July 27, 2009 1:13 PM

Health Care Overhaul May Cost $1.5T

(AP)  Your lungs may work just fine, but the estimated price for universal health care could take your breath away. Health policy experts say guaranteeing coverage for all Americans may cost about $1.5 trillion over the next decade. That would be more than double the $634 billion 'down payment' President Barack Obama set aside for health reform in his budget.

About 48 million people are uninsured, and the problem is only expected to get worse because the cost of coverage keeps rising.

Still, administration officials have pointedly avoided providing a ballpark estimate for Obama's fix, saying it depends on details to be worked out with Congress.

"It's impossible to put a price tag on the plan before even the basics have been finalized," said White House spokesman Reid Cherlin. "Here's what we do know: The reserve fund in the president's budget is fully paid for and provides a substantial down payment on the cost of the reforming our health care system."

The potential for runaway costs is raising concerns among Republicans and some Democrats as Congress prepares to draft next year's budget. The U.S. spends $2.4 trillion a year on health care, more than any other advanced country. And some experts estimate that a third or more of that goes for tests and procedures, rather than prevention and treatment.

"We shouldn't just be throwing more money on top of the present system, because the present system is so wasteful," said Sen. Judd Gregg of New Hampshire, the ranking Republican on the Budget Committee.

The health care plan Obama offered as a candidate would have cost nearly $1.2 trillion over ten years, according to a detailed estimate last fall by the Lewin Group, a leading consulting and policy analysis firm. The campaign plan would not have covered all the uninsured, as most Democrats in Congress want to do. But it is a starting point for lawmakers.

John Sheils, a senior vice president of the Lewin Group, said about $1.5 trillion to $1.7 trillion would be a credible estimate for a plan that commits the nation to covering all its citizens. That would amount to around 4 percent of projected health care costs over the next 10 years, he added.

The cost of covering the uninsured is "a difficult hurdle to get over," Sheils said in an interview.

"I don't know where the rest of the money is going to come from," he added.

Some of the leading advocates of coverage for all use cost estimates around $1.5 trillion.

"Honestly ... we can't do it for the $634 billion the president put in the reserve fund," John Rother, public policy director for AARP, told an insurance industry meeting in Washington last week.

"In all likelihood, it will be over $1 trillion," he added, citing his own estimate of $1.5 trillion.

Economist Len Nichols, who heads the health policy project at the New America Foundation, said guaranteed coverage will cost $125 billion to $150 billion a year when fully phased in.

White House budget director Peter Orszag told the House Budget Committee earlier this month that the president's $634 billion fund is "likely to be the majority of the cost." Roughly half of the money would come from spending cuts, and the other half from tax increases.

But whether the $634 billion represents 50 percent, 60 percent or 70 percent of the cost "will depend on the details of whatever is finally done ... as we move through the legislative process," Orszag added.

The overall cost matters because the expansion of health coverage is meant to be a permanent reform. That means future generations will have to bear the cost.

"We are dealing with huge numbers," said David Walker, a former U.S. comptroller general and now head of the Peter G. Peterson Foundation, a group that promotes fiscal responsibility. "We need to have a much better sense of what we are talking about doing, and whether or not it's affordable and sustainable over time."

© 2009 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment
by mars7578 March 19, 2009 7:43 PM EDT
I wish congress would get a few mid size cities and setup a model of what they are trying to do.I believe that costs and quality of care can be greatly improved.The first thing that congress has to do is get back to the AMERICAN type of CAPITALISM.Right now, we have adopted Third World capitalism which WALL STREET says is necessary to complete in a global economy.When we were true to our principles in government and legislation,healthcare was about the health of the nation.Right now its about every man for himself. Going back to our real American Heritage, of for the people, HAS BECOME SO LOST IN OUR SOCIETY, THAT THE CONFUSED THIS PART OF CITIZENSHIP ,SOCIALISM.
Reply to this comment
by sjc_1 March 18, 2009 8:00 PM EDT
People should see the movie Sicko. They talked with doctors and citizens in the U.K., Canada and France. They think we are nuts to put health care in the hands of the greed mongers.
Reply to this comment
by iam4honesty March 18, 2009 7:54 PM EDT
Bottom line... it doesn't matter how much it costs, it has to be done. The cost (whatever they are) will be recouped and it makes a lot more sense than spending the money attacking other nations and killing people.
Reply to this comment
by sjc_1 March 18, 2009 7:07 PM EDT
We may get National Health Insurance that will compete with private health insurance. There is no reason why the public sector can not compete with the private sector and make a profit. We would all get better health care at lower cost and pay less taxes.
Reply to this comment
by aziridine March 18, 2009 6:48 PM EDT
Does this guy do anything that does cost in the Trillions/
Reply to this comment
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook