March 7, 2009 12:49 PM

Kepler Asks: Are Other Earths Out There?

By
CBSNews
(CBS)  By CBS News space consultant William Harwood

Lighting up the night sky, a Delta 2 rocket roared to life and vaulted away from the Cape Canaveral Air Force Station late today, boosting a powerful space telescope into orbit around the Sun for a $591 million mission to search for Earth-like planets orbiting distant stars.

"I think people everywhere want to know whether, with all the stars out there, do they have planets that are Earth-sized?" said principal investigator William Borucki of NASA's Ames Research Center. "Are Earths frequent or are they rare? And this gives us that answer. It's the next step in mankind's exploration of the galaxy."

The Kepler spacecraft's three-and-a-half-year mission began on time at 10:49:57 p.m. with a crackling roar and a torrent of fire that briefly turned night into day along Florida's space coast. Putting on a spectacular weekend sky show, the United Launch Alliance Delta 2 rocket quickly climbed from its seaside launch pad and arced away to the east over the Atlantic Ocean as it streaked into space.

Just over one minute after launch, six solid-fuel strap-on boosters that were ignited at liftoff to assist the Delta's first-stage engine burned out and fell away while a final set of three ignited for another one-minute burn. The first-stage engine shut down as planned four-and-a-half minutes after launch, and the ascent continued on the power of the Delta's compact second stage.

Two second-stage burns were required before Kepler and its solid-fuel third-stage motor were released for a final one-and-a-half-minute firing to boost the craft out of Earth's orbit. Spacecraft separation came on time at 11:52 p.m. At that point, Kepler was moving out at a blistering 6.2 miles per second.

This was the 339th Delta rocket launched since 1960, the 141st upgraded Delta 2, and the 86th successful Delta launch in a row dating back to January 1997. The Delta 2 record now stands at 139 successful missions against just two failures.

"And now we have plenty of handshakes going on here in the mission director's center because we have confirmation of spacecraft separation," said NASA launch commentator George Diller. "It did occur on time at 61 minutes 49 seconds. ... So at this point, the Kepler team now really gets to work."

Engineers will spend about two months checking out and calibrating Kepler's complex systems before the mission begins in earnest.

(Carter Roberts, Eastbay Astr. Soc.)
Trailing the Earth in its orbit around the Sun, Kepler will aim a 95-megapixel camera on a patch of sky the size of an out-stretched hand that contains more than 4.5 million detectable stars. Of that total, the science team has picked some 300,000 that are of the right age, composition and brightness to host Earth-like planets. Over the life of the mission, more than 100,000 of those will be actively monitored by Kepler.

The spacecraft's camera will not take pictures like other space telescopes. Instead, it will act as a photometer, continually monitoring the brightness of candidate stars in its wide field of view and the slight dimming that will result if planets happen to pass in front.

By studying subtle changes in brightness from such planetary transits and the timing of repeated cycles, scientists can ferret out potential Earth-like worlds in habitable-zone orbits.

The probability of finding sun-like stars with Earth-like planets in orbits similar to ours - and aligned so that Kepler can "see" them - is about one-half of 1 percent. Given the sample size, however, that still leaves hundreds of potential discoveries.

(NASA)
But it will take three-and-a-half years of around-the-clock observations to capture the repeated cycles needed to confirm detection of an Earth-like world in an Earth-like orbit.

"There's a lot of desire in the science community to understand extra-terrestrial planets, not just find them," said Ed Weiler, NASA's associate administrator for space science. "We've already found 300 or so, mostly from the ground. But now we're entering the stage of going beyond just proving that they exist. It's how many are out there, and perhaps the most important question of all, are there any 'Earths' out there?"

Named in honor of Johannes Kepler, the 17th century German astronomer who formulated the laws of planetary motion, NASA's newest science satellite weighs 2,320 pounds and measures 15.3 feet from top to bottom. It is equipped with four solar panels capable of generating 1,100 watts of power, a radiation-hardened PowerPC flight computer and a Ka-band communications link to relay science data back to Earth. The spacecraft was built by Ball Aerospace of Boulder, Colo.

Kepler will pass the Moon's orbit in just two days as it heads into a 371-day orbit around the Sun, separating slowly from Earth. It will aim itself at a patch of sky near the left wing of Cygnus the Swan, midway between the stars Deneb and Vega.

And then, Kepler will simply stare at the same stars for three-and-a-half years.

"An Earth-like planet passing in front of a sun-like star is going to cause the brightness of that star to dim by only 1 part per 10,000," said Natalie Batalha, a Kepler co-investigator at San Jose State University. "That's like looking at a headlight from a great distance and trying to sense the brightness change when a flea crawls across the surface. But the Kepler instrument is designed to detect such small changes in brightness."

(NASA/Ball Aerospace)
(Left: Kepler's focal plane array consists of 42 charge coupled devices (CCDs), each 2.8 by 3.0 cm with 1024 by 1100 pixels. The entire focal plane contains 95 megapixels.)

Kepler is capable of detecting Earth-like planets around stars ranging from 600 to 3,000 light years away.

The science team is particularly interested in planets that may orbit within a star's habitable zone. Habitable zones vary in location depending on a star's size and brilliance. By timing changes in a star's light as a transit occurs, scientists can figure out the size of a presumed planet's orbit and thus whether it falls in that star's habitable zone.

"The habitable zone is where we think water will be," Borucki said. "If you can find liquid water on the surface, we think we may very well find life there. So that zone is not too close to the star, because it's too hot and the water boils. Not too far away where the water's condensed and ice-covered, a planet covered with glaciers. It's the 'Goldilocks zone' - not too hot, not too cold, just right for life."

Weiler said Kepler is a pathfinder of sorts for more sophisticated missions that may one day study the atmospheres of Earth-like planets to look for signs of biological - or even industrial - activity.

"A lot of scientists out there would like to immediately go out and build very large telescopes, not just to find Earth-like planets but to study their atmospheres, to search for clues that there might be life on those planets," Weiler said. "The trouble is, most of these proposals start at about $5 billion and work upwards from there.

"Before we actually take the next step, looking for signs of life on Earth-like planets, we've got to be sure there are at least a few Earth-like planets out there. And that's why Kepler is so important. It's a rather small mission, a moderate mission (around $600 million), and it's really a pathfinder for future large space telescopes that will go after the question that we all have: Are we alone in the universe?"


For more info:

  • NASA: Kepler Mission
  • Kepler on Twitter
    By William Harwood
  • Copyright 2009 CBS. All rights reserved.
    Add a Comment See all 163 Comments
    by honestabe8 March 9, 2009 7:15 AM EDT
    singingrick09, or whatever name he goes by, buys into the schtick that man needs salvation. yet he calls darwinism a hoax. go figure
    Reply to this comment
    by honestabe8 March 9, 2009 7:12 AM EDT
    so, singinrick09 has a new nickname now? it has got to be tough when everyone shouts you down....

    of course, logic has never been rick's strong suit....maybe preaching under another name will allow him some time to preach.
    Reply to this comment
    by carlj6 March 9, 2009 12:23 AM EDT
    WGNT, it's called internal conflict or inconsistencies when talking about who said what in the bible. If you've got Genesis 1 saying one thing and Gen 2 saying another that's internal regardless of whether Moses lived or not or whether Evolution is born out by either creation account.

    If you've got JC referring to "this generation" to the people he's speaking to there's no reason to believe it's prophesy (by coincidence) to the time YOU live in ( 1948-). By the way, time's running out on that one too so they'll have to "twist the truth" of the bible to account for another failed prophesy. You should do what Jehovah Witnesses learned back in the late 70's: Stop Predicting! You will only lose followers.

    One thing about science is that it does have predictive value. For instance it predicted planets- over 350 discovered so far. It predicts Earth-size planets- We'll see soon! It predicted black holes before they were discovered. DNA was inferred before it was discovered. Pretty powerful stuff to put your faith in.
    Reply to this comment
    by Marie Zarankevich March 8, 2009 11:50 PM EDT
    Oh people of Lilliput. -- It does not matter which end of the egg is opened first. -- Got it? -- We're looking for intelligent life out there in the cosmos. -- We have intelligent life right here on Earth that nobody bothers with already! -- FIRST you learn to respect the life around you, right here on Earth, THEN you are allowed to go find other living things, elsewhere. -- NOT before.
    Reply to this comment
    by WereNotGonnaTakeIT March 8, 2009 11:23 PM EDT
    Jesus Christ was a man and a Jew at that. How you religious nut cases drag religion into a space shot could only make sense to you. I just see $600 million thrown out the window.
    Posted by hetup-2009

    Why do you believe that Jesus Christ was just a man and a Jew. What's your source?
    Reply to this comment
    by WereNotGonnaTakeIT March 8, 2009 11:21 PM EDT
    so, singinrick09: the babble says that atheists are fools, eh? does it occur to you that atheists don't give a rat's behind what the bible says?
    Posted by honestabe8

    Tell that to carljr, after all, he brought up a reference to Christ

    ;)
    Reply to this comment
    by WereNotGonnaTakeIT March 8, 2009 11:21 PM EDT
    Singinrick is a very patient man. His end of times was already predicted wrongly by JC himself saying it would happen "in our generation," which would have been 2000 years ago.
    posted by carlj6

    This is another common atheist lie that's used widely on various blogs on the WWW. The fact is atheists like yourself twist the Scriptures out of context in order to push your worldview of deception.

    When Christ was referring to "this generation" He was speaking prophetically, in case you don't know, that means in the FUTURE. If you were to actually read the ENTIRETY of the Scripture you would clearly see that Israel had to be reborn as a nation again(which is was in 1948) before the generation that Christ was talking about could come into play.

    Again, this atheist trick that Christ' prophecy didn't come true is an all too common trick that atheists use to push their evangelical atheism on the internet.

    When one reads the WHOLE context of the Scripture, they can clearly see how atheists lie about this.

    The funny thing is, atheist try to say Christ said something, yet they don't believe in the Bible to begin with , so how can they use it as a source to claim that Christ said something?

    Hilarious!
    Reply to this comment
    by WereNotGonnaTakeIT March 8, 2009 11:17 PM EDT
    Religion raises it's "ugly head" every time science undermines its claims, which is to say CONSTANTLY.
    Posted by carlj6

    Actually science interpreted correctly CONFIRMS the Biblical account of history, not the secular Darwinian myth.

    No "religion" is required, unless you're a Darwinists and you're putting all your faith and marbles into the belief that you came from primeval soup.
    Reply to this comment
    by carlj6 March 8, 2009 6:35 PM EDT
    Regarding bajajohn's comparison of extraterrestrials to "angels," and calling the universe outside of Earth "Heaven," is pretty pathetic. Unless, of course, you're Mormon and actually believe the supreme deity lives on a planet out there. Regarding JC's credentials, as Hetup says he was a Jew and the Jews don't believe he was a reincarnated supreme deity. There's probably more evidence to support alien life (such as methane outflow on Mars) than the fact of JC's existence, much less any spiritual nature.

    Religion raises it's "ugly head" every time science undermines its claims, which is to say CONSTANTLY.
    Reply to this comment
    by carlj6 March 8, 2009 6:22 PM EDT
    Singinrick is a very patient man. His end of times was already predicted wrongly by JC himself saying it would happen "in our generation," which would have been 2000 years ago.

    However, Hetup is under the impression that $600 million is "thrown out the window." Many forget that money spent on space doesn't "go into space." It stays here on Earth to form jobs and goes right back into the economy in the form of payroll, payroll taxes, and thru people spending- sales tax.

    Much better investment (along with spin-off technologies that have much benefit) than spending a trillion (as someone else posted) on 2 wars with no tangible benefit except jobs created through rebuilding after destroying- not the greatest way to do business!
    Reply to this comment
    See all 163 Comments
    .
    Scroll Left
    Scroll Right More »
    CBS News on Facebook