G20 Protesters Clash With London Cops

1 Dead, Dozens Arrested As Demonstrators Smash Windows Of RBS Bank, Try To Storm Bank Of England

(CBS/AP)  Protesters clashed with riot police in central London on Wednesday ahead of the G-20 summit, breaking into the heavily guarded Royal Bank of Scotland and smashing its windows. Nearly two dozen people were arrested in multiple clashes.

Some 4,000 anarchists, anti-capitalists, environmentalists and others clogged the streets of London's financial district for what demonstrators branded "Financial Fool's Day." The protests were called ahead of Thursday's summit of world leaders, who hope to take concrete steps to resolve the global financial crisis that has lashed nations and workers worldwide.

A battered effigy of a banker in a bowler's hat hung on a set of traffic lights near the Bank of England. Protesters also tried to storm the Bank of England and pelted police with eggs and fruit.

While most of the protesters were peaceful, a violent mob wearing balaclavas broke into the RBS building and stole keyboards that were used to break windows. Other protesters spray-painted graffiti on the RBS building, writing "class war" and "thieves."

Riot police batted back protesters carrying banners that read "Abolish Money."

Protesters focused the Royal Bank of Scotland because it was bailed out by the British government after a series of disastrous deals brought it to the brink of bankruptcy. Still, its former chief executive Fred Goodwin — aged just 50 — managed to walk off with a tidy annual pension of 703,000 pounds ($1.2 million) — just as unemployment in Britain is at 2 million and rising.

"Every job I apply for there's already 150 people who have also applied," said protester Nathan Dean, 35, who lost his information technology job three weeks ago. "I have had to sign on to the dole (welfare) for the first time in my life. You end up having to pay your mortgage on your credit card and you fall into debt twice over."

Late in the day, police said a man had been reported to have collapsed near one of the protest camps and responding officers were unable to resuscitate him. He was pronounced dead at a hospital. It was unclear if the man was a protester, and the cause of death was under investigation.

The protests in London's financial district - known as "The City" - began as Prime Minister Gordon Brown and President Barack Obama held a news conference at Britain's Foreign Ministry elsewhere in the capital.

Bankers have been lambasted as being greedy and blamed for the recession that is making jobless ranks soar. Other banners read "Banks are evil" and "Eat the bankers," and "0 percent interest in others." Some bankers went to work in casual wear Wednesday fearing they could be targeted.

Some bolder financial workers leaned out office windows, taunting the demonstrators and waving 10 pound notes at them. Two men - one wearing a suit - exchanged punches before police intervened.

London's police are using a new tactic in this demonstration - a variation on the police cordon - not to keep the demonstrators out, but to keep them in, reports CBS News correspondent Mark Phillips. But penning them in only seemed to make some of the protestors angrier.

Groups of protesters converged on the central bank, with Tibetan, Palestinian, communist, and anarchist flags poking out from the crowd. Tensions rose as officers refused to let the protesters leave the small plaza in front of the bank.

Protesters pelted police standing guard at the Royal Exchange with paint, eggs, fruit and other projectiles, and a small group of anarchists, skinheads, and masked protesters repeatedly attacked a police cordon flanking the Bank of England.

Some in the crowd urinated against the bank and the message "Built on blood" was scrawled in chalk in front of the building. Police helicopters hovered above.

The G20 leaders may be here to try to fix the world's economy. The demonstrators were here to hold to account the bankers who they believed broke it, reports Phillips.

"As well as anger there is, no question about it, there is a righteous fury against this sculldugery and corruption and sheer theft," said protest organizer Camilla Power.

Some bankers went to work in casual wear Wednesday for fear they could be targeted.

A particularly ferocious balaclava-wearing mob broke into a closed RBS bank branch and stole keyboards, using them to break windows. Other protesters spray-painted graffiti on the RBS building, writing "Class War" and "Thieves." Mounted riot police eventually pushed them back.

Plastic bottles, raw eggs and bags of flour arced from group to group, reports CBS News' Peter Bluff from London. A policeman was hit on the head by a protester with a big stick.

There were surreal moments: Earlier in the morning, police impounded an armored personnel carrier - complete with what looked like a machine-gun turret - near London's Liverpool Street Station as slack-jawed office workers took pictures with their cell phones.

Police arrested 11 people aboard for possessing police uniforms, a Scotland Yard spokeswoman said. She offered no further detail on the incident.

Environmental protesters descended on the area around the European Climate Exchange around noon, and - in a matter of minutes - turned it into a tent city, complete with a pedal-powered sound system; a kitchen cooking baked beans; and compost toilets.

At least one police officer was hurt when a printer and other office equipment was thrown out of the RBS window. Hundreds cheered as a blue office chair was used to smash one of the blacked-out branch windows. One protester dressed as the Easter bunny managed to hop through the police cordon but was stopped before he could reach the Bank of England. Another black-clad demonstrator waved a light-saber toy at officers.

Sporadic protests rumbled on into the evening, as the rowdier elements tangled with riot police, tossing barricades and hurling bottles.

London equity analyst Viktor Gusman, 53, said he understood the protesters' anger but said it didn't put him off working in finance.

"This is what I do," he said, taking a cigarette break a block down from a police barricade. "I'm supporting my wife and mother and I don't know that it hurts anyone."

Anti-war demonstrators descended on the U.S. Embassy bearing signs that put a pacifist twist on Obama's trademark political message. "Quit Iraq and Afghanistan: Yes We Can!" one placard read.

Police helicopters hovered above as a separate protests — climate change and anti-war — started near Trafalgar Square.

"It seems like everything is in a mess," said protester Steve Johnson, 49, an unemployed construction worker.

One protester dressed as the Easter bunny managed to hop through the police cordon but was stopped before he could reach the Bank of England. Another black-clad demonstrator waved a fake light saber at officers.

More protests are planned in London for the G-20 meeting on Thursday.

Still, the London protests Wednesday were minor compared to those during a World Trade Organization meeting in Seattle in 1999, where some 50,000 people turned out and several hundred people were arrested.

Meanwhile, pro-Tibet demonstrators picketed the London hotel of Chinese President Hu Jintao.

[sndkzyaa]

Why did corporations move out of the country in the first place?...
Posted by corey24446 at 9:14 PM : Apr 1, 2009


Exactly, and very well said.

Companies move jobs out of the USA because the WTO and our own government make it a no-brainer business decision. It costs them more to keep jobs here, it costs less to move jobs out. So they move the jobs. It's just simple business economics.

If our government is serious about creating jobs, why not keep the ones we have left by not making it such a no-brainer decision to move jobs out?

[sndkzyaa]

if he people in town objected to a Walmart or a McDonalds they could simply comtinue to patronize the original local businesses. For some reason, after they complain they end up SHOPPING at Walmart. Funny, isn't it?
Posted by aziridine at 9:23 PM : Apr 1, 2009

No, it isn't funny.

People end up shopping at Wal-Mart because Wal-Mart usually puts most local merchants out of business.

Then there's nowhere left to shop except Wal-Mart.

[sndkzyaa]

1. How is that whining?
2. Why are you so hostile?
Posted by taebok at 7:49 PM : Apr 1, 2009

OK, let's go over this again, real slow.

The whole point is to create jobs for U.S. workers.

They're U.S. workers, so the jobs would need to be HERE in the USA. Because that's where U.S. workers live. Strangely enough, if you do some research you'll find it's true.

Isn't that just common sense?

And yet, when I talk about creating jobs in the USA, you call it "isolationism."

Hmm. OK, how did you plan to make jobs for U.S. workers if creating the jobs here is "isolationist???"

Remember, you're the hostile one who challenged me to some kind of a showdown because I suggested a simple thing like an honest day's pay for an honest day's work.

Look who's talking about hostile.

[yurang]

i know nothing about economics nor plutonomy, No matter what anybody says, there's going to be some kind of tragedy when the bloodshed was happening.Anyway.the people are brave and firm indeed.
i feel so sad when all the medias were covered with the bloodshed ,but they failed to report what those protesters' idea.So ,after reading too much
the same story in both chinese and english,i still don't know why they held the demonstration.
Greeting the dead...

[_CBS_is_Pravda_]

Those 4,000 anarchists, anti-capitalists, environmentalists and others that clogged the streets of London's financial district - are Obama-supporting Socialists.

This is the kind of spawn that is responsible for Obama getting elected.

[aziridine]

This is actually pretty hilarious. A few unemployed iliterate Brits trying to look like a sizeable protest. Notice how the media clips the shots to make this look like a significant story. Heck half of them will probably be arrested for vagrancy, petty theft or prostitution within a week.

[aziridine]

most of those that 'make things happen' have access to the resources (read money) and knowledge that the other 96% don't.Posted by taebok
______________________________________________________________

That's right Taebok, its called "Getting an Education"! and it's called Diligence. Funny how people who engage in those to practices tend to have knowledge that others dont!

The cool thing is, the poorer you are the easier it i to get an education with grants, scholarships etc. Unfortunately, a heckuva lotta porr kid decide that "they're to COOL for SCHOOL" and they start making babies at age 15. Check out Obama's old Englewood district in Chicago, the district he's supposed o have provided with leadership. Those kids dropout and make babies and commit crime all the time, instead of going to school! That's that Obama leadership showing through!!!

[aziridine]

I think a community should be able to vote whether or not they want global franchises to move in to their communities such as Walmart, McDonalds, etc. at the expense of the locally owned, family run businesses in the community. Posted by Insurgeon_General
____________________________________________________

That's why you elect a Zoning Board. What did you think they do? Of course, if he people in town objected to a Walmart or a McDonalds they could simply comtinue to patronize the original local businesses. For some reason, after they complain they end up SHOPPING at Walmart. Funny, isn't it?

[The-Wrongs-of-Man]

"First by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and the corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all property, until their children wake up homeless. . . . Power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs. The modern theory of the perpetuation of debt has drenched the earth with blood, and crushed its inhabitants under burdens ever accumulating."


Thomas Jefferson, 1816

[The-Wrongs-of-Man]

The solution to this whole mess is painfully obvious:

1. Seize all assets of every executive, board member, financier, banker, inside trader, broker, accountant, lawyer and lobbyist involved in the corrupt and profligate enterprises that crashed our whole system.

2. Use the cash from their overflowing offshore accounts and from the fire-sale of their regal homes, vacation estates, private jets and investment portfolios to pay this monumental bill they accrued with our stolen credit -- and retire the national debt while we're at it. Then repair all facets of this nation's crumbling infrastructure while employing every able American who wants to work fixing it. There will STILL be BILLIONS left over to update our waning military resources and to shell out some well-deserved bonuses to our returning soldiers.

3. Use some of the leftover funds to buy up dilapidating public housing projects and slum domiciles now facing foreclosure, and sequester said 'businessmen' and their families within. Feed and shelter them there at public expense -- like we?re already doing, but on a realistic budget -- for no longer than one year. After that, they have to work like everybody else.

Period. And bounce all those lying homeowners out into the street. Every last one of them.


Simple, straightforward and just. You steal, you deal.

[sndkzyaa]

that sounds a lot like protectionism and isolationism to me. Not sure that would work.
Posted by taebok at 7:25 PM : Apr 1, 2009

OK, are you here to solve our problems, or are you here to whine?

Waah waah waah. Grow up.

[sndkzyaa]

You fail to acknowledge the VAST majority of Americans who have worked hard all their lives only to see their efforts wiped out by Wall Street greed.
Posted by democracy1 at 7:06 PM : Apr 1, 2009

Thanks for posting lies about me. I think they call that "slander."

But if you've been paying attention, I've been posting about exactly that all evening.

That's what I mean by the non-enforcement policy of the Clinton administration, which was then foolishly adopted by the Bush administration.

Madoff, Enron, Worldcomm, Andersen Accounting, and all the rest of the rampant financial fraud of the Clinton years that finally got busted in the Bush years. That's how hard-working people got robbed of their future.

The result is a new generation of youngsters who look at Madoff and Kennedy and Clinton and conclude that "work is for losers - I wanna get rich like them."

You have no idea what kind of a future we are facing when todays youth becomes the adults who are running this country in the future.

What will happen when our nation is led by a generation that was raised believing that "work is for losers?"

Our problems are only beginning.

[sndkzyaa]

Because I really can't see places like Wal-Mart ever offering employees an 'honest days pay'
Posted by taebok at 7:02 PM : Apr 1, 2009

I know how to hurt Wal-Mart really bad: FORCE them to buy only "Made in USA" products.

You know, like they used to? And they used to brag about it on their TV commercials???

[democracy1]

First, we have to teach people that work is a necessary part of success. It's not a joke to be avoided and shunned as a task for "losers."

That's step one...
Posted by sndkzyaa at 6:47 PM : Apr 1, 2009

You fail to acknowledge the VAST majority of Americans who have worked hard all their lives only to see their efforts wiped out by Wall Street greed. And you seem to want to stereotype Obama supporters as people who don't fall into that category. I pity someone as narrow-minded as you.

You've bought into the myth that only "welfare" types support Obama and are looking to him to find a solution to this mess.

Wall Street greed has done more to bring this country to this point than anyone else, so knock off the "lazy, non-working people" blame. Yes, there are some of those, but you can hardly blame them for what our country is facing at this point. Unless, that is, you're talking about lazy people who wanted fat, short-term profits, without regard to the risks that they involved (Wall Street) or who would be hurt in the long-term (Main Street).

If you voted for someone who supported financial deregulation, an immensely costly and unnecessary war that has cost us TRILLIONS, and tax cuts that favored mostly the wealthy (who did NOT "trickle" it down), then you only have yourself to blame.

[sndkzyaa]

Actually, the thing that really burns me about Bush lately is his tax holiday on deferred corporate taxes by companies that moved jobs out of the USA.

An earlier law allowed them to defer corporate taxes on jobs they moved out of the country. They soon accumulated a huge backlog of unpaid taxes.

So the Bush admin made a special law that gave them a chance to pay dimes on the dollar on all the deferred taxes they owed.

You can bet they payed it all off in a hurry.

All that potential tax revenues, gone with the stroke of a pen.

That was absolutely unforgivable.

Bush is the kind of Republican who gives Republicans a bad name.

That only made it more astonishing when he went turncoat and went communist with his bailouts with no oversight.

That was just shocking.

Bush deserves to be locked in the same prison cell with Bill Clinton. But only after Clinton was there for 8 years first.

[mav547166]

So the protestors are protesting for what? Denying developing countries the opportunity to step out of grass and mud huts? All of that energy wasted for the world to laugh at them for taunting cops and getting beat down. What a joke.

[sndkzyaa]

(Clinton wasn't perfect, but apparently you think Bush was, you hypocrite!)
Posted by democracy1 at 6:52 PM : Apr 1, 2009

When did I ever say that?

Please provide time and date.

I could write an even longer post blasting Bush.

But the Bush bashers do that every day on these discussions, so why bother.

I'm just setting the record straight on Clinton.

[democracy1]

Posted by sndkzyaa at 6:18 PM : Apr 1, 2009 :

Ooh! Back a libtard into the corner, and look what happens. The gloves come off and the name calling begins. (Yet you're calling people "libtards, hypocrite)

Looks like you're trying to forget Clinton's 8 years. (Looks like you'd LIKE to forget Bush's 8 years.)

Are you denying that Madoff was turned in for his Ponzi scheme in 2000, on Clinton's watch? (Maybe so, but what did Bush do about in for 8 years?)

Are you denying that Madoff, Enron, Worldcomm, Andersen Accounting, and other rampant financial fraud was happening on Clinton's watch and got busted on Bush's watch? Many of the guilty are in prison now because of getting caught on Bush' s watch. (Bush let it fester for 8 years until it got too big too deal with instead of nipping in the bud.)

Are you denying that the 9/11 attack was in the planning stages during the Clinton administration? Are you denying that the FBI sent undercover agents to check on reports of suspicious activity by 9/11 pilots at flying schools, but they found nothing? (Are you forgetting that Bush ignored the "Bin Laden Determined to Attack in U.S. report that was supplied to him by Clinton? Bush was more concerned about being on vacation in Crawford.)

And I suppose you can explain this: http://usgovinfo.about.com/library/weekly/aa120800b.htm (And in response as well to your following statements: How do you see that this opened up the U.S. to the events of 9/11 AND why do you think Bush didn't de-authorize it if it did?)

Our country had suffered a string of terrorist attacks, allegedly the Clinton admin had information indicating that a major attack was imminent, and it would involve airline hijackings. (See above.)

Why, then, did Clinton issue an executive order on Pearl Harbor Day 2000 to effectively block the FAA from preventing airline hijackings by giving them a different top priority, which deprioritized airport security? (See above.)

And we've already discussed Clinton's WMD lies. (Not even close to GWB's, since Clinton's intel didn't tell him that there were grave doubts about the WMDs, but Bush's intel DID and he chose to ignore it.)

Are you telling me there was nothing wrong with the Clinton administration, so you just forget about those 8 years? (Clinton wasn't perfect, but apparently you think Bush was, you hypocrite!)

[bumpedoff1]

cbsblogger try hulu lots carlin stuff

[cbsblogger]

Most of them did not have a major inerest in the Star of David.
Posted by sndkzyaa at 6:37 PM : Apr 1, 2009

Either you are naive or absorbed in irrelevance. There is nothing of significance that happens in the USA that doesn't have tentacles to the supporters of the Star of David. Promoting of their wealth and influence is at the root of American mainstream politics and cronyism.