BEIJING, March 10, 2009
China Says U.S. Navy Ship Broke Laws
Beijing Rejects U.S. Claim Of Harassment In South China Sea, Says Ship Was Operating Illegally
-
-
In this photo released by the U.S. Navy, the military Sealift Command ocean surveillance ship USNS Impeccable is seen underway in this photo, date unknown. (AP Photo/U.S. Navy)
-
In this photo released by the U.S. Navy, crewmember on a Chinese trawler uses a grapple hook in an apparent attempt to snag the towed acoustic array of the military Sealift Command ocean surveillance ship USNS Impeccable in the South China Sea, March 8, 2009. (AP Photo/U.S. Navy)
-
-
Interactive Focus On China Explore the history, people and economy of China, the world’s most populous nation.
Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Ma Zhaoxu said Tuesday that "the U.S. claim is totally inaccurate and wrong."
He said the ship "broke international and Chinese laws in the South China Sea without China's permission."
The U.S. Defense Department says Chinese ships surrounded and harassed the Navy vessel in international waters Sunday, at one point coming within 25 feet of the American boat and strewing debris in its path.
The Obama administration said the incident Sunday followed several days of "increasingly aggressive" acts by Chinese ships in the region.
U.S. officials said a protest was to be delivered to Beijing's military attaché at a Pentagon meeting Monday.
"The unprofessional maneuvers by Chinese vessels violated the requirement under international law to operate with due regard for the rights and safety of other lawful users of the ocean," said Marine Maj. Stewart Upton, a Pentagon spokesman.
A Chinese intelligence ship and four others surrounded the USNS Impeccable, an unarmed vessel with a civilian merchant marine crew, as the craft conducted ocean surveys in international waters in the South China Sea, the Defense Department said in a statement.
The other Chinese ships were fishing vessels and tried to snap the U.S. ship's towed sonar, among other things, reports CBS News correspondent David Martin.
The Impeccable sprayed one ship with water from fire hoses to force it away. Despite the force of the water, Chinese crew members stripped to their underwear and continued closing within 25 feet, the Defense department said.
© MMIX, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
More From World
Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie."
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- next
See all 68 CommentsClowning? Not likely. I am sure the Chinese Communist government gave orders to harass with explicit instructions which were followed to the letter.
If a ship tries to ram our boats, it should be treated as a hostile act and there should be shots fired. I guarantee that will be the end of harassment from the Chinese.
If the Chinese does the same thing near California or Hawaii, what would the US navy do ?
Posted by at 7:32 AM : Mar 11, 2009"
Still incorrect. You are so full of it your eyes must be brown. There was nothing economic or even remotely related to exploitation of resources, and there is nothing, repeat nothing about spying in even your latest desperate attempt. Since there was no spying, you are even more ridiculous. Are you really so foolish as to believe that in these days of satellites, remote sensing, and yes even submarines, that there would be a need to send such a large and easily detected vessel to watch .... what?
What does your OWN source say about the treaty you purposefully mis-read?
"The treaty covers these major topics:
* Limits of maritime zones (territorial sea, contiguous zone, exclusive economic zone, continental shelf)
* Rights of navigation, including through straits used for international navigation
* Peace and security on the oceans and seas
* Conservation and management of living marine resources
* Protection and preservation of the marine environment
* Scientific research
* Activities on the seabed beyond the limits of national jurisdictions
* Procedures for settling disputes between States"
If anyone was breaking any law it is the Chinese who were trying to obstruct free movement on the seas in INTERNATIONAL WATERS.
you have water fights with other men in your underwear
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_waters
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Convention_on_the_Law_of_the_Sea
Now Im not sure where you get that each country individually defines internation waters (that would make no sense, there are over 130 countries, what would stop someone from make international waters 1000miles off their cost? its called logic).
Posted by anti-zionist007 at 6:23 AM : Mar 11, 2009 "
First I did not say that each country makes its own international waters definition. I said that it can vary. Which it can in areas where the countries are close together. Areas such as the English channel. Or in the Baltic regions. You did use the word 'logic' I believe?
As usual, you are incorrect. Since reading seems to be beyond you, look at you own link to Wikipedia, the diagram on the right side of the page. What does it say is the "TERRITORIAL BOUNDARY", not the Econonic Zone?
Or if you want to try reading again. Again from YOUR own link;
"Territorial waters
Out to 12 nautical miles from the baseline, the coastal state is free to set laws, regulate use, and use any resource. "
"Exclusive economic zones (EEZs)
Extend 200 nautical miles from the baseline. Within this area, the coastal nation has sole exploitation rights over all natural resources. " Which the ship was not doing.
It seems that I did look at your links. To bad you did not.
Now, since your own source shows you to be wrong. Want to try again?
It said the incident happened 120 km (70 miles) south of the island.
Ma said there were laws about scientific research in Chinese waters.
The U.S. ship "violated the relevant international laws and Chinese laws and regulations," he said, urging the United States to halt such action. U.S. defense officials said the incident followed days of increasingly aggressive Chinese conduct in the area, including fly-bys by Chinese maritime surveillance planes.
Posted by ajmarine2 at 3:24 PM : Mar 10, 2009 "
The Chinses can do just as you did, claim anything that they want to. Specifics however seem to be missing. Specifics such as what interrnational law? Chinese laws, such as they are, are valid in China only and the ship was far outside Chinese territorial waters.
Don't be in such a hurry to ignore reality just so that you can jump on the "blame US" wagon.
Posted by mrs_concrete at 5:59 AM : Mar 10, 2009 "
I'm still waiting for any of you 'experts' to tell us just what internationally valid laws were broken.
Really? And you believe that the Russians and Chinese are not using ships for intelligence on the US?
Do you also believe in the Easter Bunny?
Then you can tell us what law was broken.
Please do so. However, since the ship was not in Chinese territorial waters, you can't try that one.
We are using China to make the things we use. They know it as do most of us Americans.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- next
See all 68 Comments