April 2, 2009 10:05 AM

1 In 5 Medicare Patients Readmitted Fast

(AP)  One in five Medicare patients end up back in the hospital within a month of discharge, a large study found, and that practice costs billions of dollars a year.

The findings suggest patients aren't told enough about how to take care of themselves and stay healthy before they go home, the researchers said. A few simple things - like making a doctor's appointment for departing patients - can help, they said.

The study found that a surprising half of the non-surgery patients who returned within a month hadn't even seen a doctor between hospital stays.

"Hospitals put more effort into the admission process than they do into the discharge process," said Dr. Eric Coleman, one of the study's authors from the University of Colorado in Denver.

Coleman, who runs a program to improve "hand-offs" between health care systems, said patients often have a honeymoon notion about how things will be once they're home. Then when they become confused about how to take their medicine or run into other problems, they head back to the hospital because they don't know where to turn, he said.

The issue of hospital readmissions and their cost has come under scrutiny in recent years. And it's getting attention now because President Barack Obama's budget calls for reducing spending on Medicare readmissions to pay for health care reform.

For their study, reported in Thursday's New England Journal of Medicine, the researchers looked at Medicare records from late 2003 through 2004. They found that about 20 percent of 11.9 million patients were readmitted to the hospital within a month of discharge; about a third were back in the hospital within three months.

About half of the patients hospitalized for ailments didn't see a doctor before they landed back in the hospital within a month.

Patients with heart failure and pneumonia had the most readmissions overall; among surgical procedures, heart stents and major hip and knee surgery had the highest returns.

About 10 percent of all readmissions were probably planned, such as putting in a stent, the researchers said. They estimated that the cost of unplanned return visits in 2004 was $17.4 billion.

"It's a big hunk of money and it's a big hunk of misery," said another study author, Dr. Stephen Jencks, an independent consultant who worked for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.

Besides making follow-up doctor appointments, Jencks said hospitals should give patients a list of all their medications, explain what to do at home and where to call if they run into problems. He said the hospitals should also call the patient within two days and make sure that the patient's doctor knows they were in the hospital.

He said the goal is to keep patients from getting really sick again, not to keep them out of the hospital if they do.

The differences in readmission rates among states suggests that improvements can be made, he said. Iowa had the lowest rate with 13 percent, while Washington, D.C., had the highest at 23 percent.

Dr. Brian Jack at Boston Medical Center tells the story of a patient who didn't understand that the blood pressure medicine that the hospital told her to take was the same as the one she had at home - just with different names. She took both and returned to the hospital with kidney failure. Jack and his colleagues tested a new checklist that nurses used when they sent patients home. The patients who used the checklist had 30 percent fewer visits to the emergency room or return hospital stays over the next month, compared to patients who didn't use it, they found.

"There are not too many things that improve health and save money," said Jack, who was not involved in the new research.

In 2007, a panel that advises Congress on Medicare suggested ways to cut hospital readmissions. One recommendation was to change how Medicare pays hospitals and to cut payments to those with high rates - an approach included in Mr. Obama's budget proposal.

Currently, hospitals get the same payment for each hospital stay and critics say there's no incentive to reduce readmissions.

© 2009 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment See all 15 Comments
by ka_ree4 April 3, 2009 9:41 AM EDT
Medicare and Medicaid (at least in Kansas) have recently changed their policies. Now, if a patient develops a nosocomial (aquired during a hospital stay) infection (ie- urinary tract infection, pneumonia, staph, etc.) the hospital will not be paid for ANY of the care provided to that patient during that ENTIRE hospital stay. Same goes for patients that develop pressure ulcers.

On one hand, this is great because hospitals must pay better attention to infection control, do more detailed assessments more often, and provide direct patient care more often. This is designed to force hospitals into providing better care to get better patient outcomes.

What ends up happening is that the hospitals get scared of not getting paid for services. (Some hospital aquired infection are going to occur no matter what you do.) So in turn they are more cautious of admitting and keeping Medicare and Medicaid patients. The politics of it all is what's killing people- the quality of care IS accessible. Now if it were only affordable.
Reply to this comment
by hg2008-2009 April 3, 2009 3:57 AM EDT
The article states: "In 2007, a panel that advises Congress on Medicare suggested ways to cut hospital readmissions. One recommendation was to change how Medicare pays hospitals and to cut payments to those with high rates - an approach included in Mr. Obama's budget proposal."

If hospitals will be punished by less Medicare dollars for a high rate of readmissions, then ultimately the patients will suffer. Hospitals will be looking to minimize their readmission rate and will find a way to not readmit, even if needed.
Reply to this comment
by diamruby April 2, 2009 5:14 PM EDT
It should also be noted that patients are no longer allowed to stay in the hospital until they are well. They are sent home the next day after surgery & after being treated for many illness because Medicaid & other insurance companies will not allow them to stay longer. Many older people go home with no one to care for them, some are discharged & are back in the hospital the same day for the same problem because they were not treated or diagnosed properly the first time. We pay very large premiums for insurance & our treatments are not very good & the costs have skyrocketed.
Reply to this comment
by ka_ree4 April 2, 2009 3:24 PM EDT
There is SUPPOSED to be a multi -faceted approach to making sure that patients know what to do after discharge.

# 1- Their Dr. is SUPPOSED to speak with them personaly day of discharge with Care Manager at his side.

#2- Patient's nurse is SUPPOSED to go over discharge instructions AND ask if the patient has any ?'s AND take the time to answer those questions (AND find answers to questions that they don't know and report back to patient).

#3- Care Manager is SUPPOSED to come in and talk to patient and explain AGAIN what the Dr. already said- just to make sure there is no miscommunication. AND Care Managers many times are responsible for referrals to outside agencies (i.e. home health care, medical equipment suppliers, physical therapy, etc.)

In an ideal wolrd- the patient should go home with a clear understanding of what to DO, what to REPORT to their Dr., #'s to call, appointments already made for them for follow up and other services. All said they should feel comfortable with their situation - knowing that they can take care of themselves and that they have the support that they will need. (I know all of this because that's what all the text books say- and i just finished nursing school.)

Now, there are SOOOOO many problems with this scenario-

Where to start? The Dr.s have too many patients to deal with in their office AND at the hospital (NO- not all hospitals have hospitalists on staff all the time).
The care managers try to keep up but they too are overloaded with orders and errands and paperwork.
The nurses are assigned too many patients and while they are dismissing 4 they are getting 3 new admits and whether we like to admit it or not - things fall through the cracks when we're that busy.
Also, ALL of these caregivers are HUMAN and they do make mistakes, forget things from time to time.
One more key factor and I believe VERY important is that patients are too timid to ask ?'s. Afraid of offending the Dr. or don't want to be a bother- SERIOUSLY??? Each person's health is ultimately on them- if you don't ask the ?'s, if you don't report symptoms - you WILL NOT get the best health care possible.
You have to be responsible for your own health.

I was floored by the difference in what we are taught in school and they way things actually work. Medicare wants Drs. to keep hospital stays as short as possible due to costs- but it ends up costing more in the end when more complications occur and a longer stay is required to correct the problem.

Our health care sys is broken and I doubt we'll ever really fix it. SAD...
Reply to this comment
by cyberus-2009 April 2, 2009 1:49 PM EDT
*****
About half of the patients hospitalized for ailments didn't see a doctor before they landed back in the hospital within a month.
*****

Gee .. I wonder if thats because after getting discharged when they called for "follow up" appointments with their doctor they got appt dates WEEKS away?
Reply to this comment
by erasmus111 April 2, 2009 1:24 PM EDT
It's no wonder there are so many problems. I've never seen such incompetence in my life.


"The findings suggest patients aren't told enough about how to take care of themselves and stay healthy before they go home, the researchers said. A few simple things - like making a doctor's appointment for departing patients - can help, they said."

When a patient leaves a hospital where I live, that person is explained things in detail on how to take care of themselves. And they are told to go to their doctor a week after being discharged. In fact, an appointment with the specialist is usually made before they leave. And you will keep going to the specialist until he/she tells you that you are okay and there is no need to return.


"Then when they become confused about how to take their medicine or run into other problems, they head back to the hospital because they don't know where to turn, he said."

Like I said, here, everything including how to take their medicine is explained before they leave. AND if for any reason they should get confused about the medication, all they have to do is phone their pharmacist ( who know more than the doctors), and they will explain everything to them.


"Patients with heart failure and pneumonia had the most readmissions overall; among surgical procedures, heart stents and major hip and knee surgery had the highest returns."

My mom had hip replacement surgery and after she went home, not only did she return to the hospital every week for rehabilitation, but also had regular visits with the specialist.



"Dr. Brian Jack at Boston Medical Center tells the story of a patient who didn't understand that the blood pressure medicine that the hospital told her to take was the same as the one she had at home - just with different names. "

This is all taken care of, first by the hospital, and then by the pharmacist when they pick up their medicine.
Reply to this comment
by patocc123 April 2, 2009 1:02 PM EDT
Yes, the GOP PARROTS are really stupid. Their tiny PARROT BRAINS are clouded by hate and ignorance. They squawk the usual garbage about poor people and welfare moms. They don't have the slightest understanding about how the WORKING poor are left without health care despite 60 hours of work a week, or how families who work and struggle have dying children because the PARROTS have no respect for the labor of these WORKING POOR and could care less if they can see a doctor.
---------------------------------------

Have you ever realized that the working poor that work 60 hours a week make up a large portion of the people who vote republicans. Have you've been to a red state lately or into any urban areas. You might be surprised that they are not by any means wealthy. But hey thats the image that democrats want to post on the republicans just as the republicans want to post an image of people sitting around collecting governments checks. This article has a great underlining meaning on how to improve healthcare wether it be government controlled or private industry and people like this and 95% of the other posters on here want to become political lemmings for thier respected party. No wonder things are all screwed up in the country its better to blame the other guy instead of looking at whats wrong with ones self.
Reply to this comment
by DefendLiberty April 2, 2009 12:36 PM EDT
Are you really that stupid? Most Medicare recipients are older retired people whom the private insurers will NEVER write a policy for. These are people who worked hard all their lives, pay taxes and buy insurance through their employers (when it's available). The current stupid employer-based health care system that you think is so great does not provide insurance if you're retired, and without Medicare older people would never be able to afford heath care, considering their age and health issues.
Posted by incog-nito at 9:30 AM : Apr 2, 2009

-------


Yes, the GOP PARROTS are really stupid. Their tiny PARROT BRAINS are clouded by hate and ignorance. They squawk the usual garbage about poor people and welfare moms. They don't have the slightest understanding about how the WORKING poor are left without health care despite 60 hours of work a week, or how families who work and struggle have dying children because the PARROTS have no respect for the labor of these WORKING POOR and could care less if they can see a doctor.
Reply to this comment
by DefendLiberty April 2, 2009 12:31 PM EDT
That's exactly how his wife Michelle got a $250,000 bonus at the hospital she worked for - by blocking patients without health care insurance from being treated at her hospital.
Posted by _CBS_is_Pravda_ at 8:00 AM : Apr 2, 2009
-----

Another LIE by the PARROTS on the GOP payroll. Can they EVER STOP? Michelle spearheaded an innovative program to bring HEALTHCARE TO THE COMMUNITY by setting up CLINICS in NEIGHBORHOODS to take care of patients' smaller problems. This unloaded the hospitals from dealing with the little stuff, and provided a MORE EFFECTIVE CONDUIT for sick people to get more QUICKLY REFERRED TO THE HOSPITAL if they needed more care.

If you are a GOP PARROT, this is just HORRIBLE. After all, GOP PARROTS can't think for themselves, and only deal with out-of-context sounds bites to make up LIES that sound good to the SQUAWKING CLASS of GOP idiots.
Reply to this comment
by I_am_me1953 April 2, 2009 11:58 AM EDT
From the above article, "Hospitals put more effort into the admission process than they do into the discharge process," said Dr. Eric Coleman, one of the study's authors from the University of Colorado in Denver."
-----------------

Gee, do you think maybe it is because there is more $$ in having the patient in the hospital bed than at home taking care of themselves.
Reply to this comment
See all 15 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
Better Information. Better Health.
CBS News on Facebook