March 24, 2009 12:38 PM

Investigators Eye Ice, Crowding In Crash

(CBS/AP)  Speculation over what caused the crash of a single-engine plane into a Montana cemetery shifted Monday to possible ice on the wings after it became less likely that overloading was to blame.

All 14 people on board were killed, half of them small children.

While descending Sunday in preparation for landing at the Bert Mooney Airport in Butte, Montana, the turboprop plane passed through a layer of air at about 1,500 feet that was conducive to icing because the temperatures were below freezing and the air "had 100 percent relative humidity or was saturated," according to AccuWeather.com, a forecasting service in State College, Pennsylvania.

Safety experts said similar icing condition existed when a Continental Airlines twin-engine turboprop crashed into a home near Buffalo Niagara International Airport last month, killing 50.

A possible aerodynamic stall in which ice causes the plane to lose lift, and the pilot's reaction to it, has been the focus of the Buffalo investigation.

"It's Buffalo all over again, or it could be," said John Goglia, a former member of the National Transportation Safety Board. "Icing, given those conditions, is certainly going to be high on the list of things to look at for the investigators."

Mark Rosenker, acting NTSB chairman, told reporters in Montana that investigators would look at icing on the wings as a factor.

"We will be looking at everything as it relates to the weather," he said.

The single-engine plane, designed to carry 10 people, crashed 500 feet short of the Montana airport runway Sunday, nose-diving into a cemetery and killing seven adults and seven children aboard. Relatives said the victims were headed to an exclusive resort on a ski vacation, and gave the children's ages as 1, 3, 5, 7 and 9, plus two 4-year-olds.

According to CBS News Correspondent Hattie Kauffman, witnesses said it looked like the pilot was struggling to maintain control.

"I thought it was a stunt plane because it was going into high-G turns and such," 14-year-old eyewitness Kenny Gulick told CBS' The Early Show Monday. "All of the sudden it went into a nosedive."

CBS News correspondent Nancy Cordes reports the plane's airworthiness certificate was current, according to FAA officials.

(Pilatus)
According to figures from AvData Inc., there were 570 of the PC-12 aircraft (as pictured, left) registered in the U.S. and Canada as of early 2008. Having flown 1,389,139 hours, according to the manufacturer, there were 12 accidents recorded, three of them involving fatalities.

Safety experts said finding the cause of the crash is likely to be significantly complicated by the absence of either a cockpit voice recorder or a flight data recorder; neither is required for smaller aircraft that don't fly commercial passengers.

Hours after the crash, federal investigators had focused on overloading as a possible cause.

"It will take us a while to understand," Rosenker said. "We have to get the weights of all the passengers, we have to get the weight of the fuel, all of the luggage."

Goglia said the Pilatus has a powerful engine for its size and is unlikely to be affected by the additional weight of a few children "unless they had an awful lot of baggage."

One key in the Butte crash will be whether the pilot had changed the position of the aircraft's wing flaps for landing because changing the configuration of the wings by moving the flaps is where icing problems often show up, said Peter Goelz, a former NTSB managing director.

The last radio communication from the turboprop's pilot was with the Salt Lake City center when the plane was about 12 miles from Butte, said Doug Church, a spokesman for the National Air Traffic Controllers Association. The pilot told controllers he intended to land at Butte using visual landing procedures rather than relying on instruments, which is not unusual, Church said.

Rosenker confirmed that the pilot said nothing to controllers to indicate he was having trouble, including during radio conversations earlier in the flight when the pilot notified controllers he intended to divert from the flight's original destination of Bozeman, Montana, to Butte.

"We don't know the reason for the requested change to the flight plan," Church said. "We don't know whether weather was a factor in Bozeman. There was no apparent reason given for the change in flight plan from Bozeman to Butte."

Lewis Pullen, father of one of the crash victims, told CBS, "People who planned this vacation did a wonderful thing, and it turned out to be a tragedy."

(AP Photo/Rich Pedroncelli)
(Sadie Beltz looks over a memorial set up for Dr. Erin Jacobson and his family at St. Helena Hospital in St. Helena, Calif., Monday, March 23, 2009. Dr. Jacobson, his wife, Amy, and their three children - Taylor, 4; Ava, 3; and Jude, 1 - were killed Sunday, along with nine others when the plane they were in crashed in Butte, Montana.)

© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Add a Comment
by strmrnnr March 24, 2009 10:47 AM EDT
You can't tell me that the aviation industry has been flying for over a hundred years and are now just encountering the phenomena of this type of air mass. If the air mass was was known to be there and the controllers knew it was there the controllers should have put out a warning to all planes in the area of the conditions. Possibly they will have to put a limit on the relitive humidity/temp that our aircraft can safely fly. This makes 64 needless dead in the last two month. Who was onboard. ??Could there be a conspiracy?? I like those.

How many more are they willing to kill to keep their secret?
Reply to this comment
by rrozsa March 24, 2009 9:52 AM EDT
ah, rrozsa, if there were 18 people on board and the manufacturer says it has a maximum capacity of 12, the plane is overloaded. This is not a snap judgement. They didn't say it was difinitive cause of the accident or not.

Posted by Vet_Turner at 3:36 PM : Mar 23, 2009

===================

Newest reports are saying that the children were small, so they wouldn't have added any extra weight, unless they were carrying extra baggage to accommodate the little kids. Now they are pointed to icing. As I said before, they need to wait until they investigate the evidence before they start making snap judgments.

I'm not saying bring extra people on board wasn't a violation -- I'm just saying it may not have been the actual cause of the crash.
Reply to this comment
by usanative1 March 24, 2009 8:54 AM EDT
First let me say . The password system for cbs is so fked up a dick cheney could not fkit up any worse. Second it seems to me that if a solar panel was incorporated into the wing or fuselage system couldn't the plane carry stored heat to help prevent this . Im not a aviator so i don't know if this is feasible.
Reply to this comment
by barbaraf4 March 23, 2009 11:50 PM EDT
14 people were killed aboard a plane designed to carry 10 people but overloading was "less likely to be the cause."

I suggest one of the kids had been kicking the back of the pilot's seat for the duration of the flight and finally the pilot just flipped out.
Reply to this comment
by txx75081 March 23, 2009 7:40 PM EDT
The person who leased the plane, and lost family members, owns the leasing company that leased the plane?
Reply to this comment
by valentin73 March 23, 2009 6:23 PM EDT
Why carry children to the mountains, that should have been a strictly adult thing. Leave the children, don't risk taking them abroad, just think, all these children's lives were lost. Shame on the adults for doing something like this....
Reply to this comment
by FreddyBartholomew March 23, 2009 5:26 PM EDT
Self-service fuel? Crashing on takeoff? Fueling mistakes are all too common in aviation. Condolences to the families.
Reply to this comment
by rrozsa March 23, 2009 3:16 PM EDT
I just read on another news site that aviation investigators have confirmed that the plane was overloaded. I'm surprised to hear them making definitive statements like that, when they haven't really had much time to investigate. This is such a shame.
Reply to this comment
by kaiyo4u March 23, 2009 1:55 PM EDT
The Pilatus is a good aircraft, but like anything mechanical something can go wrong.
From the eye witness account it sounds like the plane stalled and was too low to recover.
Who knows what the pilots reasons for not saying anything to ATC before or after diverting?
My prayers and blessings to the families of those who died in the crash.
Reply to this comment
by swingset4u March 23, 2009 1:38 PM EDT
I would like to know WHY this pilot diverted before saying anything. And Harry, Do you have angels pushing your car when you go somewhere? Pleaseleave god out of this one.
Reply to this comment
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook