May 11, 2009 7:58 AM

Ahmadinejad: Let Journalist Defend Herself

(AP)  President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said an American journalist sentenced to eight years in prison on charges of spying for the U.S. should be allowed to offer a full defense at her appeal, the state news agency reported Sunday.

The statement came a day after Iran announced the conviction and sentence for Roxana Saberi, a 31-year-old dual American-Iranian citizen. It was the first time Iran has found an American journalist guilty of espionage and her lawyer said he will appeal.

Ahmadinejad instructed chief Tehran prosecutor Saeed Mortazavi to personally ensure that "suspects be given all their rights to defend themselves" against the charges. "Prepare for the court proceedings ... to observe and apply justice precisely," the IRNA state news agency quoted the president as saying.

Saberi's case has been an irritant in U.S.-Iran relations at a time when President Barack Obama is offering to start a dialogue to break a 30-year-old diplomatic deadlock. A few days before her sentence was announced, Ahmadinejad gave the clearest signal yet that Iran too was ready for a new relationship with the U.S.

The White House said Saturday that Mr. Obama was "deeply disappointed" by Saberi's conviction. The U.S. has called the charges baseless and said Iran would gain U.S. good will if it "responded in a positive way" to the case.

Iran has released few details about the charges. Saberi was arrested in late January and initially accused of working without press credentials. But earlier this month, an Iranian judge leveled a far more serious allegation that she was passing classified information to U.S. intelligence services.

She told her father in a phone conversation that she was arrested after buying a bottle of wine. Her father said she had been working on a book about the culture and people of Iran, and hoped to finish it and return to the United States this year.

The Fargo, North Dakota native had been living in Iran for six years and had worked as a freelance reporter for several news organizations including National Public Radio and the British Broadcasting Corp. Because Saberi's father is Iranian, she received Iranian citizenship.

Her father, Reza Saberi, is in Iran and has said his daughter was not allowed a proper defense during her one-day trial behind closed doors a week ago. He said no evidence has been made public and his daughter was tricked into making incriminating statements by officials who told her they would free her if she did.

He told CNN her trial only lasted about 15 minutes.

"The trial of course was not a real trial," her father told CNN. "A few minutes until the trial, she still didn't know there was a trial," he added. "It was a mock trial."

On Saturday, the father told NPR that his daughter was convicted Wednesday, two days after she appeared for trial. He said the court waited until Saturday to inform lawyers of its decision.

Her father was not allowed into the courtroom to see his daughter, whom he described as "quite depressed."

Saberi's case has been a point of friction between the U.S. and Iran at a time when President Obama has said he wants to engage in talks on Tehran's nuclear program and other issues - a departure from the tough talk of the Bush administration.

The United States severed diplomatic relations with Iran after its 1979 Islamic revolution and takeover of the U.S. Embassy in Tehran. Relations deteriorated further under the former President George W. Bush, who labeled Iran as part of the so-called "Axis of Evil" along with Saddam Hussein's Iraq and North Korea.

Iran has been mostly lukewarm to the Obama administration's overtures until Ahmadinejad's comment last week that he was ready for a new start.

But Iran's judiciary is dominated by hard-liners, who some analysts say are trying to derail efforts to improve U.S.-Iran relations.

Saberi's conviction comes about two months ahead of key presidential elections in June that are pitting hard-liners against reformists who support better relations with the United States. Ahmadinejad is seeking re-election, but the hard-liner's popularity has waned as Iran's economy struggles with high-inflation and unemployment.

© 2009 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment See all 21 Comments
by fariborzzak April 21, 2009 1:38 AM EDT
Pres. Ahmadinejad is right.
Reply to this comment
by DE58 April 20, 2009 2:06 AM EDT
Apparently, some believe a gang of thugs seizing US diplomats is alright. When we respond with sanctions we become the "bad guys" because we were friendly with a corrupt ruler. To resolve the situation, it is claimed, all we need to do is send (more) diplomats to talk to a corrupt government bent on destroying us and everything we stand for. If dealing with the first situation makes us bad, how does repeating it make us good? Is not the definition of insanity repeating the same actions expecting diferent results?

You can call me short-sighted or narrow minded but I seem to see a problem with this approach....
Reply to this comment
by whitemale08 April 19, 2009 11:25 PM EDT
I highly doubt that Human Rights Watch is shilling for Wall Street or anyone else. I can hardly believe what I read when the US Constitution is used to protect the non-existent rights of hereditary Old World rulers-in-fact, as we find them in a pattern of repression from North Africa straight-through to Central Asia.
Posted by U-R-So-Wrong at 7:14 PM : Apr 19, 2009 -

First of all the sanctions are drafted by the private and illegal Federal Reserve System, that's right, the politicians announce sanctions but sanctions mean that a countries money will no longer be exchanged for other currency within the Federal Reserve System.

When sanctions happen, then these countries retaliate by seizing foreign property but remember we do it first when we announce sanctions. We seize bank accounts owned by sovereign governments, we take other peoples property, everything.

Second, we allow the bankers to loot everything, hell they just looted Americas pensions and retirement funds with this ridiculous 401k scam.

It's amazing how blinded you are and how you make excuses to defend the very system who is using 'soft oppression' to force you back into serfdom, working at Starbucks pouring coffee at $5.oo a cup so some clowns on Wall Street can make a killiing.

And who's economy is Medeival? I would say our economy under this British-style 'free trade' globalization nonsense more Medeival, more evil then any economic system that has ever existed.

When you use gambling bets as collateral to be sold and stuck into pension funds, and 401ks to loot the labor and wealth of nations around the world and have the nerve to call them 'assets' when they are nothing more then worthless derivatives and credit-default swaps, how much more evil can you can get then that?

I suggest that you stop listening to Druggie Limbaugh who preaches this absolute nonsense of 'American exceptionalism'....it doesn't exist, we are no different then other nation.

We might be special, because we were the first to have a constittution that rejects the notion of 'empire' and revolted against the British, but we have lost that sense of purpose and began thinking like you, that the British empire of globalization and fiat-paper currency should be defended and given exception.

Freedom starts with getting rid of the premises you have for your arguments.
Reply to this comment
by TryTakingMyMoney April 19, 2009 11:11 PM EDT
Her situation is worse than just prison, she will soon be vaporized when Israel starts the bombing. I mean...when Israel "and US" starts the bombing because we will be pulled into this when Iran strikes our troops in Iraq. This will happen in the next few months?you can take this to the bank (while we still have one).
Reply to this comment
by whitemale08 April 19, 2009 7:10 PM EDT
from its power or by those who are philosophically damaged and recognize something of themselves in such use of force. There may be some anti-Americanism to this as well, but it is self-defeating when Iranian oil funds, geography and the potential for WMDs are considered.
Posted by U-R-So-Wrong at 2:37 PM : Apr 19, 2009 --

There you go again, arguing with me on with false premises.
I could care less and am not afraid of Iran with a nuclear armed missle then the Iranians are afraid of the Israelis or the West bombing them with nuclear weapons.

Besides I would rather see a stable theocratic government controling Iran then an unstable puppet regime we install for the sake of bankers on Wall Street/City of London.

I also want Sovereign Nation-States to govern the way the see fit as long as they give their peoples the freedom to move and live elsewhere.

We do not need to sacrifice any more soldiers that the Constitution meant for us to use as legitimate defense, to further the idealistic goals of naive groups like Human Rights Watch to be used as propaganda tools for bankers.

Stop living in the past with the way our parents and grandparents lived in fear and think war is the answer to every time we don't get our way.

The fact that we don't get our way shows that the West-phalia idea of Sovereign Nation-States is working, and countries are FREE to govern as they wish.

No country can successfully carry out genocide, a holocaust or war against its own people with out the 'money interests' there to supply the chemical weapons, the guns, the logistics, the tanks, and the constant flow of fiat-paper currency to do it all.
Reply to this comment
by sdemaggie April 19, 2009 6:59 PM EDT
Why is the fate of an Iranian citizen an issue? So her father or grandfather is an Iranian exile that no doubt profitted greatly under the Shah, stole what they could prior to the fall of the Shah and landed in the US. Who cares....
Reply to this comment
by tmonta67 April 19, 2009 5:01 PM EDT
Stop whining and wake up and smell the coffee, people. The Iranian President's response is as positive as he can allow at this time. She'll be given preferential treatment. What that means by Iranian standards is anybody's guess, but it could be a lot worse. Stop measuring things by US eyes alone, and wait and see.
Reply to this comment
by whitemale08 April 19, 2009 4:28 PM EDT
And there you have it. Gangs have no claim of Sovereignty. They have merely a Day of Reckoning. To confuse the Iranian regime with a legitmate form of government gives them intellectual sanction from those who should know better. This blurs the line between good and evil (except for those intellectuals who don't believe in good and evil).
Posted by U-R-So-Wrong at 12:45 PM : Apr 19, 2009 --

Not only is your comment wrong but dangerous rhetoric which is why the world is screwed up as it is.

Every genocide, holocaust and conflict can be traced back to an empire funding and inciting through media propaganda to keep peoples fighting and killing each other so those run the empire remain in power.

Hitler could not have risen to power without the help from bankers in London and Prescott Bush.

Leaders of nations are not initially in power to hurt their own peoples because it's against human nature. Either you believe that or think human beings are nsaturally no different then beasts.

Don't argue with me with a premise based upon failed assumtions that are presently evident and obvious today.

To debate someone like me, you must first use as a premise based upon ideas that have not been tried before.

I'm not saying I'm 'all-knowing', just giving you a tip to help better your arguments.
Reply to this comment
by credibility2 April 19, 2009 3:50 PM EDT
I thought the purpose of the trial was for this individual to defend herself. So now, a convenient claim of appeal rights? Does Iran first have a monkey trail without the accused being allowed to defend themselves and then only allows this in the form of an appeal? Peculiar, to say the least. BTW, supposedly her documents allowing in the country had expired. Is there any proof of this? I'd like the Iranian government to produce the expired documents. This young reporter doesn't seem like she'd deliberately allow her documents to expire, of unless of course, she were trying to get into the prison system as part of a story she was working on. Very confusing.
Reply to this comment
by jwesel1 April 19, 2009 3:29 PM EDT
Oh good grief, I called this mess yesterday. It's all a publicity stunt. Send the girl to prison for a long, horrifying sentence. Then Ahmadinejad comes to her rescue, hand to forehead, "Oh no, the girl MUST be able to defend herself". Allow me to barf now. What a joke they ALL are. Bunch of backwards, archaic, oppressive murderers, all in the name of their violent muhammed.
Posted by CnUHerMeNow at 9:43 AM : Apr 19, 2009
====================================================================
It's a shame that Iranian government is stooping down to the level of Bush neocon government.
Reply to this comment
See all 21 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook