May 21, 2009 10:48 AM

Unpaid Sunni Fighters Threaten To Quit

(AP)  Sunni security volunteers who turned against al Qaeda complained Saturday the Iraqi government has not paid them in months, with some threatening to quit a movement widely credited with helping turn the tide against insurgents.

The issue of how to deal with the groups, whose ranks include former insurgents, is a test of the Shiite-led government's ability to win the loyalty of disaffected Sunnis - an essential step in forging a lasting peace in Iraq.

Last October, the Iraqi government assumed responsibility for paying the more than 90,000 security volunteers, known variously as Sons of Iraq or Awakening Councils, and bringing some of them into the army and police.

The U.S. had been paying them since they began turning against al Qaeda in 2006, joining forces with the Americans to hunt down extremists.

"We have not received our salaries in two months," said Ahmed Suleiman al-Jubouri, a leader of a group that mans checkpoints in south Baghdad. "We will wait until the end of April, and if the government does not pay us our salaries, then we will abandon our work."

Similar complaints were also raised by Sons of Iraq groups in Azamiyah, a former al Qaeda stronghold in north Baghdad, and in Diyala province near the capital.

"The fighters in Diyala haven't been getting paid since three months ago," said Khalid Khudhair al-Lehaibi, leader of the volunteers in the province. "We appeal the government to pay our salaries, and if they won't, we will organize demonstrations and sit-ins in the province."

Efforts to contact a government spokesman were unsuccessful because offices are closed on weekends.

However, al-Jubouri said officials told him that the delay was due to red tape after responsibility was transferred from the Ministry of Defense to the Ministry of Interior.

Sabbar al-Mashhadani, a Sons of Iraq leader in Azamiyah, said the government had given assurances that "we are still on the payroll" and the problem will be solved "in the coming few days."

The Iraqi government has problems paying many employees, including soldiers, police and schoolteachers due to bureaucratic problems and inefficiencies.

But the issue is particularly sensitive for the Sons of Iraq because of deep distrust between the Sunnis and the Shiite-dominated government, which considers many of the fighters as enemies who switched sides for money and who may well turn their guns on the Shiites again.

On Saturday, police arrested the head of a Sons of Iraq group in central Baghdad and his aide for alleged involvement in terrorism. The arrest triggered a gunfight that killed four people - three civilian bystanders and a policeman - and wounded 10 other people, police said on condition of anonymity because they were not supposed to release the information.

Under pressure from the U.S., the government agreed to accept 20,000 of the fighters into the police or army and continue paying the rest until they could find them civilian jobs.

But U.S. officials say the process has been slowed because the drop in world oil prices has cut deeply into the government's revenues, prompting a freeze on army and police recruiting.

The Iraqi government is to assume responsibility for paying the last 10,000 volunteers still on the U.S. payroll on April 1.

Also Saturday, a senior aide to Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki confirmed that contacts were under way to win the release of five Britons taken hostage in May 2007 but denied Arab media reports that deal had been finalized.

The widely read Saudi-owned news Web site Elaph quoted a leader of the Shiite extremist group Asaib Ahl al-Haq, or League of the Righteous, as saying one of the five Britons would be freed "very soon" in exchange for 10 of its members.

If that exchange goes according to plan, the other hostages would be released in stages in exchange for the freedom of more detained Shiites. The first group of detainees would include Laith al-Khazali, brother of the league's founder Qais al-Khazali, Elaph said.

The final exchange would free Peter Moore, an information technology consultant, in exchange for Qais al-Khazali and Ali Moussa Daqduq, a Lebanese Hezbollah commander who was captured in Iraq in 2007, the Web site reported.

Moore and four of his security guards were seized by gunmen in police uniforms from the Finance Ministry.

Last week, the British Embassy confirmed receiving a hostage video but refused to say who appeared on it. The BBC said it was Moore, who had appeared in an earlier video shown on Feb. 26, 2008.

The league is a splinter group from the Mahdi Army militia loyal to radical Shiite leader Muqtada al-Sadr. The U.S. believes the group is backed by Iran, a charge the Iranians deny.

Qais al-Khazali, a Shiite cleric and former aide to al-Sadr, has been in U.S. custody since March 2007. U.S. officials believe al-Khazali's group launched a January 2007 raid on a government compound in Karbala, that killed five U.S. soldiers.
By Associated Press Writer Robert H. Reid

© 2009 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment See all 23 Comments
by sean1z March 30, 2009 6:19 AM EDT
Why allow industrial sabotage? Baghdad should pay Sunnis for security duty. Militants will indiscriminantly murder people for revenge and authority.
Reply to this comment
by boandco March 29, 2009 3:49 PM EDT
US forces should stay focused on protecting the oil fields and not get involved fighting these minor skirmishes. It gives the US a bad image. For a very small fraction of the oil revenue, they can pay the Baghdad government to subjugate their own people. After all, that is the reason we installed them in power in the first place.
Reply to this comment
by metsobitso March 29, 2009 3:22 PM EDT
Occupation forces are not leaving any time soon. They are not deploying in 16 months, not leaving the cities this summer, and they do not feel bound to pay the awakening councils the payroll they agreed. The kind of people that would invade another country, kill their people and steal their oil are not the kind of people that would keep their word about simple agreements. Occupation forces will stay as long as there is oil to be pumped.
Reply to this comment
by motown67usa March 29, 2009 3:06 PM EDT
Beginning in the summer of 2008 Baghdad began arresting some Sons of Iraq leaders in Baghdad and then really went after the ones in Diyala trying to break up the main groups there. This is the first time fighting erupted. The government promised not to make any such arrests as part of their agreement to integrate the SOI, but Maliki will do what he pleases. It?s a way for him to let the SOI know that Baghdad holds their fate. There may be future clashes, but overall the SOI now need to the government to pay them and hope they can find a few jobs because the U.S. isn?t going to do it anymore. If the government ran off most of the Diyala SOI leaders and arrested over a hundred of them and no fighting erupted, I would not expect many other SOI to take up their guns again against the government. Musingsoniraq.blogspot.com
Reply to this comment
by promaclaura March 29, 2009 1:07 PM EDT
"The issue of how to deal with the groups, whose ranks include former insurgents, is a test of the Shiite-led government's ability to win the loyalty of disaffected Sunnis - an essential step in forging a lasting peace in Iraq."




When Bush started paying the Sunni insurgents $300 a month in the summer of 2007, which is TRULY what stopped the violence - not the surge, all of us moderates and liberals started asking, "What's going to happen when we stop paying them?"

The standard Sean Hannity answer was, "By then, they'll ALL be on our side."



Ooops.

Dropped yet ANOTHER ball, huh Mr. Conservative?
Posted by hungry1968-15 at 2:55 PM : Mar 28, 2009


Jeez, and this is exactly what Obama is going to do in Afghanistan/Pakistan, BUY THEM OFF! Your arguement is moot, since this seems to be the desired method of our current President.
Reply to this comment
by promaclaura March 29, 2009 1:00 PM EDT
Let the buying of cooperation in Afghanistan/Pakistan commence! At least Iraq is semi-modern, we don't have a snowballs chance in he11 with tribal Afghanistan. Wave bye-bye to your money.
Reply to this comment
by rational_1 March 29, 2009 8:59 AM EDT
Before they re-join al Qaeda they might want to think about that organization's compensation plans. You seem to get paid in virgins after you blow yourself up - I don't need to comment on the health plan they offer.
Reply to this comment
by clancy49 March 29, 2009 8:35 AM EDT
Putting on a uniform is done by one of two methods. 1. You are conscripted or drafted. 2. You volunteer. Therefore it would be like saying every Marine, Army, Navy, or Air Force volunteer is a mercenary if you are indicating these Sunnis volunteered so therefore they have a paid loyalty or call them mercenary. I will try to keep this readable since hungry1968 has me laughing so hard my eyes are watering. Isn't it hysterical that a simple statement of reason can be so accurate and so funny. It is almost Irish. We did indeed inflict our government upon the Iraqi people. Previously the Sunni had the wealth power. Now the Shiite have the wealth power and it is all controlled by a puppet dictator. Need I say more?
Reply to this comment
by rushliberal March 29, 2009 3:48 AM EDT
These guys should have worked for blackwater/KBR, They pay their mercs......
Posted by JoetheDumbass

-------------------------

Wrong *******

WE pay their Mercs................
Reply to this comment
by gce651 March 29, 2009 3:41 AM EDT
"Unpaid" being the operative word here...
Reply to this comment
See all 23 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook