IMF: U.S. Banks May Lose $2.7 Trillion

Global Credit Crisis Could Top $4 Trillion In 2009

(AP)  The International Monetary Fund said Tuesday U.S. financial institutions could suffer $2.7 trillion in losses from the global credit crisis, part of a worldwide total expected to top $4 trillion.

The $2.7 trillion estimate for the United States was nearly double the IMF's projection from just six months ago. The agency for the first time estimated losses for other regions of the world, saying the global total could surpass $4 trillion.

The IMF also warned that governments must take decisive policy actions to contain the fallout. The agency said governments have made progress getting extra money into the banking system, but more needs to be done to deal with toxic assets on banks' books and shutting down insolvent financial institutions.

Additional capital is needed to cushion balance sheets against further loan losses and to restore investor confidence, the IMF said. The Obama administration has said it's considering converting some of the $200 billion in loans to banks into purchases of common stock as a way to bolster their capital reserves.

The financial system remained under "severe stress" as the economic crisis broadens from the banking sector to consumers and businesses, the IMF said in its "Global Financial Stability Report."

"Further determined policy action will be required to help restore confidence and to relieve the financial markets of uncertainties that are undermining the prospects for an economic recovery," the IMF said.

The stability report and an updated economic outlook due out Wednesday will form the basis for meetings slated to begin with talks among the Group of Seven rich industrial nations and the Group of 20 major industrial and developing economies on Friday.

Discussions among the nations that serve on the steering committees of the IMF and World Bank are scheduled for Saturday and Sunday. Those talks will seek to flesh out the commitments made at a G20 leaders summit in London last month. At that meeting, President Obama and the other leaders pledged to boost financial support for the IMF and other international lending institutions by $1.1 trillion.

Emerging economic powers like China and Brazil are demanding a bigger voice in how the IMF and World Bank are run in return for their increased support.

Besides debates over rearranging the governing structure of the lending institutions, the weekend talks are expected to focus on reforms that should be made in how the IMF, the world's global policeman, performs its duties.

The 185-nation lending institution came under severe criticism a decade ago, during the 1997-98 Asian currency crisis, for the types of stringent reforms it imposed on countries seeking IMF loans.

IMF Managing Director Dominique Strauss-Kahn has sought to revamp the agency's lending programs to make them more flexible. The IMF has created a new line of credit it's willing to extend to countries with solid economic track records without the tough restrictions of normal IMF loan programs. So far, Mexico has been offered $47 billion and Poland $20.5 billion under the new program.

The agency already has shown greater flexibility in the loans it has extended for countries caught up in the current crisis, including those made to the formerly communist Eastern European countries of Hungary, Latvia, Ukraine, Serbia and Romania.

Some economists worry that without stringent IMF programs, countries will not make the tough choices needed to trigger an economic rebound. But most believe the new flexibility is a welcome change from past approaches.

"There was a general feeling after the Asian crisis that some of the loan conditionality had been too intrusive," said Michael Mussa, a former chief economist at the IMF.

"The old IMF was too harsh. Some of the conditions they imposed in the past did not take into account practical realities," said Sung Won Sohn, an economist at the Smith School of Business at California State University.

At the same time, some member nations are pushing to give the IMF greater powers as a global economic watchdog. They argue that if the agency had played a greater monitoring role, some of the financial market excesses that led to the current crisis could have been avoided.

However, any move to increase the IMF's oversight is likely to meet stiff resistance among countries like China where officials have objected to IMF lectures on its undervalued currency.

The financial stability report said the estimate of $2.7 trillion in losses in the U.S. included $1.07 trillion in loan losses and $1.6 trillion in losses on securities backed by mortgages, consumer and business debt. The losses for the 16 nations using the euro currency and Britain were estimated at $1.2 trillion. The losses in Japan were put at $149 billion.

The IMF said banks worldwide have raised about $900 billion in new capital since the crisis began, with about half of that coming from public sources. In the U.S., the government has spent $200 billion from a $700 billion bailout fund to inject fresh capital into more than 500 banks.

[mcv57]

If the Federal Government does nothing about the old established management system in mean-street and Wall Street, yes, I agree, Trillions will be nothing more bean-counter game to host a phony economy.

Unforturnately, B.O. has convinced the world to play the monopoly game. The globe economy is continue to play less, the entire world will suffer.

[dear-one]

ONLY THE SUPREME COURT COULD POSSIBELY PREVENT OUR INEVITABLE COLLAPES!

The Bailout will not change the current practices of the Financial Institutions. New Regulations will only last until all of the Chambers of Commerce can squeeze enough money out of the Financial and Insurance Industry to Service the thousands of Lobbies that fully control our Congress with their Big Bucks, and can obtain enough money to have regulations canceled!
*
The Economic crises of 2008 were largely due to the Removal of Regulations of the Financial Institutions, which allowed the Lenders to become ?Self Regulated?! This catastrophe occurred when the Financial Institutions paid Lobbies and Special Interest Groups to Buy Influence in Congress; i.e., to Cancel Regulations!
*
The United States desperately needs a Supreme Court challenge to the practice of our Federal, State, County, and City Politicians receiving moneys and gifts from Lobbies and Special Interest Parties and putting those monies and gifts into their own Coffers, for the official Government work that they do, rather than the Government Treasure.
*
I have great difficulty believing that our Forefathers intended for the Legislators to take Bribes, Kickbacks and Pay-Offs for the official Government work that they do, anyway you slice it, and it amounts to selling of their Votes! All of our U.S.A. Legislators are on the Take! http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/25/washington/25lobby.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1&th&emc=th

[jtdev1]

Great Depression? - Caused by the Banks & WallStreet.

Today's Recession? - Caused by the Banks & WallStreet.


Notice anything in common?

[beach671]

So how well are US Banks doing on trying to collect $$$ from the 5+ million illegal immigrants that they gave mortgages to starting in 2005 and went into foreclosure?

Weren't able to collect a dime were they? Hard to do when they aren't citizens of the country isn't it?

What's the IMF think about that monetary policy? Didn't pan out? Well it did strip the US of it's economy/wealth if that is what the intended purpose was.

[whitemale08]

PUT THE IMF/WORLD BANK AND BIS (Bank of International Settlements) AND THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM INTO RECEIVERSHIP IMMEDIATELY!!!!!

IT IS NOT FAIR TO FORCE MANKIND TO PAY FOR OVER 1.4 QUADRILLION IN WORTHLESS TOXIC DERIVATIVES AND CREDIT-DEFAULT SWAPS!!!!!

MANKIND DID NOT BARGAIN FOR PAYING OFF GAMBLING-BETS!!!!

PUT THE DAMN FEDERAL RESERVE INTO RECEIVERSHIP IMMEDIATELY!!!!!