April 23, 2009 10:24 AM

Deadly End Raises Stakes In Pirate Attacks

(CBS/AP)  The killing of three Somali pirates in the dramatic U.S. Navy rescue of a cargo ship captain has sparked concern for other hostages and fears that the stakes have been raised for future hijackings in the busy Indian Ocean shipping lane.

Sunday's rescue of Capt. Richard Phillips from his captors aboard a drifting lifeboat followed a shootout at sea on Friday by French navy commandos, who stormed a pirate-held sailboat, killed two pirates and freed four French hostages. The French owner of the vessel was also killed in the assault.

The two operations may have been a setback for the pirates but they are unlikely to quell the brigands, who have vowed to avenge the deaths of their comrades.

Experts indicated that piracy in the Indian Ocean off Somalia, which transformed one of the world's busiest shipping lanes into one of its most dangerous, has entered a new phase with the Navy SEAL rescue operation of Phillips.

It "could escalate violence in this part of the world, no question about it," said Vice Adm. Bill Gortney, commander of U.S. Naval Forces Central Command.

The International Maritime Bureau said Monday it supported the action by the U.S. and French navies, but cautioned it may spark retaliatory moves by pirates.

"We applaud the U.S. and the French action. We feel that they are making the right move, although the results sometimes may be detrimental," said Noel Choong of the IMB's piracy center in Kuala Lumpur.

He did not elaborate, but for families of the 228 foreign nationals aboard 13 ships still held by pirates, the fear is revenge on their loved ones.

"Those released are lucky, but what about those who remain captive?" said Vilma de Guzman, the wife of Filipino seafarer Ruel de Guzman. He has been held by pirates since Nov. 10 along with the 22 other Filipino crew of the chemical tanker MT Stolt Strength.

The U.S. rescue operation "might be dangerous (for) the remaining hostages because the pirates might vent their anger on them," she said.

So far, Somali pirates have never harmed captive foreign crews except for a Taiwanese crew member who was killed under unclear circumstances. In fact, many former hostages say they were treated well and given sumptuous food.

The pirates had operated with near-impunity in the Gulf of Aden north of Somalia, and more recently in waters south of the country after a multinational naval force began patrolling the Gulf.

Choong said there have been 74 attacks this year with 15 hijackings as compared to 111 attacks for all of last year.

The modus operandi of the pirates is simple: Board unarmed or lightly armed merchant ships, fire shots in the air or at the hull to intimidate the crew, divert the ships to hide-outs on the Somali coast and wait for the owners to pay millions of dollars in ransom.

But the game changed last week when the pirates boarded the U.S.-flagged Maersk Alabama. In an act of courage, Phillips offered himself as hostage in return for the safety of his crew.

The pirates transferred the 53-year-old Phillips, a Vermont native, to a lifeboat. But the pirates had not counted on the U.S. military's resolve.

On Sunday, after a five-day standoff during which a small U.S. flotilla tailed the lifeboat, President Obama had personally authorized the use of force. It was a move that may serve to bolster Mr. Obama's credentials as commander of the world's most powerful military.

Navy Seal snipers on a destroyer shot and killed three pirates and plucked an unharmed Phillips to safety. A fourth surrendered.

CBS News correspondent Sheila MacVicar reports that the Navy was defending its decision to use force, arguing that Capt. Phillips life was in imminent danger after one of the pirates was seen holding a gun to his back.

The comrades of the slain pirates immediately threatened retaliation.

"From now on, if we capture foreign ships and their respective countries try to attack us, we will kill them," said Jamac Habeb, a 30-year-old self-proclaimed pirate, told The Associated Press by telephone from the pirate hub, Eyl.

Abdullahi Lami, one of the pirates holding a Greek ship in the pirate den of Gaan, a central Somali town, told the AP that pirates will not take the U.S. action lying down.

"We will retaliate for the killings of our men," he said.

Giles Noakes, chief maritime security officer of the largest international shipping association, the Denmark-based BIMCO, says it is premature to say Philips' rescue will lead to an escalation of violence.

"The question here is whether there will be a change of attitude in the pirates and in their modus operandi. We hope the change will be that they will be even more deterred because of the successful action by both the Maersk Alabama crew and the navies," he said.

Many of the governments whose ships have been captured - including Taiwan's Win Far 161 with a multinational crew of 30 - are in talks with the pirates and would not comment on the consequences of the American rescue for fear of jeopardizing the negotiations.

"We are monitoring the situation closely, but the ship owner wants to keep a low profile to help with their negotiation with the abductors," Taiwanese Foreign Ministry spokesman Henry Chen said.

He said the crew, comprising 17 Filipinos, six Indonesians, five Chinese and two Taiwanese, were safe as of Monday.

Some families also wonder if Phillips' rescue drew so much of attention because of his nationality.

"It's difficult when the ship's crew are all Filipinos because we are ignored," said de Guzman. "Maybe if there are Japanese, Koreans or British among the crew, the case would get more attention."

© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Add a Comment See all 277 Comments
by toldyouso29 April 16, 2009 1:37 AM EDT
Perhaps the American businesses can respect piracy as kindred spirits..sort of see them as 'corporate raiders engaged in temporary, hostile takeovers--then our businessmen buy them off and are allowed to continue--or...it is no different than the extortion bribery money paid to the FDA and other government operations as the cost to do business. The only people who don't get the game are regular Joes who still think there is honor and integrity in the land.
Reply to this comment
by batchitcrazy April 14, 2009 2:13 AM EDT
"We will retaliate for the killings of our men."--Yup and we will kill you every time you take one of our own...dam Somali pirates
Posted by Truckman09 at 3:53 PM : Apr 13, 2009
----------------------------
Let the games begin....
Kudos to the Sniper Team.... outstanding marksmanship......
Reply to this comment
by batchitcrazy April 14, 2009 2:11 AM EDT
Hi there gents :-)
Posted by IrishWench01 at 3:49 PM : Apr 13, 2009
---------------------------
Top o' the mornin to ya Lady
Reply to this comment
by quapawsix April 13, 2009 10:36 PM EDT
we will retaliate? ooooo I'm scared
Reply to this comment
by ubrew12 April 13, 2009 10:08 PM EDT
Suppose European nations were dumping nuclear and toxic waste in the waters you fished in, causing your children to get sick and die.

Suppose European nations, having fished out their waters, began fishing out YOUR waters, leaving you and your family to starve, because you're a subsistence Somalian fisherman.

So, these guys banded together and started a militia to police the waters offshore and keep illegal dumping and fishing from occurring. And it got out of hand and they now need to be reigned in. They're pirates, for sure, but pirates often start out of necessity and even with the lawful right on their side. And so in go the fleets of the worlds most powerful nations.

There was a pirate who lived and died in the fourth century BC. He was captured and brought to Alexander the Great, who demanded to know 'what he meant by keeping possession of the sea.' The pirate smiled, and responded: 'What do you mean by seizing the whole earth; but because I do it with a petty ship, I am called a robber, while you, who do it with a great fleet, are called emperor.'
Reply to this comment
by weedapeapl April 13, 2009 8:07 PM EDT
Was it another one of those naked boys links of yours?
Posted by julesarcher1 at 3:59 PM : Apr 13, 2009

If Bill Clinton had naked boys in the White House in December 2000, I don't know anything about it.

But it sounds more like you're just being really juvenile and refusing to face facts.

BILL CLINTON COMPROMISED OUR AIRPORT SECURITY by redirecting the FAA to address airline flight delays as their top priority,

at a time when he supposedly had DETAILED INFORMATION THAT THE 9/11 ATTACK WAS IMMINENT.

But all you want to do is make jokes about naked boys.

I think that says it all about you.
Reply to this comment
by weedapeapl April 13, 2009 8:04 PM EDT
You like is not official, its a propoganda site. Do not let facts get in the way of your rhetoric! Give the EO number so all here can go and read it for themselves and see what kind of idiot you are...
Posted by frankie2fing at 3:44 PM : Apr 13, 2009

When I see it, it's an official White House release.

http://usgovinfo.about.com/library/weekly/aa120800b.htm

Title: Clinton Acts to Battle Flight Delays

Date: December 7, 2000

Source: The White House

The site should begin with the following paragraph:

"The following report was released by the White House in conjunction with President Clinton's issuance of an Executive Order creating the Air Traffic Performance-Based Organization (ATO). "

If you're calling an official report released by the Clinton White House a "propoganda site," then I guess there's no reasoning with you.
Reply to this comment
by globalcoolin April 13, 2009 7:13 PM EDT
The United Nations and pirates around the world are on the same page! Good people going about their business making an honest living at sea should NOT BE ARMED!
No No NO NOO NO NOOOOOOOOOO.
Expect the UN threw unions and political parties in various countries to start using EXCUSES as to why merchant ships crews from the west should not --repeat-- NOT protect themselves or have the ready means to!
Firearms and other means to resist meaningfully are NOT part of the pirates or the UN's nice plans for everyone!
Excuses:
one is (random number) times more likely to hurt themselves than successfully stop an attack.
explosive decompression.
liability.
the 'training" of the crew question
the better alternative to lock your self in a "safe place," and be a good witness if you survive.
Call 911
Global warming
Everyone gets to add more lame excuses here!
let's pull the UNs' funding before the knives and forks of ships gallies are outlawed by international conventions and treaties... which the pirates wont be required to sign. The pirates will keep their assault forks. And guns.
Reply to this comment
by julesarcher1 April 13, 2009 7:02 PM EDT
Hi there gents :-)
Posted by IrishWench01 at 3:49 PM : Apr 13, 2009

I'm not a gent, but I'll say hi.
Reply to this comment
by Truckman09 April 13, 2009 6:53 PM EDT
"We will retaliate for the killings of our men."--Yup and we will kill you every time you take one of our own...dam Somali pirates
Reply to this comment
See all 277 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook