AP/ April 20, 2009, 4:03 AM

271M Lbs Of Pharmaceuticals In Our Water

U.S. manufacturers, including major drugmakers, have legally released at least 271 million pounds of pharmaceuticals into waterways that often provide drinking water - contamination the federal government has consistently overlooked, according to an Associated Press investigation.

Hundreds of active pharmaceutical ingredients are used in a variety of manufacturing, including drugmaking: For example, lithium is used to make ceramics and treat bipolar disorder; nitroglycerin is a heart drug and also used in explosives; copper shows up in everything from pipes to contraceptives.

Federal and industry officials say they don't know the extent to which pharmaceuticals are released by U.S. manufacturers because no one tracks them - as drugs. But a close analysis of 20 years of federal records found that, in fact, the government unintentionally keeps data on a few, allowing a glimpse of the pharmaceuticals coming from factories.

As part of its ongoing PharmaWater investigation about trace concentrations of pharmaceuticals in drinking water, AP identified 22 compounds that show up on two lists: the EPA monitors them as industrial chemicals that are released into rivers, lakes and other bodies of water under federal pollution laws, while the Food and Drug Administration classifies them as active pharmaceutical ingredients.

The data don't show precisely how much of the 271 million pounds comes from drugmakers versus other manufacturers; also, the figure is a massive undercount because of the limited federal government tracking.

To date, drugmakers have dismissed the suggestion that their manufacturing contributes significantly to what's being found in water. Federal drug and water regulators agree.

But some researchers say the lack of required testing amounts to a 'don't ask, don't tell' policy about whether drugmakers are contributing to water pollution.

"It doesn't pass the straight-face test to say pharmaceutical manufacturers are not emitting any of the compounds they're creating," said Kyla Bennett, who spent 10 years as an EPA enforcement officer before becoming an ecologist and environmental attorney.

Pilot studies in the U.S. and abroad are now confirming those doubts.

Last year, the AP reported that trace amounts of a wide range of pharmaceuticals - including antibiotics, anti-convulsants, mood stabilizers and sex hormones - have been found in American drinking water supplies. Including recent findings in Dallas, Cleveland and Maryland's Prince George's and Montgomery counties, pharmaceuticals have been detected in the drinking water of at least 51 million Americans.

Most cities and water providers still do not test. Some scientists say that wherever researchers look, they will find pharma-tainted water.

Consumers are considered the biggest contributors to the contamination. We consume drugs, then excrete what our bodies don't absorb. Other times, we flush unused drugs down toilets. The AP also found that an estimated 250 million pounds of pharmaceuticals and contaminated packaging are thrown away each year by hospitals and long-term care facilities.

Researchers have found that even extremely diluted concentrations of drugs harm fish, frogs and other aquatic species. Also, researchers report that human cells fail to grow normally in the laboratory when exposed to trace concentrations of certain drugs. Some scientists say they are increasingly concerned that the consumption of combinations of many drugs, even in small amounts, could harm humans over decades.

Utilities say the water is safe. Scientists, doctors and the EPA say there are no confirmed human risks associated with consuming minute concentrations of drugs. But those experts also agree that dangers cannot be ruled out, especially given the emerging research.
1/3

© 2009 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
29 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
erasmus111 says:
Even doctors tell you to flush your expired medicine.

Posted by observer2020 at 10:50 AM : Apr 20, 2009

Where I live, we are told NEVER to flush medicine down the toilet. We are told to take it to the pharmacies so they can dispose of them.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
erasmus111 says:
I don't know what other people will do, But I intend to pursue filtering my drinking and cooking water. I probably can't be sure to filter all these contaminants, but doing something is better than doing nothing.
A little peace of mind is better than great doubt.

Posted by grumpygeezer at 5:22 AM : Apr 20, 2009

Our water is constantly being tested and is supposedly alright to drink, but I still won't drink it because I don't feel like ingesting chlorine and all the other chemicals that are in it. I have a separate water tap that is filtered.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
SteveDeibele says:
The pharmaceuticals and chemicals that are used to create the pharmaceuticals have a number of reasons for being in our water. Some chemical contents are the result of residues on the production vessels, others are the result of intermediate processing steps, and still others are certainly the result of disposal. The rules governing chemical waste and disposal will continually evolve as technology changes and as the public sentiment changes. From a scientific perspective, the "cocktail" mixes of chemicals can play highly influential roles in human and animal healths. Health responses to environmental changes can be extremely nonlinear, so the most appropriate approach is to put GREAT effort in minimizing chemical dumping into the environment. The pharmaceutical and chemical industries should not self-regulate, as time and again we can find examples where a business looks out for its own immediate interests, even at the expenses of the public. The article has insufficient information to make many critical-thinking conclusions. But clearly, 271 million pounds is a big deal, especially when you know the science and can reasonbly assume that the concentration of these pharmaceuticals are very nonuniformly distributed. The concentrations, in PPM, PPB, PPT, are also scientifically important. It is completely incorrect to say our uncontrolled, unrepeatable "cocktail" exposure to these chemicals makes us healthier. You don't have to look very hard to find case after case where chemical cocktails caused health problems for humanity, domesticated animals, and wildlife. Prevention of chemical pollutants in the environment is the key; regulatory changes to chemical and pharmaceutical production and disposal are needed.

Dr. Steve Deibele
Kiel, WI
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
weedapeapl says:
you better trot on over to Fox for the REAL news.
Posted by jimsmename at 10:58 AM : Apr 20, 2009

I've never seen their site.

What's the address?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
weedapeapl says:
Even doctors tell you to flush your expired medicine.
Posted by observer2020 at 10:50 AM : Apr 20, 2009

If you've ever seen the "meds room" at a nursing home, they actually have a toilet installed up high at countertop level for disposing of expired meds - and the meds of residents who have "expired."

They are REQUIRED BY LAW to flush excess meds.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
observer2020 says:
Amazing what is flushed nowadays. Even doctors tell you to flush your expired medicine. Remember people....we ALL live downstream. They need to devise a "safe" way of disposing of our chemicals, medicines, etc., before we all turn into one-eyed, six-legged mutants.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
weedapeapl says:
The article mentions the weight of the drugs, however no mentioning of the weight of the water in the US. Unless such information is available, how is someone able to calculate the ppm
Posted by jwesel1 at 7:02 AM : Apr 20, 2009


271 MILLION pounds of Drugs were released into waterways used for drinking water and you want to split hairs? No thanks!
Posted by skyk-2009 at 8:33 AM : Apr 20, 2009

Yah! How dare you confuse Sky King with facts!!!!

Don't you know? Liberals are ALLERGIC to facts!!!

How are is the liberal media going to create another hysterical scare story if you get bogged down with FACTS????/


LOL!!!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
louiville2 says:
Hey thats why I flush twice because I know Berkley is somewhere down stream.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
calgal4 says:
Drugs in the water, hormones and antibiotics in our meat, caffeine/guarana/ephedra in our drinks, pollution in our air....it's a miracle we're not all pychos with large breasts, lungs, and gonads, who have full immunity from everything!!!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
txlakeside says:
My god there sure are a lot of STUPID folks questioning a story they should be worried about! One idiot actually posted that Europeans are healthier because they have pharmaceuticals in their water .... ROFLMAO! And another trying to figure out PPM based on weight when it is actually figured on total mass (volume x density) ! The story had nothing to do with PPM rather total pounds dumped! Dumb as dirt!
reply
See all 29 Comments