June 7, 2009

Ben Bernanke's Greatest Challenge

Fed Chairman Discusses Recession, Financial Rescues And Recovery In Wide-Ranging 60 Minutes Interview

  • Play CBS Video Video The Chairman Part 1

    In a rare interview with a sitting Federal Reserve chairman, Ben Bernanke tells Scott Pelley what went wrong with America's financial system and how it caused the current economic crisis.

  • Video The Chairman Part 2

    Ben Bernanke tells Scott Pelley what the Fed is doing to help fix the current economic crisis and when he expects the crippling recession to end.

    • Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke

      Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke  (CBS)

    • President Barack Obama, left, speaking with Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke.

      President Barack Obama, left, speaking with Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke.  (White House photo)

    Previous slide Next slide
  • Interactive Inside The Fed

    A history of the Federal Reserve, glossary of terms and a look at changing interest rates.

(CBS)  The day after Lehman, Bernanke's Fed did something astounding: it loaned $85 billion to a company that wasn't a bank at all - American International Group (AIG), the global insurance giant that was also involved in backing risky mortgage investments. Bernanke says, unlike Lehman, the Fed could make the loans based on good collateral in AIG's portfolio.

"There have now been four rescues of AIG, $160 billion. Why is that necessary?" Pelley asked.

"Let me just first say that of all the events and all of the things we've done in the last 18 months, the single one that makes me the angriest, that gives me the most angst, is the intervention with AIG. Here was a company that made all kinds of unconscionable bets. Then, when those bets went wrong, we had a situation where the failure of that company would have brought down the financial system," Bernanke said.

"You say it makes you angry?" Pelley asked.

"It makes me angry. I slammed the phone more than a few times on discussing AIG. I understand why the American people are angry. It's absolutely unfair that taxpayer dollars are going to prop up a company that made these terrible bets, that was operating out of the sight of regulators, but which we have no choice but the stabilize, or else risk enormous impact, not just in the financial system, but on the whole U.S. economy," Bernanke explained.

By September, Bernanke and then-Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson went to Capitol Hill to urge a massive bailout of the banking system.

Asked how close of a call it was, Bernanke said, "It was very close. It was very close. The Congress passed the bill that gave Treasury the right to put capital into the banks in the first week of October. And it was in the second week of October that the crisis reached its peak. If we had not had those powers, we could have had a much, much worse outcome. So it was a very dangerous situation."

"Was anyone on Capitol Hill skeptical? Did they push back at all, you know, 'Mr. Chairman, it's probably not quite that bad'?" Pelley asked.

"Well, I do remember one conversation I had where I was addressing a caucus of congressmen. And a congressman said to me, 'Mr. Chairman, you know, I'm talking to bankers in my town. I'm talking to shopkeepers in my town. And they say things are normal. Nothing's going on. We don't see any problem.' And I turned to him and I said, 'You will,'" Bernanke recalled.

That second week of October, the Dow fell 18 percent - its worst week in history.

In the midst of the crisis, Bernanke had freedom to act immediately - he doesn't need permission from Congress or the president. While they debated on Capitol Hill, Bernanke cut interest rates nearly to zero; then he used Depression-era emergency powers to launch a dozen rescue programs of his own. There was support for money market funds, mortgages, short term lending to small business, and support for auto loans, student loans and small business loans - commitments of a trillion dollars, doubling the size of the Fed's balance sheet.

Asked if it's tax money the Fed is spending, Bernanke said, "It's not tax money. The banks have accounts with the Fed, much the same way that you have an account in a commercial bank. So, to lend to a bank, we simply use the computer to mark up the size of the account that they have with the Fed. It's much more akin to printing money than it is to borrowing."

"You've been printing money?" Pelley asked.

"Well, effectively," Bernanke said. "And we need to do that, because our economy is very weak and inflation is very low. When the economy begins to recover, that will be the time that we need to unwind those programs, raise interest rates, reduce the money supply, and make sure that we have a recovery that does not involve inflation."

Continued



Produced by Henry Schuster and Rebecca Peterson
© MMIX, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Recent Segments
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Add a Comment See all 313 Comments
by AbdulGB November 23, 2009 12:30 AM EST
Typo:
...but Ben Bernanke had never done an interview until he sad (sat) down with....
Reply to this comment
by mark1190david September 4, 2009 3:02 PM EDT
Your interview with Mr. Ben Bernanke was my last resort in dealing with Washington Mutual since it gave me a "brain storm" to go on the Federral Reserve web site to file a complaint, and they provided an intermediary on my behalf since I was spinning my wheels, and literally getting nowhere. In fact, I am passing this information along to other people. Thanks, 60 Minutes.
Reply to this comment
by Hunter5326 July 8, 2009 11:05 PM EDT
He (Bernanke) is a traitor,bought and sold!
The Same people who killed Kennedy in 1963 are still in control,and Americans are "dumbed down" to the point of stupidity by the lap dog news media!!

I fear it is too late for us all!
Reply to this comment
by TriciaLMurphy June 15, 2009 8:19 PM EDT
Several years ago (2000?) Ben Bernanke and a bus full of Federal Employees were given a tour of Gettysburg, PA, by Tricia L. Murphy, a Gettysburg Licensed Battlefield Guide. During the two-hour tour she mentioned that her recent historical research suggested there would be a massive global depression between the years 2005 and 2008. In less than 60 Seconds the battlefield guide briefly illustrated historical aspects of the economy and what may happen in the near future if the trends continued.

Ben Bernanke disagreed with her theory and dismissed the idea. Tricia L. Murphy posed this question to Bernanke and the Federal Employees regarding the possibility of a future severe recession ? ?What if I am right? What steps can The Federal Government take NOW to prevent an economic melt down of the US and Global Economy? The hero will be the person who can come up with a strong well thought out economic plan to head off a global recession.?

Ben Bernanke and Tricia L. Murphy concluded the tour with a friendly wager - lunch in 8 years ? for the person who was correct.

Mr. Ben Bernanke, at your convenience, you may buy me that lunch?

Tricia L. Murphy,
Unemployed former
Gettysburg Licensed Battlefield Guide
Tricia.L.Murphy@live.com

PS ? The reports of my death have been greatly exaggerated.
Reply to this comment
by TriciaLMurphy June 13, 2009 9:08 PM EDT
Several years ago (2000?) Ben Bernanke and a bus full of Federal Employees were given a tour of Gettysburg, PA, by Tricia L. Murphy, a Gettysburg Licensed Battlefield Guide. During the two-hour tour she mentioned that her recent historical research suggested there would be a massive global depression between the years 2005 and 2008. In less than 60 Seconds the battlefield guide briefly illustrated historical aspects of the economy and what may happen in the near future if the trends continued.

Ben Bernanke disagreed with her theory and dismissed the idea. Tricia L. Murphy posed this question to Bernanke and the Federal Employees regarding the possibility of a future severe recession ? ?What if I am right? What steps can The Federal Government take NOW to prevent an economic melt down of the US and Global Economy? The hero will be the person who can come up with a strong well thought out economic plan to head off a global recession.?

Ben Bernanke and Tricia L. Murphy concluded the tour with a friendly wager - lunch in 8 years ? for the person who was correct.

Mr. Ben Bernanke, at your convenience, you may buy me that lunch?

Tricia L. Murphy,
Unemployed former
Gettysburg Licensed Battlefield Guide
Tricia.L.Murphy@live.com

PS ? The reports of my death are greatly exaggerated.
Reply to this comment
by RobertEdwardKroff June 15, 2009 8:46 PM EDT
Its not a theory, it's a fact. The term is "rowing the economy." A short row is 10 years and a long row is 20 years. The idea is to coordinate the end of the row stroke on a year ending in 7. Catherine Austin Fitts has spoke about this for years now. Read up on her stuff - its a trip!
by cool1207 June 13, 2009 1:33 AM EDT
It's very simple, bad decision has bad results, keep making bad decision, will have bad results. If AIG keep making bad business decision, will fail. Fed tried to save US bank system end up to encourage them do wrong without pay. So, has to have better way, that's private ownership or let company fail, failing forward, you can't encourage the child with bad behavior. In U.S., we don't have real famine(food shortage) but we do have politician famine.
Reply to this comment
by RobertEdwardKroff June 12, 2009 7:11 AM EDT
I tried several times to send my email cut & pasted below to 60minutes@cbsnews.com . However I get a bounce each and every time, so I am posting it here. My personal information is not of any concern to me being displayed on your site.


Dear, 60 Minutes Staff

I asked on the phone a few days back about Ben Bernanke?s 60 minutes interview comments- "Over the last dozen years or so, enormous amounts of savings has flowed into the United States, and some other industrial countries. That savings has come from China and East Asia. It's come from oil producers. And hundreds of billions of dollars, it has come into our financial system. And, you know, that would be great if we took that money and invested it wisely, and got a high return. But instead, our financial system didn't do a good job. We had a regulatory system that was like a sandcastle on the beach. When you had little small waves just lapping up against the sand castle, everything looked good. But when you had a big breaker come in, suddenly the system wasn't strong enough to deal with it."


