Colon Cancer State Rankings
CBS Evening News: Report Card On Which States Require Insurance Companies To Pay For Screenings
-
Play CBS Video Video Colon Cancer Report Card Your chances on surviving colon cancer may depend on your state's insurance law covering screenings. Dr. Jon LaPook looks at a new report card ranking where you live.
-
Catherine Murray-Rust, who was denied coverage of a colonoscopy in Colorado, and then moved to Georgia where she was tested. She learned she had stage 3 colon cancer. (CBS)
-
Video Archive Eye On Health CBS News medical correspondent Dr. Jon LaPook examines various health issues and treatments.
-
Interactive Conquering Colon Cancer Check out facts & figures, test your colorectal cancer IQ with our quiz and much more.
But when detected early, it can be successfully treated the vast majority of the time.
The results of the 2009 Colorectal Cancer Screening Legislation Report Card were recently released. CBS News medical correspondent Dr. Jon LaPook reports that for the first time since it was first issued six years ago, the report shows that more states have received an A than a failing grade for their colon cancer screening laws. Twenty-one states, plus D.C., got an A, and 19 have gotten an F.
And what a difference a grade can make.
Sixty-year-old Catherine Murray-Rust plays tennis, goes ballroom dancing, and has even run two marathons since Moving to Atlanta last summer. But now, she’s been on a different kind of marathon -- one that’s a lot more grueling.
“It changes your perspective on life significantly,” Murray-Rust said. “Every day becomes much more important to you.”
Back in Colorado in 2006, she wanted to get a routine colonoscopy, which is generally recommended starting at age 50. She called her insurance company.
“I asked if they would cover a colonoscopy and they asked me whether it was preventative or diagnostic,” Murray-Rust said. “I said it was preventative. And they said, ‘in which case, we won't pay for it.’”
She delayed the $3,000 test. Then last August, when she moved to Atlanta to head up the Georgia Tech University library, she decided she’d waited long enough.
“It probably was a bad thing that I held out quite so long,” Murray-Rust said.How Does Your State Rank?: Check out the report card on efforts to pass laws requiring insurers to cover colon cancer screening.
She was happy to learn that the same company that denied coverage in Colorado would pay for the exam in Georgia - but the results were devastating.
“When they did the surgery on January 5, the pathology report from that surgery confirmed that I had early Stage 3 colon cancer,” she said.
What was the life or death difference between Georgia and Colorado?
Georgia, which received an A in the colon cancer report card, has a law requiring that insurance companies pay for the most comprehensive colon cancer screening. States receiving an F have no requirements, which should make their residents ask questions.
“Why do I live in a state that doesn't allow me standard of care, providing colon cancer screening, which we know not only saves money, but more importantly saves lives?,” said Dr. David A. Johnson, professor of medicine at Eastern Virginia Medical School, of the questions that residents in F states should ask.
Murray-Rust’s cancer spread to two of her lymph nodes, and now she’s getting chemotherapy.
“It's extremely difficult for one's health and for one's family,” she said. “It's a hard thing, especially as 90 percent of colon cancers can be prevented if you catch them early.
On a bittersweet note, Colorado became an A state this year, which means an insurance company must cover a colonoscopy if a doctor orders one.
©MMIX, CBS Interactive Inc.. All Rights Reserved.

Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie."





- 1
- 2
- next
See all 28 CommentsAnd, if you want good insurance, read the fine print and get a plan that has the coverage you want..
My god americns are a pathetic whiney bunch ofknownothings
Posted by brainteaser2 at 5:22 PM : Mar 6, 2009
Very true indeed. We have a friend who lives in Canada and they never have these things happen AND the cost is so much lower than ours.
Posted by mom3204 at 12:43 PM : Mar 6, 2009
You should read the Article all the way through again.
You apparently have little or no experience with a national single pay program. My father had medicare while he was alive. Medicaire is a single pay program of the United States government. for people over 65. Just like all of the private health plans, there are plenty of restrictions. There are limits on what is covered and who is eligible for certain procedures. For example, after my father had a stroke, medicare would only pay for three physical therapy sessions. At that time, prescriptions were not covered. Further, not all doctors accepted medicare. On the other hand, before my father retired, his private plan payed for anything the doctors felt were medically necessary and all of his prescriptions.
Healthcare decisions should be made at the bedside, not in the boardroom.
Healthcare in America is too expensive and of inferior quality because it is uncoordinated, and wastefully mismanaged by administrators who neither know nor care about treating patients. Corporate profits and shareholder dividends siphon the funds needed to treat the uninsured. We spent $1.34 trillion on healthcare in 2004 and $1.9 trillion in 2006 and $2.1 trillion in 2008. This is projected to double to $4.1 trillion in 10 years. More than 30% of that money (at least $700 Billion) is wasted on inefficient administration. And decisions about what specialist you can see or what treatment you can have are made by bottom-liner business people. Now with the influence of President Obama, interest is rising on healthcare reform. That is certainly good, but nearly every plan uses the insurance industry with competition as the vehicle for delivery of care. That is a tragic mistake. It maintains the source of our high costs and reduced quality. It keeps the costs that are sinking the ship and adds further $billions in expenses to cover the uninsured. There is another way that is simple, that uses techniques and methods already tried and in use, but that saves $Billions while it provides universal coverage. And it is uniquely American. See www.GoodMedicineAmerica.com or American Medicine MisManaged Care (amazon.com) or call 1800 800 9111 for info. And tell your Gov Reps.
Someday, CBS, you need to publish nice color maps of both the major industries' (finance, Wall Street, insurance, oil, U.S. Chamber of Commerce, unions, etc.) "campaign contributions" to federal, state, and local elected officials as well as their physical "presence" in the individual states so that America can correlate between them and maps such as the one you include in this article.
Americans are pretty bright; having that information readily available would go far to enlighten our voters...and with computers and a list of "Show me!" buttons on a web page...
Not natures plan. One dies one born.
Go ahead hate me it doesn?t change the facts. Just makes you realize them.
PEACE TO ALL
Posted by harbinger19
There is a link in the center of the article that takes you to a PDF file.
[Posted by EAJMOM at 6:01 AM : Mar 6, 2009 ]
tell your doctor to change the classification of the reason for the test ... as diagnostic for the identification of cause due to symptoms.
My insurance was supposed to cover colonoscopies but I had to pay $350 out of pocket. That was adding insult to injury because I did not tolerate the procedure very well and my digestive system was messed up for weeks afterwards. I had to pay for that, too.
They'd beter develop some kind of blood test for detecting colon cancer - I will NEVER have another colonoscopy if I live to be 100. There is no history of any kind of cancer in my entire family - this was a total waste of time for me.
The Hemoccult tests described above are a joke compared to this new test that is being developed.
NON-INVASIVE SCREENING IS ON ITS WAY!!!
- 1
- 2
- next
See all 28 Comments