April 16, 2009

Friends, Foes Cash In On Palin

Politico: Alaska Governor Is A Fundraising Juggernaut For Both Political Parties

    • Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin speaks during the Republican Governors Association Annual Conference in Miami, Thursday, Nov. 13, 2008.

      Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin speaks during the Republican Governors Association Annual Conference in Miami, Thursday, Nov. 13, 2008.  (AP)

    • Republican vice presidential candidate, Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, right, speaks to supporters at a Reno, Nev., campaign rally Tuesday, Oct. 21, 2008.

      Republican vice presidential candidate, Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, right, speaks to supporters at a Reno, Nev., campaign rally Tuesday, Oct. 21, 2008.  (AP Photo/Scott Sady)

    Previous slide Next slide
  • Timeline Palin's Path

    A look at Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin's life and career

  • Photo Essay Sarah Palin

    Alaska's youngest and first female governor tabbed to be McCain's running mate.

(The Politico)  This story was written by Kenneth P. Vogel.


Since the conclusion of the presidential election, Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin (R) has largely avoided the political fundraising circuit. Nevertheless, she’s emerged as an almost unparalleled fundraising force, with both foes and fans minting money off the mere mention of her name.

The candidates and causes that have climbed aboard the Palin gravy train include, but aren’t limited to, abortion rights foes and supporters, environmental groups, and political committees supporting both Republican and Democratic candidates. It’s a testament not only to her star power, but to the strong feelings she generates among partisans.

For the most part, Palin herself is an unwitting participant in the burgeoning business.

“The only authorized thing out there at this point is SarahPAC. And the rest are just using her name and brand to draw attention and roll in the dollars,” said Meg Stapleton, a spokeswoman for SarahPAC, the committee Palin set up in January to raise money for her political staff, travels and contributions to like-minded candidates.

Aside from an early e-mailed solicitation from the group and a Thursday anti-abortion banquet in Indiana that the PAC will pay for Palin to attend, neither the governor nor her PAC have engaged in much in fundraising this year, due to her attempts to focus on Alaska’s legislative session.

But that hasn’t stopped others from seeking to fill their own coffers by pillorying her in direct mail, piggybacking on or her stances and symbolism, hinting she might appear at their fundraisers and sometimes even falsely implying contributions will go directly to Palin.

With some groups, it’s not entirely clear what the overarching goal is, other than to milk the Palin brand for everything it’s worth.

“Sarah Palin’s Defense Fund,” for instance, was the name of one curious entity until a sternly-worded letter from a Palin lawyer instructed the site’s proprietor to “remove all references to Governor Sarah Palin and/or her likeness from your site pending written approval.” That prompted the proprietor to replace that fund with another called “Sarah's War Chest” which seeks contributions “to encourage her to run in the upcoming elections.”

Last month, a different group called Americans in Contact PAC launched a high-tech, multi-state campaign seeking contributions to help re-elect Palin as Alaska governor in 2010, even though its own direct mail included puzzling fine print serving notice that all contributions “are only used in Federal elections."

Stapleton said that Palin’s virtual absence from the fundraising scene has created a vacuum that others have used to their benefit. But she asserted that continued intense interest in the Alaska governor will enable her to be a successful fundraiser when she does hit the rubber chicken circuit, regardless of how many groups have tapped her name to raise money.

“If we find that other people have had a chance at the dollars first, that’s O.K.,” she said. “We’re not really concerned about diluting any message. It’s just we’re concerned about people thinking the dollars are going for her or her vision or her philosophy or values when it may just be going for a big screen TV.”

Stapleton singled out an Americans in Contact PAC direct mailer that arrived at the Palin residence in Wasilla, Alaska.

“[Palin’s husband] Todd brought it to my house and said ‘you guys shouldn’t be doing this,’” Stapleton recalled. “And I said ‘Todd, that’s not from us.’ But it was quite tricky. And, gosh, I was fooled reading through it.”

That certainly wasn’t the intent of the mailer, said Gabriel S. Joseph, III, the treasurer of Americans in Contact, which on its website lists its mission as an effort “to identify social ad fiscal conservatives throughout America and engage them at the grassroots level in the political process of elections and legislation at all levels of government.”

“This is just an independent, altruistic, committed effort to do our part to help Sarah Palin get reelected governor of Alaska. Period. End of line,” Joseph said, explaining that the PAC is paying a polling, data-mining and fundraising firm of which he is the president, ccAdvertising, to prospect for likely donors by making so-called “artificial intelligence” telephone calls to a database of “13 million identified conservatives from previous efforts.”

Between September and the end of last year - the period covered by the PAC’s only Federal Election Commission filings  - Americans in Contact raised $73,000, contributed $1,750 to candidates and paid $28,000 to ccAdvertising for “PAC surveys” and phone and administrative services.

Quote

She’s becoming the new Rush Limbaugh.

Christian Heinze, “GOP 12”
Joseph wouldn’t say how the PAC would spend the money raised from its Palin appeal (“Why would I want the enemy to know to know what’s going on?” he said). Instead, he explained that, generally speaking, “there is money spent in raising the money. But there is also money spent in accumulating the data of supporters for her that can then be generated and used in get out the vote efforts and otherwise.”

More importantly, he said the data can be used “to identify more donors and more supporters potentially to build an army of supporters for Sarah Palin. Of Sarah Palin, not for Sarah Palin. Of Sarah Palin.”

Other conservative groups see Palin’s drawing power and pine for her to headline their fundraisers, with some reticent to take "no" for an answer.

“I can’t tell how many invitations I’ve seen with ‘Gov. Palin’ in 25-point font and ‘invited’ in 1-point font,” said Stapleton of SarahPAC.

The Palin pitch is proving irresistible for both sides of the abortion debate. The Susan B. Anthony List, a group that supports female politicians who oppose abortion rights, began seeing its paid membership spike soon after Republican presidential nominee John McCain tapped Palin - a vigorous abortion rights opponent - to be his running mate, said its political director Joy Yearout.

“It’s invigorated us in ways that we could never have anticipated,” she said.

The group used Palin in fundraising emails during the campaign, and it’s continued raising money through a passive appeal on a free social networking site it established called “Team Sarah,”  that boasts 65,000 members, said Yearout.

Palin appears to be just as effective for groups supporting abortion rights.

An anonymous viral e-mail asking abortion rights supporters to contribute to Planned Parenthood “in Sarah Palin’s name” generated more than $1 million in contributions in the month after the Republican convention, according to spokesman Tait Sye.

And NARAL Pro-Choice America used direct mail and email solicitations targeting Palin to boost its fundraising “significantly” in 2008, said spokesman Ted Miller.

“Although she has taken a somewhat lower profile now, if she chooses to reemerge and take on a more public profile in either attacking President Obama or pushing anti-choice policies, our members will respond in kind,” Miller said.

Another group that saw its fundraising soar by opposing Palin was the Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund, which raised more than $1 million to air an ad in swing states blasting Palin for supporting aerial wolf hunting.

The ad, which was reshot after the election to feature Ashley Judd, continues to boost the group’s membership and fundraising, said fund president Rodger Schlickeisen.

“In this age, when a lot of the donors out there look at thi administration and this Congress and incorrectly conclude that [on] environment and conservation [issues], their worries are over, it is very beneficial to us to be able to point to Alaska and Palin,” he said.

The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee apparently agrees since it sent out a pair of fundraising appeals blasting Palin last month after the Republican House and Senate campaign committees prematurely announced that Palin would be headlining their June fundraiser.

“They have her. We have you,” read an emailed DCCC solicitation with Palin’s picture.

Another DCCC plea for cash, this one from Democratic consultant and commentator James Carville, suggested Palin should “get back on that bridge to nowhere.”

It hardly mattered that Palin ended up backing out of the GOP dinner, said Christian Heinze, whose blog “GOP 12” obsessively tracks every mention, movement and statement of prospective 2012 Republican presidential candidates.

“She’s becoming the new Rush Limbaugh,” Heinze said. “I get emails from people all the time saying ‘when is Sarah Palin going to go away?’ But neither side wants her to go away. She’s benefitting both of them. They seem to be getting pretty equitable bang for the buck off of her.”


By Kenneth P. Vogel
Copyright 2009 POLITICO



We cover politics with enterprise, style, and impact.

Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 49 Comments
by ladypirate2 April 25, 2009 11:15 AM EDT
Stuart2560: You might think that Obama knows what he reads but he doesn't know how many states there are in the union! He thinks there are 56! At least Sarah knows that there are 50 states in the union!

Also it wasn't that Sarah didn't know what she reads because she certainly does. She didn't answer the question because the question was insulting! It implied that people in Alaska don't read! Also none of the other candidates were asked that question so why should she be? She should have been shown the same respect that the other candidates were shown!
Reply to this comment
by tigerrram9 April 17, 2009 7:40 PM EDT
America did not need the Palins in 2008 and for sure we don't need them in 2012. Just keep your eyes to the north and you will see more negative news on the Palin Saga. I am just waiting to see something on Todd Palin. He will err and the cameras will be there to catch the new.
Reply to this comment
by dj292009 April 17, 2009 6:00 PM EDT
Gee, that's funny, DJ. You voted Obama, didn't you? Any of the room regulars know that.

So, since you're sore, and since the guy you voted for WON, that makes you the sore winner. And what was it you said about sore winners?
Posted by slownewsday05

Hey Slow, have I said that the other party is the party of hate? Do I go around blaming one party when I know both parties are at fault. Do I talk about Palin and say she is the witch of alaska knowing Obama's preacher is not any better?

NO, so do us all a big favor and stop thinking you know me, you don't. You have not been right about me one time
Reply to this comment
by TPS2 April 17, 2009 5:38 PM EDT
Show a link to such a claim.
by actornaught


www.msnbc.msn.com
Reply to this comment
by actornaught April 17, 2009 3:39 PM EDT
Great summary of Olberman's talking points
Posted by TPS2 at 7:33 AM : Apr 17, 2009

Show a link to such a claim.
Reply to this comment
by jsilver2th April 17, 2009 2:36 PM EDT
Posted by oftencensord: "her critics still are working overtime to cast her either as a dimwit Tina Fey skit, or a fanatical anti-abortionist, or a religious fascist ! "

Oh gee- no I don't work over time - I quit at 5:00. It's not a hard job though- she does all the work for us.
Reply to this comment
by actornaught April 17, 2009 12:34 PM EDT
I like the part where, in a recent Tonight Show interview, John McCain refused to name Sarah Palin as a legitimate future leader of the republican party.

Where was THAT guy during the campaign last year?
Reply to this comment
by seriously121 April 17, 2009 11:52 AM EDT
iam4honesty is sooooooo funny... "it's called comedy" that's hysterical.
Reply to this comment
by slownewsday05 April 17, 2009 11:20 AM EDT
Wow look at the great democrats.; What a great party you all are
Posted by dj292009

sorry loser!
Posted by lucasnico

First off, It is better than a soar winner. secondly you should be proud
Posted by dj292009

Gee, that's funny, DJ. You voted Obama, didn't you? Any of the room regulars know that.

So, since you're sore, and since the guy you voted for WON, that makes you the sore winner. And what was it you said about sore winners?
Reply to this comment
by TPS2 April 17, 2009 10:33 AM EDT
ainttaken
Great summary of Olberman's talking points
Reply to this comment
by rational_1 April 17, 2009 8:57 AM EDT
I believe Palin is all three. Never knew a candidiate so ill-equipped to be President as her.
Posted by Stuart2560 at 5:42 AM : Apr 17, 2009

The guy currently in office is a pretty close second and behaving like he's ready to assume the lead.
Reply to this comment
by cs4466 April 17, 2009 8:47 AM EDT
The Witch of Wasilla certainly grabs the neocons' attention. No doubt about that!
Posted by cs4466 at 8:25 PM : Apr 16, 2009

Apparently she has yours as well.
Posted by TPS2 at 8:37 PM : Apr 16, 2009

It's a little like watching a train wreck, hard to take your eyes off it.
Reply to this comment
by iam4honesty April 17, 2009 8:19 AM EDT
ainttaken, it truly boggles the mind that someone as vapid, shallow and self righteous as Nancy Pelosi is Speaker of the House and third in line to be President of the United States.
Posted by rbstrcklnd



WOW!!
I'm impressed. The last Palin supporter I talked to thought the Secretary of Defense was third in line.
Reply to this comment
by iam4honesty April 17, 2009 8:16 AM EDT
If she was truly irrelevant, the media would quit printing all the articles on her. She must really be a threat to the left. They just can't leave her alone.
Posted by rbstrcklnd


It's called comedy.
Reply to this comment
by iam4honesty April 17, 2009 8:06 AM EDT
Despite Sarah Palin repeatedly presenting common sense conservative positions and principles of empowering people and businesses, her critics still are working overtime to cast her either as a dimwit Tina Fey skit, or a fanatical anti-abortionist, or a religious fascist ! Good Freaking Sakes, what a bunch fools you are to believe this crap...
Posted by oftencensord


The video of Palin on stage with her preacher having the "Witches" exorcised was not a Tina Fey skit... it was real. The interviews she did with news commentators where she couldn't name one publication she reads was not a Tina Fey skit... it was real. And the list goes on and on. Sarah Palin is the epitome of the dumb republican.
Reply to this comment
by iam4honesty April 17, 2009 8:00 AM EDT
The Palin Family is a threat to the democrats and we all know it because you say this every time and you keep saying the same old lies. Wow I wonder what would happen if she actually did run, and GOT the GOP nomination, well then you would be WRONG
Posted by dj292009


PLEASE keep thinking that way, and PLEASE convince all your republican buddies to think the same.

BTW you called me a liar based on my last post??? Sarah Palin DOES believe in witches (it's documented on film), her sister-in law DID get arrested for burgulary (Todd's sister), and Levi's mom WAS arrested on drug charges. How did I lie?
Reply to this comment
by Justonefirefly April 17, 2009 7:43 AM EDT
I find it hard to believe anyone believes that Sarah Palin hasn't sacrificed her family. She trotted them out like a dog and pony show. She took them out of school to feed her family image. She had a then pregnant daughter and trotted her out. She drags out her baby and shows no real involvement in her chiildren lives. She is not a mother. She is a beauty queen, a hunter, a celebrity, but trust me she is not a mother. Nor has she ever been that involved in her children's lives. She is more interested in her tanning beds and wardrobe and running her mouth but I am really surprised she even remembers their names.
She is now to busy to run Alaska. Well Alaska, Trig Trip, Bristol and who ever the rest of her children are: Just because she is your mother or you elected her doesn't mean that she has to do a good job. She has to have time for herself. You know, children are just going to grow up and get pregnant and leave and voters are going to just have to stuff it. For heavens sakes - She is Sarah Palin. Who else out there had a mother like this? They should have been sterilized. Her interest is only in herself.
Reply to this comment
by excoachken April 17, 2009 6:59 AM EDT
A typical born again psycho. They mess up their own lives with poor decisions (drugs, teen pregnancy, crime, etc), then they finally read 1 book which promises to erase their irresponsible mistakes. Because of this "revelation" they will spent the rest of their lives endlessly ranting at the rest of society about how they "know the answer" to happiness, based on fairy tales, exaggerations, and deceptions described in that 1 book. They become Dr. Phil, overnight, and feel obliged to annoy all more intelligent life with their sales pitch. Even their pets get bored with the same old krap while waiting for their dog dish to be filled.
Reply to this comment
by rharrin1 April 17, 2009 5:48 AM EDT
Gee you all would have voted for Mickkey Mouse if he was running. Then you sit here and tell us that the GOP is the Party of Hate and all that when your party says the same Damn thing, but again you get a pass right, Why because you are democrats?

Posted by dj292009 at 10:00 PM : Apr 16, 2009

You can't see past the end of your nose pinocchio we voted against your mickey and minnie in the election.
Reply to this comment
by merlgrey April 17, 2009 2:34 AM EDT
a tanning bed in the govs mansion

narcissist.
Reply to this comment
See all 49 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Health Care Bill Clears 1st Senate Hurdle

    (268 recent comments)

Exclusive Webshow

The road ahead in Afghanistan, and the crucial decision Obama faces.
Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: