April 22, 2009 1:50 AM

China Aircraft Carrier Worries Neighbors

(AP)  A future Chinese aircraft carrier may worry neighboring navies because Beijing has not specified what role the warship would play in the region, the U.S. chief of Naval Operations said.

China, meanwhile, said Tuesday that a more powerful navy would not pose a threat as it mulls adding its first aircraft carrier to an increasingly sophisticated fleet.

The comments by Adm. Gary Roughead came amid growing signs that China plans to build a carrier as the country puts on a major display of naval weaponry this week in the northern port of Qingdao. The show was part of celebrations for the Chinese navy's 60th anniversary.

Long a goal of Chinese military planners, a carrier would bring much desired prestige to China's navy and could embolden it in asserting Chinese territorial claims, particularly in the South China Sea, analysts say. A carrier would also better allow Beijing to defend sea lanes crucial for the safe passage of trade and natural resources.

"If it is not clear what the intent is of the use of an aircraft carrier, I would say that it may cause concern with some of the regional navies and nations," Roughead told reporters in Qingdao where he held talks with his Chinese counterpart, Adm. Wu Shengli.

Wu did not comment on a possible Chinese carrier.

In earlier comments to The Associated Press, defense analyst John Pike of GlobalSecurity.org said an aircraft carrier could bring China into conflict at sea with other regional military powers, including the U.S., Japan, South Korea and India.

"The main barrier (to operating a carrier) is deciding what role such ships would play in China's maritime strategy," Pike said.

Vice Adm. Ding Yiping, the Chinese navy's deputy commander, reiterated China's contention that the People's Liberation Army does not pose a threat to other nations.

"The PLA Navy will continue to make contributions to maintain world, regional and maritime peace," Ding was quoted as saying by the official Xinhua News Agency.

A total of 21 foreign ships are attending the Qingdao naval display, the first of its kind for China.

Thursday's international fleet review is to feature vessels from China and 14 foreign nations, including - for the first time - Chinese nuclear submarines, according to Ding. The types of vessels were not specified.

The People's Liberation Army, controlled by the Communist Party, has traditionally kept its best weaponry tightly under wraps, but recent years have seen a growing openness as it seeks to take its place among the ranks of modern, professional militaries.

China's 225,000-member navy operates more submarines than any other Asian nation, with up to 10 nuclear-powered vessels and as many as 60 diesel-electric subs.

The country's nuclear-powered Jin and Shang class submarines are considered just a notch below cutting-edge U.S. and Russian craft. Its diesel-electric Yuan class also boasts an indigenously developed air-independent propulsion system that allows it to remain submerged for weeks.

In comments to foreign commanders gathered Tuesday, Wu said world navies need to work together to confront non-conventional security threats - a reference to the multinational anti-piracy mission off the Somali coast.

He encouraged all navies to make maritime peace their "unshakable mission."

China's deployed its anti-piracy patrol last December to Somalia in a rare joint operation with navies from other countries. It was the first time the communist state dispatched ships abroad on a combat mission.

Wu also reiterated China's insistence that the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea guide the resolution of all maritime disputes. China says the convention gives it the right to restrict the collection of military intelligence within its 200-mile exclusive economic zones, and has dispatched boats to harass U.S. Naval vessels within that area.

"We must abide by the principles and the regulations of the United Nations Charter when handling maritime affairs and carrying out military operations on the oceans," Wu said.

The U.S., however, insists on the right of free passage in international waters, and says the convention specifically gives warships and naval auxiliary vessels immunity from being stopped, searched or boarded, while allowing military operations within the economic zones.

© 2009 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment See all 20 Comments
by wcreader April 24, 2009 2:40 AM EDT
Re-send: As mention by some comments earlier, I agree that Chinese Navy has every right to deploying aircraft carriers if China think that fit to their national interest and that fit to the need of their national defense. America has carriers, Russia has them. France has them. India has them, and even little country as Thailand has one as well. Now, why should some be surprise that a country as big as China should not have one? Worry and complain? AP seems very Bias on this topic and not be able to be logical in this news. Is it true, It seems to AP as that Only Japan and now US, has the right to rob and bomb other people and other nation, yet, others has no right to defense themselves? Think in the shoes of others, don't China worries when Chinese see Japan, US, and all his Neighbors had already better arm than China? China had suffered huge loss of life in WWII by the invasion of Japan. If US feel the pain of Pearl Harbor, US will understand the feeling of Chinese for not being able to defense itself. The odd is that, Japan, who had threat and killed million of people in WWII around its? neighbors, never say sorry, yet, Yet,, Japan is not complaining other people to threaten them? just to build a carrier. Did Japan just complete one that look exactly like carrier. One might not be surprise that Japan will attack again in our surprise. Shame on them! The hope is that through communication, China, US and all nations will willing to work together to promote world peace and to build a better world to live on for all. God help the mankind!
Reply to this comment
by wcreader April 24, 2009 2:27 AM EDT
As mension by comment earlier, I agree that Chinese Navy has every right to deploying aircraft carriers if China think that fit to their national interest and national defence need. America has carriers, Russia has them. France has them. India has them, and even little country as Thailand has one, Why shouldsome be suprise a country as big as China should not have onbe? Worry and complain? AP does not seems to be very Bias and not being very logical in this news. It seems to AP as that Only Japan and now US, has the right to rob and bomb other people and nation, yet, others has no right to defence themself? Think in the shose of others, don't China worries when Chinese see Japan, US, and all his Neighbors are better armed? China had suffer huge lost of life in WWII by the invation of Japan. If US feel the pain of Pearl harbour, US will understand the feeling of China for not being able to defence itself. The odd is that, Japan, who had threat and kill million of people arround his neighbours, never say sorry, no, Japan is saying other people are threat.en, just to build a carrier. They have just complete one. One might not be surprise that thay will attack again in your surprise. Shame on them! The hope is that China, US and all nations to work together to promote world peace and to build a better world to live on for all.
Reply to this comment
by vietnamwar April 22, 2009 7:17 PM EDT
Is a US fault....All the manufacturing jobs are in China and now the have money. so stop complain ...
Reply to this comment
by OnlineWarrior April 22, 2009 11:53 AM EDT
China should keep boasting it naval force in order to crash the Satanic US navy if it dare to attack china for pink "white" supremacists reasons. the KKK backed USA government is the representant of the devil on earth as seen by the fact that they are occupying the USA after killing most of the native people of that land.

Today many part of the world speak that satanic english of theirs because of their enslavement, occupation and colonization of all that do not have their skin color.

the solution to the Satanic KKK pink "white" supremacist of the USA is for them to be military defeated then removed from land they are occupying and taken back to their own satanic land called western europe.
Reply to this comment
by erasmus111 April 22, 2009 10:16 AM EDT
Posted by romulusxxiv at 7:01 AM : Apr 22, 2009

Ahh, I see the scum is back. What took you so long? Have a hard time thinking of a name?
Reply to this comment
by walt1944 April 22, 2009 9:56 AM EDT
The STILL-RED Chinese have announced they plan on building an aircraft carrier, the first such ship in the Chinese navy.

They are thanking the absolutely GGRREEDDYY corporate executives of Corporate and Financial America for handing them the technological and manufaturing knowledge to build such a ship.

The Chinese plan on naming the ship "Mao's Revenge" and plans are that it will make a "goodwill" voyage to the United States soon after it is launched to show us all who the REAL BOSS IS!!!

HAIL OBAMA!!!!
Reply to this comment
by mrs_entity April 22, 2009 8:43 AM EDT
Dont worry, Jesus loves America better than them. Shop at Walmart and live better. e:)
Reply to this comment
by rc55 April 22, 2009 8:34 AM EDT
mejordelahistoria....If they have the same rights, then they have the same responsibilities, yet I don't see them fessing up for their poisonous sheetrock, foods, toys, and whatever else they've tried to kill us with! Yeah, Yeah, a little lip service is all you're gonna get from the Chinese government. Now that they realize they can't get rid of the U.S. by poison alone, they will have to fight. How else do you explain the recently hacked data for the new U.S. fighter jets? They've been planning this kinda cr*p for decades. Slow and patiently. Killer satellites to knock out communication, they now know how to disrupt the U.S. power grid, they hold the financial system in their hands with all the debt we sold them. Shall I Go On? Yet they have rights...just like in Tibet, or wanting Taiwan by force if necessary, RIGHT?
Reply to this comment
by mav547166 April 22, 2009 7:48 AM EDT
We will treat China just like we did Japan, and Germany. We allowed our military to dwindle to nothing while two relatively small countries took over a large chunk of the world. Oh by the way we didnt care then either until they attacked us.
Reply to this comment
by TPS2 April 22, 2009 7:45 AM EDT
Face it, capitalism wasn't working! America is turning socialist, and will continue to as this economy requires socialism to keep us away from a second great depression.
by tristham

Russia and China adopting the free market supports your argument of how well socialism worked in their countries.
Reply to this comment
See all 20 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook