Vermont Nixes Veto, Legalizes Gay Marriage
Becomes 4th State To OK Same-Sex Marriage After Legislature Overrides Governor's Veto
-
-
Rep. Jason Lorber, D-Burlington, right, gets a hug from Stan Baker following the passage of a gay marriage bill in Montpelier, Vt., Tuesday, April 7, 2009. (AP Photo/Toby Talbot)
-
A room at the Vermont Statehouse in Montpelier is filled with gay marriage opponents Monday, March 16, 2009. (AP Photo/Toby Talbot)
-
-
Play CBS Video Video Benefits For Gay Spouses? The Defense of Marriage Act prevents gay spouses of federal workers from receiving financial benefits that heterosexual spouses receive. The first major legal challenge against the act has been filed. CBS? Ross Palombo reports.
-
Video Gay Rights And Blood Donation Human and Equal Rights Organizers held an event Monday to protest a Food and Drug Administration policy that bans sexually active gay men from donating blood, KPHO-TVs Omadelle Nelsonm reports.
-
Video Daytime TV's First Gay Marriage ABC's All My Children has aired the first gay marriage to hit daytime TV. And, as Itay Hod reports, the wedding may be the least unconventional thing to happen in the fictional town of Pine Valley.
-
Photo Essay Taking The Plunge In Calif. Festive atmosphere as gay and lesbian couples take their marriage vows.
-
Timeline Gay Marriage Goes Global A look at the nations that have passed laws recognizing same-sex marriage.
The House recorded a dramatic 100-49 vote the minimum needed to override Gov. Jim Douglas' veto. Its vote followed a much easier override vote in the Senate, which rebuffed the Republican governor with a vote of 23-5.
Vermont was the first state to legalize civil unions for same-sex couples and joins Connecticut, Massachusetts and Iowa in giving gays the right to marry. Their approval of gay marriage came from the courts.
Tuesday morning's legislative action came less than a day after Douglas issued a veto message saying the bill would not improve the lot of gay and lesbian couples because it still would not provide them rights under federal and other states' laws.
House Speaker Shap Smith's announcement of the vote brought an outburst of jubilation from some of the hundreds packed into the gallery and the lobby outside the House chamber, despite the speaker's admonishment against such displays.
Among the celebrants in the lobby were former Rep. Robert Dostis, D-Waterbury, and his longtime partner, Chuck Kletecka. Dostis recalled efforts to expand gay rights dating to an anti-discrimination law passed in 1992.
"It's been a very long battle. It's been almost 20 years to get to this point," Dostis said. "I think finally, most people in Vermont understand that we're a couple like any other couple. We're as good and as bad as any other group of people. And now I think we have a chance to prove ourselves here on forward that we're good members of our community."
Dostis said he and Kletecka will celebrate their 25th year together in September.
"Is that a proposal?" Kletecka asked.
"Yeah," Dostis replied. "Twenty-five years together, I think it's time we finally got married."
Craig Bensen, a gay marriage opponent who had lobbied unsuccessfully for a nonbinding referendum on the question, said he was disappointed but believed gay marriage opponents were outspent by supporters by a 20-1 margin.
"The other side had a highly funded, extremely well-oiled machine with all the political leadership except the governor pushing to make this happen," he said. "The fact that it came down to this tight a vote is really astounding."
Also in the crowd was Michael Feiner, a farmer from Roxbury and gay marriage supporter, who took a break from collecting sap for maple syrup-making to come to the Statehouse.
"I'm taking a break to come and basically make sure that I was here to witness history," he said.
The House had initially passed the bill last week with a 95-52 vote.
© MMIX The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Michelle Obama tells how her role as the First Lady has changed her perspective.





- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
... - 14
- next
See all 262 CommentsPosted by honestabe8 at 7:06 AM : Apr 8, 2009
Ypu do know what the dirtiest thing ever said on t.v. was (before cable and premium channels) don't you. June Cleaver says "Ward, you were a little hard on the beaver last night?"
Posted by honestabe8 at 7:00 AM : Apr 8, 2009
I do my best.
Posted by honestabe8 at 6:51 AM : Apr 8, 2009
I forgot to mention that is one of my personal conflicts. Although i consider lesbian sex to be deviant and not equal to hetero sex I also find it to be erotic.
Posted by honestabe8 at 6:51 AM : Apr 8, 2009
Which is one of the problems with this issue. Many people find male male sex to be abhorent, disgusting, completely offensive but lesbian sex is widely consodered erotic. Why this is I don't know. Maybe just the way wea re wired. I have known many women that view male male sex as disgusting but have no problem with lesbian sex.
Posted by honestabe8 at 6:37 AM : Apr 8, 2009
Yes I do believe that same gender sex belongs in the same category as beastiality, pedophelia, sibilng sex, parent child sex. The consent issue i believe to be a criminal issue and seperate from the sexual behavior issue.
Posted by endurorob
i must have misunderstood when you said that all deviant sexual behavior belonged in the same category. what you meant was that some deviant sexual behavior belongs in the same category. so, you DO believe that same gender sex belongs in the same category as beastiality? no credit as to one being consentual and with the same species?
Kinkyness and adultry (I assume adultry is what you meant by the pool boy thing) are not in the same category as same sex sex, same family sex, pedophilia, or beastiality.
Posted by endurorob
You know this how?
Posted by honestabe8 at 6:08 AM : Apr 8, 2009
How do I know that gay sex is on the same level as beastiality and sibling sex and parent child sex and pedophilia? I wouldn't necessarily say I know because I have not tried any but lets just say it is a belief that all deviant sexual behvior is on the same level.
What bothers me here is that the Judicial branch can override the executive branch veto. In other words ANY bill can pass if they load the judiciary and congress with one party. Absolutely no checks and balances in Vermont. Vetoes are not just used to block laws but to bring around compromise and that is what has helped make this country great. For without compromise we are nothing but a fascist state.
I now see Vermont is controlled by Fascists.
Posted by louiville2 at 6:06 AM : Apr 8, 2009
That is how the fed works and as far as I know how all the states work. The legislative branch generally needs a 2/3 vote to over ride an executive veto. This prevents all power going to one person.
Posted by endurorob
You know this how?
Posted by honestabe8 at 5:54 AM : Apr 8, 2009
No but gay sex is that low.
Posted by curse914
I knew a woman who had relations in an algae filled pond. Next thing she knew, she was 3 months stagnant
Posted by jcnbma1 at 5:42 AM : Apr 8, 2009
He disagrees with your view of the world so that makes him a jerk? I think you are the jerk for failing to understand not everyone agrees with your views.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
... - 14
- next
See all 262 Comments