Marijuana Advocates See "Tipping Point"
Pot Smokers Celebrate "420" With Protests, Smoke Outs As Usage Becomes More Accepted And Supporters Push For Legalization
-
Play CBS Video Video Obama On Legalizing Pot During the first ever online White House town hall meeting, President Barack Obama answered a question submitted online about legalizing marijuana to boost the economy.
-
Video Marijuana Rx Has medical marijuana gotten a bad rap? Dr. Jon LaPook talks with Dr. Herbert Kleber and Dr. Mitch Earleywine on the pros and cons of using medical marijuana for your health.
-
(CBS)
Yes, the argument was articulated by an animated dog. And yes, the response from one of the other characters was, well, a fart. But still: Last night, a serious argument for marijuana legalization was articulated on a major American cable network during prime time.
It's safe to say we've come a long way from "Reefer Madness," the church-financed 1936 anti-marijuana propaganda film (also known as "Tell Your Children") that suggested marijuana leads to murder and depravity.
"There's some data out there that shows 47 percent of Americans have smoked marijuana at some point in their life," said Keith Stroup, founder of the marijuana legalization organization NORML, pointing to a Time/CNN poll from 2002. "That was five years ago, and that means there are likely more living Americans today who have smoked than have not. That tells me that we are very close to a tipping point on this issue."
Today is April 20th, or 4/20, a date that has become something of a rallying point for marijuana enthusiasts. (The number 420 has increasingly become synonymous with pot smoking over the past two decades, though its origins are murky.) It's the day when college students all over the country - most notably at the University of Colorado, where 10,000 showed up a year ago - gather for "smoke out" events to protest the law and, in many cases, light up in public.
Also scheduled this year is a protest meant to take place on the White House lawn in which Americans are encouraged to "just spark up at 4:20" - and, it seems, just see what happens.
In addition, NORML has chosen April 20th to unveil a new ad calling for marijuana legalization; it is set to air on CNN, Fox News Channel and elsewhere. In the spot, Americans say of the drug, "you can tax it, you can regulate it, apply age restrictions…create millions of new jobs… save our economy."
"President Obama, it's time for legalization," one advocate says, looking directly into the camera. (Watch the ad here.)
NORML founder Stroup suggests that Mr. Obama is the ideal president under which to reform marijuana laws, because he smoked the drug when he was a teenager and "knows it didn't destroy his life [or] turn him into some sort of reefer maniac."
Stroup added that he doesn't expect the president, who presently opposes legalization, to do anything "dramatic" on the issue, because he presently has more pressing priorities. But he argued that Mr. Obama could well take action if he is elected to a second term.
"I think within 5 years we're going to stop arresting responsible marijuana smokers in this country," he said.
That remains to be seen. But there does seem to be a clear movement toward greater acceptance of marijuana use; positive representations of pot smokers are increasingly popping up on television (The Sarah Silverman Program, Real Time With Bill Maher) and in movies (Pineapple Express, The "Harold And Kumar" series.) In a move that surely brought a smile to the faces of legalization backers, one of the stars of the "Harold and Kumar" movies, Kal Penn, is going to work in the White House.
And it's not just pop culture: Politicians, long wary of taking anything other than a zero-tolerance attitude on marijuana for fear of being labeled soft on drugs and crime, are increasingly willing to wade into the legalization debate. Libertarians like Ron Paul are advocating legalization; as the New York Times notes, more than twelve states are considering legalizing medical marijuana or are lessening penalties for possession of the drug.
In two states, legislators have floated legalizing and taxing the drug as a way for states to deal with their economic struggles. The Obama administration's Justice Department, meanwhile, has largely abandoned the Bush-era practice of interfering with medical marijuana production and distribution in one of those states, California. (The Office Of National Drug Control policy did not return calls for comment.
It would be a mistake to assume there is widespread support for legalization. A CBS News poll last month found that 58 percent of those surveyed oppose legalizing marijuana use, even if it can be taxed and generate revenue for states. The federal government continues to fight an aggressive war on marijuana and other drugs, the trafficking of which has led to an increase in gang-related violence on the U.S.-Mexico border. And despite the pop-culture inroads, widely-aired anti-pot ads from the non-profit Partnership For A Drug Free America continue to portray use of the drug in a negative light.
Video: CBS 5 At A Protest In San Francisco
Despite these facts, however, legalization advocates remain optimistic - and primed for a party. High Times magazine will be spending the evening crowning "Miss High Times 2009," a New York City event that looks much more like a celebration than protest. And pot smokers around the country seem content to mark the date by indulging in a drug that, despite its status, is relatively easy for most Americans to secure.
Said Stroup, laughing: "This is our holiday."
© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
- I agree completely with the decision of the people to use their herb in public. If hundreds of thousands if not millions of Americans were to take to the street and smoke pot in front of police, would our local governments arrest EVERYBODY?? there would be no one left. the economy would crumble. It takes tragedy to learn a lesson, and if the tragedy of losing all these people to the war on drugs so they can't be productive members of society, then maybe that's what it takes.
- Reply to this comment
- The arguement against the legalization of marijuana is ridiculous. This article says the advocates for marijuana are a bunch of potheads looking for a way to get high cheaply? First of all, if marijuana is legalized then there is no way that it is going to be sold cheaper than what people can get it for now. The government is going to tax the hell out of it the same way that they tax cigarettes and alcohol, but that is not going to stop people from buying it because it is much better than messing with dealers. Secondly, advocates who are speaking for the legalization of marijuana include Arnold Schwarzenegger, Ron Paul, and ex-Presidents of other countries. Honestly, what good comes from keeping marijuana illegal? It takes our tax money, it overcrowds our prisons, and it stops people from getting jobs when they are still beneficial people to society. Marijuana does not hinder a person's ability to make moral choices. I can guarantee that if weed is legalized the statistics will report less fatalities and car accidents then alcohol. I do not know if President Obama will legalize weed but there is no way that it is going to remain illegal in the next 10 years- once youngsters are allowed to vote the population popularity rating will be far greater than 50%. However, in the midst of this recession America needs to do its own research instead of sticking to the racist and conservative ways of the past..
- Reply to this comment
- Legalize marijuana..ABSOLUTELY!
It was total BS propoganda that made it illegal in the first place. I list these four reasons as to my belief......
(a)HARRY J. ANSLINGER "The Father of the Drug War"
Commissioner of the U.S. Bureau of Narcotics 1930-1962
On January 1, 1932, Anslinger had no legal jurisdiction over marijuana, but his interest in it was intense.
The Bureau's first Annual Report under his aegis warned that marijuana, dismissed as a minor problem by the Treasury one year earlier, had now "come into wide and increasing abuse in many states, and the Bureau of Narcotics has therefore been endeavoring to impress on the various States the urgent need for vigorous enforcement of the local cannabis laws."
Many people believe that Mr. Anslinger collaborated with industry giants to outlaw marijuana. It is known that he was acquainted with both the Hearsts (of Hearst Newspapers) and the DuPonts, of DuPont plastic fame. (Hemp seed oil derivatives could replace DuPont's petroleum derived compounds.)
In the 1930s, Hearst, who owned newspapers all over the country, started publishing sensationalist-type "news" stories about marijuana use. These stories, often written by Hearst or Anslinger himself, talked about "insanity, criminality, and death" caused by smoking marijuana, sometimes after just one joint. This intense propaganda campaign led to anti-marijuana laws in many states.
In 1937, the Marijuana Tax Stamp Act was passed, effectively prohibiting possession or use of marijuana. It was claimed to be needed to oversee and coordinate existing state law concerning marijuana.
The following are excerpts of Mr. Anslinger's testimony before a Senate hearing on marijuana in 1937:
"There are 100,000 total marijuana smokers in the US, and most are Negroes, Hispanics, Filipinos, and entertainers. Their Satanic music, jazz, and swing, result from marijuana use. This marijuana causes white women to seek sexual relations with Negroes, entertainers, and any others."
"...the primary reason to outlaw marijuana is its effect on the degenerate races."
"Marijuana is an addictive drug which produces in its users insanity, criminality, and death."
"You smoke a joint and you're likely to kill your brother."
"Marijuana is the most violence-causing drug in the history of mankind."
(b)Nixon refused to hear or even read his own committee's report on the benefits of marijuana.
(c) More people would smoke pot before drinking alcohol, thus alcohol sales would drop and alcohol companies are big money behind politicians.
(d) Insurance companies, again big money lining lazy fat cats - Reply to this comment
- Too bad a majority of the 58% who oppose simply do so because they are greatly uneducated and brainwashed on the matter. If only more people would research a little for themselves and find out the truth, that percentage would really shrink .
- Reply to this comment
- 58% still oppose legalization? If smoking pot in the privacy of one's own home were truly a threat and worthy of being considered a criminal activity, it'd be more than 99%. What percentage of people oppose murder? Rape? Theft? Burglary? Those have to be close to 100%.
Anything that more than 5 or 10% of the population thinks is OK, should probably be legal. (The only exception I can think of is, perhaps, robbing/overtaxing the super-wealthy, but hopefully not many Americans would be so unprincipled as to support a progressive income tax -- oh, wait...!) - Reply to this comment
- it is just a plant it , it is just a plant. why is their such a big deal over something that has most likely been on this planet longer than us. its here for as reason, it is not manufactured it grows (it is natural). in the grand scheme of things you mean to tell me we are going to spend more time and money trying to destroy a PLANT than feeding starving people. that kinda sounds dumb
- Reply to this comment
- To detain, steal/extort from, and deprive a citizen of liberty for possessing, distributing, transporting, or growing a NATURAL HERB is blatantly UN-AMERICAN, at least from the Founding Fathers' perspective. Neocons and phony "Christians" expect blind obedience and subservience to the state no matter how wrong the law may be.
- Reply to this comment
- Marijuana Prohibition should have ended over 35 years ago had it not been for Richard Nixon, the CRIMINAL president. In that time, the law-enforcement/correctional bureaucracy has grown in leaps and bounds to become a formidable special-interest lobby that stifles reform efforts because repeal threatens their careers and ability to steal and extort from peaceful, otherwise law-abiding citizens. Most politicians are too timid and gutless to admit the laws are wrong because the government has been lying for decades and the people have been intimidated into submission.
- Reply to this comment
- To maintain Prohibition is to pay tribute and honor the memory of the white-supremacist hate-mongers who, under the leadership of Harry Anslinger, rammed legislation through Congress with no debate what-so-ever. Also tribute to President Richard Nixon who was forced to resign in disgrace of face certain impeachment and conviction for CRIMES related to the violation of trust the American people placed in him. Nixon ignored the recommendations of his very own Shafer Commission which were to repeal criminal penalties.
The perpetuation of such Nanny State policies in light of the human misery they inflict is a disgrace to our flag and the memory of all those who have served and died in combat for the cause of freedom. As much as I hate to admit it, the Stars & Stripes are the symbol of my enemy--a government that has declared war on those who choose to self-medicate with a natural, eco-friendly plant that God Almighty put on this Earth for food, fiber, medicine, fuel and many, many other beneficial uses. - Reply to this comment
- FIrst off let me state that I am an Eagle Scout, and currently a college student, no just some couch potato pothead. It actually wouldn't be legalizing it, it would be re-legalizing it. Most people don't even know that it was legal prior to the 1930's and it was banned to give an excuse to deport mexican pot smokers. America is supposed to be the land of the free, im not whining, I want my freedom! This nation wouldn't even exist if people just blindly followed the laws of their government. I hate how Obama laughed at the notion of legalization. Just like ending prohibition of alcohol helped end the depression, legalization of marijuana could help our country and its recession. I bet if we could ask the founding fathers what they thought they would say legalize it, in fact most of them grew hemp. So eff off you ingnorant brainwashed @$$holes, open your eyes and minds its time to legalize.
- Reply to this comment
- One thing your program "What If Marijuana Were Legal? Possible Out comes " left out was the effect legalized marijuana would have on the cultivation of industrial hemp which is now prohibited. If marijuana were legal hemp would also be legal. The prospect of legal hemp would bring far more income to farmers than marijuana as the products for hemp have far reaching social consequences hemp can be used as fuel, food, paper and fiber. In some parts of the nation hemp can be harvested three times a year. Hemp would replace many items that petroleum now produce. Such as nylon and plastics. The plastic would be of high quality and biodegradable. Marijuana and hemp are the same plant and should always be considered together when weighting the merits or demerits of legalization. The legalization of this plant would benefit all americans. One of those benefits being a lessening of our dependence on foreign oil. Another would be the environment as this plants products would be sustainable and benevolent to our exosphere. It would put farmers to work bring new economy and tax income. The effect of legalization would be felt on the industrial products of the plant and the benefits would far outweigh any problems associated with the drug.
- Reply to this comment
- JosephAmmons: Researchers HAVE determined a fatal dosage of marijuana. It turns out that the fatal dosage is a 50 lb. bale dropped from a 5th story window
- Reply to this comment
- http://www.webmd.com/smoking-cessation/news/20030918/marijuana-smoking-doesnt-kill
I hope WebMD is a credible source for most people. Please note the comment "...there's no such thing as a fatal marijuana overdose...".
So you can overdose on Tylenol, but not marijuana. And which one is legal? - Reply to this comment
- I don't know that I agree with roycas's assertion that pot will never be legal. First of all, never is a long time. Secondly, the fact that it is being discussed means that it is on people's minds. Also, he or she repeats the often used assertion that those who smoke pot are unemployed and spend their time on the couch. The people I know who smoke it work full time in professional and skilled trades positions. They simply prefer weed to beer as a method of relaxation after work.
- Reply to this comment
- It is funny how people have to attack my spelling or what you think is my intelligence level. You are all blowing smoke. Thay have been trying leagalize pot for longer than any of you have been alive and it hasn't happened. Guess what, it never will. From all these posts I have read which I will not be reading any more becasue it is a waste of my day, you are all high! You all crack me up. Good luck in your silly lives. And by the way, if you all put down the pot and go to work this economy might get a little better. Get of the couches people! Your a waste. Go ahead and reply to this but I won't see them. LOL
- Reply to this comment
- I wonder what is so lacking in Rowdy's life that she has to come on and abuse total strangers every day.
- Reply to this comment
- hey doug take some of your own advice and "GROW THE FREAKING UP!!!!!". lol it looks likes you gots some darn well English skills dare sunny........not. try saying"please consider being more mature" or at the least cut it down to "grow up" so you don't look so foolish. While you are busy growing up and going back to grade school so you can FREAKING learn how properly speak and write, you should also look back at your absurd and contradicting statements. but since I know you are to stupid to do this i will go back and do it for you. First apparently you have some confusion when it comes to the comparison of weed to tobacco. The brainless whacko idiot hypocrites that smoke weed and condemn cigarette smoking are actually not hypocrites, and most likely not whacko idiots either. Studies show that the two are very different. While i could explain the science behind this i feel like you can look it up for yourself. second you say "You want the wholed damned planet toked up and brainless? Living like little hippy twits in Utopia?" So you mean to say that if pot is legalized everyone is going to smoke it to extreme excess, including you. Funny it seems that alcohol is legal and everybody is not a drunk moron. It seems that smoking saliva is legal yet the entire world isnt smoking that and tripping.(haha you dont even know what salvia is do you) and lastly you say "o something with your life and find some happiness other than crying like little whiney babies because somebody said NO, we're not having that KRAP in our lives and we don't want our children corrupted with it." we are not crying we are trying to reason, big difference lol kinda like how tobacco and weed are really different. Lastly weed does not corrupt children, crazy people like you do. well i got to go spark a white owl have fun living live as an ignorant *****
- Reply to this comment
- When it comes to Obama ignoring the issue of legalization and wondering about the people writing in from online, I personally felt offended. It was a propelled movement form people who voted for him. This was not a couple of people sending mass emails, this was friends telling friends to let the president know that we want to be heard and taken seriously. Considering the number of people fighting for this cause versus the attention paid to the Tea Parties, doesn't it seem a little unfair?
- Reply to this comment
- I can't believe marijuana legalization is being considered at the same time tobacco seems on the verge of being banned. Cigarette smokers are being vilified while pot smokers are being portrayed in an increasingly favorable light. Having never tried pot, I don't feel I'm qualified to form an opinion on its effects. However, smoking is smoking. If you are in favor of smoking one plant, how can you be against smoking another? If it is legalized, I certainly hope it is considered by society to be just as disgusting as cigarettes. Otherwise, we are truly a nation of hypocrites.
- Reply to this comment
- Posted by douglas_dunn at 9:41 PM : Apr 20, 2009
Why are you so intent on living a drugged up pot headed life? What's so important about smoking pot? You can't handle your responsibilities and need some wacky weed to pump your ego up? What's the matter can't feed yourself without tokin up first?
What's the matter, can't stand any discipline in your life, any boundaries of behavior or morals.....you idiots that blow your brains out over smoking a cigarettte yet you tout smoking pot like some brainless whacko idiot hypocrite?
Don't we have enough to put up with with alcoholic sots that can't face reality or responsibility? You want the wholed damned planet toked up and brainless? Living like little hippy twits in Utopia?
Like little spoiled brats that can't do without your candy treats just because you wanna!!!
GROW THE FREAKING UP!!!!! Do something with your life and find some happiness other than crying like little whiney babies because somebody said NO, we're not having that KRAP in our lives and we don't want our children corrupted with it.
Posted by Rowdy106 at 10:28 PM : Apr 20, 2009
not sure who posted this but just to clear up the mistaken assumption that potheads are idiots: I am a successful business woman, full-time professor, mother of four, grad student credits away from graduation and all the while have smoked pot as a stress reliever for the past 15 yrs. You know when your day runs from 5-8 a.m. with kid duty, then 8-5 p.m. with students, then 5-9 p.m. running a business all the while dropping off kids at practices, then 10-1 a.m. with online classes and house duty then i feel like i deserve to take off the edge in whatever manner i see fit as long as it is responsibly without being judged by people who don't know what they are talking about. And you know what, i am grown up. Everyone has a vice. Mine is weed. What's yours? - Reply to this comment