You never asked Ben Bernanke for example if ARAMCO is a depositor in the FED, and if so, how much ARAMCO has deposited in the FED approximately, and other entities like it. This is interesting to me because I am writing an objective style nonfiction book on the subject of the most likely depositors in the Federal Reserve: how it all works within the petrodollar recycling system, and so forth :how the west would be much different without such a macro economic dynamic.

How I got started on this topic is when my uncle sometime ago, who is a retired executive from the Saudi state owned oil company, told me this> He said, "ARAMCO is the largest depositor in the FED, and dwarfs the American Government's stake in the bank. No other depositor holds a candle to the Saudi's deposits in the FED." He also said, "Without first producers (energy companies) demanding the currency they trade their product in, the currency we all use each and everyday, would thus have no upstream demand. Without this pull upstream for currency the Federal Reserve Notes the FED issues to the public would be rendered worthless." He also said to me, "Note, taxes and energy paid in what ever is demanded at the final point upstream is money."

I would like to lay it all out in my book, but I lack first quotable sources to do this. So if possible I ask, "Can you please give me access to other parts of Ben Bernanke's interview I may use in my book that did not make the final cut?" This if any such material was even made. Specifically being any material that I could use related to the topic I have described needed for first source documentation which I need for my book outlined within this email.

Sincerely, Robert Edward Kroff
Phone:541-994-2114
6432 SW Inlet Ave. Lincoln City, OR 97367
Reply to this comment
by Biggest_Fan June 11, 2009 2:09 AM EDT
My neighbor burned his house down smoking in bed, so I took out a loan and built him a new house, then I gave him a bonus for burning his old house down. Now I don't have enough money to send my kids to college. Can Bernanke help me?
Reply to this comment
by robjr100 June 10, 2009 6:18 PM EDT
What a lame interview.Why wasn`t Bernanke asked why the Federal Reserve is NOT a part of the government? Why is it run by a bunch of international bankers that answer to no one? Why wasn`t Ron Paul`s bill for total transparity brought up?

These big bankers are big time crooks as it looks like they own Washington DC.

Senator Dick Durbin of Illinois says the "bankers frankly own the place"(the senate) as his bill to save 1.7 million americans their homes.
http://mgx.com/blogs/2009/05/02/olbermann-senate-backs-bankers-over-homeowners/

Check out former bank regulator William Black on Bill Moyers as he explains the flim flam game run on the United States that get`s zero air play on the mainstream media.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rz1b__MdtHY&feature=channel_page
Reply to this comment
by brdr4ev June 9, 2009 9:50 AM EDT
I am simply appalled at the interview in which I viewed Sunday, And the overall untruths that were aired. The Federal Reserve and Bernanke should not be in charge of our Money supply. The Constitution did not allow for this and questions should have been asked to the unconstitutionality of the supposed Federal Reserve and how it came into existence in the First Place.
This is just typical Main Stream Medias attempt to cover up what is really on the Plate. Let everyone Know the truth heh! . What A Joke. I tell you what you should be covering is Ron Paul's H.R. 1207 and the medias attempt to not let the American People to make concise intellectual decisions . That is why we have a tyrannical Government in place today, that is turning our Great Republic into a supposed Democracy. You keep your Change and I will keep my Mind.
Reply to this comment
by wakeupamerica4 June 9, 2009 1:07 AM EDT
I was surprised at the rosy picture you painted of Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke. Apparently Mr. Bernanke is a "wonder child" who apparently deserves only accolades.
Perhaps you forget that Mr. Bernanke sat in on every meeting with the presidents and ceo's of our failed investment banks. He knew well in advance about the huge bonuses given to top executives after having received taxpayer bailout money. He knew and did nothing. He also masterminded giving the hundreds of billions of dollars of taxpayer money to these failed banks. Giving this money to banks with no strings attached....such as requiring them to loan the bailout money to consumers and small businesses. This was bad judgement on his part. The banks took the money and sat on it, making our recession deeper. Mr. Bernanke says he'll know when there are signs of a turnaround when the banks acquire private equity. I say we'll know the signs of recovery when the average person or a small business can easily get a loan.
Reply to this comment
by inachu1 June 8, 2009 7:43 PM EDT
Here is the economic plan in the USA.
Drive down the economy slow and hard to the breaking point.
This is done on purpose so once the dollar is about equal to that of India and China then pretty soon everyone will want to buy from USthen off shoring will come back as then when this happens offshoring will become expensive and prohibitive.

It is the worlds banks to try and make all nations economy about or near equal to each other in the terms of equal trade dollar strength. The last country that we will help is africa and in 20 years time soon all emplyers will choose africa aas the country after ASIA and Russia are too expensive to off shore to.

Think the above is lies? examine all you see and the economy will not rebound. it will get worse and worse.
this is not a republican or democrat or independant or a choice made by congress but by the bankers.
Reply to this comment
by Donna_H June 8, 2009 3:08 PM EDT
We watched Mr. Bernake with great hope and were greatly disappointed.

My husband and I each have our own business and we have made a living for the past 20-plus years. The archetypal American enterpreneurs, no? We have no safety net: no one pays unemployment insurance, healthcare, retirement, disability, re-training, vacation or half of our social security requirement for us. This all comes out of our pockets, and we are not even eligible for unemployment. Our businesses have both have suffered significantly in the past year.

For us, and hundreds of thousands like us, the answer is two-fold: create work (and then people will once again hire our services) and provide good, affordable health care NOT tied into one's job.

Why, instead, are we bailing out the bankers/businessmen/speculators who messed us up so badly? They should be made to pay the consequences, not bailed out. Jail? Restitution? Are the regulators culpable? WE would be in jail for fraud if we cheated our clients. No one is bailing out our small businesses.
Reply to this comment
by wrgoodman56 June 8, 2009 11:35 AM EDT
Well AIG is his hot button well let me give you a story on that. American General Financial is part of AIG and they have my home loan. They refuse to redo the loan according to the Presdents package. They flat refuse to do any thing after we baled them out so they could keep their jobs. So you want to push another hot button push American General Finacial because I am not the only person that in this with them, my credit union tells me their really bad for this. You guys like hot buttons push this one.
Bill Goodman
Reply to this comment
by thurston2001 June 8, 2009 7:53 AM EDT
If Bernanke is so concerned with confidence why not start with putting these masters of the universe in prison, I guess in America if you rob people of thousands you go to prison, but if you rob people of billions you get a big fat bonus. America is doomed.
Reply to this comment
by hyptia June 8, 2009 2:17 AM EDT
This may have been addressed above; I haven't read all the comments, but am impressed that there have been so many. Who decided that Scott would pitch only softballs? The network? Or was it a condition of the Fed? Note that the most important issue was
deftly avoided; namely, the unconscionable negligence of Mr. Libertarian Greenspan, who was shocked, shocked! that the markets did not regulate themselves. Maybe Bernanke felt he had to make nice to his ignoble predecessor. Buthow about at least a passing mention of the repeal of Glass-Steagal (sp?) which made it possible for the greedy, crooked UNREGULATED investment banks to wreck the housing market.
Reply to this comment
by smillsbc June 8, 2009 1:58 AM EDT
Actually, I am a conspiracy theorist and I believe that this whole thing was planned down to the very last detail. These people are smart enough to pretend they were "asleep at the switch". Lies, all lies. Bernanke can do nothing without sanction from those who stand in the shadows. He takes orders just as all puppets do.

The men in the shadows have a plan. Hopefully, we won't be living in China when they are done working their magic.
Reply to this comment
by josephp5 June 8, 2009 1:31 AM EDT
I am not so reassured that Bernanke's only concern is for the well being of Main Street, after learning that he has hired former Enron lobbyist Linda Robertson to handle public relations. for the Fed.
Reply to this comment
by IrqWarVet June 7, 2009 10:31 PM EDT
And Bernanke says the Fed is showing more transparency....Really??? When was the last time the Fed was audited by Con-gress??? Been a long while hasn't it, maybe never??? But it will be another long forever, since Sen. Shelby all but killed Ron Paul's bill to audit the Fed.
Reply to this comment
by IrqWarVet June 7, 2009 10:23 PM EDT
What a load of horse manure...Bernanke and Paulson, and Geithner are three thieves in a pod.
What 60 minutes did not explain, but only touched on, is why is the Fed so secretive? Where are those unaccounted for trillions of dollars they have loaned out and no one knows where it's gone.
I don't believe this guy (Bernanke) for a moment, what I do believe is he (the fed) and Con-gress have off loaded a multi-generational debt that will continue to erode our standard of living...except for those who have profited most from this scam.
If anyone believes what they have done and are doing is legal, constitutional and will save us from ourselves...then I have some prime real estate for sale in Baghdad where you can raise your children safely...Gullibility and ignorance is a choice.
Reply to this comment
See all 313 Comments
60 Minutes RSS Feed