CBS/AP/ June 18, 2009, 6:26 PM

Geithner: Bailout Strikes "Right Balance"

Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner acknowledged continued weaknesses in the financial system Tuesday, citing declines in consumer lending and higher costs for credit despite billions of dollars of government money for financial institutions.

At the same time, the International Monetary Fund predicted U.S. financial institutions could ultimately lose $2.7 billion from the global credit crisis and said U.S. banks may need $275 billion in new capital.

Geithner told members of a congressional oversight panel that despite the ongoing crisis, the government's financial rescue policies were showing signs of progress, including increases in the number of refinanced mortgages and signs that credit conditions have improved.

"We need a financial system that is not deepening or lengthening the recession," he said. "Meeting this obligation requires actions by the government; it requires the government to take risks."

The stock markets appeared to take a positive view of Geithner's testimony, including his assessment that "the vast majority" of banks could be considered well-capitalized. Bank stocks slid on Monday, but bounced back after Geithner's comments.

His testimony came in the wake of a watchdog agency report that warned Obama administration initiatives could increasingly expose taxpayers to losses and make the government more vulnerable to fraud.

Neil Barofsky, a special inspector general assigned to the bailout program, concluded in a 250-page quarterly report to Congress that a private-public partnership designed to buy up bad assets is tilted in favor of private investors and creates "potential unfairness to the taxpayer."

Geithner said the new plan "strikes the right balance" by letting taxpayers share the risk with the private sector while at the same time letting private industry use competition to set market prices for the assets. The plan is "better than the alternatives," Geithner said.

"That is a better model than having the government itself come in and independently try to value these things," Geithner said.

Geithner reported that "the vast majority of banks" have more capital than they need to be considered well-capitalized. But he said the economic crisis and the bad assets have created uncertainty about the health of individual banks and reduced lending across the system.

"For every dollar that banks are short of the capital they need, they will be forced to shrink their lending by $8 to $12," he said.

While credit conditions have improved in the past few months, "reports on bank lending show significant declines in consumer loans, including credit card loans, and commercial and industrial loans," Geithner said.

The IMF forecasts come as the government is putting banks through "stress tests" to determine their individual capital needs going forward. The IMF's $2.7 trillion figure covers expected losses from 2007 through 2010.

In a letter Tuesday to oversight panel chairwoman Elizabeth Warren, Geithner said that $109.6 billion in resources remain in Treasury's rescue fund. But officials expect the fund will be boosted over the next year by about $25 billion as some institutions pay back money they have received.

Under questioning from panel members, Geithner said that even if banks want to pay back the money, that doesn't mean the government would necessarily accept the payment.

"Ultimately we have to look at two things, one is do the institutions themselves have enough capital to be able to lend and does the system as a whole, is it working for the American people for recovery," Geithner said.

The government's effort to stabilize the financial sector and unclog the credit markets has come under heavy scrutiny. Treasury officials say the Obama administration has been holding participants more accountable. Geithner sent key members of Congress six-page letters last week spelling out his department's measures.

Still, Warren told Geithner: "People want to see action described in terms that make sense to them and want to see that taxpayer funds aren't being used to shield financial institutions from the consequences of their own behavior."

Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz told a congressional panel that the government should create a "financial products safety commission" to determine which financial products are potentially toxic to the banking system. This should be done in addition to tightening regulations on banks and preventing them from becoming "too big to fail" in the first place, he said.

And Barofksy, using blunt language, offered a series of recommendations to protect the public and took the Treasury to task for not implementing previous advice.

Overall, Barofsky's report said the public-private partnership — using Treasury, Federal Reserve and private investor money — could total $2 trillion. "The sheer size of the program ... is so large and the leverage being provided to the private equity participants so beneficial, that the taxpayer risk is many times that of the private parties, thereby potentially skewing the economic incentives," the report stated.

In particular, the report cited funds that would be used to purchase troubled real estate-related securities from financial institutions. Under plans unveiled by Treasury, for every $1 of private investment, Treasury would invest $1 and could provide another dollar in a nonrecourse loan. That money could then leverage a loan from another government fund backed mostly by the Federal Reserve, a step that Barofsky said would dilute the incentive for private fund managers to exercise due diligence.

Barofsky recommended that Treasury not allow the use of Fed loans "unless significant mitigating measures are included to address these dangers."
© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
55 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
hwy71so says:
Turbo-Tax-Tim, KNOWS what he's talking about.


...from experience.

We need people up there that know how to clean up the mess that's up there. Not leach off the remnants...
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
valh1 says:
What is up with BO's choices in cabinet members? They all seem to be playing with a few cards short of a deck. Geithner looks like a guy from the depression era with that haircut. Actually that will make him fit right in during the Obama Depression.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
spaceatoms says:
The bailout isn't going to work, its taking money and spoon feeding to investors of the 80's and 90's who had it so good that they addicted to the money now and like babies can't admit they are human beings no different than the rest. You just to remember the saying "what goes around comes around"!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
budmag06 says:
Shouldn't the bailout be starting to work? It seems that banks are now wanting to send the bailout money back. Don't they trust "Big Government"? Now, it seems that "Big Government" wants to add strings to the bailout money to make it more difficult to return. Mr. Obama, why don't you just admit that "Big Government" wants to own the banks?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
stn_sage says:
Treasury Secretary Geithner has HIS opinion of this issue and the rest of us have OURS!

My opinion is this bailout as constituted was a huge mistake! It was a 'giveaway' to the Federal Reserve and a select part of the banking community, WITHOUT necessary oversight and responsibility!

As such, I am unimpressed with the action taken thus far by the Obama administration on this issue! It remains to be seen, whether or not, the situation will improve. But, whether
Mr. Obama gets the problem fixed or not; either way, he's going to go down in history over
this issue! Thus, I would think he would be highly motivated to correct it!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
rssllbll55 says:
using tax dollars to repair the damage done over the years is money well spent. the waste comes in when republican start crying wolf forgetting that along with all the watch dogs and the presidents honest, determined public servants allows for the ensure that things will and can be done right. The goal is to get the balance sheet unscrambled and set these insituitons back on the right course. With all the negative commentary I've read, and listen to. Its clear to me that most people want to see the country on a course that will allow job creation, and lift credit restriction. This is a new big fix, and its gonna take extreme diligences on the part of those elected to uncover and right the wrongs. I really don' t believe the president is gonna give in to the negative comments here, or from others. Especially Dick the Rat!! Cheney.
So all you republicans buckle up. the run may be ruff, don't complain this is the same road you've taken the country down to get us in this mess. The roads destroyed by years and years of your carelessness and lack of intelligence, and foresight to see that driving a heavy truck over a asphalt road creates pot holes.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
sandman1108 says:
Hopefully we can turn this economy around and actually focus on solving the deeper, systemic issues for why we're in this situation. Obviously bad banking's a good place to start, but there are other issues, like global poverty, that have huge economic and geopolitical ramifications.

The Borgen Project (www.borgenproject.org) has some interesting insight into addressing the issues of global poverty, something we can remedy easily and sustainably.

Some interesting figures to ponder:
$30 billion USD: The annual shortfall to end global poverty.
$550 billion USD: The annual US defense budget.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
pensacola8-2009 says:
Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner has the world's capitalism in his hands.

Support him and pray for his success. Our way of life depends on it.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
mikesarcbs says:
Did he really mean what he said? Will our leaders refuse the bank payback if, in their own judgment, they think the bank needs our money more than taxpayers?
Did I miss something here? Why is he so generous with our money?
At other times, I would have wondered if he is getting cut, on the side.
Does anybody support his views? That those appointed by our elected leaders, funded in many cases by financial institutions... you figure!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
demongirl60 says:
The "Right balance"

YEAH, RIIIIGHT!

Its' the "right balance" if you're ALREADY RICH!
reply
See all 55 Comments