Dow
     +72.81
12874.04
+0.57%
|
     +9.13
1351.77
+0.68%
|
     +0.00
14106.44
+0.00
|
     +27.51
2931.39
+0.95%
|
     +0.61
53.88
+1.15%
|
     +0.14
116.41
+0.12%
|
     +0.03
1.96
+1.37%
February 20, 2009 7:32 AM

Obama's New Best Friend: Huffington Post

By
Tucker Reals
(MarketWatch)  This analysis was written by MarketWatch media columnist Jon Friedman
How did Huffington Post, a Web site featuring bloggers who lean overtly to the left, become President Barack Obama's new best friend in the media?

At a recent press conference, Obama shook up the print, television and radio establishment when he called on Huffington Post reporter Sam Stein to ask a question, which for the record, focused on how the president stood on a proposal to prosecute members of the Bush administration.

Was it an example of Obama recognizing a scrappy beacon of the increasingly prominent Internet journalism community? Or was it a way to thank to an organization that was in his corner when he ran against Republican Sen. John McCain?

Leveling the playing field

With one swift gesture, Obama placed Huffington Post on the nation's big stage, right alongside the New York Times, the Washington Post, and the television networks. It was a clear indication that this White House, which has vowed to be all-inclusive, was determined to extend courtesy and respect to a -- gasp! -- new media company known for its blogging.

"I have noticed the reaction to it," Stein told me. "It's not unexpected. There had been a tradition of which reporters get to ask questions to the president. It's historical, and worth noting. I'm happy. It's a refection of how the media landscape is changing in a good way. There are more outlets, different viewpoints and different questions."

For veteran media watchers, Obama's action was a signal, at the very least, that he would be doing things differently than his predecessor.

"President Obama calling on a Huffington Post reporter is only 'revolutionary' if our frame of reference is President George W. Bush," noted Ken Auletta, the New Yorker media critic.

Or, perhaps, Obama could be repaying a debt. During the Obama-McCain presidential campaign, Huffington Post was one of the Democrats' staunchest media allies. Huffington Post made Salon look like the National Review -- and that's perfectly fine.

Just as Fox News (which is, like MarketWatch, owned by News Corp.) and General Electric's MSNBC divide the political audience on cable TV, Huffington Post shrewdly staked out its Internet territory for liberals.

Achieving legitimacy

Understandably, Stein is sensitive to suggestions that he and Huffington Post give Obama a free pass.

"We have written critical stories on the Obama administration and his campaign before, including breaking the 'Bittergate' piece about his comments on guns and religion in San Francisco," Stein said.

For his part, Stein could do without being branded a trailblazer among bloggers. He prefers to view it as the administration's acknowledgement that Huffington Post is a legitimate alternative to newspapers, magazines, TV stations and radio outlets.

"We do good reporting and we break news," he said. "Huffington Post has earned legitimacy."

That point was confirmed Wednesday night when Arianna Huffington, founder and editor-in-chief of the operation, discussed the financial crisis and yukked it up with Jay Leno, a sure sign that Huffington has become a celebrity journalist.

In fact, Huffington Post threw a ball during the inauguration festivities last month in Washington. It was one of the best-attended parties in town.

Perhaps a lot of the debate centers on professional jealousy. Huffington Post has come a long way in a short time. It's now part of the White House's dialogue with the American people. Suddenly, it matters what the blogs on the site are saying about the president.

In fact, you might say that Tina Brown's Daily Beast, Michael Wolff's Newser and Sharon Waxman's The Wrap have all followed Huffington Post's lead online.

I believe it's wrong for naysayers to suggest that Obama was helping out Huffington Post. I'm a fan. The site does good, solid work.

Stein just shakes his head when someone implies hat Obama only wanted to show his appreciation for Arianna Huffington's loyalty.

"That's silly," Stein said. "He's not paying me back in any way."

MEDIA WEB QUESTION OF THE DAY: Did Obama allow Stein to ask a question because he was acknowledging Huffington Post's strong journalism record or paying off a debt?


By Jon Friedman

MarketWatch
  • Tucker Reals

    Tucker Reals is a senior news editor and overnight site editor for CBSNews.com, based at CBS News' London bureau.

Add a Comment See all 28 Comments
by zhuxiaomin November 21, 2011 2:09 AM EST
Thanks for your share. The CBS News/National Journal debate Saturday night was the first to focus on foreign policy [url=http://www.girlshighheel.com][b]girls high heel[/b][/url], and it generated fewer fireworks - but more substance - than many of its predecessors [url=http://www.girlshighheel.com][b]girls pumps[/b][/url]. For that reason we aren't going to simply list winners and losers this time around and instead discuss the candidates' performances - though we're still putting those we thought did best at the top [url=http://www.girlshighheel.com][b]girls boots[/b][/url] [url=http://www.girlshighheel.com][b]girls on sale[/b][/url].
Reply to this comment
by zhuxiaomin November 21, 2011 2:08 AM EST
Thanks for your share. The CBS News/National Journal debate Saturday night was the first to focus on foreign policy <a href="http://www.girlshighheel.com" title="girls high heel"><b>girls high heel</b></a>, and it generated fewer fireworks - but more substance - than many of its predecessors <a href="http://www.girlshighheel.com" title="girls pumps"><b>girls pumps</b></a>. For that reason we aren't going to simply list winners and losers this time around and instead discuss the candidates' performances - though we're still putting those we thought did best at the top <a href="http://www.girlshighheel.com" title="girls boots"><b>girls boots</b></a> <a href="http://www.girlshighheel.com" title="girls on sale"><b>girls on sale</b></a>.
Reply to this comment
by ToddDi August 20, 2009 3:24 PM EDT
I agree with you!
Todd DiRoberto
http://www.topix.com/content/prweb/2009/07/todd-diroberto-of-american-satellite-hosts-independence-day-charity
Reply to this comment
by blindersoff March 3, 2009 12:01 PM EST
He may have been "repaying" a favor. Just like George Bush used to call on Fox and also there was a fake reporter that only had credentials from the White House that was asking made up soft ball questions. Jeff Gannon, the former gay escort reporter. True story, look it up.
Reply to this comment
by ozus February 26, 2009 11:21 PM EST
It's gratuitous comment to say Huffington Post is not in Obama's corner. When it is not slobbering all over him, it is attacking him from the left.

It is pushing a point of view that would be more at home in her homeland of Greece in its socialist days than any traditions of American thought.

To give a propaganda-based organization prominence at a news conference cheapens the concept of Presidential news conferences.

Thank God Hunter S. Thompson is dead.
Reply to this comment
by darrren12000 February 25, 2009 7:50 AM EST
New best friend? Huffo was Obama's best friend starting in the primaries. Huffo bloggers bashed Clinton to a pulp. After she conceded and they wanted to shame Dems who said they would vote for McCain, they started rehabilitating her image. Now, she's just peachy. She still ranks under Obama, but she's probably the second or third most beloved individual on the blog.
Reply to this comment
by dumdnc February 22, 2009 4:30 PM EST
allzwell-as an ex-dem for most of my life just explain the dems actions during the Bush administration. What did they do &quot;to help&quot; the other side. Why, I do remember pelosi, reid, dodd and the rest of the &quot;trolls&quot; (to use your words)coming out and saying they would obstruct anything Bush tried to do. How do you explain the vile lies told about our military (murtha). I have never seen nor heard such vile language and actions from a political party in my life. Take the Social Security issue. Bush suggested allowing US, the taxpayer, to put up to 5% of SS funds (our money)in a private account. YOUR side lied and the lie was taken up by your media saying he wanted to privatize the entire program. That was an outright lie!! And yes, even with obama crashing to market since he's been in, I would rather have the choice of handling at least part of my hard earned money.
So, ex-republican, drink the koolaid.
Reply to this comment
by dumdnc February 22, 2009 4:24 PM EST
What has Palin got to do with this story?? Good grief people, get over it or are you just a bit frightened of her? Either way, she is a non entity at this point.
gdmbush-you really need to cite some sources on your stupid remark about the msm loving Bush. My God, the man was vilified for what he did, didn't do, should have done, should have said, did say. Why, they even demeaned him for exercising!!! You want a love affair, take a look at what happened during the campaign and the very fact that mathews (tingle up his leg)came out and said he would do &quot;everything in his power to make the obama administration a huge success&quot;. That's a direct quote.
Drink some more koolaid.
Reply to this comment
by sickofpalin February 21, 2009 10:12 PM EST
Patteman

You are an idiot like Palin!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Reply to this comment
by sickofpalin February 21, 2009 10:10 PM EST
The HP is the best web page for news and opinion.

Good, Good, Good!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Reply to this comment
See all 28 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook