March 29, 2009
Officials: Waterboarding Foiled No Plot
Washington Post: Torture Of Abu Zubaida Produced False Leads
-
The Bush administration, believing Abu Zubaida to be an al Qaeda leader, authorized torture of the detainee when they were frustrated at the level of information gleaned from him. Now court documents reveal he was not even a member of the terror group, and his name has been expunged from charge sheets drafted against other detainees. (CBS)
-
Interactive Gitmo Tribunals Detainees on trial, photos and a history of the naval base.
When CIA officials subjected their first high-value captive, Abu Zubaida, to waterboarding and other harsh interrogation methods, they were convinced that they had in their custody an al Qaeda leader who knew details of operations yet to be unleashed, and they were facing increasing pressure from the White House to get those secrets out of him.
The methods succeeded in breaking him, and the stories he told of al Qaeda terrorism plots sent CIA officers around the globe chasing leads.
In the end, though, not a single significant plot was foiled as a result of Abu Zubaida's tortured confessions, according to former senior government officials who closely followed the interrogations. Nearly all of the leads attained through the harsh measures quickly evaporated, while most of the useful information from Abu Zubaida - chiefly names of al Qaeda members and associates - was obtained before waterboarding was introduced, they said.
Moreover, within weeks of his capture, U.S. officials had gained evidence that made clear they had misjudged Abu Zubaida. President George W. Bush had publicly described him as "al Qaeda's chief of operations," and other top officials called him a "trusted associate" of al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden and a major figure in the planning of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.
None of that was accurate, the new evidence showed.
Abu Zubaida was not even an official member of al Qaeda, according to a portrait of the man that emerges from court documents and interviews with current and former intelligence, law enforcement and military sources. Rather, he was a "fixer" for radical Muslim ideologues, and he ended up working directly with al Qaeda only after Sept. 11 - and that was because the United States stood ready to invade Afghanistan.
Abu Zubaida's case presents the Obama administration with one of its most difficult decisions as it reviews the files of the 241 detainees still held in the U.S. military prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Abu Zubaida - a nom de guerre for the man born Zayn al-Abidin Muhammed Hussein - was never charged in a military commission in Guantanamo Bay, but some U.S. officials are pushing to have him charged now with conspiracy.
The Palestinian, 38 and now in captivity for more than seven years, had alleged links with Ahmed Ressam, an al Qaeda member dubbed the "Millennium Bomber" for his plot to bomb Los Angeles International Airport on New Year's Eve 1999. Jordanian officials tied him to terrorist plots to attack a hotel and Christian holy sites in their country. And he was involved in discussions, after the Taliban government fell in Afghanistan, to strike back at the United States, including with attacks on American soil, according to law enforcement and military sources.
Others in the U.S. government, including CIA officials, fear the consequences of taking a man into court who was waterboarded on largely false assumptions, because of the prospect of interrogation methods being revealed in detail and because of the chance of an acquittal that might set a legal precedent. Instead, they would prefer to send him to Jordan.
Some U.S. officials remain steadfast in their conclusion that Abu Zubaida possessed, and gave up, plenty of useful information about al Qaeda.
The government seems finally to understand [Zubaida] is not at all the person they thought he was. But he was tortured. And that's just a profoundly embarrassing position for the government to be in.
Law professor Joseph MarguliesUntil the attacks on New York and Washington, Abu Zubaida was a committed jihadist who regarded the United States as an enemy principally because of its support of Israel. He helped move people in and out of military training camps in Afghanistan, including some men who were or became members of al Qaeda, according to interviews with multiple sources, who spoke on the condition of anonymity. He was widely known as a kind of travel agent for those seeking such training.
That role, it turned out, would play a part in deciding his fate once in U.S. hands: Because his name often turned up in intelligence traffic linked to al Qaeda transactions, some U.S. intelligence leaders were convinced that Abu Zubaida was a major figure in the terrorist organization, according to officials engaged in the discussions at the time.
But Abu Zubaida had strained and limited relations with bin Laden and only vague knowledge before the Sept. 11 attacks that something was brewing, the officials said.
His account was echoed in another U.S. interrogation going on at the same time, one never previously described publicly.
Noor al-Deen, a Syrian, was a teenager when he was captured along with Abu Zubaida at a Pakistani safe house. Perhaps because of his youth and agitated state, he readily answered U.S. questions, officials said, and the questioning went on for months, first in Pakistan and later in a detention facility in Morocco. His description of Abu Zubaida was consistent: The older man was a well-known functionary with links to al Qaeda, but he knew little detailed information about the group's operations.
The counterterrorism official rejected that characterization, saying, "Based on what he shared during his interrogations, he was certainly aware of many of al Qaeda's activities and operatives."
One connection Abu Zubaida had with al Qaeda was a long relationship with Khalid Sheik Mohammed, the self-proclaimed mastermind behind the Sept. 11 attacks, officials said. Mohammed had approached Abu Zubaida in the 1990s about finding financiers to support a suicide mission, involving a small plane, targeting the World Trade Center. Abu Zubaida declined but told him to try bin Laden, according to a law enforcement source.
Abu Zubaida quickly told U.S. interrogators of Mohammed and of others he knew to be in al Qaeda, and he revealed the plans of the low-level operatives who fled Afghanistan with him. Some were intent on returning to target American forces with bombs; others wanted to strike on American soil again, according to military documents and law enforcement sources.
Such intelligence was significant but not blockbuster material. Frustrated, the Bush administration ratcheted up the pressure - for the first time approving the use of increasingly harsh interrogations, including waterboarding.
Such treatment at the hands of the CIA has raised questions among human rights groups about whether Abu Zubaida is capable of standing trial and how the taint of torture would affect any prosecution.
The International Committee of the Red Cross said in a confidential report that the treatment of Abu Zubaida and other, subsequent high-value detainees while in CIA custody constituted torture. And Abu Zubaida refused to cooperate with FBI "clean teams" who attempted to re-interview high-value detainees to build cases uncontaminated by allegations of torture, according to military sources.
"The government doesn't retreat from who KSM is, and neither does KSM," said Joseph Margulies, a professor of law at Northwestern University and one of Abu Zubaida's attorneys, using an abbreviation for Mohammed. "With Zubaida, it's different. The government seems finally to understand he is not at all the person they thought he was. But he was tortured. And that's just a profoundly embarrassing position for the government to be in."
His lawyers want the U.S. government to arrange for Abu Zubaida's transfer to a country besides Jordan - possibly Saudi Arabia, where he has relatives.
The Justice Department declined repeated requests for comment.
Even before President Obama suspended military commissions at the military base in Cuba, prosecutors had expunged Abu Zubaida's name from the charge sheets of a number of detainees who were captured with him and stood accused of conspiracy and material support for terrorism.
When they were first charged in 2005, these detainees were accused of conspiring with Abu Zubaida, and the charge sheets contained numerous references to Abu Zubaida's alleged terrorist activities. When the charges were refiled last year, his name had vanished from the documents.
Abu Zubaida was born in 1971 in Saudi Arabia to a Palestinian father and a Jordanian mother, according to court papers. In 1991, he moved to Afghanistan and joined mujaheddin fighting Afghan communists, part of the civil war that raged after the 1989 withdrawal of the Soviet Union. He was seriously wounded by shrapnel from a mortar blast in 1992, sustaining head injuries that left him with severe memory problems, which still linger.
In 1994, he became the Pakistan-based coordinator for the Khalden training camp, outside the Afghan city of Khowst. He directed recruits to the camp and raised money for it, according to testimony he gave at a March 2007 hearing in Guantanamo Bay.
The Khalden camp, which provided basic training in small arms, had been in existence since the war against the Soviets. According to the 9/11 Commission's report, Khalden and another camp called Derunta "were not al Qaeda facilities," but "Abu Zubaydah had an agreement with Bin Laden to conduct reciprocal recruiting efforts whereby promising trainees at the camps could be invited to join al Qaeda."
Abu Zubaida disputes this, saying he admitted to such a connection with bin Laden only as the result of torture.
When the Sept. 11 attacks occurred, Abu Zubaida was in Kabul, the Afghan capital. In anticipation of an American attack, he allied himself with al Qaeda, he said at a 2007 hearing, but he soon fled into hiding in Pakistan.
On the night of March 28, 2002, Pakistani and American intelligence officers raided the Faisalabad safe house where Abu Zubaida had been staying. A firefight ensued, and Abu Zubaida was captured after jumping from the building's second floor. He had been shot three times.
Cowering on the ground floor and also shot was Noor al-Deen, Abu Zubaida's 19-year-old colleague; one source said that he worshiped the older man as a hero. Deen was wide-eyed with fear and appeared to believe that he was about to be executed, remembered John Kiriakou, a former CIA officer who participated in the raid.
"He was frightened - mostly over what we were going to do with him," Kiriakou said. "He had come to the conclusion that his life was over."
Deen was eventually transferred to Syria, but attempts to firmly establish his current whereabouts were unsuccessful.
His interrogations corroborated what CIA officials were hearing from Abu Zubaida, but there were other clues at the time that pointed to a less-than-central role for the Palestinian. As a veritable travel agent for jihadists, Abu Zubaida operated in a public world of Internet transactions and ticket agents.
"He was the above-ground support," said one former Justice Department official closely involved in the early investigation of Abu Zubaida. "He was the guy keeping the safe house, and that's not someone who gets to know the details of the plans. To make him the mastermind of anything is ridiculous."
As weeks passed after the capture without significant new confessions, the Bush White House and some at the CIA became convinced that tougher measures had to be tried.
The pressure from upper levels of the government was "tremendous," driven in part by the routine of daily meetings in which policymakers would press for updates, one official remembered.
"They couldn't stand the idea that there wasn't anything new," the official said. "They'd say, 'You aren't working hard enough.' There was both a disbelief in what he was saying and also a desire for retribution - a feeling that 'He's going to talk, and if he doesn't talk, we'll do whatever.'"
The application of techniques such as waterboarding - a form of simulated drowning that U.S. officials had previously deemed a crime - prompted a sudden torrent of names and facts. Abu Zubaida began unspooling the details of various al Qaeda plots, including plans to unleash weapons of mass destruction.
Abu Zubaida's revelations triggered a series of alerts and sent hundreds of CIA and FBI investigators scurrying in pursuit of phantoms. The interrogations led directly to the arrest of Jose Padilla, the man Abu Zubaida identified as heading an effort to explode a radiological "dirty bomb" in an American city. Padilla was held in a naval brig for 3 1/2 years on the allegation but was never charged in any such plot. Every other lead ultimately dissolved into smoke and shadow, according to high-ranking former U.S. officials with access to classified reports.
"We spent millions of dollars chasing false alarms," one former intelligence official said.
Despite the poor results, Bush White House officials and CIA leaders continued to insist that the harsh measures applied against Abu Zubaida and others produced useful intelligence that disrupted terrorist plots and saved American lives.
Two weeks ago, Bush's vice president, Richard B. Cheney, renewed that assertion in an interview with CNN, saying that "the enhanced interrogation program" stopped "a great many" terrorist attacks on the level of Sept. 11.
"I've seen a report that was written, based upon the intelligence that we collected then, that itemizes the specific attacks that were stopped by virtue of what we learned through those programs," Cheney asserted, adding that the report is "still classified," and, "I can't give you the details of it without violating classification."
Since 2006, Senate intelligence committee members have pressed the CIA, in classified briefings, to provide examples of specific leads that were obtained from Abu Zubaida through the use of waterboarding and other methods, according to officials familiar with the requests.
The agency provided none, the officials said.
By Washington Post Staff Writers Peter Finn and Joby Warrick; Staff researcher Julie Tate contributed to this report.
© 2009 The Washington Post. All rights reserved.
- I am only sorry that Daniel Pearl is no longer around to add his perspective to this argument.
At least 1200 American Military recruits are water boarded every year as part of their training to help them to survive interrogation at the hands of enemy combatants. How many American kids need to die over a pair of sneakers or a new coat every year in this country before these bozos in Washington start getting real about crime and punishment. All of this noise about torture is directly out of the Saul Alinsky play book and the Obama administration must think that no one else has read his 'Rules For Radicals' . - Reply to this comment
- It's hard to have any pity for what terrorists have done to the US, but torture is just plain WRONG!
The terrorists didn't just knock down the Twin Towers and kill thousands of lives, but made the US forget it principles and values. And that's a moral victory for them.
As parents will often tell their children, two wrongs don't make a right. - Reply to this comment
- i suspect that guyfrompa50 is unable to post without spewing ad homs, if not outright insults.
- Reply to this comment
- Never have listened to Rush, I get my news form CBS.
- Reply to this comment
- karlimhof, are you suggesting all that violence is our fault? are you suggesting that terrorists would not cause that violence? that they would not take advantage of every circumstance to create violence to push their agenda? That the terrorists are really nice guys and the Americans are the bad guys? Gee, your sounding like Hillary.
Posted by Aldymac at 4:35 PM : Mar 30, 2009
************************************************************************
No, I think "karlimhof" is suggesting that you listen to some news other than Rush Limbaugh. The twisting of every statement that doesn't support a Republican into something unpatriotic, and using Hillary as the evil witch, is just not working anymore. We have moved on from Republican vitriol, and maybe so should you. - Reply to this comment
- In the end, though, not a single significant plot was foiled as a result of Abu Zubaida's tortured confessions, according to former senior government officials who closely followed the interrogations. Nearly all of the leads attained through the harsh measures quickly evaporated, while most of the useful information from Abu Zubaida - chiefly names of al Qaeda members and associates - was obtained before waterboarding was introduced, they said.
**************************************
Oh no, that can't be true. According to the evil Dick Cheney, torture has saved the world. I bet Dick's only regret is that he couldn't be there when those fellow's being waterboarded were vomiting and gagging and pi**ing their pants. Maybe the CIA will give him some tapes of the torture sessions to watch with his grandchildren and a bowl of popcorn on Sunday evening after church. - Reply to this comment
- karlimhof, are you suggesting all that violence is our fault? are you suggesting that terrorists would not cause that violence? that they would not take advantage of every circumstance to create violence to push their agenda? That the terrorists are really nice guys and the Americans are the bad guys? Gee, your sounding like Hillary.
- Reply to this comment
- Posted by davicar2 at 10:05 AM : Mar 30, 2009
Making a commitment to that kind of wrong is why history will mark w as America's Dictator. There's a place for anybody in Gulog, Alaska.... - Reply to this comment
- Posted by guyfrompa50 at 8:07 AM : Mar 30, 2009
Find the clues, torture does NOT get good information, and in the stated case, it got NO information. See "None of that was accurate, the new evidence showed" from the article.
How would you like it if one of the tortured falsely accused your family member of plotting attacks? That's what they often do to make it stop. How would you like if your family member was then detained for years, and tortured as well. That's basically what's been happening. It's enough to make a terrorist of people that weren't otherwise.
These points are just some of the reasons we had habeous corpus, and that torture is illegal. - Reply to this comment
- aldy - suggest you consult following
The Johns Hopkins / Lancet tally
An eminent research team from the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health in Baltimore, United States estimates that as of July 2006, 654,965 Iraqis have died as a consequence of the war. Of these, 601,027 deaths are due to violence. The study specifies that people in Iraq are dying at a rate two-and-a-half times greater since the invasion occurred, and that violent deaths are primarily responsible for the increase. - Reply to this comment
- Is anyone really surprised by this??? Other than Cheney of course.
- Reply to this comment
- formrusmcsgt, you don't know much about warfare, in Viet Nam ,the enemy did not play by the rules. And if you are going to survive you find that you can't play by them either.
I am a former U S Marine, I was also a Sgt. and a Viet Nam veteran. The terrorists don't have any rules of engagement, other than kill by any means possible, and innocent people are game also, you don't have to worry about them being able to fight back.
Anyone who believes in allowing the terrorists to have a little here or there is O K, is nothing more than a coward, they want everything you have, including your life. - Reply to this comment
- 500,000 dead innocent Iraqis, you must be talking about the ones Saddam killed, because the Americans didn't kill that many, not even a fraction of that. The terrorists killed more Iraqis that the Americans did in the invasion, not counting the torture of innocent Iraqis by the terrorists and Saddam. But to liberals , the beheading of people is not considered to be torture, its just a way of life.
People who absolutly do not understand just how deep the extremist hatred for anyone who doesn't bow to them really is, will listen to anyone who says "they're really not all that bad". Perhaps we should religate our methods of interrigation to those of the terrorists, perhaps that would not be as bad, but there is one thing you are leaving out about their methods by calling water boarding extreme, waterboarding is survibable, their methods are not.
National socialism is what islamist takeover of nations goes to before it reverts to islamic law, in case you haven't been looking, thats what BHO is doing to this country, right before your eyes, and you are so blinded by the glory of his presence you can't even see the truth. GWB is going to look like a saint compared to what BHO is going to do, and history will bare that out in a short period of time. Nobody wanted to believe what was coming out about the man because the liberals were making LOTS of money from his campaign, so hiding the truth was only a minor thing. Now we all will pay a higher price for a MAJOR lack of diligence on the part of forgoing truth for a false savior. - Reply to this comment
- Totrue involves the infliction of pain, whether or not there is resulting mutilation. By the no-loss-of body-parts standard, you also legitimize hooking electrodes to the testicles. There are plenty of accounts written by experienced intelligence professionals that you get more and better intelligence from interrogation techniques which are well within the Geneva conventions. These methods take time, effort, and patience. Resorting to torture and other shortcuts such as "truth serums" and lie detectors shows laziness in extracting the intelligence and impllies matching laziness in interpreting the results (we got it by torture, it must be right). Watch the fictional example in the movie the Guns of Navarone in which information extracted by torture and a truth serum is used without critical analysis with, fortunately, disastrous results for the Nazis. I would think it likely that Bush and Cheney, macho men, have seen the movie. Apparently they did not get the lesson.
- Reply to this comment
- they've lied about 911
about iraq too
now i know how
normal germans felt
after WW2 - Reply to this comment
- Quote from US Senator from Arizona and 2008 Republican candidate for President John McCain - "Torture does not work".
If that isn't clear enough for the right wing knee-jerks, there is absolutely no hope for them. - Reply to this comment
- "Bush's vice president, Richard B. Cheney, renewed that assertion in an interview with CNN, saying that "the enhanced interrogation program" stopped "a great many" terrorist attacks on the level of Sept. 11. " CBS
note "on the level of 9-11"
strike anyone as another proof that these thugs are still "using" 9-11?
i wonder if they will even answer for the 500'000 innocent dead iraqis their madness is responsible for. Most likely they'll invoke "9-11" again...... - Reply to this comment
- War is nasty business - there's no argument about that.
And war can be waged with or without honor.
Terrorists are condemned for waging war without honor.
Where's the honor in torture?
Watching dubya and cheney condemn terrorists as "criminals" and "thugs" while instituting torture reminds me of the passage from Orwell's Animal Farm that goes "Four legs good, two legs better"........
Posted by formrusmcsgt at 3:50 AM : Mar 30, 2009
Semper Fi!! Spoken like a Marine! A nation without Honor... a Nation who follows those without Honor can not long endure. We have known for a long time that those who follow people like Bush have no Honor and you need only to look at their history to understand that. Without Honor the United States has lost its very Soul... Without Honor the nation can join those who still hold on to the flag of traitors, making excuses for the terrible things they did. - Reply to this comment
- Ok....lets say that it didn't work,,,,lets try it on the Obama administration...it might not work either but I'll enjoy it.
Posted by dongo3 at 1:49 AM : Mar 30, 2009
Oh come on! You are just sad that you and the rest of the Hood and Sheet Crowd can no longer do things like this! LOL Your day has come and gone so all you have left is the sickness in your very small little mind out there in a No Name Town in some back woods place that no one ever heard of or cared for. It's your ONLY chance, the ONLY one you'll ever have to act like you really mean something! LOL Sad and very very sick... all of you in the Hood and Sheet Crowd... sad and very very sick. - Reply to this comment
- Waterboarding, barking dogs, and rock-n-roll are not torture. Why not? There is no physical damage or intent to harm; only intent for information. Come see the torture museums of Europe for some perspective. Real torture involves intent to hurt, kill, and administer suffering as a twisted form of punishment/ pleasure.
Posted by Stevenapoli7 at 3:27 AM : Mar 30, 2009
You do not know what you are talking about!! Waterboarding is Torture and is considered so by our OWN Army. By saying trash like this you open the door to our OWN troops enduring the same treatment. By trying to defend the scum that did this you place our OWN troops in harms way. I do NOT know what motivates clowns like you but one thing is certain, you have NOT been subjected to Combat and the possibility of being put in a situation where Torture is possible. Now IF you would like to show us all that it isn't torture why not subject YOURSELF to the process!! Where do you people come from?? - Reply to this comment






