Time For Marijuana Legalization?
Andrew Cohen: Economic Crisis Spurring Politicians To Talk About Legalizing Pot
-
(DEA)
-
Interactive Substance Abuse In America Get the facts on a national problem. Find out where to get help, learn how drugs affect the body and compare state drunk-driving laws.
Apparently, it was nothing personal after all. Apparently, it was strictly business all along.
After generations of defending capital punishment and marijuana possession laws on moral, ethical and religious grounds, after years of declaring that the death penalty acted as a deterrent against violent crime and that pot smokers were more dangerous to society than, say, alcohol consumers, all of a sudden thanks to our economic crisis more and more mainstream powerbrokers are considering dramatic changes to our criminal justice system.
The New York Times today has a late-arriving piece by Ian Urbina which posits that lawmakers in several states are considering abandoning the death penalty because it’s just too expensive and cuts into other law enforcement priorities. State officials are beginning to acknowledge that they can more productively spend their budget funds on cracking unsolved cases or ensuring better police protection than on keeping pot smokers in prison or fighting for decades with capital defendants. This, Urbina writes, is forcing a sea-change around the nation:
“Last year, in an effort to cut costs, probation and parole agencies in Arizona, Kentucky, Mississippi, New Jersey and Vermont reduced or dropped prison time for thousands of offenders who violated conditions of their release. In some states, probation and parole violators account for up to two-thirds of prison admissions each year; typical violations are failing drug tests or missing meetings with parole officers.
As prison crowding has become acute, lawsuits have followed in states like California, and politicians find themselves having to choose among politically unattractive options: spend scarce tax dollars on expanding prisons, loosen laws to stem the flow of incarcerations, or release some nonviolent offenders.”
This trend toward releasing non-violent offenders naturally begs the question: what about legalizing marijuana possession and lowering the drinking age? A California lawmaker Monday introduced legislation that would legalize (and tax) pot there. In Colorado, as seen this past Sunday on 60 Minutes, the police chief in Boulder (which houses a raucous University of Colorado) made a compelling case for saving money by reducing the drinking age from 21. Better to have police officers tracking violent crime, the argument goes, than writing tickets for college kids who are going to drink no matter what.
These declarations, from the political and legal arena, are not just isolated voices shouting into the wilderness. Consider the late, great Milton Friedman, the Nobel Laureate, former Reagan advisor, and esteemed scholar associated with the very conservative Hoover Institution. He was among hundreds of important economists who argue that pot should be legalized and taxed - and that the income from such taxation could generate billions in new revenues and billions more in enforcement savings. If you live in California, what would you rather have? Pot smokers whose cases are tying up the legal system? Or better health care and roads thanks to a marijuana tax. I’m just asking the question-and others are too.
Friedman and his colleagues first made these arguments years ago - before the economy tanked. Is it time to take his view more seriously with states facing huge budget shortfalls that threaten to curtail vital projects and policies? It is such a great leap from releasing prisoners from prison early to save money and not sending them there at all to save more? I would suspect a survey of police officials and prosecutors, and a survey of state budget officials, would indicate that the matter is being taken more seriously today than it ever has been.
It’s not my place to advocate anything - so please don’t write and accuse me of being Cheech or Chong. All I am saying is that the economic case for legalizing marijuana, and for lower the drinking rate, is as compelling as it has ever been and that, in a time of great changes in the interaction between government and the governed, it would not be the worst thing in the world to have a serious national debate on the topic. If we are going to lower state and federal budgets for criminal justice, if we are going to be emptying our prisons anyway to save costs, let’s make sure we do it in a way that maximizes the opportunities available to us.
© MMIX, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.

The secrets of tennis legend 



- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
... - 19
- next
See all 368 CommentsMarijuana takes on colon cancer:
The chemicals in marijuana could put the brakes on colon cancer, according to new research. That doesn?t mean smoking a joint will help, though, as the chemicals only form part of the process.
Raymond DuBois and colleagues at the University of Texas in Houston discovered that a key receptor for cannabinoids, which are found in marijuana, is turned off in most types of human colon cancer.
Without this receptor, a protein called survivin, which stops cells from dying, increases unchecked and causes tumor growth.
To better understand the role that the receptor, called CB1, plays in cancer progression, the researchers manipulated its expression in mice that had been genetically engineered to spontaneously develop colon tumors.
?When we knocked out the receptor, the number of tumors went up dramatically,? says DuBois. Alternatively, when mice with normal CB1 receptors were treated with a cannabinoid compound, their tumors shrank.
End Article:
Explanation:
Every second of your life 50,000 cells in your body die and are replaced by new ones. There are approximately 50-100 trillion cells in your body. Occasionally, one of these cells does not die, but instead mutates. This mutation seems to be caused by the CB1 receptor being "switched off".The survivin protein is produced as part of the process which is what infects healthy cells and spreads cancer by instructing cells to "switch off" CB1.
What this means is, when the CB1 receptor is off and the mutated cell is in close proximity to healthy cells, the healthy cells in turn switch off their own CB1 receptors.
Over time, a lump of these cells form. This is the cancerous tumor(s) your doctor informs you about. Cancer is the presence of mutated cells. Cancer screenings look for the presence of survivin, a protein. Malignancy means the cancer is spreading. If the cancerous tumor(s) can be killed (chemo-radiation) or surgically removed, you get rid of the cancer.
Cannabinoids bind reversibly and stereo-selectively to the cannabinoid receptors. Tetrahydrocannabinol or THC "switches on" CB1 again.
The THC method of "switching on" the CB1 receptor causes apoptosis and cancerous tumors burn themselves out through a process called autophagy in which they literally eat their own cell walls. The healthy cells are not affected. No more tumors or "CB1 off" cells means no more cancer. The Cannabinoid receptors in the human body are like light bulb sockets. Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) plugs in like a missing component.
You can't cure cancer by smoking a joint as burning the compounds make them ineffective. It has to be ingested in a high enough quantity to permeate the body, hence the THC oil. One pound of marijuana will produce 2 ounces of oil, enough for 2 months use. There is very little "high" with this type of use and it can be used for other types of disease caused by mutating cells. 13 states have legalized medical marijuana.
To those who have the ability to vote this into law--go for it, and godspeed.
The only way to end this war is to "Legalize".
Just a side note: I know some Growers for Dispensaries, and (by association) Dispensary owners here in California. Who really DON'T want legalization because it will hurt their "BOTTOM LINE". Now how can we expect TV to allow HONEST debate when we can't even trust the one's who wanted "legalization" of medical marijuana just so they can line there pockets with "over priced" product? We have GREED on the "inside" who would like nothing else but to continue selling a $1.60per .05g unit for over $6.00+ a .05g unit. Do we "honestly" think we have a shot with a new (growing more powerful daily) roadblock?
As for the drinking age, i think it should be lowered. College kids are going to drink no matter what, so making it legal for them, as well as making marijuana legal, would free up the authorities to deal with more violent crimes. As for them drinking more, your an idiot. They have all the alcohol they need, so legalizing it isn't for letting them buy it, its mainly being legalized to save money and free the authorities attention, in reality a lot of these college students might even drink less, being that it wouldn't be rebellious if it were legalized, and them being able to drink more often would lesson them drinking at one time.
But to leave you with one last note..."Man Made Beer, God Made Pot...Who Do You Trust?"...
"As a gay man, I had to file a restraining order against my (ex) boyfriend of 12 years who has been exclusively adicted to a mix of pot and tabaco"
It's spelled tobacco. Geez...
http://www.chelseagreen.com/bookstore/item/marijuana_is_safer:paperback
Not gonna lie - I work for the company, but given the heated debate on the topic, it's worth the read.
Marijuana. For far to long we as citizens of this country have been supressed by our government, controlled, told that we are free! this country was founded on freedom. the south was also right back in the cival war. We came here to be independant, We came here to be FREE!!!!! How free are you when you caonot partake in a natural plant that is of this earth. in the very early 1900's marijuana could be found on any corner store. Marijuana is not like herion or crystalmeth which are common REAL crimanal drugs, and for that matter if Marijuana were legalized people WOULD use less of the other drugs Which are bad. Marijuana is not bad. It has only been given a bad rap. marijuana has been proven of excellent use for medical reasons. its natural, Think of how many jobs there could be added to Ameiricas work force. Todays government has grown into a very stale ball of crap where officail just dont give a damn, and FEAR CHANGE. Marijuana is a cash crop. why not regulate it like tobbaco and tax it if it has to be taxed? i personally believe people should have the right to grow it in there back yards if they want, Who the hell is anyone to say someone cant grow a plat, seriously. Ameirica needs to wake up. we need to fight for our rights. Marijuana should be legal, and it absolutely leaves me in awe that it has to even be such a big deal. Legalize Marijuana. the effect legalizeing Marijuna would have is more jobs, less bogus crimanal drug charges, i say bogus because it a natural plant its not meth for crying out loud, the economy would improve, we might even find fuel energy as a great gain. GROW UP AMERICA TIME HAS WELL BEEN OVERDUE FOR THE LEGALIZATION OF MARIJUANA!
Teens are going to use both no matter what you have to say. Just be a responsible adult and educate them and watch over them as parents. Be a parent. Don't tell them it is bad... because then it becomes the "forbidden fruit". Instead, tell them "I smoked marijuana when I was younger, but wait till your older and your brain is done developing". Be a parent; not a police officer.
LEGALIZE CANNABIS CONGRESS!!!
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
... - 19
- next
See all 368 Comments