it wasn't the old one?

My concern about Obama before the election is that he was a complete unknown. He had no track record to judge him by. He attained a certain celebriity status and won the election based on that celeberity status. He was an unknown then.

So far he has not lived up to any promise. He promised a more open and accountable administration but we are getting a budget that will be neither open, nor accountable.

And frankly the US Federal budget is based on OUR MONEY!! Not their money - it is OURS. Why are we not allowed to know HOW OUR MONEY is going to be spent?

Why do you trust a president who tells you one thing and does another??

Why are you so willing to buy a pig in a poke?? Simply because he isn't somebody else??

Do you even understand how inane and infantile that sounds?? that is middle school reasoning at it's very best.
Reply to this comment
by jimmyc1955 April 24, 2009 4:09 PM EDT
Look at this paragraph and I ask you if tons of alarms aren't going off in your head?


The negotiations have centered on the annual congressional budget resolution, which sets the parameters for the legislation that follows. Congressional votes next week would provide a symbolic victory for Mr. Obama's sweeping agenda to enact a universal health care system, invest in education and clean energy and cut the exploding budget deficit to manageable levels.

How exactly do you create universal health care, invest in education and clean energy AND CUT THE DEFICIT?????? How is that even remotely possible?

TAXES - only huge, relentless tax increases can do this. You can;'t spend more and cut debt unless you dramatically increase revenue - and the only form of revenue a government has is TAXES.

Please - wake up - pay attention -start asking your senators and congressmen why they are going along with this pipe dream.
Reply to this comment
by jimmyc1955 April 24, 2009 4:04 PM EDT
skyk-2009 - And here is a question that just crossed my mind? What exactly is in this budget that ensures the bill will get 51 votes? How much pork spending went into this to ensure Obama looks good in the press??

Thats what "protecting:" the healthcare system means. How may senators and congressmen will be putting wasteful projects into their districts too get re-elected just so Obama's health care system will pass?

Don't you want to know that???
Reply to this comment
by jimmyc1955 April 24, 2009 4:01 PM EDT
skyk-2009 - You keep saying Republicans used it - they NEVER Did - not once. You just think they did because the news was so intense about the prospect of using the rule. The Democrats will be the first to use it - the first to quell debate, ignore the opposition and ram rod the budget without any feedback.

where is the bi-partisanship in that???
Reply to this comment
See all 41 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook