April 19, 2009
Living A Life Sentence
What Happens After The Innocent Are Exonerated For Crimes They Didn’t Commit? For Many, It's Tougher Than A Prison Yard
-
Larry Peterson was found innocent and released more than three years ago after being sentenced to life plus 20 years for the 1987 killing and sexual assault of a young woman in New Jersey. He just recently got his first job. (CBS)
-
Play CBS Video Video Exonerated The day innocent people are released from prison brings attention to the wrongly convicted. Kelly Cobiella examines what happens after innocent people are freed.
At 51, Beverly Monroe was practically central casting for an accomplished middle class mom:
"I had a great life, absolutely great life," she said. "I had a super job, career. I had my own home. I was financially secure. My daughter Katie had just finished law school, my youngest daughter Shannon was a senior at William and Mary. My son was living with me and going to college.
"Things could not have been better."
"And then this happens," Cobiella said.
"Yes."
In March of 1992 Monroe found her longtime companion Roger de la Burde dead in his Virginia home, a bullet in his head, a pistol by his side.
By all appearances, it was a suicide. But the police told Beverly Monroe she was suspected of murder …
.
"I had no experience, no thought of ever being accused of anything," she told Cobiella. "I mean, it's incomprehensible."
It was equally incomprehensible to Beverly's daughter. But, as a young lawyer beginning a new job, Kate Monroe also knew that "incomprehensible" did not make her mother's conviction impossible.
"I think I understood immediately when Mom was charged that she could be convicted," Kate said. "And I understood when then she was convicted that she might never come home."
It turns out she was half-right. In October of 1992, a jury believed not her mother but the prosecutor. Beverly Monroe was sentenced to 22 years in prison.
"I was convicted on not only no evidence, but just sheer speculation," Beverly said.
Lawyer Kate Monroe quit her job and spent the next six years searching for proof of her mother's innocence.
She found it in 1999. Prosecutors, she discovered, had withheld evidence showing that the likely cause of Roger de la Burde's death was suicide, not murder.
Seven years after her conviction, Beverly Monroe was released.
(CBS)
She was 62 … and starting over.
"In that time, what do you think you lost?" Cobiella asked.
"You lose everything that you had in a normal life," Beverly said. "For me it was house, job, career, income, separation from my family. You lose health insurance, life insurance, all of the security that you had."
Monroe tried to get it all back, starting with a job. And though she had a good earlier job history, along with a masters degree in chemistry, she also had a prison record.
"See, what I did, and also the most honest approach, is just to talk to people and tell them what happened."
"Did that work?" Cobiella asked.
"No," Beverly laughed. "Everybody was extremely empathetic and shocked and stunned. And didn't quite know what to do with that."
"But they didn't want to hire you."
"Exactly."
"I don't think any of these people realize what they're up against," said Peter Neufeld, co-director of the Innocence Project, the group that - using DNA evidence - so far has helped free 235 people falsely convicted of serious crimes, 17 on death row.
Quote
"And the reason is that, when they first come out, not only is there the fame that comes with the media sort of capturing that moment of freedom, but also, they feel, 'Okay, now I've been vindicated. Now everything will come to me, finally, that's been kept from me for so many years,'" said Neufield. You lose everything that you had in a normal life. For me it was house, job, career, income, separation from my family. You lose health insurance, life insurance, all of the security that you had.
Beverly Monroe"So there's an expectation. Unfortunately, reality is different than expectations, particularly for these wrongly convicted."
Just ask Larry Peterson. He was found innocent and released over three years ago after being sentenced to life plus 20 years for the 1987 killing and sexual assault of a young woman in New Jersey.
"Yes, I always knew I would get out," Peterson told Cobiella. "I just didn't know when. I didn't know how, you know, but that day came."
"And what was that day like?"
"Oh, man, it was joy. It was joy!"
He was 37 when he went to prison. He was 54 the day he walked out, freed because a DNA test had proved his innocence.
"Prison is capital H-e-l-l, it's hell," Peterson said.
We met Peterson in the parking lot of the truck driving school from which he'd just graduated. He was hoping that, after years of failure, it might lead to what he says would be his first job since being released from prison.
"When I went out to seek employment, any place that you go - and they do a criminal background check, when it come back and I have 'murder' upon my jacket, if you have 'rape' up on your jacket, you can't get a job."
"But you were exonerated," Cobiella said.
"What's that?" Peterson laughed. "What does that mean? It simply means that you are out of prison. It doesn't mean it erases your record."
"When they go to an employer and they bring the newspaper saying they were exonerated, the employer says, 'Well, that's wonderful. But, you know, you've got a 20-year black hole. And besides, even if you were innocent, you hung around some pretty mean characters for 20 years. I'm f------ sorry, you just don't have the skill set I need. I wish you well, but I can't hire you.' And, 'I can't give you this apartment.' And, 'I can't give you credit.'"
"Are you angry about all of this?" Cobiella asked.
"Mad as hell. Yes. Mad as hell, yes."
In the courtroom Thomas McGowan heard a judge express sympathy: "Words cannot say how sorry I am for the last 23 years."
Twenty-three years - that's how long McGowan was in prison for a burglary and rape he didn't commit.
"April 16th, that's a good day, good day," he said.
Cobiella met McGowan just thirteen days after his release.
"I'm still on this high," he said. "It's the best high. It is. New life. You know, I want to know how that feels to get a job. How it feels to get out there amongst the people. You know, just the whole different thing now, Life. It's a whole different life."
(CBS)
Cobiella took him for a tour of a Circuit City store. "Ever been to a big store like this?" she asked.
"Not like this."
"Welcome to the world of electronics!"
She showed him large flat screen TVs, home theatre systems. "When I went in, could only see that at the movies," he said.
She showed him a laptop computer and its finger control. "That's the cursor. You've seen that?" she asked.
"No," he said.
"What is new to you?" she asked.
"Everything is new, all that. Everything is new, a whole new world."
But it turns out that "whole new world" can be tougher than a prison yard.
"I ain't got no choice but to say it will be beautiful," McGowan said.
For twelve full months now, Thomas McGowan has been searching for work. He's still unemployed.
Larry Peterson finally found work as a deliveryman.
As for Beverly Monroe, she's working, but as a low-paid administrative assistant with no benefits.
She says playing piano brings some peace. Still, she misses the lifestyle she lost:
"It would not be enough to survive on if I did not have still some savings, and Social Security," she said.
Her mother's ordeal has also changed her daughter, Kate. After Beverly was freed, Kate moved to Utah to head the Rocky Mountain Innocence Project.
"I've seen far worse cases," she told Cobiella. "I've seen cases where you know equally and wholly innocent people, police have manufactured physical evidence. You know forensic scientists have manufactured evidence. You know prosecutors have known that their witnesses were lying."
Last year, she watched Utah Governor Jon Huntsman sign a compensation law that she helped push through the state legislature. It gives exonerated prisoners about $35,000 for every year of false imprisonment, up to 15 years. Their criminal record is expunged.
But 25 states have no such program.
The other half provides a patchwork of compensation.
The laws in Virginia provide nothing for Beverly Monroe.
But Kate, who knows so well what can happen to innocent people wrongly convicted, still considers her mother lucky:
"The reality is, this is a triumphant story. We had a happy ending. And so if anybody were to say, you know, 'Your mom's doing really well-off, considering,' I would say, 'Absolutely.'"
"Well, I think most people believe 'it'll never be me,'" Cobiella said.
"Well, I thought that, too!" Beverly said. "And I can now tell anybody in this country, including the prosecution and anyone else, it can happen to anyone, regardless of your economic status, regardless of your education, regardless of your record. It can happen to you."
For more info:
© MMIX, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment See all 40 Comments
- I can totally relate to the helplessness one feel when accused of a crime they didn't commit. I was 22 years old and getting a divorce. My husband didn't pay child support until the divorce had been final for 6 months. He showed up at my door, said he was sorry that he hadn't given me any money for our 2 daughters, and gave me $400 cash with a promise to give me more in two weeks. I was arrested two weeks later for passing counterfeit money. As I found out later, he had wanted custody of the girls and thought it would be easier if I wasn't around. The whole court thing was like a bad dream. Even though I didn't go to prison, my whole life was changed. Because I now had a record, many doors slammed in my face and I am still feeling the effects 40 years later.
- Reply to this comment
- I was charged with a crime and maliciously prosecuted by a questionable Prosecuting Attorney, that was trying to have removed from public office. I know first hand the hardship imposed by a corrupt official trying to ruin your reputation and life. I was fortunate and had a very good attorney.
I don't understand why prosecutors are not getting tried and convicted from falsely imprisoning an innocent person. As far as I'm concerned these types of crimes should be considered attempted murder. The victim could be raped, beaten or murdered while in custody. Their safety is never guaranteed.
When politicians do not get held accountable for their actions, they quickly run amuck. - Reply to this comment
- I would encourage anyone needing help and/or a job after finding themselves in this situation to investigate the Delancey Street Foundation (www.delanceystreetfoundation.org), started in San Francisco but now operating in several major cities in the US -- they operate cafes and other businesses that WILL hire people regardless of them having spent time in prison.
- Reply to this comment
- My Grandson is having that problem now it's not as bad as some cases but he happen to be at the wrong place when it got raided he's no angel but it all started in 2006 when he was riding in a stolen car he was charged with rec'd stolen goods and he wasn't the driver and now he has record of third degree felony and he can't get a job so he sit's and smokes weed so now he in county for something stupid and I can't get him out or a good lawyer .
- Reply to this comment
- "An honest legal system is all that stands between fairness to citizens, or a false conviction....A corrupt legal system ruins lives. It's bad enough to have to stand before 12 people fresh off the street.....But to be innocent and still have to be there, just because the cops lied and the prosecutor with held evidence that could have proven that you were "not guilty" ?...."
Posted by luke_4u at 2:41 PM : Apr 19, 2009
Privatization of our corrections industry is partially to blame for this. We have always had a certain number of people convicted who were innocent of the crimes charged to them; and out of that group a few the prosecution knew from the start weren't guilty. Of anything.
I believe the incidence of such outrages is rising steeply. Part of this can be attributed to greater awareness of the issue, more thorough reporting and the technology we have evolved to prove innocence of certain crimes. But a large part is due to the fact so much of our corrections capacity has been turned over to the for-profit private sector. If we consider corrections as a business rather than a community need, then the more customers (i.e. prisoners - wrongly convicted or not) the business get the more revenue (and profit) is acquired. And if you are familiar withe the recent case in Luzerne Co. Pennsylvania where two judges were accused of taking cash for imposing unususally harsh sentences on young delinquents (some of whom, again, turned out to be innocent) then you are also aware that many public officials also have a stake in perpetuating this unpleasant privatization trend.
"Where I live, a local prosecutor was interviewed on TV about the wrongly convicted. He said -- on TV -- that yes, he understands that such things happen. But that is just the price we have to pay for a civilized society."
Posted by Void_Master at 2:33 PM : Apr 19, 2009
He may have meant "That's just a cost of doing business". As I mentioned to luke_4u above, corrections is evolving into a for-profit business and the more people we can incarcerate the better the business gets. This is nothing especially new....I was involved in a conversation with an employee of a private detention facility in eastern Colorado about 8 years ago and was told that in order for his company to realize any substantial profit about 10% of the population needed to be locked up. He didn't say if he meant the local population or some other, nor did he give any reason for coming up with the figure he did but he made it clear that merit for conviction was of little relevance and it made no difference to him if his inmates were guilty or not. - Reply to this comment
- What is wrong with these people? Get angry. Get even. SUE, SUE, SUE!
Sue the state, the prosecutor, the police, the penal system. Hire the most nasty, gutter-fighting lawyer (even if you cannot afford one) in the country. Go on every media outlet and demand retribution. You are just too nice! That is why you were targetted in the first place. Fight back, Fight dirty. Make it your life's mission to get even and get a few million dollars from these officials who have stolen your life. - Reply to this comment
- From the above article, "Cobiella took him for a tour of a Circuit City store. "Ever been to a big store like this?" she asked.
"Not like this."
"Welcome to the world of electronics!"
_______________
Is CBS just recycling the news today? Their story on pharma in the rivers and lakes is about 6 or mor months old. Circut City has been closed since early this year, how did Cobiella show an exonerated convict all the electronics in a closed and sold-out store?
CBS is really scraping the low points to find something news worthy. - Reply to this comment
- I met a man last year whom was locked up in arizona seventeen years for a crime against a arizona state trooper. Dna got him released. He moved down the mountain range from me . He is great person with a great outlook and has a fine home and autos and invites his neighbors one weekend a month to a backyard party. He says he loves giving these paries. Too bad the citizens of arizona that pay him 6000 a month for life can't enjoy it. He went in at 17 out at 35.
- Reply to this comment
- Tell me again why so many people hate the government, cops, lawyers.....nefarious characters in the prosecution. Thank goodness the INNOCENT PROJECT is there.
- Reply to this comment
- Posted by actornaught at 7:40 PM : Apr 19, 2009
Imprisoning and then killing an innocent person is THE most heinous of crimes, more so than any serial killing or mass murder. In the latter case, at least the victims are remembered in a positive light. When a person is wrongly convicted and then killed, they not only lost their life but also their name and dignity, because they are forever remembered as criminals and murderers, with no chance for redress.
And the second most heinous crime is that as a society we willingly allow the most heinous crime to happen. - Reply to this comment
- "...Innocence Project, the group that - using DNA evidence - so far has helped free...17 on death row..."
After getting the death penalty, people that have been wrongly convicted can't be set free.
Two independent studies concluded that at least 50 Americans were wrongly executed in the 20th century. Barbaric.
Utterly barbaric. (And expensive.)
How many is too many to justify keeping the death penalty? - Reply to this comment
- What do people expect? They elect into high office people who claim to be "tough" on crime, judging solely by their conviction record. They allow the criminal justice system and the prison system to be privatized, effectively turning it into a growth industry. And then they wonder why abuses like these happen, and why we have the highest rate of incarceration in the Western world.
- Reply to this comment
- I think these people should in addition to $35,000 a year be given credit for social security contributions as well, so they're not bereft when they reach old age. I know I've seen a recent story about a black kid who died of asthma in prison before he was proved by DNA evidence as not being guilty of rape. The only mistake he made was letting the cops have his picture so they could show it to the victim. I know I've had my picture taken by the cops for merely riding a bicycle down the street. That's what they call pro-active policing. What a bunch of bunk. It's left me with zilch respect for cops. I even had a cop stop me after that happened to ask me some questions about what I saw down the bike path and I replied, "I don't talk to pigs." and rode off. Retired nuclear engineer and 13 gallon blood donor.
- Reply to this comment
- This story is a sad comment on the justice system in this country. It's appalling that prosecutors can behave like this and ruin innocent people's lives with impunity. And even when they are finally proven innocent, they get nothing to compensate them. There are unfortunately many other cases of abuse of citizens by their government, both local and national. I had my career destroyed by a state licensing board (Maine) which revoked my dental license for completely bogus reasons, blaming me for actions caused by one of the seven board members. There are many other cases of abuse by this state licensing board, and the "prosecutor" for the board is of the same ilk as described here in other comments. Many innocent healthcare practitioners are being ruined, as no doubt is happening in other licensed professions. These boards ostensibly exist to protect the public, but they often are really interested in their own agendas. It's no wonder that the country is going down the tubes, since the true incompetents are in charge.
- Reply to this comment
- Where I live, a local prosecutor was interviewed on TV about the wrongly convicted. He said -- on TV -- that yes, he understands that such things happen. But that is just the price we have to pay for a civilized society.
That's atrocious. But the worst thing is that nobody smashed his head to a pulp after he made that statement. - Reply to this comment
- I've been aware of this atrocity for a long time. That's why I get angry when they spend TV time and Internet space talking about the suffering of political dissidents and human rights violations in other countries. There are thousands of people sitting in jail for things they didn't do.
Lift prosecutorial and police immunity. Get rid of juror anonymity. Make public the names and addresses of all the judges, prosecutors, enforcers and jurors involved in criminal cases and let them take their chances for their misdeeds like everybody else. - Reply to this comment
- My sister was accused of child abuse, she ran a day care center (parents saw that her family had some money and thought they could sue after her conviction). She was and is innocent and it took over $25,000. to prove it. The case never went to trial because before it did we hired an expensive attorney to show that we had the evidence that she was innocent.
Without that money she would be in prison. All the prosecutor cared about was getting a conviction. He did not care about the truth at all. After we proved her innocence he just went back to trying to get other convictions, no penalty for him at all.
This was in Nebraska.
If she had come from a poor family she would be in prison for crimes she did not commit.
He should be in prison for what he put her through.
To be poor in this country makes you very vulnerable. - Reply to this comment
- I've always thought and still do, that if the police lie, no matter what their reasoning, they should be jailed and prosecuted. If a prosecutor lies or withholds evidence that could help prove the innocence of the accused, they also should be jailed and prosecuted, and never allowed to practice law again. An honest legal system is all that stands between fairness to citizens, or a false conviction. When our legal system doesn't follow the law, why should anybody else ? A corrupt legal system ruins lives. It's bad enough to have to stand before 12 people fresh off the street that couldn't pour pi55 out of a boot, even if the directions were on the heel. But to be innocent and still have to be there, just because the cops lied and the prosecutor with held evidence that could have proven that you were "not guilty" ? Kind of make's you proud to be an Amerikan, huh ? The prisons are overcrowded enough as it is, without putting people in there, that don't belong there.
- Reply to this comment
- Where I live, a local prosecutor was interviewed on TV about the wrongly convicted. He said -- on TV -- that yes, he understands that such things happen. But that is just the price we have to pay for a civilized society.
If that is the case, then I for one am ready for a return to the Stone Age. - Reply to this comment
- I found myself shaking my head in disbelief, with tears rolling down my cheeks by the time I finished reading this article. It is criminal that there is no recourse for most of these innocent victims of our justice system! Disgusting!
And this is allowed to go on in our UNITED STATES OF AMERICA? This is allowed to continue with no repercussions on the part of the innocent defendants? Unbelievable! - Reply to this comment
