July 22, 2009 2:31 PM

Obstacles Await Obama Budget In Congress

(CBS/AP)  Facing opposition even within his own party, President Barack Obama went to Capitol Hill to press hard for approval of a $3.6 trillion budget that Republicans argue would burden the country with debt for years to come.

Mr. Obama, who successfully lobbied lawmakers earlier this year for approval of his stimulus plan, maintains approval of the 2010 budget plan is crucial because it's at the heart of his strategy to revitalize the economy and improve American competitiveness.

But Republican opposition to the spending plan intensified, with Sen. Richard Shelby telling CBS' The Early Show that Mr. Obama's budget would lead the country down "the road of financial destruction."

"This is scary. I believe we've reached the tipping point now … and if we tip over, it's the point of no return. … We cannot go down this road," the Alabama senator said Wednesday.

Shelby said that although the previous Republican administration left Mr. Obama with a $1.3 trillion deficit, "it was nothing like this."

And the second-ranking House Republican charged that his proposal is "so far out of the mainstream" that even members of Mr. Obama's own party are reluctant to support it. In fact, Mr. Obama was starting his fresh push Wednesday by meeting with congressional Democrats.

House Minority Whip Eric Cantor, the chamber's No. 2 Republican, said Wednesday that Mr. Obama's budget would tax too heavily the small businesses that create a large share of the jobs across the country. "We've got to provide the relief to the job creators," the Virginia Republican said.

Both the House and Senate budget chairmen have been forced by worsening deficit estimates to scale back Mr. Obama's requests for domestic programs, and deeply controversial revenues from his global warming initiative won't be included either.

But President Barack Obama's budget director praised the work of Democrats on a $3.6 trillion budget proposal, saying it advances and protects key White House goals.

Budget director Peter Orszag said Wednesday that companion documents offered by the House and Senate budget panels will bolster education and clean-energy priorities while also providing for an overhaul of the health care system.

But there were some cuts. Senate Budget Committee Chairman Kent Conrad, D-N.D., announced a budget blueprint Tuesday that would scrap Mr. Obama's signature tax cut after 2010 while employing some sleight of hand to cut the annual budget deficit to a sustainable level.

Conrad promises to reduce the deficit from a projected $1.7 trillion this year to a still-high $508 billion in 2014. Along the way, the Senate plan would have Mr. Obama's "Making Work Pay" tax credit, delivering $400 tax cuts to most workers and $800 to couples, expire at the end of next year. Those tax cuts were included in Mr. Obama's stimulus package.

In the House, Budget Chairman John Spratt Jr., D-S.C., said his companion blueprint would employ fast-track procedures to allow Mr. Obama's overhaul of the U.S. health care system to pass Congress without the threat of a GOP filibuster in the Senate.

Democrats point out that Mr. Obama inherited an unprecedented fiscal mess caused by the recession and the taxpayer-financed bailout of Wall Street. Rather than retrenching, however, they still promise to award big budget increases to education and clean energy programs, while assuming Mr. Obama's plans to overhaul the U.S. health care system advance.

"The best way to bring our deficit down in the long run is ... with a budget that leads to broad economic growth by moving from an era of borrow and spend to one where we save and invest," Mr. Obama said in a Tuesday night news conference.

It's also becoming clear that Mr. Obama's controversial global warming initiative has experienced a setback, as neither House nor Senate Democrats are directly incorporating into their budget plans Mr. Obama's controversial "cap-and-trade" system for auctioning permits to emit greenhouse gases.

Mr. Obama's budget has ignited a firestorm on Capitol Hill, with Republicans assailing it for record spending and budget deficits. Democrats are generally supportive, though some have sticker shock over the deficit figures.

Conrad's plan was released in the wake of new Congressional Budget Office estimates that predicted Mr. Obama's plan would produce alarming estimates of red ink - $9.3 trillion over 10 years and a deficit of $749 billion in 2014. Mr. Obama's budget promises a $570 billion deficit in that year, and to get below that figure Conrad was forced to make a series of difficult choices.

Conrad said his budget makes room for Mr. Obama's hopes to deliver health care to the uninsured. He said the plan would not add to the deficit over the long haul.

In grappling with the deficit, Conrad would cut Mr. Obama's proposed increases for next year for domestic agencies funded by lawmakers to growth of about $27 billion, or 6 percent. Over five years, the savings from Mr. Obama's budget would be $160 billion.

But Conrad also makes several shaky assumptions, especially that Congress will raise taxes by about $114 billion over 2013-14 to make sure middle-class taxpayers won't get hit by the alternative minimum tax. He also saves $87 billion by promising Congress will come up with spending cuts or new revenues to avoid cuts in Medicare payments to doctors.

Both problems have been fixed in recent years by using deficit dollars.

Under Congress' arcane procedures, the annual congressional budget resolution is a nonbinding measure that sets the terms for follow-up legislation.

Neither budget includes Mr. Obama's $250 billion set-aside for more bailouts of banks and other firms.

Cantor was interviewed Wednesday morning on NBC's "Today" show.

Full Coverage Of Obama's Press Conference:

© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Add a Comment See all 86 Comments
by alien_view March 26, 2009 3:59 PM EDT
Do you idiots know what is in this bill ....a civilian military force, funded and equiped like our regular military ,and young children will be expected to participate from an early age (pre-training). Obama is turning this country into a Natzi Germany with the Hitler youth and civilian SS and Gestapo. People wake up. What else is in this 1,000+ pages that they are not telling us about. This is really scarry folks. Soon we will be turning on each other...just what Obama wants so he can over throw the US Constution out the window and become a King of the US. He still has not provided us with his real birth certificate...which no ones in the media seems to want to question. If there is nothing to hide why doesen't he provide it and be done with it. He dosen't because we are peasants to him and unworthy of such knowledge.
Reply to this comment
by wyzguy11 March 25, 2009 10:33 PM EDT
The federal government is too big!! Federal agencies need to be dismantled or consolidated such as the FHWA which was established to build the Interstate highway system....It is now complete......combine it with the railways and aviation to make a new Federal Transportation Agency!!

Tighten up the procurement process at the Pentagon so we aren't spending $50 for a screwdriver!
Reply to this comment
by credibility2 March 25, 2009 5:39 PM EDT
Sooner or later the president is going man-up and face reality and that is that he won't be able to get his way all the time. I guess that what he thought a president did. Maybe his handlers should have clued him in. Then again, maybe they tried, but he was just to arrogant to hear what they had to say.
Reply to this comment
by sanfran57 March 25, 2009 4:52 PM EDT
I sincerely hope does not back down on his budget.
Particularly on the Bush tax cuts (let them expire)
Renewable energy...Once the economy turns around, demand for oil will increase again...and we will once again be faced with $150 per barrel for oil...this will sabotage any sustainable recovery.
Reply to this comment
by sjc_1 March 25, 2009 3:37 PM EDT
Bush spent $5 trillion of borrowed dollars on tax breaks for the rich and an illegal war based on lies. Throw in $50 billion in no bid contracts for their favorite friends and you have the biggest looting to take place in quite a while.

Contrast that with spending on education, health care and energy that Obama wants to do and you can see the difference. Bush wasted a ton on things that were not necessary and only made his rich friends richer and Obama wants to spend on things that we can all use to provide a better future for us all.
Reply to this comment
by sjc_1 March 25, 2009 3:26 PM EDT
You create more home ownership though progressive policies that lead to real prosperity. When people have good stable jobs that pay high wages, they can afford homes without home mortgage interest deductions nor reduced loan origination standards.

You can create the illusion of prosperity with Bush's Ownership Society, which lowers standards for loan origination and encourages Fannie and Freddy to take on more risky loans and jumbo loans for their rich friends.

Look up "Ownership Society", it is another of Bush's half baked programs to create the illusion of prosperity. The reason few remember it is because it was mumbled about for a week and then went silent. It was promoted at about the same time that Bush wanted to Privatize Social Security. That would have been the Mother of All Failures, to turn the retirement for all Americans over to AIG and the other people that ruined the country.
Reply to this comment
by McHineguy March 25, 2009 3:21 PM EDT
For you who fear big business and business "too big to fail". Beware, our government has become a business too. Running everything from the post office to Health Insurance, and charity to the poor. As we make it bigger, we risk even more than we did on Wall Street. And, so far, we have no one to bail us out when government fails.

That is the bottom line. Our government has chosen to spend more than we can provide (they simply call it deficit spending). When AIG did it they came to us for a bail out. But the US government wont ask. They have the power to TAKE.
Reply to this comment
by onesword March 25, 2009 3:13 PM EDT
So what? Corporations are moving overseas and so on. I'll ancestors will be ashame how Americans are becoming a bunch of whiners. It seems as though over the years we are becoming more and more of an investor status than a dominant work force. People are getting more lazier because of technology. It would seems as though when a company leaves the U.S. the workers that were let go would unite and make their own company with that similar product. Invest within themselves. I might be missing some points whereas furthering their education in that field and money. Maybe the gov't or private investors might invest in that way?
Reply to this comment
by noloyalisti March 25, 2009 3:04 PM EDT
The fact is, you cannot trust corporations to police and regulate themselves any more than you can let the government exist without constant vigilance and citizen input and control. We see here now what happens when we let big corporations own and run the government, the military and the media. A whole lot of really ignorant uneducated and TV and video game watching people.
Reply to this comment
by noloyalisti March 25, 2009 2:54 PM EDT
Bubba, I think you should refuse to use the "socialist" roads and fire and police departments. Add don't expect the government run socialist military to protect you either.

How can you defend these big corporations after you see the wasteland they have created. I just don't get it. Of course I am re-reading What's the Matter with Kansas? and can't figure out this right wing mentality of supporting those who are ruining your small farms and businesses.
Reply to this comment
See all 86 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook