The Income Tax System is Broken
43 Percent Of Americans Pay No Federal Income Tax, A Sign That Something's Wrong, Writes Declan McCullagh
-
(AP)
-
Interactive U.S. Taxes Find out more about where your dollars go, and take a quiz on filing with the IRS.
An astonishing 43.4 percent of Americans now pay zero or negative federal income taxes. The number of single or jointly-filing "taxpayers" - the word must be applied sparingly - who pay no taxes or receive government handouts has reached 65.6 million, out of a total of 151 million.
Those numbers come from an analysis published yesterday by the Tax Policy Center, a joint project of the Urban Institute and Brookings Institution. Neither is a low-tax or conservative advocacy group; the Urban Institute was created under the Johnson administration during the Great Society era, and it receives most of its funding from the federal government.
"You've got a larger and larger share of people paying less and less for the services provided by the federal government," says Roberton Williams, a senior fellow at the Tax Policy Center. "The concern is that the majority can say, 'Let's have more benefits, spend more,' if they're not paying for it. It's 'free.' That's not a good thing to have."
By historic standards, today's situation is an aberration. Between 1950 and 1990, the number of owe-no-money federal tax returns averaged 21 percent, dipping to 18 percent in 1986, according to Tax Foundation data. In the 1990s, the owe-no-money percentage hovered around 25 percent of taxpayers.
But then politicians began another round of tinkering with the tax code, adding reams of new pages to an already incomprehensible set of rules that even the guy overseeing the IRS can't seem to figure out.
Democrats wanted to lower taxes on the least affluent, while Republicans wanted to lower taxes on everyone. The result was bipartisan enthusiasm for tax credits aimed at everything from children (1997) and college students (1997) to hybrid cars (2005) and homebuyers (2009). Many of these credits dole out cash to people even if they report no income, making them mere government handouts.
"There's no difference at all in terms of the effects on the federal deficit," says Williams of the Tax Policy Center. "It's perfectly equivalent. It's just easier to say, 'I cut your taxes' as opposed to 'I created a new federal program to send money to people.'"
I'm talking here about federal income taxes, not other taxes like Social Security, Medicare, state income taxes, sales taxes, or car registration taxes, some of which are extracted through payroll deductions. The owe-no-money crowd tends to get hit by at least some of those.
The perils of today's situation should be obvious. The United States is close to a tipping point - where most people can skip the post office run on April 15 to mail a check because they're expecting one from the government instead.
"It is somewhat odd that you have a decreasing number of folks paying into the federal income tax system, a decreasing number of folks who have a stake in what the government pays for," says Matt Moon of the non-partisan Tax Foundation in Washington, D.C.
It then becomes tempting to vote for politicians promising more and more handouts, paid for by money forcibly extracted from an ever-shrinking number of their neighbors. In addition to being immoral, it's poor public policy: people who pay no taxes but nevertheless get benefits are less likely to be careful overseers of their elected representatives.
"At some point people become less and less invested in making sure their government is accountable and frugal," says Peter Sepp, vice president for policy and communications at the National Taxpayers Union, a lower-tax advocacy group. "If you pay very little for getting all kinds of government benefits, you might view those programs as a bargain, even though they may waste tens of billions of dollars a year."
As a candidate, President Obama promised still more tax credits, including ones aimed at child care, "clean cars," and savings accounts. As the Wall Street Journal explained at the time: "You can receive these checks even if you have no income-tax liability. In other words, they are an income transfer - a federal check - from taxpayers to nontaxpayers. Once upon a time we called this 'welfare,' or in George McGovern's 1972 campaign a 'Demogrant.'"
A recession, the stimulus, and innumerable bailouts have placed Mr. Obama's plans on hold. But the expiration of the Bush tax cuts at midnight on December 31, 2010 will renew interest in a tax law rewrite.
That will be an opportunity to gut the current system and replace it with something simpler and fairer. After all, if government is important enough to force most of us to work until April 13 to pay its bills, why shouldn't everyone share the pain?
I encourage you to bookmark the home page for my Other People's Money column. An RSS feed is available too. If you have questions, feedback, or suggestions, please feel free to e-mail me at
declan.mccullagh@cnet.com. Declan McCullagh is the chief political correspondent for CNET and a CBS News EconWatch contributor. Previously, he was Wired's Washington bureau chief and a reporter for Time.com and Time magazine in Washington, D.C. He has taught journalism, public policy, and First Amendment law. He is an occasional programmer, avid analog and digital photographer, and lives with his wife in the San Francisco Bay area.
By Delcan McCullagh
© MMIX, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.

The secrets of tennis legend 



- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
... - 6
- next
See all 108 CommentsThey must be including children and seniors with no income other than Social Security, and maybe even teabaggers who don't file tax returns. They use this mysterious term "tax units" without ever defining it.
According to the IRS, over 80% of returns filed had some tax due.
http://www.irs.gov/taxstats/index.html
I am interested in knowing how the 43 percent number was arrived at. Does the number include seniors and disabled folks who are living on Social Security? Does it include students and minors whose income does not reach the taxable level?
If the number was computed based on 2008 filings (for 2007 income), was consideration given to the fact that in order to get the rebate, people who were otherwise not required to file a return, had to file in order to get the rebate?
If the Dems have their way... 90% flat rate across the board might be able to fund the government and wipe out the deficit.. REmember the deficit is now running at 10% of the GDP ...and this is just for the debt service.. eg interest.
If we keep on this tract you can expect that the USA will be no more in 15 years..
Think about it..
Tax the things we buy rather than our paychecks, that way those who have money pay more and those that don't have money pay less...O'bama will have his "automatic" increase in tax for the wealthy and those without automatically pay less...wow so simple. And then ALL income gets it's fair share of tax whether someone made it on a payroll check, tips for services, money made overseas which is brought home [currently not taxed], people watching porn on the internet could be paying [currently not taxed], people in illegal activities [drugs, firearms, prostitution...whatever] would still be giving Uncle Sam his share.
And if the government is concerned about taxing homes, cars to get to work in, or food...don't tax that; or have a "very reduced rate" for those items.
get over it already
Our income taxes and sales taxes are unfair and target the poor. The big corporations specifically should be gone after and not allowed to evade taxes.
Posted by WITHINMEANS at 3:29 PM : Apr 16, 2009
Yes, yes, and yes!
Posted by fiarstar at 11:56 AM : Apr 16, 2009
I couldn't believe what I was advised the other day when I paid a visit to the county seat of where I live. There is current documentation of at least three generations of the same families living off government assistance in this particular county.
Ailments appear to range from "bad nerves" to "bad backs." I have been advised that these people have learned how to "play the system." This government assistance includes help with rent, food stamps, public transportation, health care, and dental services, as well as cash for miscellaneous expenses. Contrary to popular belief, at least in the central Pennsylvania region, the majority of these families are white/caucasian, not hispanic or african-american.
This is just one more example of the ever escalating hemorraging of our country's financial health. Imagine, if you will, this particular situation multiplied literally by millions and millions of families?
If we cannot get a grip on situations like this, we may very well run out of money to be able to help those who are seriously and honestly handicapped, and truly need these services.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
... - 6
- next
See all 108 Comments