WASHINGTON, March 16, 2009

N.Y. AG Wants Answers On AIG Bonuses

Andrew Cuomo Sets Deadline For Names, Job Performances Of Those Receiving Reward Money

  • Play CBS Video Video AIG Pays Millions In Bonuses

    Insurance giant AIG - propped up with $170 billion in taxpayer dollars - is paying more than $100 million in bonuses to retain key employees. Randall Pinkston reports.

  • Video Face The Nation, 3.15.09

    National Economic Council Director Lawrence Summers spoke about controversial AIG bonuses; The New York Times' Thomas Friedman discussed bank bailouts and Bob Schieffer talks trash.

  • Video Battle Over Bonuses

    Bob Schieffer spoke with National Economic Council Director Lawrence Summers about AIG spending hundreds of millions in bailout money on executive bonuses.

    • A woman enters an AIG office building Monday, March 16, 2009 in New York. American International Group Inc. used more than $90 billion in federal aid to pay out foreign and domestic banks, some of whom had received their own multibillion-dollar U.S. government bailouts.

      A woman enters an AIG office building Monday, March 16, 2009 in New York. American International Group Inc. used more than $90 billion in federal aid to pay out foreign and domestic banks, some of whom had received their own multibillion-dollar U.S. government bailouts.  (AP Photo/Mark Lennihan)

    • New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo says he'll subpoena the names of AIG employees receiving bonuses if the company does not hand over the information willingly, March 16, 2009.

      New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo says he'll subpoena the names of AIG employees receiving bonuses if the company does not hand over the information willingly, March 16, 2009.  (CBS)

    Previous slide Next slide
(CBS/AP)  New York state's attorney general joined the growing list of those angered by news of American International Group's bonuses, and wants to have details on his desk this afternoon about who is getting it rewarded.

Attorney General Andrew Cuomo says his office will investigate whether recipients of the payments were involved in the insurance giant's decline and whether the payments are fraudulent under state law.

In a letter to CEO Edward Liddy, Cuomo said he's been investigating AIG compensation arrangements since last fall and would issue subpoenas at 4 p.m. EST Monday if he didn't get the names of employees scheduled for bonuses plus information about their work and contracts.

"Covering up the details of these payments breeds further cynicism and distrust on our already shaken financial system," he wrote.

"Taxpayers of this country are now supporting AIG, and they deserve at the very least to know how their money is being spent. And we owe it to the taxpayers to take every possible action to stop unwarranted bonus payments to those who caused the AIG meltdown in the first place."

Earlier Monday, President Barack Obama said he's asked Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner to pursue "every single legal avenue" to block the payouts.

"Under these circumstances, it's hard to understand how derivative traders at AIG warranted any bonuses, much less $165 million in extra pay," the president said. "How do they justify this outrage to the taxpayers who are keeping the company afloat?"

The Obama administration is looking for ways to recoup at least some of the money reports CBS News correspondent Peter Maer.

The White House continues to negotiate with AIG to bring any payments in line with the government's priorities, an administration official told CBS News.

The administration official said that the bonuses "long been known about inside and outside AIG. But we didn’t want to accept them."

"This isn’t just a matter of dollars and cents. It’s about our fundamental values," Mr. Obama said at the beginning of a speech at the White House on lending to small business owners.

Maer reports that the White House is seeking what are described as "mechanisms" to recover money spent on bonuses, but the company insists some of the bonuses are part of legally binding contracts signed before the government's bailout.

The administration is concerned that public reaction to the bonuses could affect the president's overall economic agenda, reports Maer.

"It is unacceptable for Wall Street firms receiving government assistance to hand out million dollar bonuses, while hard-working Americans bear the burden of this economic crisis," the official told CBS News.

Meanwhile, AIG disclosed Sunday that it used more than $90 billion in federal aid to pay out foreign and domestic banks, some of whom had received their own multibillion-dollar U.S. government bailouts.

Some of the biggest recipients of the AIG money were Goldman Sachs at $12.9 billion, and three European banks - France's Societe Generale at $11.9 billion, Germany's Deutsche Bank at $11.8 billion, and Britain's Barclays PLC at $8.5 billion. Merrill Lynch, which also is undergoing federal scrutiny of its bonus plans, received $6.8 billion as of Dec. 31.

Lawrence Summers, Director of the White House National Economic Council, said on CBS' Face The Nation on Sunday that the AIG bonuses were "outrageous… The whole situation at AIG is outrageous. What taxpayers are being forced to do is outrageous."

The company, now about 80 percent owned by U.S. taxpayers, has received roughly $170 billion from the government, which feared that its collapse could cause widespread damage to banks and consumers around the globe.

In an exclusive interview aired Sunday on 60 Minutes, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke spoke with unusual candor of the frustration he felt in bailing out AIG.

"Of all the events and all of the things we've done in the last 18 months, the single one that makes me the angriest, that gives me the most angst, is the intervention with AIG," Bernanke told 60 Minutes correspondent Scott Pelley.

"Here was a company that made all kinds of unconscionable bets. Then, when those bets went wrong, we had a situation where the failure of that company would have brought down the financial system," Bernanke said.

"It makes me angry. I slammed the phone more than a few times on discussing AIG. I understand why the American people are angry. It's absolutely unfair that taxpayer dollars are going to prop up a company that made these terrible bets, that was operating out of the sight of regulators, but which we have no choice but to stabilize, or else risk enormous impact, not just in the financial system, but on the whole U.S. economy," he told Pelley.

The $90 billion chunk of the bailout money went to banks to cover AIG's losses on complex mortgage investments, as well as for collateral needed for other transactions.

Other banks receiving between $1 billion and $3 billion from AIG's securities lending unit include Citigroup Inc., Switzerland's UBS AG and Morgan Stanley.

Municipalities in certain states, including California, Virginia and Hawaii, received a total of $12.1 billion under guaranteed investment agreements.

More AIG Related Coverage:

Poll: Frustration Growing Over Bailouts

Can AIG Get The Bonus Money Back?

Are We Taxpayers - Or Suckers?

Will AIG Flap Lead To Obama Backlash?

Obama Rips AIG Bonuses

White House Seeks "Mechanisms" To Recoup AIG Bonuses

© MMIX, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 149 Comments
by ____One_American___ March 17, 2009 5:25 PM EDT
While the Democrats pretend to be outraged by the AIG bonuses - we find that the Democrat Chris Dodd was responsible for AIG bonuses protected under a very recent law that the Democrats just passed:

******
Senator Chris Dodd (D-Conn.) on Monday night floated the idea of taxing American International Group (AIG: 0.95, 0.1699, 21.78%) bonus recipients so the government could recoup some or all of the $450 million the company is paying to employees in its financial products unit. Within hours, the idea spread to both houses of Congress, with lawmakers proposing an AIG bonus tax.

The move represents somewhat of an about-face for the senator.

While the Senate was constructing the $787 billion stimulus last month, Dodd added an executive-compensation restriction to the bill. That amendment provides an "exception for contractually obligated bonuses agreed on before Feb. 11, 2009" -- which exempts the very AIG bonuses Dodd and others are now seeking to tax.

The amendment made it into the final version of the bill, and is law.

Separately, Sen. Dodd was AIG's largest single recipient of campaign donations during the 2008 election cycle with $103,100, according to opensecrets.org.

A spokesperson for Senator Dodd said the senator "was completely unaware of these AIG bonuses until he learned of them in the past few days; to suggest that the bonuses affecting AIG had any effect on Senator Dodd's action is categorically false."

One of AIG Financial Products' largest offices is based in Connecticut.
*****

Do you have any doubts now about just how slimy the Obama administration and the Democrats are?
Reply to this comment
by aziridine March 17, 2009 12:49 PM EDT
The bonuses will most likely remain in force. AIG folks were big contributors to Obama, he owes them. It's sad to see our President bought and paid for, beholden to financial interests, but that's what just over half of America wanted. Obama is a lawyer, first and foremost. A member of the most corrupt profession in the world.

Madoff was big contributor to Democrats, as well. As a result, there will be no recovery of assets and Bernie will never go to anything but a country club. Remember you heard it ere, first!
Reply to this comment
by billmorris01 March 17, 2009 10:17 AM EDT
why is Cuomo involved in this? i don't think NYS should have to police national/international companies for the country. this is a job for Holder. Cuomo is just grandstanding in the hopes of getting elected to a higher office, perhaps becoming governer. lets cut the budget for the NYS AG's office to the bone that should save us all a few dollars.
Reply to this comment
by optimystic March 17, 2009 9:01 AM EDT
This is a tough issue. We think of AIG as this giant evil empire (for good reason), but most people working there were/are not decision makers. They were/are employees. Some of them were paid using a calculated bonus as part of compensation. It was agreed to up front. So in a lot of cases, not giving bonuses would be tantamount to not making payroll. Discretionary bonuses for execs wouold be another matter entirely, but most people seem to think that is what this is.
Reply to this comment
by Rickp400 March 17, 2009 2:34 AM EDT
it is not just incompetent folks but corporate executive schemes
they are taking a big millions dollar paycheck which I can not
simply understand why any normal hard working people needs
millions a year paychecks it is a desire for us to have a few
millions to provide for the rest of our life but no we are not
allowed that except for the elite folks whom scams us
for their fat paycheck and given themselves the raise first
and leave us for the least amount of raise if we get any

so many of the corporate executives wants the millions
dollar paycheck and many of them do while we are the
lower middle class are breaking our backs and getting more
regulations imposed on us with less pay and or no pay raise
we are being so cheated out of just about every thing you can
think of

hey wait a minute who else is cheating us beside corporates
executives -- well you name it? The government is doing that
too which the corporate and government each other right hand
let us put that in perspective while we are the lower middle class
is making at Minimum Wage and or not much above is cheaper
for corporates and government well it is true
we know why corporates likes to pay us low wage but
how is the government is involved well let us look at
social security and medical care while we make
low wage income our SS and MC is not much either
when we do retire is also cheaper for the govt
while those high income earnings folks such as
corporate executives will be getting as good sizable
sum for their retirement with SS & MC and 401K and
pension plan and where do with fit in all this
we are their provider paying taxes and products
that we purchase which is taking account from raw
to the end is you the customer and tax payer


so in overall we the low income folks are paying them
their lifestyle and fat paycheck and their taxes too
and also their personal expenses as well is the burden
of the low income to provide
Reply to this comment
by cccbaxter March 17, 2009 1:57 AM EDT
...wagging the dawg...
Reply to this comment
by gmw7777 March 17, 2009 12:54 AM EDT
Many politicians/Madoffs think the public is stupid because we are busy working and we assume (hoping against hope, as it were), that they are too. They're working alright:: solely for themselves and their family/friends. It's too bad that they don't seem to understand that they could accomplish both public service AND self-service, as we all do in one way or another and then everybody wins.

For any Obama, or Clinton bashers or (even) Bush bashers: The fault for this economic meltdown rests squarely on the shoulders of none other than RONALD REAGAN and a compliant Congress from 1981-89. "Mr. Popularity" was fond of destroying all government "interference" in the name of a "free market." He accomplished this (with the help of Congress) by tearing down or severely weakening the impact of (almost) all regulations: SEC, telephone companies, banks, etc. He tried to dismantle Medicare/Medicaid as well but that was too much even for him! And don't forget his "brilliant" concept of the "Trickle Down Theory": that the subsequent riches proceeding from this deregulation of almost all government oversight, would eventually trickle down to the "deserving" poor. Utter and complete nonsense and complete selfishness! This is when Madoff really started to defraud people as well (no government oversight or "interference.")

"The government has stepped in four times to help AIG through $170 billion in bailout packages, in large part because it had issued risky credit default swaps -- a kind of insurance for bad loans made by banks and investment companies." This is a direct quote from today's news on the MSNBC website. The government now owns 80% of AIG.
ABSOLUTELY NO BAILOUTS IF BONUSES ARE GIVEN AND RECOVER ALL PREVIOUS BAILOUT MONEY.

Finally, NO TAX COLLECTIONS until the government is truly responsive to "We the people..." Then watch how fast the government will act! (Sorry, Mr. Obama, but if something definitive isn't done soon, we could very well have another revolution like that of France in the 18th century). The people have had enough. Does money grow on trees in Washington, D.C.? .
Reply to this comment
by bajajohn1 March 17, 2009 12:31 AM EDT
Fire all the bums at AIG. All of the incompetent people in America should not be clustered in one building.
Reply to this comment
by mcv57 March 17, 2009 12:08 AM EDT
Well, there you go folks. Once a corporate thief; alway a corporate thief ... did you really expect anything different - remember Katrina.
Reply to this comment
by walt1944 March 16, 2009 11:22 PM EDT
Everyone is so upset with AIG heaping rewards in the form of bonuses and perks on people who brought about the failure of the company in the first place.

Unfortunately, this is absolutely NOTHING NEW. It happens in EVERY major corporation in America, with corporate executives who don't know their "arse" from a hole in the ground, getting tons on money and perks for making bad business decisions and when things get worse because of those decisions, they making even more bad ones by firing workers, cutting back on the "benes" of those who survived, and gouging the customer.

Naturally, these corporate executives won't give up any of their perks, won't take a paycut, or give up THEIR lifestyles, but they are perfectly happy that YOU GIVE UP YOURS!!!!!

It's called "business", American style and has been going on since the days of Richard "the Trickster" Nixon.

I say, let them ALL fail, the big banks, AIG, Wall Street, everyone. I would hate to see all the average workers suffer, but if it means that the rotten apples suffer too, then maybe its worth it!!!

HAIL OBAMA!!!!
Reply to this comment
by LIBSwanttheUSSAin2009 March 16, 2009 9:59 PM EDT
AIG, Obama & Geithner Knew Long Ago About AIG's $165 Million in Bonuses

http://davidgoldsmith.com/wordpress/?p=1486
Reply to this comment
by LIBSwanttheUSSAin2009 March 16, 2009 9:54 PM EDT
It's good to see that Americans are starting to stand up against Obama's socialist policies finally.

Unfortunately however, millions of people chose to follow his deceptions before the election and vote for him, and now we're seeing the end result of these very deceptions.

But heh, the jury is still out on his citizenship at least!:

Chief justice accepts 'eligibility' petition
Roberts agrees to read Obama docs

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=91763
Reply to this comment
by homespunlady March 16, 2009 9:51 PM EDT
So, those EXCUSING THIS "QUARTERLY PAYMENT" of the OVER FOUR HUNDRED MILLION BONUS agreement seem to be MISSING the point.

Lets see...Nobody's mentioning the REGULAR PAY AND GOODIES they get along WITH these "bonuses" ...My BET is the TAXPAYERS are being FLEECED to the tune of AT LEAST A HALF-BILLION DOLLARS PER YEAR by this one 400 person (including the secretaries) AIG "BAIT AND SWITCH UNIT" alone. THREE of which get OVER 3 MILLION apiece.

I HAVE heard that for ALL of AIG the "BONUS" payout is OVER 1.2 BILLION!

In any NORMAL business environment - if a group of employees BANKRUPTED their company and ENDANGERED THEIR ENTIRE SOCIETY they would be TOSSED OUT at the least and FINED, JAILED and their assets CONFISCATED at the other end.

BUT apparently we're in the economic equivalent of SOMALIA now with CON ARTIST PIRATES RUNNING THE NATION and "terrorizing" our "elected officials" with threats of "I'm gonna SUE if I don't get my ILL-GOTTEN GAINS!"

Sheesh, do we run for the hills in SHEER TERROR now screaming "the lawyers are coming! The lawyers are coming!"

When this nation was led by REAL MEN such an INSANE threat would have had them rolling on the floor in LAUGHTER!

My suggestion - RELOCATE that CLUELESS to REAL POVERTY bunch to Somalia and let them threaten to SUE the pirates over there.
Reply to this comment
by tincup356 March 16, 2009 9:32 PM EDT
I don't know which is worse......corporate scum like madoff,,,,,,or,,,,,,,political scum that are no better than them and usually more corrupt going after them after abetting them in congresses case..........Lame excuses they use......"we need to pay these bonuses to retain the smartest people"......they should fire every one of them ....There are A LOT of people out of work right now that could take their places for much less money and be glad to do it....and probably do an honest job too.,,,,,,,,,,,All of America must do their part,,,,it cannot be expected of the people to foot all the bills and cuts,,,,while those who created this problem in the first place,,,,CONGRESS,,,,,,,via their addiction to corruption, addiction to the lobby dollar, personal greed, and FAILURE to honor the oaths they took to the American people, They sold legislation to the lobby dollar that let wall street and the banks....... steal from the people,,,,,,,,and somehow ....congress is giving them hundreds of billions of dollars,,,,,knowing,,,,,it is the same fools that ran those companies into the ground with their lobby legal schemes that allowed them to run unchecked fueled on greed.
Reply to this comment
by Mickey1776 March 16, 2009 9:26 PM EDT
As long as we're throwing out contract law we should also:

Throw out the contracts that GM has with the union.

Throw out pension and full pay that Congress gets after only four years in office.

Take back the pay raises given to Congress. The country is broke so why did they get a raise? Really? We'd fire them in the real world,
Reply to this comment
by Mickey1776 March 16, 2009 9:06 PM EDT
Incompendent morons! People in CONGRESS should be fired!
How is it we gave AIG BILLIONS without knowing about what they were contracted to pay? Isn't it up to congress to have reviewed these issues or is this like the hog bills that they just can't seem to find time to read?

The Idiot?s Guide to Destroying the Economy: a 12-Step Program

Think destroying the mighty economy of the United States is too big a job for you? Relax. Anyone can do it. A friend sent me a handy-dandy no-fuss 12-step program for wreaking financial havoc among even the world?s most advanced economies. I adapt it below for your edification. Your congressmen probably already have a copy. The White House certainly does. But you might want to print it out in case some opportunity for spreading unhappiness comes your way:

1. Since investors and the market in general hate uncertainty, have a vast array of conflicting ad hoc policy decisions so as to create uncertainty everywhere.

2. Transfer money from those who create sustainable jobs to those who create unsustainable jobs, e.g., the government

3. Promise to invest money in things that will enhance the country?s infrastructure, such as roads and internet access, but then practice bait and switch on a breathtaking scale, so the effort is swamped with pork for pet projects dear to Democrats

4. A sufficiently generous larding of pork can help ensure the destruction of bi-partisanship, so squandering the initial good will is definitely a very good move. After all, it?s hard to get things done when you?ve alienated people whose help you need.

5. Undermine the ability of those who create jobs by increasing their taxes so there?s less money available for investment.

6. While you?re at it, offer to spread the income around by raising taxes, in the process, making it clear to those who work hard, invest in their educations, take risks, save, and delay gratification that they will see their money go to those who do not do these things.

7. Encourage class warfare. Divide the populace and destroy cooperation, thus encouraging backlash and creating paralyzing polarization.

8. Talk up protectionism, since the beggar-thy-neighbor approach has such a long and vigorous history of encouraging depression.

9. Scare people with talk of economic catastrophe. You can backpeddle later, but the initial good work of helping people lose confidence should have a lasting impact.

10. Print money on a scale that will insure inflation in the future. Print it on a scale that will make people not want to hold U.S. debt without staggering interest on that debt, if they?re willing to hold U.S. government debt at all.

11. Instead of allowing hopeless institutions to go bankrupt, pour vast amounts of money into them, prolonging the pain and running up the cost while only delaying the inevitable.

12. Burden future generations with unprecedented amounts of debt so that the economy you ruined today stays ruined tomorrow.

My friend stresses that this list is not exhaustive. Ask your elected representatives for further tips. Or write to the White House: they have loads of ideas for making things worse. But be patient. Ruining the greatest economy the world has ever seen is not something you can do overnight. But it?s amazing, isn?t it, how much progress the President has made in less than two months? Five days before the election, he told his followers that they were that many days away ?from fundamentally transforming the United States of America.? Poor things. They thought he intended to make America stronger. Fat chance.
Reply to this comment
by Johnschang March 16, 2009 8:22 PM EDT
If AIG had declared bankruptcy would they have gotten the bonuses? I think not.
Reply to this comment
by Curmudgeon10 March 16, 2009 8:17 PM EDT
This hissy fit over AIG bonuses is hilarious!!

The United States OWNS AIG! When you OWN the company, you exercise your rights of ownership! Don't fight with the CEO. Tell him WHAT TO DO.

Its ridiculous.
Reply to this comment
by TheRAH March 16, 2009 8:08 PM EDT
BONUSES FOR FAILURE - ANY COMPANY THAT RECEIVED BAILOUT MONEY AND PAYS A BONUS OR A RETENTION FEE TO ANY EMPLOYEE WHILE THERE IS BAILOUT MONEY OUTSTANDING WILL RESULT IN THAT EMPLOYEES BONUS BEING TAXED AT 90%.

IF THE EMPLOYEE LEAVES AND GOES TO WORK FOR ANOTHER EMPLOYER THE TAX RATE WILL INCREASE TO 95% ON ANY BONUS THAT EMPLOYEE RECEIVES FROM THE NEW EMPLOYER

CASE CLOSED
Reply to this comment
by excoachken March 16, 2009 7:25 PM EDT
To Questionauthority: Obama did not make the deal with AIG, Bush did. Why aren't you "questioning the foresight" of the guy in charge when the deal was made?
Reply to this comment
See all 149 Comments
Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: