Stevens Off The Hook, But Not Prosecutors
A seething federal judge dismissed the corruption conviction of former Alaska Sen. Ted Stevens on Tuesday and took the rare and serious step of ordering a criminal investigation into prosecutors who poisoned the case.
"In nearly 25 years on the bench, I've never seen anything approaching the mishandling and misconduct that I've seen in this case," U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan said.
Sullivan appointed a special prosecutor to investigate Justice Department lawyers who repeatedly withheld evidence from defense attorneys and the judge during the monthlong trial. Stevens was convicted in October of lying on Senate forms about home renovations and gifts he received from wealthy friends.
"Judges don't suffer deceit gladly and federal judges in particularly don't like it when they, or defense attorneys, are lied to by government attorneys," writes CBS News legal analyst Andrew Cohen. (Read Cohen's complete analysis.)
The case cost Stevens, 85, a Senate seat he had held for 40 years. Once the Senate's longest-serving Republican, he narrowly lost to Democrat Mark Begich soon after the verdict.
Now, the case could prove career-ending for prosecutors in the Justice Department's public corruption unit.
"I think what is most shocking about this are the allegations that these prosecutors or the people who work for them may have absolutely fabricated evidence which is an order of magnitude worse than simply not turning over certain documents," Cohen said.
Upon hearing the charges dismissed, the combative ex-senator - known for his "Incredible Hulk" necktie - raised a fist in celebration as his wife and daughters began to cry, reports CBS News correspondent Bob Orr.
"Until recently, my faith in the criminal system, particularly the judicial system, was unwavering," Stevens told the court Tuesday, his first public comments since Attorney General Eric Holder announced he would drop the case. "But what some members of the prosecution team did nearly destroyed my faith. Their conduct had consequences for me that they will never realize and can never be reversed."
The unraveling of the case overshadowed the facts of a trial in which Stevens was shown to have accepted thousands of dollars in undisclosed gifts.
Sullivan appointed Washington attorney Henry Schuelke to investigate contempt and obstruction by the Justice Department team. Schuelke is a former prosecutor and veteran defense attorney who oversaw a Senate Ethics Committee investigation into influence-peddling allegations against former New York Sen. Alfonse D'Amato in 1989.
The Justice Department has already launched its own investigation of the prosecutors. But the judge made it perfectly clear he doesn't trust the government alone to reach a timely and fair conclusion, reports Orr.
Sullivan criticized former Attorney General Michael Mukasey for not responding to complaints: "Shocking, but not surprising," Sullivan said.
He worried aloud about how often prosecutors withhold evidence, from Guantanamo Bay terrorism cases to public corruption trials. He called on Holder to retrain all prosecutors in the department.
The decision to open a criminal case raises the question of whether the prosecutors, who include top officials in the department's public corruption unit, can remain on the job while under investigation. The investigation carries the threat of prison time, fines and disbarment.
It also threatens to derail the investigation into other public officials, including Rep. Don Young, R-Alaska, who has been under scrutiny by the same prosecutors now being investigated. Young's lawyer attended Tuesday's hearing but said nothing after it ended.
Subjects of the criminal probe are lead prosecutor Brenda Morris, the department's No. 2 corruption official and an instructor within the department; Public Integrity prosecutors Nicholas Marsh and Edward Sullivan; Alaska federal prosecutors Joseph Bottini and James Goeke; and William Welch, who did not participate in the trial but who supervises the Public Integrity section and has overseen every major public corruption case in recent years.
Judge Sullivan repeatedly scolded prosecutors for their behavior during trial. After the verdict, an FBI whistleblower accused the team of misconduct and Sullivan held prosecutors in contempt for ignoring a court order.
The prosecution team was replaced and, last week, the new team acknowledged that key evidence was withheld. That included notes from an interview with the government's star witness, contractor Bill Allen.
On the witness stand, Allen said a mutual friend told him not to expect payment for Stevens' home renovations because the senator only wanted the bill to cover himself. It was damaging testimony that made Stevens look like a scheming politician trying to conceal his freebies.
But in the previously undisclosed meeting with prosecutors, Allen had no recollection of such a discussion. And he valued the renovation work at far less than what prosecutors alleged at the trial.
"I was sick in my stomach," attorney Brendan Sullivan said Tuesday, recalling seeing the new evidence for the first time. "How could they do this? How could they abandon their responsibilities? How could they take on a very decent man, Ted Stevens, who happened to be a United States senator, and do this?"
The Justice Department did not comment after court and the prosecutors under investigation either declined comment or did not respond to messages. But Paul O'Brien, a federal prosecutor newly assigned to the case, apologized to the judge on behalf of the department.
Despite the prosecutorial misconduct, the trial revealed that Stevens - regardless of Allen's discredited testimony - accepted a massage chair, a stained-glass window and an expensive sculpture but never disclosed them on Senate documents.
None of that mattered Tuesday as Stevens gave what amounted to the election victory speech he never had a chance to give. Standing at the courtroom lectern wearing a pin of the U.S. and Alaska flags on his sweater, he recounted his career in government - from flying planes in World War II to serving as U.S. attorney to his storied career in the Senate.
He thanked his friends, his supporters and his wife. And he vowed to push his friends in the Senate for tough new laws on prosecutorial misconduct.
Then, with the prosecution team feeling the scrutiny that Stevens felt for years, he smiled, posed for pictures with his family outside the courthouse and said:
"I'm going to enjoy this wonderful day."
Justice officials filed papers last week asking the judge to dismiss the indictment. It was first reported last Wednesday by National Public Radio, which said Holder decided the conviction could not be defended because of problems with the government's prosecution.
"Because Holder owes little fealty to Bush-era decisions at Justice - indeed, because he has taken strong steps to separate himself from some of the worst policies and practices of his predecessors - the move to dismiss Stevens' convictions is both a political no-brainer and a legal necessity," writes Cohen. "It was the right thing to do on many different levels." (Read more analysis from Cohen.)
© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report. "In nearly 25 years on the bench, I've never seen anything approaching the mishandling and misconduct that I've seen in this case," U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan said.
Sullivan appointed a special prosecutor to investigate Justice Department lawyers who repeatedly withheld evidence from defense attorneys and the judge during the monthlong trial. Stevens was convicted in October of lying on Senate forms about home renovations and gifts he received from wealthy friends.
"Judges don't suffer deceit gladly and federal judges in particularly don't like it when they, or defense attorneys, are lied to by government attorneys," writes CBS News legal analyst Andrew Cohen. (Read Cohen's complete analysis.)
The case cost Stevens, 85, a Senate seat he had held for 40 years. Once the Senate's longest-serving Republican, he narrowly lost to Democrat Mark Begich soon after the verdict.
Now, the case could prove career-ending for prosecutors in the Justice Department's public corruption unit.
"I think what is most shocking about this are the allegations that these prosecutors or the people who work for them may have absolutely fabricated evidence which is an order of magnitude worse than simply not turning over certain documents," Cohen said.
Upon hearing the charges dismissed, the combative ex-senator - known for his "Incredible Hulk" necktie - raised a fist in celebration as his wife and daughters began to cry, reports CBS News correspondent Bob Orr.
"Until recently, my faith in the criminal system, particularly the judicial system, was unwavering," Stevens told the court Tuesday, his first public comments since Attorney General Eric Holder announced he would drop the case. "But what some members of the prosecution team did nearly destroyed my faith. Their conduct had consequences for me that they will never realize and can never be reversed."
The unraveling of the case overshadowed the facts of a trial in which Stevens was shown to have accepted thousands of dollars in undisclosed gifts.
Sullivan appointed Washington attorney Henry Schuelke to investigate contempt and obstruction by the Justice Department team. Schuelke is a former prosecutor and veteran defense attorney who oversaw a Senate Ethics Committee investigation into influence-peddling allegations against former New York Sen. Alfonse D'Amato in 1989.
The Justice Department has already launched its own investigation of the prosecutors. But the judge made it perfectly clear he doesn't trust the government alone to reach a timely and fair conclusion, reports Orr.
Sullivan criticized former Attorney General Michael Mukasey for not responding to complaints: "Shocking, but not surprising," Sullivan said.
He worried aloud about how often prosecutors withhold evidence, from Guantanamo Bay terrorism cases to public corruption trials. He called on Holder to retrain all prosecutors in the department.
The decision to open a criminal case raises the question of whether the prosecutors, who include top officials in the department's public corruption unit, can remain on the job while under investigation. The investigation carries the threat of prison time, fines and disbarment.
It also threatens to derail the investigation into other public officials, including Rep. Don Young, R-Alaska, who has been under scrutiny by the same prosecutors now being investigated. Young's lawyer attended Tuesday's hearing but said nothing after it ended.
Subjects of the criminal probe are lead prosecutor Brenda Morris, the department's No. 2 corruption official and an instructor within the department; Public Integrity prosecutors Nicholas Marsh and Edward Sullivan; Alaska federal prosecutors Joseph Bottini and James Goeke; and William Welch, who did not participate in the trial but who supervises the Public Integrity section and has overseen every major public corruption case in recent years.
Judge Sullivan repeatedly scolded prosecutors for their behavior during trial. After the verdict, an FBI whistleblower accused the team of misconduct and Sullivan held prosecutors in contempt for ignoring a court order.
The prosecution team was replaced and, last week, the new team acknowledged that key evidence was withheld. That included notes from an interview with the government's star witness, contractor Bill Allen.
On the witness stand, Allen said a mutual friend told him not to expect payment for Stevens' home renovations because the senator only wanted the bill to cover himself. It was damaging testimony that made Stevens look like a scheming politician trying to conceal his freebies.
But in the previously undisclosed meeting with prosecutors, Allen had no recollection of such a discussion. And he valued the renovation work at far less than what prosecutors alleged at the trial.
"I was sick in my stomach," attorney Brendan Sullivan said Tuesday, recalling seeing the new evidence for the first time. "How could they do this? How could they abandon their responsibilities? How could they take on a very decent man, Ted Stevens, who happened to be a United States senator, and do this?"
The Justice Department did not comment after court and the prosecutors under investigation either declined comment or did not respond to messages. But Paul O'Brien, a federal prosecutor newly assigned to the case, apologized to the judge on behalf of the department.
Despite the prosecutorial misconduct, the trial revealed that Stevens - regardless of Allen's discredited testimony - accepted a massage chair, a stained-glass window and an expensive sculpture but never disclosed them on Senate documents.
None of that mattered Tuesday as Stevens gave what amounted to the election victory speech he never had a chance to give. Standing at the courtroom lectern wearing a pin of the U.S. and Alaska flags on his sweater, he recounted his career in government - from flying planes in World War II to serving as U.S. attorney to his storied career in the Senate.
He thanked his friends, his supporters and his wife. And he vowed to push his friends in the Senate for tough new laws on prosecutorial misconduct.
Then, with the prosecution team feeling the scrutiny that Stevens felt for years, he smiled, posed for pictures with his family outside the courthouse and said:
"I'm going to enjoy this wonderful day."
Justice officials filed papers last week asking the judge to dismiss the indictment. It was first reported last Wednesday by National Public Radio, which said Holder decided the conviction could not be defended because of problems with the government's prosecution.
"Because Holder owes little fealty to Bush-era decisions at Justice - indeed, because he has taken strong steps to separate himself from some of the worst policies and practices of his predecessors - the move to dismiss Stevens' convictions is both a political no-brainer and a legal necessity," writes Cohen. "It was the right thing to do on many different levels." (Read more analysis from Cohen.)
Popular in Politics
- IRS' Lerner: "I have not done anything wrong" 670 Comments
- Obama to view Oklahoma tornado damage Sunday
- Christie: Keep politics out of Oklahoma disaster relief
- WH says criticism of its handling of IRS story is "legitimate"
- Former Miss America might challenge McConnell
- House passes GOP bill to speed Keystone XL pipeline approval
- Officials on Benghazi: "We made mistakes, but without malice"
- Poll: Most think IRS targeting was deliberate 282 Comments
legal malpractise of this magnitude must NEVER be condoned! The alleged tampering with evidence, outright fabrication of same and with holding of documents is not only outrageous and ethically bankrupt, it was unneccessary. Stevens was as guilty as sin! That he accepted bribes and gifts illegally is beyond dispute. It is as open and shut as any case can ever be. The fact the prosecuting team has no integrity whatever is not indicative that Stevens has any himself. It's basically bad guys vs. bad guys.
For those of you who say that Stevens belongs in jail regardless of the conduct of the prosecution remember that our most cherished foundations of justice is agressive ETHICAL prosecution. It isn't what you know that's important; it's what you can prove. Moreover it is what you can prove within the framework of the law. If the prosecution had so little confidence in obtaining the conviction Stevens so richly deserves without resorting to chicanery, then he should be allowed to walk.
Also bear in mind there is a hope that Bush, Cheney and a host of other blatant criminals may also have to stand trial for their offenses against humanity. If we allow a political or ideological agenda to get in the way of our pursuit of justice then we become no better than the mob we prosecute. No mistake, I want them all strung up by their testic- er...thumbs but NOT at the cost of breaking or politicizing a system of justice that has been for over 200 years the standard by which many free nations look up to. If we can't do it honestly then we don't do it at all!
Posted by zokin at 3:24 PM : Apr 7, 2009
More personal attacks!!! that will ruin the Democratic party faster than anything we conservatives do. Personal attacks instead of reason and ration. Isnt that what you accused Bush II of doing?
Posted by gmw7777 at 2:32 PM : Apr 7, 2009
The lead prosecutor is one Brenda Morris. Do a Google search on "Brenda Morris prosecutor". It will open your eyes to a world of probablilities.